Double Crush Syndrome

Double Crush Syndrome in the Lower Extremity: Simultaneous L5 Radiculopathy and Common Peroneal Nerve Compression

BACKGROUND

Double crush syndrome (DCS) is defined as multiple sites of compression along a single nerve. The combination of a compressive proximal lesion in the lumbar spine and a distal common peroneal nerve entrapment may result in compound nerve dysfunction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 patients who underwent common peroneal nerve decompression with a diagnosis of L5 radiculopathy between January 2000 and April 2023 at two quaternary academic institutions was performed. Patients were included if they had both active L5 radiculopathy and active peroneal mononeuropathy on electromyography (EMG) or imaging findings. Ten patients had a "pure" DCS of the lower extremity, meaning the co-occurrence of both active diseases based on EMG or imaging. Descriptive statistics of patient demographics, clinical presentation, surgical details, and outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

All 10 patients underwent common peroneal nerve decompression, 3 of the patients underwent a prior lumbar spine surgery to address their L5 radiculopathy. Preoperatively, 6 patients (60%) had a positive Tinel's sign, which reduced to 3 patients (30%) postoperatively. Relative to preoperative strength, dorsiflexion, extensor hallucis longus, and ankle eversion strength all improved on average following common peroneal nerve decompression. The presence of numbness in the lateral leg or dorsal foot decreased from 9 (90%) preoperatively to 4 (40%) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first series to report DCS with two active points of compression in the lumbar spine and lower extremity based on EMG and imaging findings. Common peroneal nerve decompression was found to improve average dorsiflexion strength.

Understanding risk factors for revision surgery after cubital tunnel release: Analysis of patient selection, surgeon, and clinical factors

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize factors that may contribute to revision surgery following primary cubital tunnel release (CuTR) surgery.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed by reviewing all patients who underwent CuTR at a single institution between 2014 and 2021. Only primary in situ CuTR surgeries were included. Exclusion criteria were any case of primary ulnar nerve transpositions or ulnar nerve decompression surgery related to pathology other than isolated ulnar neuropathy (ie. elbow fracture repair, medial epicondylitis debridement, etc.). Revision surgery was defined as return to the operating room by the index surgeon or another surgeon within the same practice for repeat ulnar nerve decompression and/or transposition. Patient demographics and surgical information was analyzed to determine factors that may be associated with revision surgery following primary in situ ulnar nerve decompression.

Results

A total of 1367 patients met inclusion criteria. Revision rate following primary CuTR was 1.2 ​% (n ​= ​16). Of the factors evaluated, younger age (46.6 vs 57.0 years) and a history of cervical stenosis had a higher correlation with undergoing a revision. Patients who had revision surgery were more likely to have negative electrodiagnostic studies versus those who did not. Otherwise, there was no association between sex, race, tobacco use, medical comorbidities, symptom severity, bilateral symptoms, or concurrent surgery and the subsequent need for revision ulnar nerve decompression.

Conclusions

Following primary in situ CuTR, younger age or a history of cervical stenosis may be at higher risk of undergoing revision surgery. Additionally, patients without electrodiagnostic evidence of ulnar neuropathy may have less reliable outcomes versus those who have a positive nerve study. Given the unpredictable nature of ulnar nerve surgery, further prospective data including diagnostic imaging and biomechanical evaluation of patients following ulnar nerve release may help provide a deeper understanding of this unique patient population.

Level of evidence

Prognostic, level IV.

The Efficacy of Combined Decompression of Carpal and Cubital Tunnel in the Setting of Cervical Spine Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and objective Hand numbness, often associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), significantly impacts the quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined carpal and cubital tunnel decompression (CCTD) in patients with concurrent mild to moderate cervical spine stenosis when compared to single decompression procedures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 100 patients who underwent decompression surgery for hand numbness and concurrent cervical spine stenosis, with positive electromyography (EMG) results in some cases, between January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024. Surgical interventions included carpal tunnel decompression (CTD, n=91), cubital tunnel decompression (CuTD, n=4), and combined procedures (n=5). Results Of the 100 patients (aged range: 32-92 years), 11 with coexisting cervical stenosis reported neck pain. Those who underwent CCTD reported significantly lower pain severity and interference scores, as well as better functional outcomes, compared to single decompression groups. Despite the small number of patients (n=5) in the combined decompression group, preliminary findings suggest potential benefits related to this approach. Conclusions Simultaneous decompression of the carpal and cubital tunnels may offer superior symptom relief and functional improvement in patients with mild to moderate cervical spine stenosis, highlighting the importance of addressing cervical spine pathology in cases of hand numbness. However, further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to validate these preliminary results and better understand the efficacy of combined decompression for complex cases.

Simultaneous Versus Staged Surgery for Double Crush Syndrome of Cervical Radiculopathy and Peripheral Nerve Compression at the Wrist: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the results of surgical treatment in patients with double crush syndrome associated with cervical radiculopathy and upper limb peripheral nerve compression after staged and simultaneous operations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Currently, choosing the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for treating patients with double crush syndrome remains unresolved.

METHODS

The study included 79 patients with double crush syndrome (cervical radiculopathy and syndrome of Guyon's canal or Carpal tunnel syndrome). Two independent groups were studied: In the Staged Group (n=35), we performed a cervical decompression with stabilization and peripheral nerve decompression at separate days due to ongoing clinical symptoms (average interval between interventions being 22 (18;26) days). In the simultaneous group (n=33), we performed both the cervical spine surgery as well as the peripheral nerve procedures in one surgical session. Total operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, complications, and clinical data (NDI score, SF-36, VAS neck pain score, VAS arm pain score, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Macnab scale) were compared. We used the Mann-Whitney (MW) test for intergroup comparisons, the Wilcoxon criterion for dependent samples, and the Fisher exact test for binomial parameters.

RESULTS

There was a significantly lower operative time, duration of inpatient treatment, and temporary disability in the simultaneous group (P=0.01, P=0.04, and P=0.006, respectively). Comparative analysis did not reveal significant intergroup differences using NDI, VAS, and DASH ( P >0.05), whereas, at discharge, significantly better clinical parameters were appreciated for the simultaneous group using SF-36 and Macnab scores ( P =0.04 and P =0.03, respectively). At the last follow-up, an intra-group analysis revealed comparable clinical effectiveness between the two approaches ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comparison of the effectiveness of simultaneous and staged surgery revealed comparable long-term clinical outcomes. However, simultaneous surgery conveys clinically important advantages in terms of surgical time, anesthesia duration, length of hospitalization, and patient disability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Study Findings Differ Between Patients With Double-crush Syndrome and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Propensity Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Double-crush syndrome (DCS) represents a condition that involves peripheral nerve compression in combination with spinal nerve root impingement. The purpose of this study was to compare electrodiagnostic study (EDS) results in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome with those undergoing both CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for DCS.

