Removal of broken hardware

The biointegration profile of fiber-reinforced plates following tibial implantation in sheep

Biointegrative, mineral fiber-reinforced bone fixation implants recently introduced in orthopedic surgery have expanded available treatment options for fractures and bone deformities. This new technology aims to address the disadvantages of permanent metallic implants while overcoming inherent concerns of adverse inflammatory reactions when using polymer-based orthopedic implants. The purpose of this double-arm preclinical study was to evaluate the safety, biocompatibility, and biointegration of fiber-reinforced plates, following implantation on the tibias of eight sheep. Left tibias underwent periosteal elevation, allowing for implant attachment directly onto the cortical surface; right tibia plates were implanted over intact periosteum. Microcomputed tomography and histopathology were performed at 13, 26, 52, 78, 104, and 134 weeks postimplantation. All animals were evaluated clinically at each time point, with no evidence of local adverse reactions. Histopathology demonstrated anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophages and multinucleated giant cells corresponding to implant bioabsorption, similar for both groups at each time point, and indicating expected implant biocompatibility. Inflammatory cells (i.e., eosinophils, lymphophyctes, plasma cells, and M1-like macrophages) were absent throughout the study. The bioabsorption process had started at 13 W, with the highest rate at 52-78 W. At 104 W, only residual polymer material was left (∼5% of implant area). Low amounts of mineral fibers were evident at 78 W and were absent (fully remodeled) by 104 W. At 134 W, implants at both sites were fully bioabsorbed. In conclusion, these new fiber-reinforced implants demonstrated bone remodeling and complete biointegration, with no adverse tissue response. Clinical significance: In this double-arm, 2.5-year study, a biointegrative, fiber-reinforced plate implanted on the tibias of sheep was fully absorbed within 134 weeks, with no adverse tissue reaction. Bioabsorption was similar, with or without periosteal elevation, mimicking conditions like those observed in traumatic injuries disrupting the periosteum, open reduction and internal fixation, or minimally invasive surgeries. These results demonstrate the feasibility, versatility, and safety of this new class of biointegrative bone implants. This newly developed technology avoids the complications of the removal of metal implants.

Etiologies of Orthopedic Implant Removal Among Patients Who Underwent Orthopedic Fixation Surgeries in King Abdulaziz Medical City

BACKGROUND

Hardware removal surgeries are considerably common. However, the justifications for these surgeries are debatable. The indications may vary from pain, surgical site infection, or failure of osteosynthesis. Additionally, the surgery can be performed without medical indication. Following these surgeries, many complications can occur. Therefore, surgeons and patients should be aware of the appropriate indications and have realistic expectations of the risks and benefits of implant removal.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review study. We included all patients aged 17-86 years who underwent hardware removal surgery in the orthopedic surgery department of King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2010 to 2019. All relevant data, such as demographic characteristics, location and type of hardware, indication for hardware removal, duration between insertion and removal, and complications after removal were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 244 medical records were reviewed with a mean patient age of 34 years. Out of the total, 190 patients (77.9%) were male. The femur was the most common location of hardware removal, in 50 cases (20.58%). Plates and screws were the most common type of implants (40.2%). Most patients underwent hardware implantation because of fractures (89.3%). In total, 119 patients (48.8%) had the hardware removed electively. Only 29 patients (12%) reported postoperative complications; 190 patients (77.9%) were advised by their surgeon against hardware removal.

CONCLUSION

Hardware removal procedures are commonly performed worldwide for various reasons, including infection, pain, and loosening. In this study, we have outlined the reasons for implant removal, the locations, complications, and the rationale behind this surgery. We have provided a new decision-making assessment, aimed at the general population and surgeons alike, that will help patients better comprehend the complications and risks associated with this elective surgery.

Navigation assisted removal of a broken cannulated sacroiliac screw: A technical note

Non-union of displaced pelvic ring injuries are challenging to treat. In cases where a previous osteosynthesis has failed it can be challenging to remove the previous implant. This technical note presents a technique for the removal of a broken SI screw in the sacrum. It is a navigation assisted technique that allows for minimal invasive screw remnant removal so that the sacral corridors remain available for later reconstruction.

Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone orthopedic implants in musculoskeletal and spinal tumors: imaging and clinical features

Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) orthopedic implants are gaining popularity in oncologic applications as they offer many potential advantages over traditional metallic implants. From an imaging perspective, this instrumentation allows for improved evaluation of adjacent anatomic structures during radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This results in improved postoperative surveillance imaging quality as well as easier visualization of anatomy for potential image-guided percutaneous interventions (e.g., pain palliation injections, or ablative procedures for local disease control). CFR-PEEK devices are also advantageous in radiation oncology treatment due to their decreased imaging artifact during treatment planning imaging and decreased dose perturbation during radiotherapy delivery. As manufacturing processes for CFR-PEEK materials continue to evolve and improve, potential orthopedic applications in the spine and appendicular skeleton increase. An understanding of the unique properties of CFR-PEEK devices and their impact on imaging is valuable to radiologists delivering care to orthopedic oncology patients in both the diagnostic and interventional settings. This multidisciplinary review aims to provide a comprehensive insight into the radiologic, surgical, and radiation oncology impact of these innovative devices.

'Extended tibia osteotomy': a technical tip for removal of incarcerated reamer with broken guide wire bead during tibia nailing and literature review

Intramedullary nailing has become a standard of care for tibia fractures. Reaming is an essential part of this technique due to its multiple advantages like a better fit and earlier union. In young bone, with a narrow cortical canal, incarceration and breakage of reamer is a possibility. This can be removed with a ball-tip guidewire. In our case, the broken incarcerated reamer was complicated by a broken ball-tip of the guidewire, leading us to invent a novel medial tibial osteotomy window for the reamer removal. This can be a handy tool for a stuck surgeon intraoperatively.

Extraction of Broken Tibial Interlock Nail with a Retrograde Hooked Guide Wire: A Novel Surgical Technique

Introduction

Removal of a distal piece of a broken nail often possesses a technical challenge. Several methods have been described in the past to extract a distal piece by using specialized instruments like such as hooks, olive wires, and talwalkar radial square nail etc. It is difficult to extract a distal piece from a proximal incision site and often fracture or the nonunion site has to be opened. In this article, we describe a novel technique to extract a distal piece of broken intramedullary tibia nail by retrograde manner using a guide wire with a “‘U”’ shaped bend at its distal end to hook the tip of a distal piece of broken nail and help in extraction.

Case Report

A 43- year-s old male presented with complain of pain in left leg since 3 months. Patient had sustained left- sided compound Grade 2 tibia shaft fracture in a road traffic accident 4 years back. He was operated with tibia interlock nail followed by skin grafting for wound coverage in a different facility. On clinical examination: There was tenderness around distal tibia, no swelling, no coronal or sagittal plane fracture mobility, and no crepitus or loss of transmitted movements which suggested fracture union clinically. Radiographs confirmed complete union of tibia shaft fracture with hypertrophic nonunion of distal fibula with broken intramedullary nail IMN at the level of proximal most screw hole of distal locking holes with both distal locking screws broken. As fracture was united, we planned for removal of broken nail without opening fracture site. For extraction for distal tibial broken nail part, we used this new Retrograde Hooked Guide Wire technique.

Conclusion

It is a simple, cost effective, minimally invasive procedure with minimal blood loss and decrease time of surgery that can be used before attempting more invasive extraction methods and hence should be included in standard procedures for extraction.

Technical note on the removal of a "cold-welded" lag screw from a Trigen Meta-Tan nail

Intramedullary or cephalomedullary nail removal often is performed during nonunion reoperations. We have experienced a rare case in which it was difficult to remove the lag screw of the antegrade intramedullary nail, requiring a large amount of force to be applied over a long period. Removal of the lag screw is essential for removal of the nail and subsequent revision surgery. In our case, the lag screw could be removed only by cutting the screw with a carbide drill. For cases in which the nail and lag screw are firmly fixed, surgeons should prepare for the possibility of their separation using a carbide drill. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Technique for Removal of Broken InterTAN Integrated Cephalomedullary Screw

SUMMARY

Pertrochanteric femoral fractures are routinely treated with cephalomedullary nailing, with good success. In the event of nonunion, implant fatigue failure may occur. The Trigen InterTAN system (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) features 2 integrated cephalomedullary screws for improved rotational stability of the proximal segment. The inferior compression screw prevents rotation of the larger, superior lag screw. In the event of inferior screw breakage, the retained portion will prevent the integrated lag screw from being rotated to permit extraction. We present a case of a broken nail as well as a broken integrated screw, and describe a technique for successful implant removal.

Dissociation of a Femoral Intramedullary Magnetic Lengthening Nail During Routine Hardware Removal: A Case Report

CASE

A 15-year-old boy with a right femur length discrepancy secondary to infection underwent hardware removal 1-year status-post right femur osteotomy with placement of an antegrade intramedullary magnetic lengthening nail after successful lengthening of 4.2 cm. During hardware removal, dissociation between the proximal (outer) and distal (inner) components of the device was observed. The distal component was removed using an endoscopic pituitary rongeur after considering multiple possible techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

In the event of nail disconnection during removal of an intramedullary implant, we recommend use of a long pituitary rongeur to retrieve the distal nail component.

A Simple Technique for Removal of Interlocking Screw from an Intramedullary Nail: A Case Report

Introduction

Difficulties encountered during removal of implants present a common technical challenge in orthopedic surgery, for which a number of factors have been implicated. A variety of techniques and instruments have been used to overcome this. However, some of these may prove to be time consuming, expensive, and inaccessible to many surgical setups. We describe a technique used for the removal of a jammed interlocking screw from an intramedullary nail that allows for minimal damage to the hardware, bone, and surrounding soft tissue, with the added advantage of being relatively quick and technically uncomplicated with the use of simple instruments.

Case Report

We describe the case of an 81-year-old female with a history of surgical fixation for a left femur intertrochanteric fracture, who presented with groin pain 13 months post-fixation. Radiographs were suggestive of avascular necrosis of the femoral head with resultant cut-in of the blade, and the patient was eventually taken up for the removal of implants and total hip replacement. Intraoperatively, difficulties were encountered in the removal of the distal interlocking screw, with failure of conventional techniques initially. A high-speed burr was then employed to shape the screw head so as to achieve better grip with extraction devices, which facilitated smooth removal.

Conclusion

We describe a simple method for difficult screw removal involving the use of a high-speed burr and vise grip pliers. This technique provides a quick and inexpensive option with commonly available surgical tools and may be considered when encountering difficulties with screw extraction.

Closed Management of a Distal Radius Refracture Through a Bent Volar Plate: Can an Open Procedure be Avoided?: A Case Report

CASE

A 55-year-old man sustained a distal radius fracture, which was fixed with a volar plate 20 years ago. He then fell from 2 m and sustained a refracture with a bent but intact volar plate. A manipulation under anaesthetic/anaesthesia was attempted. Satisfactory reduction was confirmed and maintained, with bony union confirmed at 6 months. Regular follow-up showed continuing functional improvement.

CONCLUSION

This rare case avoided surgical intervention and its associated risks and costs. Attempted closed reduction can be considered a treatment option before open revision fixation, with demonstrated ability for fracture healing in an acceptable position.

Unstable AO/OTA type 31-A1.2 intertrochanteric femur fracture: An unusual case report

AO/OTA type 31-A1.2 intertrochanteric femoral fractures generally are considered stable intertrochanteric fractures. We report a case of an unstable AO/OTA type 31-A1.2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Primary internal fixation was performed with a long cephalomedullary nail taking instability into account. Postoperative X-rays showed an acceptable reduction with a slight fracture gap in extension on the lateral trochanteric side. However, additional salvage surgery was required because the long cephalomedullary nail broke as a result of the instability caused by non-union and varus deformity of the proximal femur. More attention should be directed to strategies of primary internal fixation including choice of fixation instrumentation in terms of mechanical stability because this type of fracture can be remarkably unstable despite radiographic diagnosis of a usually stable AO/OTA classification type 31-A1.2 fracture.