METHODS

Patients receiving an isolated CTR were compared with those undergoing CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion within two years of CTR. The latter group was defined as our DCS cohort. Electrodiagnostic study results were collected which included sensory and motor nerve conduction data as well as electromyogram (EMG) findings. All electrodiagnostic studies were done before CTR in both sets of patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with DCS and 137 CTR-only patients were included. Patients with DCS were found to have decreased sensory onset latency (3.51 vs 4.01; P = 0.015) and peak latency (4.25 vs 5.17; P = 0.004) compared with the CTR-only patients. Patients with DCS had slower wrist motor velocity (30.5 vs 47.7; P = 0.012), decreased elbow motor latency (9.62 vs 10.6; P = 0.015), and faster elbow motor velocity (56.0 vs 49.4; P = 0.031). EMG results showed that patients with DCS were more likely to have positive findings in the biceps (31.9% vs 1.96%; P < 0.001) and triceps (24.4% vs 2.97%; P < 0.001), but not abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (45.7% vs 37.9%; P = 0.459).

CONCLUSION

We identified changes on EDS between patients with and without DCS. In patients with DCS, sensory nerve studies showed shorter peak and onset latency than in CTR-only patients. Interestingly, DCS and CTR-only patients had different patterns of wrist and elbow motor nerve conduction. Providers observing positive EMG findings proximal to the APB should raise their suspicion for possible cervical radiculopathy and when present with carpal tunnel syndrome-like symptoms, should also consider DCS in their diagnostic differential.

Complications and Reoperation Following Surgery for Concurrent Carpal Tunnel and Cervical Spine Compression

BACKGROUND

Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may also have cervical radiculopathy (CR) or vice versa, potentially requiring carpal tunnel release (CTR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study evaluates whether there is an increased risk of complications following CTR or ACDF in patients with concurrent CTS and CR (CTS-CR) compared with those with only CTS or CR.

METHODS

A multipayer database was used to identify patients with CTS-CR. From this cohort, patients who underwent CTR and/or ACDF were identified. Patients with CTS-CR undergoing surgery were compared with those undergoing surgery with only CTS or CR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare matched populations to assess postoperative complications and risk of undergoing both procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 110 379 patients with CTS-CR were identified. Carpal tunnel release was performed in 21 152 patients (19.2%) with CTS-CR, from which 835 (0.76%) underwent ACDF. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed in 6960 patients (6.31%) with CTS-CR followed by CTR in 1098 patients (0.99%). Patients with CTS-CR were at greater risk of reoperation and complex regional pain syndrome following CTR. In ACDF, patients with CTS-CR were at greater risk of reoperation. Obesity and tobacco use were significant risk factors in patients with CTS-CR who underwent both CTR and ACDF rather than a single surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of more than 100 000 patients with CTS-CR found a greater likelihood of reoperation and perioperative complications following surgery than those without concurrent diagnoses. Obesity and smoking increased the risk for patients undergoing both procedures. Patients presenting with CTS-CR are high risk and should be counseled on risk of complication and reoperation and optimized to reduce risk of undergoing both CTR and ACDF.

Nerve Injury Following Regional Nerve Block: A Literature Review of Its Etiologies, Risk Factors, and Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postoperative nerve injury after nerve block is complex and multifactorial. The mechanisms, etiologies, and risk factors are explored. This review article conducts a literature search and summarizes current evidence and best practices in prevention of nerve injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging technology such as ultrasound, injection pressure monitors, and nerve stimulators for peripheral nerve block have been incorporated into regular practice to reduce the rate of nerve injury. Studies show avoidance of intrafascicular injection, limiting concentrations/volumes of local anesthetic, and appropriate patient selection are the most significant controllable factors in limiting the negative consequences of nerve block. Peripheral nerve injury is an uncommon occurrence after nerve block and is obscured by surgical manipulation, positioning, and underlying neural integrity. Underlying neural integrity is not always evident despite an adequate history and physical exam. Surgical stress, independently of nerve block, may exacerbate these neurologic disease processes and make diagnosing a postoperative nerve injury more challenging. Prevention of nerve injury by surgical teams, care with positioning, and avoidance of intrafascicular injection with nerve block are the most evidence-based practices.

Experience With Proximal Median Nerve Entrapment by the Lacertus Fibrosus

BACKGROUND

Unconscious bias of the clinician favors the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in patients with median paresthesia. We hypothesized that more patients in this cohort would be diagnosed with proximal median nerve entrapment (PMNE) by strengthening our cognitive awareness of this alternative diagnosis. We also hypothesized that patients with PMNE may be successfully treated with surgical release of the lacertus fibrosus (LF).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, cases of median nerve decompression at the carpal tunnel and in the proximal forearm for the 2-year periods before and after adopting strategies to mitigate cognitive bias for CTS were enumerated. Patients diagnosed with PMNE and treated by LF release under local anesthesia were evaluated to determine surgical outcome at minimum 2-year follow-up. Primary outcome measures were changes in preoperative median paresthesia and proximal median-innervated muscle strength.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in PMNE cases identified after our heightened surveillance was initiated (z = 3.433, P < .001). In 10 of 12 cases, the patient had previous ipsilateral open carpal tunnel release (CTR) but experienced recurrent median paresthesia. In 8 cases evaluated an average of 5 years after LF release, there was improvement in median paresthesia and resolution of median-innervated muscle weakness.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to cognitive bias, some patients with PMNE may be misdiagnosed with CTS. All patients with median paresthesia, particularly those with persistent or recurrent symptoms after CTR, should be assessed for PMNE. Surgical release limited to the LF may be an effective treatment for PMNE.

Incidence and predictive factors of double crush syndrome in patients undergoing cervical surgery: a database study

BACKGROUND

Double crush syndrome (DCS) is characterized by multiple compression sites along a single peripheral nerve. It commonly presents with persistent distal symptoms despite surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Management typically involves nerve release of the most symptomatic site. However, due to overlapping symptoms with cervical radiculopathy, patients may undergo cervical surgery prior to DCS diagnosis. Due to its rarity and frequent misdiagnosis, the authors aim to utilize a large national database to investigate the incidence and associations of DCS.

METHODS

The Pearldiver database was utilized to identify patients undergoing cervical surgery for the management of cervical radiculopathy. Patients were stratified into three cohorts based on their clinical course before and after cervical surgery. The primary outcome was the prevalence of DCS, and secondary outcomes included an evaluation of predictive factors for each Group, using a significance level of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among 195,271 patients undergoing cervical surgery for cervical radiculomyelopathy, 97.95% were appropriately managed, 1.42% had potentially mids-diagnosed DCS, and 0.63% were treatment-resistant. Diabetes and obesity were significant predictors of potentially misdiagnosed DCS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study presents data indicating that 1.42% of patients who receive cervical surgery may have underlying DCS and potentially benefit from nerve release prior to undergoing surgery. A concurrent diagnosis of diabetes and obesity may predict an underlying DCS.

Detection of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis from Oblique Radiograph Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm that can diagnose cervical foraminal stenosis using oblique radiographs and evaluate its accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 997 patients who underwent cervical MRI and cervical oblique radiographs within a 3-month interval were included. Oblique radiographs were labeled as "foraminal stenosis" or "no foraminal stenosis" according to whether foraminal stenosis was present in the C2-T1 levels based on MRI evaluation as ground truth. The CNN model involved data augmentation, image preprocessing, and transfer learning using DenseNet161. Visualization of the location of the CNN model was performed using gradient-weight class activation mapping (Grad-CAM).