"Turn the tail, not the head": a simple, quick and inexpensive technique for the safe removal of jammed/stripped locking screws

A jammed screw is a well-known complication of locking plates. Noncompliance to the standard techniques, nonusage of torque limiting screwdrivers and manufacturer-specific instrumentations are the common causes of jammed locking screw heads. Previously, various techniques have been described for the retrieval of jammed locking screws by damaging the screw head, using conical reverse threaded drill bits and often cutting off the plates at jammed screw sites that often generate metal debris and cause bone and soft tissue damage of unknown extent. We present a simple technique and a novel device that does not damage the screw head or the plate, and therefore, no metal debris is generated. The threads on the terminal part of the screw are used to disengage the jammed locking screw head from its locking hole.

Evaluating the reoperation rate and hardware durability of three stabilizing implants for 105 malignant pathologic humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Many patients sustaining a malignant pathologic humerus fracture (MPHF) elect for surgical stabilization. Complications prompting reoperation can occur, leading to additional quality of life and financial cost. One common event preceding reoperation is a broken implant (BI). The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of reoperation following surgical stabilization of MPHF with three techniques - photodynamic bone stabilization (PBS), intramedullary nail (IMN), and cemented plate fixation (CPF) - and estimate to what extent improved implant durability might prevent reoperation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data collection was performed, identifying 105 procedures (100 patients) who underwent non-articular MPHF surgery from 2010-2016: 19 PBS, 65 IMN, 21 CPF. All patients were followed for at least two years or until death.

RESULTS

Reoperation rates were similar at one year (10.5%,6.2%,4.8%, p = 737), two years (15.8%,6.2%,9.5%, p = 375), and final evaluation (15.8%,7.7%,14.3%, p = 248). The rate of BI for PBS, IMN, and CPF was 10.5%,0%, and 4.8% (p = 049 PBS/IMN) at one year, 15.8%,0%, and 9.5% (p = 010 PBS/IMN) at two years, and 15.8%,0%, and 14.3% (p = 010 IMN/PBS, p = 013 IMN/CPF) at final evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation rate was not significantly different at any time point. However, IMN surgery resulted in the lowest rate of broken implants (zero), statistically significant versus PBS at all time periods and versus CPF at final follow-up. PBS may eventually offer selected advantages for MPHF management, but current data suggests fragility must be thoughtfully considered.

Hardware considerations in infection and nonunion management: When and how to revise the fixation

The occurrence of both nonunion and fracture-related infection provides challenges for both the patient and the treating orthopaedic surgeon, with the potential need for complex reconstructive procedures to achieve union and/or eradicate infection. In addition to addressing the multiple different factors that often contribute to nonunion, surgeons are often forced to deal with difficult hardware issues at the time of revision surgery including infected hardware, loose or failing hardware, malaligned hardware, or inappropriate hardware constructs. This article reviews common causes of nonunions with emphasis on infection management and provides indications and techniques for hardware removal in the context of an algorithmic approach to nonunion management with illustrative case examples.

A simple reproducible technique for the retrieval of broken proximal femoral blades, a technical note and review of literature

Despite advances in metallurgy, fatigue failure of hardware in orthopaedics is common especially when a fracture fails to heal. Revision procedures can be difficult, usually requiring removal of intact or broken hardware. Several different methods are usually used to successfully remove the intact or broken hardware. The proximal blade fracture is rare and under-reported in the literature. In our tertiary non-union and limb reconstruction unit, we have developed a technique for an easy and quick removal of a broken proximal femoral blades.

Management of a Broken PRECICE Femoral Nail at an Ununited Distraction Osteogenesis Site: A Case Report

CASE

A 20-year-old man with a history of right lower extremity fibular hemimelia previously treated with PRECICE femoral nail lengthening presented with a broken magnetic nail and a displaced fracture through an ununited distraction osteogenesis site. Using a combination of techniques, we removed the broken implant while maintaining the achieved limb length and preserving the native biology without bone grafting.

CONCLUSION

The unique challenges associated with the removal of a broken PRECICE femoral nail are described, with a technique for implant removal that preserves the achieved length, the innate biology of the distraction osteogenesis site, and promoting union without bone grafting.

Predictors of mechanical complications after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the gold standard treatment for tibial shaft fractures, but can be associated with various mechanical complications, including delayed union.

HYPOTHESIS

We believe that complications do not occur randomly, but in certain conditions that contribute to their development. Risk factors likely to predict delayed union can be identified to support prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 171 fractures treated by IM nailing between 2005 and 2015 was reviewed retrospectively. Independent variables included intrinsic, patient-related factors and extrinsic factors such as those related to the fracture or surgery. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine which factors can predict each type of complication.

RESULTS

Delayed union occurred in 22.8% of patients. Smoking and high-energy trauma were risk factors. Hardware breakage was significantly reduced (p<0.05) when the nail diameter was greater than 10mm. A nail diameter/reamer diameter ratio outside the recommended limits (0.80-0.99) was more likely to be associated with screw failure. Diabetes is a risk factor for hardware migration, which itself is associated with other complications.

DISCUSSION

Nonunion is the most common complication after IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Smoking cessation after a fracture is necessary in our opinion, even if the literature is ambivalent on this aspect and stopping to smoke once the fracture occurs may not be sufficient to prevent a poor outcome. Use of a nail diameter/reamer diameter between 0.80 and 0.99 favors union and prevents hardware breakage. Hardware migration in a diabetic patient may be a warning sign of other types of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study. Level IV.

A Compatibility Guide for the Orthopaedic Surgeon Planning to Perform Hardware Removal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Removal of previously placed orthopaedic implants is a commonly performed procedure worldwide. Given the diversity of orthopaedic implant manufacturers, surgeons may be uncertain whether they have the appropriate screwdriver on site. The purpose of this study was to assess the compatibility of screw head and size configurations from various orthopaedic manufacturers with two commonly used universal screw removal sets.

METHODS

Inclusion of orthopaedic implant manufacturers was determined by market share based on industry-monitoring financial firms. Screw size and drive type for the top grossing orthopaedic implant manufacturers were collected and recorded. Screw and screwdriver compatibility was assessed and compared with two commonly used universal screw removal sets.

RESULTS

In total, six orthopaedic implant companies with commonly implanted screws throughout the appendicular skeleton were included. The data were compiled in table format with noncannulated, cannulated, and locking screw offerings separated by the screw size and manufacturer. Guidewire size compatibility for cannulated offerings was also assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the ubiquity of implanted orthopaedic implant, removal must be as safe, planned, and controlled as possible. The data in this article provide an inclusive, centralized resource for surgeons looking to confirm the compatibility of previously implanted screws and available removal equipment at their institution.

Use of high-speed burr and water-based lubricant in the partial removal of surgical plates: A technique Guide

Implant removal comprises 5% of all orthopaedic surgery procedures performed annually. Surgical indications range from implant failure, infection, non-union, and symptomatic hardware. Intra-operatively, surgeons need to prepare for complications including bony overgrowth, cold-welding, broken screws, and stripped screw heads. Large anatomic dissections required for complete hardware removal place the patient at increased risk of complications due to increased operating time and larger dissections. The authors present a safe and effective technique for the partial removal of surgical implants. The technique utilizes a high-speed burr to cut surgical plates, minimizing the total dissection and operative time. Sterile surgical laps covered in water-based lubricant capture metal debris to reduce tissue contamination as well as surgeon exposure to metal particles.

New Technique for Removal of Screws With Damaged Heads

Removal of orthopedic implants may sometimes be difficult because of ongrowth of new bone. Titanium screws can become encased or stripped during the process of initial open reduction and internal fixation or at the time of hardware removal. Difficulty in removing screws from a locking plate is particularly well-known. Two patients with tibial and femoral diaphyseal fractures were treated using a locking plate or an intramedullary nail. However, after fracture healing, it was difficult to remove the locking screw or reconstruction screws because of damage to the heads. The stripped reconstruction screw was successfully removed employing the authors' so-called parallel planes technique. In this method, a high-speed diamond-tipped burr is applied to opposite sides of the screw head to form 2 parallel faces located slightly away from the recess of the screw head. The 2 faces can then be grasped solidly with locking pliers, allowing removal of the implant by unscrewing it with a gentle upward pulling action. The locking plate was cut from the plate edge to the edge of the screw hole. While making these radial cuts in the plates, the authors were careful not to extend the blade into the screw head. After removal of the locking plate from the screw, the authors were able to extract the jammed screw uneventfully using this technique. This technique can be performed without difficulty and does not require a special device. It is a useful option for extraction of damaged screws. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e911-e914.].

First Metatarsal-Phalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Primary, Revision, and Salvage of Complications

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint has been proposed for treatment of severe hallux valgus, end-stage hallux rigidus, rheumatoid arthritis, and revision of failed surgery due to the perceived safety and efficacy. This article discusses the principles of first metatarsal-phalangeal joint arthrodesis in primary and revision situations, joint preparation, configurations of osteosynthesis, and common complications, including salvage of nonunion and revision of malunion with realignment osteotomy.

Presence of Failed Fracture Implants in Association With Lower Extremity Long Bone Nonunion Does Not Portend Worse Outcome After Nonunion Repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the finding of failed fracture implants in association with lower extremity long bone fracture nonunion portends worse clinical or functional outcome after surgical nonunion repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

PATIENTS

One hundred eighty-one patients who presented to our institution over a 10-year period and underwent surgical repair of a lower extremity fracture nonunion.

INTERVENTION

Surgical repair of lower extremity fracture nonunion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to union, postoperative complications, visual analog scale pain scores, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores after lower extremity nonunion repair. Data were analyzed to assess for differences in postoperative outcomes based on the integrity of fracture implants at the time of nonunion diagnosis. Implant integrity was defined using 3 groups: broken implants (BI), implants intact (II), and no implants (NI).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in time to union after surgery between the BI, II, or NI groups (mean 8.1 months vs. 7.6 months vs. 6.2 months, respectively). Fourteen patients (7.7%) failed to heal, including 5 BI patients, 7 II patients, and 2 NI patients. One tibial nonunion patient in each of the 3 groups underwent amputation for persistent nonunion after multiple failed revision attempts at a mean of 4.8 years after initial injury. There was no difference in postoperative pain scores, the rate of postoperative complications, or functional outcome scores identified between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of failed fracture implants at the time of lower extremity long bone nonunion diagnosis does not portend worse clinical or functional outcome after surgical nonunion repair. Patients who present with failed fracture implants at the time of nonunion diagnosis can anticipate similar time to union, complication rates, and functional outcomes when compared with patients who present with intact implants or those with history of nonoperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Randomized, Prospective Comparison of Bioabsorbable and Steel Screw Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries

OBJECTIVE

This study's objective is to compare outcomes of bioabsorbable versus steel screws for treating Lisfranc injuries.

DESIGN

This research was conducted in a prospective and randomized manner between September 2008 and December 2013.

SETTING

This study was performed in the outpatient setting at a tertiary-level care center in a single surgeon's practice.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Forty patients with acute Lisfranc injuries, amenable to open reduction and screw fixation, enrolled and presented for final follow-up.

INTERVENTION

Through randomization, 20 and 20 patients received bioabsorbable versus steel screws, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Function and pain were graded using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM) and a visual analog scale of pain. Radiographs were assessed for joint stability and degeneration.