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve based on DenseNet161 was 0.889 (95% confidence interval, 0.851-0.927). The F1 score, accuracy, precision, and recall were 88.5%, 84.6%, 88.1%, and 88.5%, respectively. The accuracy of the proposed CNN model was significantly higher than that of two orthopedic surgeons (64.0%, p<0.001; 58.0%, p<0.001). Grad-CAM analysis demonstrated that the CNN model most frequently focused on the foramen location for the determination of foraminal stenosis, although disc space was also frequently taken into consideration.

CONCLUSION

A CNN algorithm that can detect neural foraminal stenosis in cervical oblique radiographs was developed. The AUC, F1 score, and accuracy were 0.889, 88.5%, and 84.6%, respectively. With the current CNN model, cervical oblique radiography could be a more effective screening tool for neural foraminal stenosis.

Sex Is a Better Predictor Than Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Findings for Outcomes After Common Peroneal Nerve Decompression for Compressive Neuropathy: A Retrospective Review

Background

There is increasing interest in the evaluation and management of compressive neuropathy of the common peroneal nerve (CPN).

Purpose

We sought to determine demographic and electrodiagnostic predictors for resolution of symptoms after CPN decompression for compressive neuropathy. We hypothesized that severity of neuropathy (as measured by compound motor amplitudes and active or chronic denervation on electromyography) would be associated with symptom resolution after CPN decompression.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent CPN decompression and had preoperative electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies at a single institution from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2023. We performed independent samples t-test and logistic regression to evaluate demographic and EDX study factors associated with symptom resolution.

Results

Of the 44 patients identified, 33 reported resolution of preoperative symptoms, with no differences based on EDX findings. The likelihood of symptom resolution was significantly higher in men than women (OR = 10.62; 95% CI = 1.218, 92.677). Patient demographics were otherwise not predictive of symptom resolution.

Conclusion

Three-quarters of our patients reported symptom resolution after CPN decompression for compressive neuropathy. While EDX studies were not predictive of outcomes, our findings suggest that sex-based factors may be contributing to outcomes. This deserves further investigation, as outcomes after surgery may be driven by preoperative characteristics such as surgeon counseling, patient expectations, or other biologic factors.

Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients with and without double crush syndrome (DCS), defined as concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy at C5-T1 on preoperative nerve conduction studies.

METHODS

Patients with preoperative nerve conduction studies who underwent unilateral, isolated CTR were retrospectively identified. All patients completed preoperative and 3-month postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and responded to the anchor question: "Since your treatment, how would you rate your overall function?" (much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, improved, much improved). Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in scores for UE, PI, and QuickDASH were compared, as were the anchor question responses and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients with DCS and 115 patients with CTS only were included. At 3- to 4-month follow-up, absolute and change in UE, PI, and QuickDASH scores were not statistically different between patients with DCS and CTS. Rates of anchor question response and MCID achievement were comparable for patients with CTS only and DCS on each questionnaire. The MCID achievement ranged from 48.4% to 68.8% in the unmatched cohort and 48.4% to 60% in the matched group.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 to 4 months, patients with DCS experience similar patient-reported symptomatic and functional improvement, and achieve MCID of outcome measures at comparable rates to patients with CTS only. For patients with nerve compression at the carpal tunnel and cervical spine, CTR is a reasonable first step prior to proceeding with cervical spine decompression.

[Postoperative outcomes after simultaneous surgery for cervical radiculopathy combined with distal peripheral nerve compression]

To date, the optimal therapeutic and diagnostic strategy in patients with simultaneous clinical manifestations of degenerative cervical spine disease and upper-extremity nerve compression is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of simultaneous surgical interventions in patients with cervical radiculopathy combined with distal peripheral compression-induced ischemic neuropathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied postoperative outcomes in 23 patients with two-level degenerative cervical spine disease with radiculopathy and peripheral nerve compression (cubital canal, Guyon's canal or carpal tunnel syndromes). Two surgical teams performed interventions. Technical features of interventions, postoperative characteristics, clinical parameters (VAS scores of pain, NDI, SF-36 and DASH scores) and complications according to the Dindo-Clavien classification were studied.

RESULTS

Mean surgery time was 104 min, blood loss - 75 ml, length of hospital-stay - 4 days. In long-term period, cervical pain score decreased from 73 (57;88) to 6 (3;11) mm (p=0.006), pain in upper extremities from 85 (74;95) to 3 (2; 5) mm (p=0.001), NDI from 74 (60; 86) to 6 (6;10) (p=0.001) points. Physical component of health increased from 26.12 (19.37; 35.51) to 52.26 (50.68; 56.42) (p=0.007) scores, psychological component - from 32.68 (18.57;40.52) to 54.92 (50.73;56.92) scores (p =0.003). DASH score of upper limb function improved from 74 (62;80) to 8 (6;10) points. There were 3 (13%) minor complications Dindo-Clavien grade I, II and IIIA after cervical spine surgery and 2 (8.7%) events after peripheral nerve repair. Only 1 (4.3%) serious complication (Grade IIIB, IV and V) was identified after cervical spine surgery.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous surgery for cervical radiculopathy combined with peripheral nerve compression is safe and effective for appropriate patients.

Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Double crush (DC) syndrome patients presenting with C6-7 radiculopathy and median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel report greater nerve irritability and weakness postdecompression than isolated peripheral nerve decompression. We hypothesize that patient-reported outcome is inferior following release at both cervical spine and wrist versus a single site of decompression.

METHODS

Patients that underwent either anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for C6-C7 radiculopathy, carpal tunnel release (CTR), or both within 5 years (DC) were identified. A total of 477 patients were analyzed (157 DC, 203 CTR, and 117 ACDF). Post-operative outcome Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected at an average of 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

QuickDASH scores were higher in the DC group versus CTR group (36 vs 22, P < .0002). Postoperative disability in the ACDF group was significantly higher than the DC group (50 vs 36, P < .017). There were no differences between ACDF and DC groups in arm pain intensity, but the CTR group demonstrated significantly greater arm pain intensity than the DC group (5.7 vs 3.6, 10-point scale, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing ACDF and CTR have greater postoperative disability than those undergoing CTR alone, but less postoperative functional disability and pain than ACDF alone, indicating cervical radiculopathy may contribute a greater proportion of long-term disability postoperatively. Additionally, CTR had greater postoperative arm pain than DC patients, potentially indicating high rates of undiagnosed cervical radiculopathy or other sources of arm pain in these patients.

Assessment, patient selection, and rehabilitation of nerve transfers

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and can have a devastating effect on physical, psychological, and socioeconomic wellbeing. Peripheral nerve transfers have become the standard of care for many types of peripheral nerve injury due to their superior outcomes relative to conventional techniques. As the indications for, and use of, nerve transfers expand, the importance of pre-operative assessment and post-operative optimization increases. There are two principal advantages of nerve transfers: (1) their ability to shorten the time to reinnervation of muscles undergoing denervation because of peripheral nerve injury; and (2) their specificity in ensuring proximal motor and sensory axons are directed towards appropriate motor and sensory targets. Compared to conventional nerve grafting, nerve transfers offer opportunities to reinnervate muscles affected by cervical spinal cord injury and to augment natural reinnervation potential for very proximal injuries. This article provides a narrative review of the current scientific knowledge and clinical understanding of nerve transfers including peripheral nerve injury assessment and pre- and post-operative electrodiagnostic testing, adjuvant therapies, and post-operative rehabilitation for optimizing nerve transfer outcomes.