RESULTS

For those with steel screws, the mean FAAM score increased from 24.9 to 89.6 of 100 and pain score decreased from 6.5 to 1.9 of 10 by latest follow-up. For those with absorbable screws, the mean FAAM score increased from 32.5 to 91.2 and pain score decreased from 4.7 to 1.3 by latest follow-up. These differences in final mean function (P = 0.4) and pain (P = 0.25) between the study groups were not statistically significant. Final radiographs showed no Lisfranc instability in any study patients, but rather midfoot arthritis in 4 and 2 patients with steel versus bioabsorbable screws, respectively. None of the patients who received steel screws had hardware-related problems, but 1 patient who received absorbable fixation developed an inflammatory reaction at a nonresorbed screw head at 2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioabsorbable screws provide short-term results that are comparable and not significantly different from steel screws for treating unstable Lisfranc injuries. Both methods are predictable in improving function and pain, but using absorbable screws eliminates the need for hardware removal after such trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early results using a biodegradable magnesium screw for modified chevron osteotomies

This is the first larger study analyzing the use of magnesium-based screws for fixation of modified Chevron osteotomies in hallux valgus surgery. Forty-four patients (45 feet) were included in this prospective study. A modified Chevron osteotomy was performed on every patient and a magnesium screw used for fixation. The mean clinical follow up was 21.4 weeks. The mean age of the patients was 45.5 years. Forty patients could be provided with the implant, in four patients the surgeon decided to change to a standard metallic implant. The AOFAS, FAAM and pain NRS-scale improved markedly. The hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle and sesamoid position improved significantly. Seven patients showed dorsal subluxation, rotation or medial shifting of the metatarsal heads within the first 3 months. One of these patients was revised, in all others the findings were considered clinically not significant or the patients refused revision. This study shows the feasibility of using magnesium screws in hallux valgus-surgery. Surgeons starting with the use of these implants should be aware of the proper handling of these implants and should know about corrosion effects during healing and its radiographic appearance. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:2207-2214, 2016.

Water-based lubricant as an adjunct to wound toilet: Validation of a technique by experiment

INTRODUCTION

Metal debris can produce a foreign body inflammatory reaction or as third body wear in the situation of joint arthroplasty. We evaluate a simple method for reducing this debris using a sterile water-based lubricating gel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight experimental surgical models consisting of porcine muscle overlying a polyethylene tube with a titanium locking plate and screws secured were constructed. Four models had water based lubricating gel applied to the wound edges, four were left without as controls. Image were then captured before and after irrigation from which the amount of debris could be quantified.

RESULTS

The reduction of surface area covered by debris for models with water-based gel was greater (p=0.001). The average reduction in surface area was 27.2% for the control group and 94.1% for the models covered with lubricating gel.

CONCLUSION

We show that using a safe, inexpensive and easily available water-based lubricating gel reduces the amount of embedded debris when burring metal implants using a high-speed burr.

Easy and Inexpensive Technique for Removal of Round Headed, Jammed Locking Screws in Distal Tibial Interlocking Plate

Introduction:

The advent of locking plates has brought new problems in implant removal. Difficulty in removing screws from a locking plate is well-known. These difficulties include cold welding between the screw head and locking screw hole, stripping of the recess of the screw head for the screwdriver, and cross-threading between threads in the screw head and screw hole. However, there are cases in which removal is difficult. We describe a new technique for removing a round headed, jammed locking screws from a locking plate.

Case Report:

55 years old male patient received a locking distal tibial plate along with distal fibular plate 3years back from UAE. Now patient came with complaint of non-healing ulcer over medial aspect of lower 1/3rd of right leg from past 1 year. Non operative management did not improve the symptoms. The patient consented to implant removal, with the express understanding that implant removal might be impossible because already one failed attempt had been performed at some other hospital six months back. We then decided to proceed with the new technique. The rest of the proximal screws were removed using a technique not previously described. We used stainless steel metal cutting blades that are used to cut door locks or pad locks to cut the remaining stripped headed screws.

Conclusion:

This technique is very quick, easy to perform and inexpensive because the metal cutting blades which are used to cut the screws are very cheap. Yet it is very effective technique to remove the stripped headed or jammed locking screws. It is also very less destructive because of very less heat production during the procedure there is no problem of thermal necrosis to the bone or the surrounding soft tissue.

A Novel Surgical Technique for Removing Buried Cannulated Screws Using a Guidewire and Countersink: A Report of Two Cases

Removal of metal implants is a common procedure that is performed for a variety of indications. However, problems such as a buried screw head may occasionally arise and render hardware removal difficult or even impossible. The problem is further compounded when the initial screw was inserted percutaneously or via a minimally-invasive (MIS) technique. In the present paper, we introduce a novel, minimally invasive technique to remove buried cannulated screws which obviates the need for excessive extension of the skin incision, surgical exploration, soft tissue dissection or excess bone removal, which surgeons may otherwise have to undertake to uncover the buried screw head. This technique is especially useful in removing cannulated screws which have been inserted using small stab incisions and MIS techniques initially. This technique can be applied to the removal of buried cannulated screws which are placed into any bone in the body.

Retrieval of broken iliosacral screws: the power of a push screw

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a common technique that is widely used for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Complications of posterior percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation include implant malpositioning and hardware failure. Removal of iliosacral screws in broken or symptomatic hardware is sometimes necessary. To our knowledge, there are few reports addressing pelvic implant removal, and most of those report on anterior pelvic implants and symphyseal plates. There are no reports describing techniques for retrieval of broken iliosacral screws. We present two cases involving removal of broken sacroiliac screws, review the literature regarding iliosacral implant extraction, and identify important aspects of safe extraction of iliosacral screws and the potential complications associated with their retrieval. We further describe a novel and powerful technique to facilitate percutaneous removal of broken screw fragments, using a "push screw" to drive a broken screw fragment from a position buried in bone.