Association of concomitant continuous pain in trigeminal neuralgia with a narrow foramen ovale

Background

The pathogenesis of concomitant continuous pain remains unclear and is worthy of further study. In this clinical study, we aimed to explore the potential role of a narrow foramen ovale in the development of concomitant continuous pain.

Methods

A total of 108 patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia affecting the third branch of the trigeminal nerve and 46 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study. Three-dimensional reconstructed computerized tomography images of all participants were collected, and the morphometric features of the foramen ovale were examined by two investigators who were blinded to the clinical data of the patients.

Results

In this cohort, patients with concomitant continuous pain suffered from more sensory abnormalities (18.4% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.015) and responded more poorly to medication (74.3% vs. 91.9%, p = 0.018) than patients without concomitant continuous pain. While no significant differences regarding the mean length (5.02 mm vs. 5.36 mm, p > 0.05) and area (22.14 mm2 vs. 23.80 mm2, p > 0.05) were observed between patients with and without concomitant continuous pain, the mean width of the foramen ovale on the affected side in patients with concomitant continuous pain was significantly narrower than that in patients without concomitant continuous pain (2.01 mm vs. 2.48 mm, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

This neuroimaging and clinical study demonstrated that the development of concomitant continuous pain was caused by the compression of the trigeminal nerve owing to a narrow foramen ovale rather than responsible vessels in classical trigeminal neuralgia.

Unusual entrapment symptomatology treated in 115 cases by neurolysis of the common fibular nerve at the fibular head combined with neurolysis of the posterior tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel

INTRODUCTION

Entrapment of the common fibular nerve (CFN) at the head of the fibula and entrapment of the posterior tibial nerve (PTN) at the tarsal tunnel are the most common nerve entrapment syndromes in the lower limb. Our aim was to study the results of combined neurolysis of the CFN and PTN for chronic lower limb pain. We hypothesized that combined neurolysis allowed a reduction of this chronic pain.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This bi-centric retrospective study took place from January 2015 to November 2018, with a single senior surgeon. The inclusion criteria were all patients operated on for an idiopathic entrapment syndrome with neurolysis of the PTN at the tarsal tunnel, combined with neurolysis of the CFN at the head of the fibula. The primary endpoint was the pain evolution assessed on a numerical analogue scale (NAS) preoperatively and postoperatively on D+21, and at the last follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to determine the prognostic factors on the clinical outcome of neurolysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen neurolysis were included, comprising 64 women and 38 men with a mean age of 57±17.6 years. The preoperative pain (NAS0) was evaluated at 6±2.4 points. At D+21 postoperatively, there was a significant reduction in pain (NASD+21: 3±2.6 points, p<0.01). Similarly, at the last follow-up (with a mean follow-up of 37±8.4 months), there was a significant reduction in pain (NASLFU: 2±2.5, p<0.01). A history of systemic inflammatory disease was the only factor associated with a less significant decrease in pain at D+21, according to a multivariate analysis (p<0.01). There were 14 complications (12%) not requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to demonstrate the efficacy of combined neurolysis of the CFN at the head of the fibula and the PTN at the tarsal tunnel, in the treatment of idiopathic nerve entrapment syndrome of the lower limb.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Retrospective comparative study.

Characteristics of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with cervical radiculopathy: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a group of signs and symptoms caused by cervical root dysfunction. Patients with this condition may also have carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which is caused by compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. This coexistent condition is referred to as double crush syndrome (DCS) which is explained by proximal disruption in axoplasmic flow that may result in nerve dysfunction. Yet, the accuracy of this hypothesis remains controversial.

Materials and Methods

Patients with confirmed CR according to electromyography were included in this retrospective study. However, we omitted patients with overt diabetic neuropathy, prior spinal or hand surgery and/or fractures, and rheumatoid arthritis. Patients underwent electrodiagnostic studies, and the results were used to determine CTS severity. We used Pearson's χ 2 test to assess the correlation between the severity of CTS and CR. Descriptive analysis was used to report patient characteristics and the prevalence of CTS in CR patients.

Results

We included 291 participants, 59% of whom were women. Although insignificant, DCS was observed more in women (n = 110) compared to men (n = 71). However, we found that patients with DCS (54.81 ± 13.3) were older than non-DCS patients (43.71 ± 12.94) which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was statistically no correlation between the severity of CR and CTS, ipsilaterlly (p > 0.05). In total, CTS was observed in 62.2% (n = 181) patients.

Conclusion

In summary, we found a relatively high prevalence of DCS in the present study. In patients with and without DCS, gender did not seem to play a role but the growing age seemed to contribute to DCS. The severity of CTS was not related to CR severity at any cervical level, which negates a causal relation between the pre-existing CR and newly diagnosed CTS.

Comparison of the Severity of Zoster-Associated Pain and Incidence of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with and without Pre-Existing Spinal Disorders at the Same Spinal Nerve Level: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

The incidences of herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are significantly influenced by age. As individuals age, the occurrence of spinal disorders increases, thereby raising the likelihood of HZ and PHN coexistence. Considering this, our study aimed to explore the potential impact of pre-existing spinal disorders at the nerve level where HZ developed, on the severity of zoster-associated pain (ZAP) and the incidence of PHN. For our investigation, we retrospectively analyzed a total of 237 patients who presented with HZ and ZAP at various sensory levels (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral) with or without pre-existing spinal disorders. The presence or absence of spinal disorders at the sensory level affected by HZ was determined using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Our study results revealed that the group with spinal disorders at the sensory level where HZ developed did not exhibit an increased incidence of PHN. However, 3-6 months after HZ onset, this same group showed significantly higher ZAP scores compared to the group without spinal disorders. It implies a need for heightened pain management, as the coexistence of these conditions can increase pain severity. This study furnishes an initial standpoint to delve into intricate interactions between two diseases.

Surgical Outcomes of Common Peroneal Nerve Entrapment Neuropathy Associated with L5 Radiculopathy

Impingement of the common peroneal nerve, a branch of the L5 nerve root, causes common peroneal nerve entrapment neuropathy (CPNE). Although there are cases of CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy, surgical intervention's effectiveness remains to be elucidated. This retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery in patients with CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy. Twenty-two patients (25 limbs) with surgically treated CPNE between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The limbs were classified into two groups: group R (limbs of CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy) and group O (limbs of CPNE without L5 radiculopathy). The durations from onset to surgery, the nerve conduction studies (NCSs), and postoperative improvement rates for motor weakness, pain, and dysesthesia were compared between the groups. Group R included 15 limbs (13 patients), and group O included 10 limbs (9 patients). There were no significant differences in the duration from onset to surgery or abnormal findings of NCS between the two groups. The postoperative improvement rates were 88% and 100% (p = 0.62) for muscle weakness, 87% and 80% (p = 0.53) for pain, and 71% and 56% (p = 0.37) for dysesthesia in group R and group O, respectively, without significant differences between groups. CPNE associated with L5 radiculopathy is common, and the results of the present study showed that the surgical outcomes in such cases were satisfactory and comparable to those in CPNE without L5 radiculopathy.

Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow Secondary to Intramuscular Lipoma of the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris: A Case Report

CASE

A 62-year-old right-hand-dominant woman presented with 1 year of persistent radiating pain, weakness, and paresthesias in her left forearm and hand. Electromyography findings were significant for ulnar neuropathy distal to the branch innervating the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), without superimposed cervical radiculopathy or other focal entrapment neuropathy. During open ulnar nerve neurolysis, an intramuscular lipoma was encountered within the FCU. Lipoma excision and cubital tunnel release with ulnar nerve transposition were performed with complete relief of neuropraxia.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate full neurologic recovery after intramuscular lipoma excision and cubital tunnel release. Although rare, anomalous anatomy and tissue overgrowth should remain on the differential for patients presenting with atypical neuropraxia.

Multiple Compression Syndromes of the Same Upper Extremity: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Treatment Outcomes of Concomitant Treatment

PURPOSE

Multiple nerve compression syndromes can co-occur. Little is known about this coexistence, especially about risk factors and surgical outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the prevalence of multiple nerve compression syndromes in the same arm in a surgical cohort and determine risk factors. Additionally, the surgical outcomes of concomitant treatment were studied.

METHODS

The prevalence of surgically treated multiple nerve compression syndromes within one year was assessed using a review of patients' electronic records. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and baseline scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were considered as risk factors. To determine the treatment outcomes of simultaneous treatment, patients who underwent concomitant carpal tunnel release (CTR) and cubital tunnel release (CubTR) were selected. The treatment outcomes were Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores at intake and at 3 and 6 months after the surgery, satisfaction 6 months after the surgery, and return to work within the first year.

RESULTS

A total of 7,867 patients underwent at least one nerve decompression between 2011 and 2021. Of these patients, 2.9% underwent multiple decompressions for the same upper extremity within one year. The risk factors for this were severe symptoms, younger age, and smoking. Furthermore, the treatment outcomes of concomitant CTR and CubTR did not differ from those of CubTR alone. The median time to return to work after concomitant treatment was 6 weeks. Patients who underwent CTR or CubTR alone returned to work after 4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 3% of the patients who underwent surgical treatment for nerve compression syndrome underwent decompression for another nerve within 1 year. Patients who report severe symptoms at intake, are younger, or smoke are at a greater risk. Patients with carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome may benefit from simultaneous decompression. The time to return to work may be less than if they underwent decompressions in separate procedures, whereas their surgical outcomes are comparable with those of CubTR alone.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Salvage total hip arthroplasty after failed internal fixation for proximal femur and acetabular fractures

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the treatment of choice for posttraumatic arthritis with failed internal fixation for hip fractures. However, the postoperative prognosis is not clear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The primary aim of the study is to report the postoperative outcome, prognosis, and complication rates of total hip arthroplasty in posttraumatic hip arthritis after failed internal fixation of fractures around the hip. The secondary aim of the study is to report results among different fracture types around the hip.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled salvage THA patients after failed internal fixation of fractures around the hip and matched control patients undergoing primary THA for hip osteoarthritis. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare the postoperative outcomes, prognosis, and complication rates of salvage THA in posttraumatic hip arthritis after failed internal fixation of different fracture types around the hip.

RESULTS

A total of 315 THAs (105 salvage THAs and 210 primary THAs) were analyzed. Patients with salvage THA had a longer operative time, lower postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, more Hb drop (2.2 ± 1.4 vs. 1.7 ± 1.2 gm/dl, p = 0.002), and delayed ambulation. The salvage THA group also had a higher dislocation rate within 2 months after salvage THA (9.5% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.002), reoperation rate (10.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.019, including debridement, open and closed reduction under sedation, revision surgery, surgical fixation for periprosthetic fractures), and revision rate (5.7% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.003) than patients undergoing primary THA. Patients who had failed fixation for acetabular fractures were younger and tended to recover well. Patients with previous intertrochanteric fracture had the longest operative time, more hip pain (83.8%, p = 0.022) and more complications.

CONCLUSION

Salvage THA in posttraumatic hip arthritis after failed internal fixation required a longer operative time and led to more blood loss and postoperative complications. The dislocation, reoperation, and revision rates after salvage THA were higher than those after primary THA. Patients with salvage THA after failed internal fixation for intertrochanteric fractures were the most susceptible to more complications compared to those with femoral neck fracture or acetabular fracture. Level of Evidence level III.

Electrodiagnostic Studies in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

The diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy can generally be made with a thorough history, physical examination, and spinal imaging. Electrodiagnostic studies, consisting of nerve conduction studies and electromyography, are a useful adjunct when the clinical picture is inconsistent or there is concern for overlapping pathology. Electrodiagnostic studies may be particularly helpful in identifying cases of myeloradiculopathy, when there is combined nerve root and spinal cord injury, both with regards to prognosis and guiding surgical treatment. Electrodiagnostic studies are a useful adjunct for the spine surgeon and should be used when there are features atypical for degenerative cervical myelopathy or when there is suspicion for a concomitant disease process.

Neuropathic upper extremity pain: A double-crush scenario

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic upper extremity pain has many causes. Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive peripheral neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. Entrapment, or compression, of the ulnar nerve at the elbow classically presents with elbow pain, numbness in the ulnar nerve distribution, and weakness in the hand. C8 radiculopathy and various brachial plexopathies can mimic cubital and carpal tunnel syndromes. Neoplastic brachial plexopathy typically is caused by local extension of a primary or metastatic tumor into the brachial plexus. Double-crush syndrome further complicates neuropathic upper extremity pain. This case report describes a patient with a double-crush lesion involving the ulnar nerve at the elbow and a metastatic mass involving the lower trunk of the brachial plexus. Because of overlapping symptoms and presentations of several upper extremity nerve conditions, clinicians must perform a thorough history and physical examination and understand the sensory and motor innervation of the upper extremity to arrive at a timely and accurate diagnosis.

Outcomes in surgical treatment for tandem spinal stenosis: systematic literature review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to a narrowing of the spinal canal in distinct, noncontiguous regions. TSS most commonly occurs in the cervical and lumbar regions. Decompressive surgery is indicated for those with cervical myelopathy or persistent symptoms from lumbar stenosis despite conservative management. Surgical management typically involves staged procedures, with cervical decompression taking precedence in most cases, followed by lumbar decompression at a later time. However, several studies have shown favorable outcomes in simultaneous decompression.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to provide a literature review and compare surgical outcomes in patients undergoing staged vs simultaneous surgery for TSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines to identify original research articles for tandem spinal stenosis. PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for electronic literature search. Original articles from 2005 to 2021 with more than eight adult patients treated surgically for cervical and lumbar TSS in staged or simultaneous procedures were included. Articles including pediatric patients, primarily thoracic stenosis, stenosis secondary to neoplasm or infectious disease, minimally invasive surgery, and non-English language were excluded. Demographic, perioperative, complications, functional outcome, and neurologic outcome data including mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association), Nurick grade (NG), and ODI (Oswestry disability index), were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 667 articles were initially identified. After preliminary screening, 21 articles underwent full-text screening. Ten articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 831 patients were included, 571 (68%) of them underwent staged procedures, and 260 (32%) underwent simultaneous procedures for TSS. Mean follow-ups ranged from 12 to 85 months. There was no difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) between staged and simultaneous groups (p=.639). Simultaneous surgeries had shorter surgical time than staged surgeries (p<.001). Mean changes in mJOA, NG, and ODI was comparable between staged and simultaneous groups. Complications were similar between the groups. There were more major complications reported in simultaneous operations, although this was not statistically significant (p=.301).