Oleic acid surfactant in polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite-composites for bone tissue engineering

Bone substitutes are required to repair osseous defects caused by a number of factors, such as traumas, degenerative diseases, and cancer. Autologous bone grafting is typically used to bridge bone defects, but suffers from chronic pain at the donor-site and limited availability of graft material. Tissue engineering approaches are being investigated as viable alternatives, which ideal scaffold should be biocompatible, biodegradable, and promote cellular interactions and tissue development, need to present proper mechanical and physical properties. In this study, poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), oleic acid (OA) and hydroxyapatite (HAp) were used to obtain films whose properties were investigated by contact angle, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, tensile mechanical tests, and in vitro tests with U2OS human osteosarcoma cells by direct contact. Our results indicate that by using OA as surfactant/dispersant, it was possible to obtain a homogenous film with HAp. The PCL/OA/Hap sample had twice the roughness of the control (PCL) and a lower contact angle, indicating increased hydrophilicity of the film. Furthermore, mechanical testing showed that the addition of HAp decreased the load at yield point and tensile strength and increased tensile modulus, indicating a more brittle composition vs. PCL matrix. Preliminary cell culture experiments carried out with the films demonstrated that U2OS cells adhered and proliferated on all surfaces. The data demonstrate the improved dispersion of HAp using OA and the important consequences of this addition on the composite, unveiling the potentially of this composition for bone growth support. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1076-1082, 2016.

Possible predictors for difficult removal of locking plates: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Difficult removal of locking plates including less invasive stabilisation systems (LISSs) and locking compression plates (LCPs) sometimes occur. However, investigations of the mechanisms and correlated factors of complicated removal remain scant. This study aims to identify correlated factors for the difficult removal of locking plates and to propose suggestions for decision making regarding implant removal and the prevention of complicated removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 308 consecutive patients who underwent LCP/LISS removal from Sep. 2004 to Nov. 2013 were assessed. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, we analysed the correlation between difficult removal and the duration between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and implant removal as well as the correlation between difficult removal and the patients' age. Using Chi Square test, we assessed the correlations between complicated removal and the size, location, insertion technique and cortical purchase of the locking head screw (LHS). Correlated factors were separately determined in upper and lower extremities. Rates of difficult removal in different fracture locations were evaluated, and postoperative complications were documented.

RESULTS

Of the total 308 patients, thirty-seven had intra-operative difficulties, and six patients experienced postoperative complications. Six out of fifteen patients with peri-elbow fractures and five out of seventeen patients with femur fractures suffered difficult removal, while four out of one hundred patients with malleolar fractures had intra-operative difficulties. Difficulties were experienced with 30 of 338 LCPs, 7 of 32 LISSs, 67 of 1533 small-diameter (≤ 3.5-mm) LHSs, and 12 of 442 large-diameter (≥ 4.5-mm) LHSs. Three LCPs and seventeen small-diameter LHSs were retained. A longer interval between ORIF and removal, younger age and bicortical screws correlated with difficult removal in the upper extremities, and a longer duration before removal, small-diameter LHS and minimally invasive insertion of LHS were predictors in the lower extremities.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications occur with LCP/LISS removal, and it should not be a routine procedure. If removal is indicated, performing surgery as soon as radiographs show fracture healing is recommended. Different considerations should apply when making decisions and removing implants from patients with different fracture sites.

Hollow mill for extraction of stripped titanium screws: an easy, quick, and safe technique

Removal of jammed titanium screws can be difficult due to the problem of stripping of the hexagonal heads of the screws. We present a technique of extraction of stripped screws with the use of a standard 4.5 mm stainless steel hollow mill in a patient of peri-implant fracture of the radius fixed with a titanium locking plate 2 years back. The technique is quick, safe, and cost effective.

Difficulty in locking head screw removal

BACKGROUND

Locking plates are an internal fixation material useful in the treatment of bone fractures, which provides effective stabilization between the plate and locking head screws (LHSs) via the locking mechanism. However, difficulty in removing LHSs is relatively common, and such cases can require long surgical procedures or use of special removal equipment. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and risk factors for difficult removal of LHSs.

METHODS

During the 5-year-6-month period from April 2006 to September 2011, 83 locking plates containing a total of 482 LHSs were removed in 80 patients at our institution. Out of 482 LHSs, there were 118 LHSs with a 2.4-2.7 mm diameter, 308 LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter and 56 LHSs with a 5.0 mm diameter. The incidence of removal difficulty was examined on the basis of screw diameter. In addition, the risk factors were assessed in only LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter. LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter were divided into 2 groups, the difficult removal group and the easy removal group, and the data were examined based on age, sex, time between insertion and removal, and screw position. The incidence of removal difficulty in LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter was examined every 6 months between insertion and removal.

RESULTS

Difficulty in removal was encountered in none (0 %) of 118 LHSs with a 2.4-2.7 mm diameter, 15 (4.9 %) of 308 LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter, and none (0 %) of 56 LHSs with a 5.0 mm diameter. In only LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter, the mean ages of the patients in the difficult removal group and the easy removal group were 32.1 and 45.6 years, respectively. The average time between insertion and removal in the difficult removal group and the easy removal group was 529.2 and 389.2 days, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in age and time between insertion and removal. Removal was difficult in 15 (9.1 %) of 165 LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter in those with >1 year between insertion and removal.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that (1) the use of LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter is a necessary condition for difficulty in screw removal, and that (2) longer time from internal fixation to removal, and (3) younger age, are risk factors for it. When removing LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter, appropriate instruments and sufficient training are necessary.

Removal of a broken cannulated intramedullary nail: review of the literature and a case report of a new technique

Nonunion of long bones fixed with nails may result in implant failure. Removal of a broken intramedullary nail may be a real challenge. Many methods have been described to allow for removal of the broken piece of the nail. In this paper, we are reviewing the different techniques to extract a broken nail, classifying them into different subsets, and describing a new technique that we used to remove a broken tibial nail with narrow canal. Eight different categories of implant removal methods were described, with different methods within each category. This classification is very comprehensive and was never described before. We described a new technique (hook captured in the medulla by flexible nail introduced from the locking hole) which is a valuable technique in cases of nail of a small diameter where other methods cannot be used because of the narrow canal of the nail. Our eight categories for broken nail removal methods simplify the concepts of nail removal and allow the surgeon to better plan for the removal procedure.