CONCLUSION

Staged and simultaneous surgery for TSS have comparable perioperative, functional, and neurologic outcomes, as well as complication rates. Careful selection of candidates for simultaneous surgery may reduce the length of stay and consolidate rehabilitation, thereby reducing hospital-associated costs.

How to Differentiate Pronator Syndrome from Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comprehensive Clinical Comparison

The diagnostic process that allows pronator syndrome to be differentiated reliably from carpal tunnel syndrome remains a challenge for clinicians, as evidenced by the most common cause of pronator syndrome misdiagnosis: carpal tunnel syndrome. Pronator syndrome can be caused by compression of the median nerve as it passes through the anatomical structures of the forearm, while carpal tunnel syndrome refers to one particular topographic area within which compression occurs, the carpal tunnel. The present narrative review is a complex clinical comparison of the two syndromes with their anatomical backgrounds involving topographical relationships, morphology, clinical picture, differential diagnosis, and therapeutic options. It discusses the most frequently used diagnostic techniques and their correct interpretations. Its main goal is to provide an up-to-date picture of the current understanding of the disease processes and their etiologies, to establish an appropriate diagnosis, and introduce relevant treatment benefiting the patient.

Diffuse Spinal Hyperostosis Causing Severe Spinal Stenosis and Thoracic Myelopathy

Introduction

Spinal stenosis has a wide range of causes including disc herniation, facet hypertrophy, degenerative spondylosis, facet cyst, ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We present three cases of diffuse spinal hyperostosis causing severe spinal stenosis and myelopathy, which demonstrate a unique association between obesity and a novel syndrome of hyperostosis.

Case Presentation

This report describes 3 morbidly obese patients with diffuse spinal hyperostosis causing critical thoracic stenosis. Their presenting complaints focus on lower extremity weakness and the CT/MRI imaging is striking for diffuse hyper-ossification at thoracic levels. Two patients were subsequently managed with spinal decompression, and one patient was managed non-operatively.

Discussion

Metabolic changes associated with obesity may result in diffuse hyperostosis with ligament ossification and spinal stenosis. Pre-operative imaging is essential to identify the degree of ossification and potential dural involvement as this may complicate management.

Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as the concomitant occurrence of stenosis in at least two or more distinct regions (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar) of the spine and may present with a constellation of signs and symptoms. It has four subtypes, including cervico-lumbar, cervico-thoracic, thoraco-lumbar, and cervico-thoraco-lumbar TSS. The prevalence of TSS varies depending on the different subtypes and cohorts.

The main aetiologies of TSS are spinal degenerative changes and heterotopic ossification, and patients with developmental spinal stenosis, ligament ossification, and spinal stenosis at any region are at an increased risk of developing TSS.

The diagnosis of TSS is challenging. The clinical presentation of TSS could be complex, concealed, or severe, and these features may be confusing to clinicians, resulting in an incomplete or delayed diagnosis. Additionally, a consolidated diagnostic criterion for TSS is urgently required to improve consistency across studies and form a basis for establishing treatment guidelines.

The optimal treatment option for TSS is still under debate; areas of controversies include choice of the decompression range, choice between simultaneous or staged surgical patterns, and the order of the surgeries.

The present study reviews publications on TSS, consolidates current awareness on prevalence, aetiologies, potential risk factors, diagnostic dilemmas and criteria, and surgical strategies based on TSS subtypes. This is the first review to include thoracic spinal stenosis as a candidate disorder in TSS and aims at providing the readers with a comprehensive overview of TSS.

10 Hypotheses in Hand Surgery

I have put together 10 topics and labeled them as hypotheses, which outline my preferred practices. The topics relate to questionable nerve compression, double crush syndrome of nerves, motion therapy after surgery, delayed primary tendon repair, proximal pole fracture of the scaphoid, short splint, and indications for postoperative hand elevation. I found no proof whether my preferred methods are better than or inferior to alternative methods that others use. The 10 hypotheses are presented to stimulate thinking, clinical observation, or investigations and highlight several areas of research. Investigation into these hypotheses may avoid unnecessary treatment or improve postsurgical comfort for patients and long-term outcomes of treatment.

Role of electromyography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of double crush lumbar radiculopathy and common fibular injury: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Double crush syndrome consists of two compression sites along a peripheral nerve and is rare in the lower extremities. Electrodiagnostic and ultrasound (US) studies may be helpful in evaluating foot drop involving overlapping pathologies.

OBSERVATIONS

Case 1 involved a man who presented with left dorsiflexor weakness and left foot numbness. Electromyography (EMG) revealed a left common fibular nerve entrapment neuropathy and left L5 radiculopathy. US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large cystic lesion of the left common fibular nerve treated by cyst removal. The left foot drop persisted postoperatively. Lumbar computed tomography myelography revealed severe left foraminal stenosis at L5–S1. Multilevel lumbar laminectomies and facetectomies with an L5–S1 fusion were performed. Within 1 month postoperatively, the left foot drop had improved. Case 2 involved a man who developed a right foot drop caused by right lumbar foraminal stenosis at L4–5 and L5–S1. EMG and US of the right common fibular neuropathy showed large fascicles involving the right common fibular nerve. MRI revealed a hyperintense signal of the right common fibular nerve. Spontaneous improvement occurred within 6 months without surgery.

LESSONS

Spine surgeons should recognize double crush in the lower extremities. EMG and US are valuable in detecting peripheral nerve abnormalities, especially in cases with overlapping lumbar pathology.

Double Crush Syndrome of the Lower Limb in L5 Radiculopathy and Peroneal Neuropathy: A Case Report

Double crush syndrome (DCS) is a clinical condition involving impingement of the spinal and peripheral nerves. DCS of the lower limbs has been recognized; however, no detailed reports have been published. Herein, we report a rare case of the coexistence of L5 radiculopathy and peroneal nerve entrapment neuropathy. The patient suffered from pain in the left lower leg and left foot combined with muscle weakness in the left leg without a Tinel-like sign in the peroneal tunnel area. MRI showed a deficit in the left L5 nerve root sleeve, and X-ray imaging revealed L5 spondylolysis. Lumbar fusion surgery was performed at L5-S1. Subsequently, the patient’s symptoms were partially improved, but the pain and toe and ankle motor weakness persisted. In addition, a Tinel-like sign appeared at the entrapment point of the peroneal nerve. The entrapped peroneal nerve was decompressed, and the patient’s symptoms improved. The patient had L5 radiculopathy owing to the improvement in his symptoms in the upper leg before and after lumbar surgery. It is unclear why no Tinel-like sign was detected before the first surgery, but we hypothesized that L5 nerve disorder may mask the symptoms triggered by compression of the peroneal nerve due to the complex pathology of DCS and dynamic factors. Distinguishing between radiculopathy and relative peripheral neuropathy should always be a consideration. DCS may mask characteristic symptoms, and it is important to carefully follow up the patient to detect changes in his or her condition.

Outcome of Surgical Treated Isolated Pronator Teres Syndromes-A Retrospective Cohort Study and Complete Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

This study aims to elucidate the occurrence of postoperative carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the functional outcome of patients with primary pronator teres syndrome (PTS), and review complete literature regarding this topic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted in patients with PTS at a single center. In all patients, a numeric Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Pinch-Test, Jamar hand dynamometer test (JAMAR), and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were analyzed preoperatively and at final follow-up to assess outcome. Additionally, a complete review of the literature was performed, including all data dealing with pronator teres syndrome.

RESULTS

Ten female and two male patients were included with a mean age of 49 years. Significant improvement in DASH and numeric VAS was detected at latest postoperative follow-up. In three patients, clinical signs of CTS pathology were detected during the follow-up period. One patient needed to be treated surgically, and in the other two patients, a conservative management was possible. In one patient (8%), a PTS recurrence was detected. All patients presented satisfied at latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In one-fourth of our patients, a CTS occurred during the follow-up period. Therefore, focusing on double-crush syndrome in unclear or mixed symptoms is necessary to avoid multiple operations. Furthermore, it seems that assessment with NCV is not enough for diagnosing PTS; therefore, further research is needed to clarify this problem.

Double Crush Syndrome of the Upper Extremity

»

The double crush hypothesis originally proposed that compression of a peripheral nerve at a proximal site increases its susceptibility to additional distal lesions.

»

The etiology of double crush syndrome is likely multifactorial as mechanical, systemic, pharmacologic, or environmental factors may increase a patient's susceptibility to this syndrome.

»

To date, there remains no standardized definition of double crush syndrome, and there is no consensus on its exact pathophysiology or diagnostic criteria.

»

Patients with double crush syndrome should be counseled that surgical repair may produce inferior outcomes compared with those who are treated for isolated entrapment neuropathies.

Possible points of compression of the ulnar nerve: Tricks and traps that await clinicians from an anatomical point of view

The ulnar nerve can be subject to numerous types of compression. The most common are cubital tunnel and ulnar tunnel syndromes, but there are many others with more uncommon etiologies. The existence of additional communicating branches, median nerve involvement, various types of injuries, and unusual anatomical variations can be a challenge for both diagnosis and treatment. This review presents a comprehensive depiction of ulnar nerve entrapment syndromes with particular reference to their anatomical background, risk factors, and clinical evaluation. Even common disorders can result from atypical morphological changes. It is important to be familiar with them as it is a key ability in daily medical practice.

Interpretation of Electrodiagnostic Studies: How to Apply It to the Practice of Orthopaedic Surgery

Electrodiagnostic studies may help orthopaedic surgeons to identify and confirm nerve pathology, determine severity of disease, localize the lesion, identify concomitant or alternative pathology, and prognosticate potential outcomes with nonoperative or operative treatment. Surgeons should recognize the indications for electrodiagnostic studies, principles of their performance, and how to assess the primary data generated by the examination and how it can inform their treatment plans.

Hidden coexisting pathology diagnosed after cervical surgery in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy: A case series report

Many neurological disorders can present similar symptomatology to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) or myeloradiculopathy (DCMR). Therefore, to avoid misdiagnosis, it is important to recognise the differential diagnosis, which has been well described in previous literature. Additionally, DCM or DCMR can also coexist with other diseases that overlap some of its clinical manifestations, which may be overlooked before cervical surgery. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed this clinical situation. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of coexisting disease with DCM or DCMR would be typically made when some symptoms persist without improvement after cervical surgery. To inform the patients of this possibility preoperatively and arrive at the early diagnosis during the postoperative period, some knowledge of the possible coexisting diseases would be necessary. In this report, we reviewed 230 patients who underwent surgery for DCM or DCMR in an academic centre to examine the prevalence and kind of underlying disease that was overlooked preoperatively. The coexisting diseases relevant to their baseline symptoms were diagnosed only after cervical surgery in three patients (1.3%) and included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lung cancer and polymyalgia rheumatica. The overlapping symptoms were gait difficulty, scapular pain and neck pain, respectively. Surgeons should recognise that the coexisting disease with DCM or DCMR may be overlooked before cervical surgery because of overlapping symptomatology, although its prevalence is not certainly high. Further, when the specific symptom persisted without improvement after surgery for DCM or DCMR, the patient should be comprehensively examined, considering diverse pathological conditions, not only neurological disorders.

Does Compression Sensory Axonopathy in the Proximal Tibia Contribute to Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in a Causative Way?-A New Theory for the Injury Mechanism

Anterior cruciate ligament injury occurs when the ligament fibers are stretched, partially torn, or completely torn. The authors propose a new injury mechanism for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee. Accordingly, non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury could not happen without the acute compression microinjury of the entrapped peripheral proprioceptive sensory axons of the proximal tibia. This would occur under an acute stress response when concomitant microcracks-fractures in the proximal tibia evolve due to the same excessive and repetitive compression forces. The primary damage may occur during eccentric contractions of the acceleration and deceleration moments of strenuous or unaccustomed fatiguing exercise bouts. This primary damage is suggested to be an acute compression/crush axonopathy of the proprioceptive sensory neurons in the proximal tibia. As a result, impaired proprioception could lead to injury of the anterior cruciate ligament as a secondary damage, which is suggested to occur during the deceleration phase. Elevated prostaglandin E2, nitric oxide and glutamate may have a critical neuro-modulatory role in the damage signaling in this dichotomous neuronal injury hypothesis that could lead to mechano-energetic failure, lesion and a cascade of inflammatory events. The presynaptic modulation of the primary sensory axons by the fatigued and microdamaged proprioceptive sensory fibers in the proximal tibia induces the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, through a process that could have long term relevance due to its contribution to synaptic plasticity. Luteinizing hormone, through interleukin-1β, stimulates the nerve growth factor-tropomyosin receptor kinase A axis in the ovarian cells and promotes tropomyosin receptor kinase A and nerve growth factor gene expression and prostaglandin E2 release. This luteinizing hormone induced mechanism could further elevate prostaglandin E2 in excess of the levels generated by osteocytes, due to mechanical stress during strenuous athletic moments in the pre-ovulatory phase. This may explain why non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury is at least three-times more prevalent among female athletes.

The characteristics, disabilities, and spinal alignment of women with double crush syndrome: a case-control study

AIMS

Double crush syndrome is a clinical condition composed of neurological dysfunction due to compressive pathology at multiple sites along a single peripheral nerve. The aims were to investigate the characteristics and disabilities of women with double crush syndrome, to compare the spinal alignment to healthy women, and to determine the cut-offs for the spinal alignment characteristics.