Removal of a broken cannulated femoral nail: a novel retrograde impaction technique

This report presents a surgical technique to remove a broken cannulated nail from the femur. A Harrington rod was modified for retrograde impaction of the retained fragment. The broken implant was finally removed without complication. This particular procedure was safe, simple, and promising.

Novel technique for removal of a broken intracortical screw during THA

Most reports regarding hardware removal involve the violation of the cortex to allow a specialized to tool to extract a retained fragment. This leaves large, unfilled screw holes that act as stress risers for months postoperatively. This article describes a novel technique to remove a retained intracortical screw fragment during total hip arthroplasty. Conversion of an intertrochanteric osteotomy to a total hip arthroplasty can be made more difficult by anatomical changes to the femur and retained hardware. Direct access to the intramedullary canal during total hip arthroplasty allowed for the safe removal of a retained intracortical screw using this technique.

Difficulties in removal of the titanium locking plate in Japan

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the frequency of intraoperative complications associated with titanium locking compression plate (LCP) removal.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for surgical technique, plate types used, position and number of screws, time from internal fixation to plate removal, and intraoperative complications. Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate the position of the plates and screws and the accuracy of the screw direction. Mann-Whitney and Yates Chi-square tests were calculated with the level of significance at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

All LCPs could be removed. Of the 342 locking head screws (LHSs), a total of 21 (6.1%) screws, 3 (2.0%) 5.0 mm screws (3/153) and 18 (10.7%) 3.5 mm screws (18/169), were difficult to remove. The frequency of difficulty associated with the 3.5 mm LHSs was significantly higher than that of the 5.0 mm LHSs (P < 0.01). The frequency of difficulty associated with the removal of LHSs at the diaphysis was higher than that of LHSs at the epiphysis (P < 0.01), especially with 3.5 mm LHSs. The mean age was significantly lower in the patients in whom removal was difficult (P < 0.05). Our analysis revealed that the frequency of removal difficulty was high when a 3.5 mm LHS was inserted into the diaphysis of young patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We should recognize that the removal of LCPs can involve numerous problems and great care should be exercised, especially in cases involving 3.5 mm LHSs.

Surgical technique: Simple technique for removing a locking recon plate with damaged screw heads

BACKGROUND

The introduction of locking plates in the treatment of periarticular fractures was a major breakthrough in orthopaedic evolution. Removal of these implants is extremely difficult as a result of cold welding and stripping of screw heads.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

A 31-year-old man had a schwannoma of the left C5-C6 nerve roots and upper trunk of the brachial plexus. One year before presentation he had undergone excision of the lesion through an approach using a clavicular osteotomy. The osteotomy had been fixed with a titanium locking recon plate. While surgically removing the implant, only one screw could be removed. The remaining five screws could not be turned owing to cold welding; repeated attempts at removing the screws damaged the screw heads. A large bolt cutter was used to cut the plate between the holes, and the resulting rectangular sections with the screws then were unscrewed from the bone.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Limited literature is available regarding techniques for locking screw removal. These include using a carbide drill bit or diamond-tipped burr, high-speed disc, or conical extraction screw.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all centers have specialized instruments such as carbide drill bits to remove screw heads, but a large bolt cutter usually is available when screws cannot be unscrewed owing to cold welding. The technique of cutting is easily reproducible and does not require additional soft tissue stripping.

Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey

Background

The aim of this survey study was to evaluate the current opinion and practice of trauma and orthopaedic surgeons in the Netherlands in the removal of implants after fracture healing.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire consisting of 44 items was sent to all active members of the Dutch Trauma Society and Dutch Orthopaedic Trauma Society to determine their habits and opinions about implant removal.

Results

Though implant removal is not routinely done in the Netherlands, 89% of the Dutch surgeons agreed that implant removal is a good option in case of pain or functional deficits. Also infection of the implant or bone is one of the main reasons for removing the implant (> 90%), while making money was a motivation for only 1% of the respondents. In case of younger patients (< 40 years of age) only 34% of the surgeons agreed that metal implants should always be removed in this category. Orthopaedic surgeons are more conservative and differ in their opinion about this subject compared to general trauma surgeons (p = 0.002). Though the far majority removes elastic nails in children (95%).

Most of the participants (56%) did not agree that leaving implants in is associated with an increased risk of fractures, infections, allergy or malignancy. Yet in case of the risk of fractures, residents all agreed to this statement (100%) whereas staff specialists disagreed for 71% (p < 0.001). According to 62% of the surgeons titanium plates are more difficult to remove than stainless steel, but 47% did not consider them safer to leave in situ compared to stainless steel. The most mentioned postoperative complications were wound infection (37%), unpleasant scarring (24%) and postoperative hemorraghe (19%).

Conclusion

This survey indicates that there is no general opinion about implant removal after fracture healing with a lack of policy guidelines in the Netherlands. In case of symptomatic patients a majority of the surgeons removes the implant, but this is not standard practice for every surgeon.

Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived matrices for enhanced osteoregeneration

The methodology for the repair of critical-sized or non-union bone lesions has unpredictable efficacy due in part to our incomplete knowledge of bone repair and the biocompatibility of bone substitutes. Although human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) differentiate into osteoblasts, which promote bone growth, their ability to repair bone in vivo has been variable. We hypothesized that given the multistage process of osteogenesis, hMSC-mediated repair might be maximal at a specific time point of healing. Using a mouse model of calvarial healing, we demonstrate that the osteo-repair capacity of hMSCs can be substantially augmented by treatment with an inhibitor of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, but efficacy is confined to the rapid osteogenic phase. Upon entry into the bone-remodeling phase, hMSC retention signals are lost, resulting in truncation of healing. To solve this limitation, we prepared a scaffold consisting of hMSC-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) containing the necessary biomolecules for extended site-specific hMSC retention. When inhibitor-treated hMSCs were coadministered with ECM, they remained at the injury, well into the remodeling phase of healing, which resulted in reproducible and complete repair of critical-sized bone defects in mice in 3 weeks. These data suggest that hMSC-derived ECM and inhibitor-treated hMSCs could be used at optimal times to substantially and reproducibly improve bone repair.

Late removal of titanium hardware from the elbow is problematic

A retrospective review of 21 patients that underwent bone screw removal from the elbow was studied in relation to the type of metal, duration of implantation, and the location of the screws about the elbow. Screw failure during extraction was the dependent variable. Five of 21 patients experienced hardware failure during extraction. Fourteen patients had titanium alloy implants. In four cases, titanium screws broke during extraction. Compared to stainless steel, titanium screw failure during removal was not statistically significant (P = 0.61). Screw removal 12 months after surgery was more likely to result in broken, retained screws in general (P = 0.046) and specifically for titanium alloy (P = 0.003). Bone screws removed from the distal humerus or proximal ulna had an equal chance of fracturing (P = 0.28). There appears to be a time-related association of titanium alloy bone screw failure during hardware removal cases from the elbow. This may be explained by titanium's properties and osseointegration.

Total hip arthroplasty in the ankylosed hip

Altered biomechanics secondary to hip ankylosis often result in degeneration of the lumbar spine, ipsilateral knee, and contralateral hip and knee. Symptoms in these joints may be reduced with conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) of the ankylosed hip. THA in the ankylosed hip is a technically challenging procedure, and the overall clinical outcome is generally less satisfactory than routine THA performed for osteoarthritis and other etiologies. Functional integrity of the hip abductor muscles is the most important predictor of walking ability following conversion THA. Many patients experience persistent limp, and it can take up to 2 years to fully assess final functional outcome. Risk factors cited for increased risk of failed THA include prior surgical ankylosis and age <50 years at the time of conversion THA.

Removal of locking plates: new implant, new challenges and new solutions

Removal of locking plates in many ways poses novel challenges compared to conventional plates. None of the techniques described for the removal of locking plates are adequate for all situations. We report our experience of 27 patients from whom a total of 33 locking plates were removed. We also describe a novel technique for the removal of locking plates which in our experience could be used in most of these patients because it is appropriate for all situations and, from a technical point of view, is easy to use. Our new technique consists of removing the problematic locking screw by cutting the plate on both sides of the screw hole and using the screw head-plate hole unit for removal. We analyzed all these patients for the location of the plate, number of locking screws, time of implant removal since the initial surgery, reason for removal of the plate, nature of the difficulties encountered during surgery, and any perioperative complications. A total of 43 (17.34%) screws were difficult to remove. Twenty screws were found to be stripped, 15 were jammed and 8 were broken. Fourteen of the 20 stripped screws and all 15 jammed screws were removed using our technique. We found this technique of locking plate removal to be very versatile and useful in most of the cases in which removal was difficult. At the same time, it also causes less damage to the bone compared to other techniques.

Analysis of plastic deformation in cortical bone after insertion of coated and non-coated self-tapping orthopaedic screws

Insertion of internal fracture fixation devices, such as screws, mechanically weakens the bone. Diamond-like carbon has outstanding tribology properties which may decrease the amount of damage in tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate methods for quantification of cortical bone damage after orthopaedic bone screw insertion and to evaluate the effect of surface modification on tissue damage. In total, 48 stainless steel screws were inserted into cadaver bones. Half of the screws were coated with a smooth amorphous diamond coating. Geometrical data of the bones was determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Thin sections of the bone samples were prepared after screw insertion, and histomorphometric evaluation of damage was performed on images obtained using light microscopy. Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy were also used to examine tissue damage. A positive correlation was found between tissue damage and the geometric properties of the bone. The age of the cadaver significantly affected the bone mineral density, as well as the damage perimeter and diameter of the screw hole. However, the expected positive effect of surface modification was probably obscured by large variations in the results and, thus, statistically significant differences were not found in this study. This can be explained by natural variability in bone tissue, which also made automated image analysis difficult.

Case report: A technique to remove a jammed locking screw from a locking plate

BACKGROUND

Locking titanium plates revolutionized the treatment of osteoporotic and metaphyseal fractures of long bones. However as with any innovation, with time new complications are identified. One of the problems with titanium locking plates is removal of screws, often attributable to cold welding of screw heads into the locking screw holes. Several techniques have been described to overcome this problem. We describe a new easy technique to remove a jammed locking screw in a locking plate that is easily reproducible and suggest an algorithm to determine the method to remove screws from locking plates.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 57-year-old man underwent removal of a locking titanium plate from the distal femur. Because the screws could not be readily removed, we used a new technique to remove the jammed locking screws. A radial cut was made in the plate into the locking screw hole and wedged with an osteotome. This released the screw head from the locking screw hole. The screw holes were connected with radial cuts and jammed locking screws were removed in a similar fashion.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Instruments used for removal of locking screws, including conical extraction screws, hollow reamers, extraction bolts, modular devices, and carbide drill bits, have been described. However, these do not always work.

PURPOSES AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Removing screws from locking titanium plates can be difficult. There is no method of implant removal that can be universally applied. Therefore, this new technique and our algorithm may be used when removing screws from locking titanium plates.

A technique for extracting a buried Kuntscher nail from the femur during total hip arthroplasty

We describe a novel technique that allows safe extraction of a buried Kuntscher nail during total hip arthroplasty in a patient with ipsilateral, symptomatic post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the hip. This method allows the surgeon to visualise the antegrade entry point of the nail allowing safe extraction of the device without compromising the result of the hip arthroplasty.