METHODS

Twenty women with double crush syndrome (age: 49.50 ± 8.64 years) and 21 asymptomatic healthy controls (age: 44.76 ± 7.82 years) were included in the study. The physical characteristics, pain intensity, and symptoms were questioned. Disability with Disability of Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index and spinal alignment with Spinal Mouse^® (Idiag, Fehraltorf, Switzerland) were assessed.

RESULTS

The pain intensity at rest, night, and during activity was 3.70 ± 3.25, 6.01 ± 2.77, and 7.15 ± 2.68 cm, respectively. The most bothersome symptom was numbness (65%). The symptoms were seen in hands and/or fingers (55%), arms (15%), shoulder blade (15%), and neck (15%). The Disability of Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index scores were 58.64 ± 15.41 and 19.55 ± 6.37, respectively. The sagittal thoracic curvature (p: .011) and lumbar curvature (p: .049) increased, and the overall spine mobility (p<.001) decreased in the double crush syndrome patients. The cut-off points were detected as 54.5° (area under the curve: 0.680, p: .049, 40% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity) for the thoracic spinal curvature, and 113.5° (area under the curve: 0.667, p<.000, 65% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity) for the overall spine mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

The double crush syndrome patients had moderate to severe pain and disability, increased thoracic and lumbar curvature, and decreased spine mobility. The cut-off values were found as 54.5° for thoracic curvature and 113.5° for spine mobility.

The Novel Technique of Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Contralateral Approach for Coexisting L5-S1 Lateral Recess, Foraminal, and Extraforaminal Stenosis and Its Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Multifocal intra-and-extraspinal lumbar stenotic lesions could be decompressed with one endoscopic surgical approach, which has the advantages of functional structure preservation, technical efficacy, and safety.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 48 patients who underwent uniportal endoscopic contralateral approach due to coexisting lateral recess, foraminal, and extraforaminal stenosis at the L5-S1 level. Foraminal stenosis grade and postoperative dysesthesia (POD) were analyzed. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and MacNab criteria for evaluating pain disability and response were analyzed.

RESULTS

The foraminal stenosis grade of the treated spinal levels was grade 1 (n = 16, 33%), grade 2 (n = 20, 42%), and grade 3 (n = 12, 25%). The rate of occurrence of POD grade 2 and above, which may be related to intraoperative dorsal root ganglion (DRG) retraction injury, was revealed to be 4.2% (two with grade 2, none with grade 3). The patients showed favorable clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Uniportal endoscopic interlaminar contralateral approach is an effective procedure to resolve combined stenosis (lateral recess, foraminal, and extraforaminal region) with one surgical approach at the L5-S1 level. It may be a minimal DRG retracting and facet joint preserving procedure in foraminal and extraforaminal decompression.

Clinical, Radiological, and Electrodiagnostic Diagnosis of Pronator Syndrome Concurrent With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective observational study that assessed the prevalence of positive diagnostic imaging and electrodiagnostic (EDX) findings in patients diagnosed with pronator syndrome (PS), who previously had a carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) surgery. The other purpose of our study was to determine how often PS occurred and was missed in patients treated surgically for CTS.

METHODS

The files of 180 patients who underwent CTS surgery were reviewed retrospectively. We assessed all patients for a diagnosis of PS. We accepted the clinical findings and patient history as the reference standard for the diagnosis of PS. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow, bilateral upper limb magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, and bilateral dynamic forearm ultrasound (US) were performed on patients with clinical symptoms and physical examinations that indicated PS. Bilateral upper limb EDX was also performed for these patients. One patient refused additional tests.

RESULTS

A total of 174 extremities in 146 patients were included in the study. Pronator syndrome was diagnosed by 2 hand surgeons in 22 extremities (19 patients) through a clinical evaluation that included a history and physical examination. Diagnostic testing was positive for findings of PS in 24% of extremities (5 of 21) tested by EDX, in 57% of extremities (12 of 21) tested by US, and 5% of extremities (1 of 21) tested by MRI. There was no lower humeral spur that could cause median nerve compression on any plain radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

With clinical evaluation as the reference standard, EDX, US, and MRI are not helpful in making a diagnosis of PS concurrent with CTS.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic IV.

Double crush syndrome: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment results

BACKGROUND

Double Crush Syndrome (DCS) is a clinical condition that involves multiple compression sites along a single peripheral nerve. The present study aims to describe the epidemiology of DCS and surgical results.

METHODS

A retrospective observational analytic study included patients with clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy and carpal tunnel syndrome who underwent surgery between January 2009 and January 2019. General demographic characteristics were noted, and 3 groups were distinguished: spinal surgery, carpal tunnel release, and bimodal decompression (BD); statistical differences were analyzed between them.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 32 patients. DCS prevalence was 10.29%. Mean age at presentation was 59.25±10.98 years. There was female predominance (75%). Paresthesia was the main symptom (65.6%). Post-surgical results of BD showed significant improvement in sensory nerve conduction velocity, motor nerve conduction velocity (both P=0.008), and disability on Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions, Neck Disability Index, and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (P=0.001, 0.004, 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis and management of DCS are a challenge. It is necessary to determine the site with maximal compression and risk of complications to decide on treatment. If first-line surgery is adequate, proximal and distal symptomatology can be improved. To maximize success, we recommend BD, according to the present results.

Possible Double Crush Syndrome Caused by Iatrogenic Acquired Lumbosacral Epidermoid Tumor and Concomitant Sacral Tarlov Cyst

We describe a rare case of 42-year-old female who had possible double crush syndrome caused by iatrogenic spinal epidermoid tumor (ET) associated with lumbar puncture as well as concomitant sacral Tarlov cyst in close proximity. She presented with progressive left-sided perianal pain. She had a history of a Caesarean section with lumbar spinal anesthesia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a relatively small intradural extramedullary solid lesion at L5/S1 level and cystic lesion at S2 level. We considered there were two different lesions, such as a tumor and Tarlov cyst; however, we could not rule out the possibility of a single lesion with two different components. Furthermore, there was a distinct compression at more than one locations along the course of the left S2 nerve root and we suspected possible double crush syndrome. We conducted tumor removal and the lesion turned out to be two different pathologies, such as an ET and Tarlov cyst. Both lesions were intraopertively pinching the left S2 nerve root at different sites as expected. The tumor was successfully removed and the cyst wall was imbricated and sutured. We need to take the possibility of ET into consideration if the patient underwent invasive spinal procedure previously. We also have to pay attention to the possibility of double crush syndrome if the nerve root possibly holding the responsibility for symptoms is compressed at two or more sites. This is the first report of possible double crush syndrome caused by acquired spinal tumor and congenital Tarlov cyst.

Chiropractic Management of a Patient With Radial Nerve Entrapment Symptoms: A Case Study

Objective

This report describes the case of a patient with chronic radial nerve entrapment symptoms managed with chiropractic care. We propose a complementary functional neurologic assessment of muscle function in different positions that could reveal muscle dysfunctions absent with standard test position.

Clinical Features

A 45-year-old man presented to a private chiropractic clinic with a throbbing pain 5 cm above the right lateral elbow epicondyle radiating onto the back of the lower arm and increasing after using a mouse when working on a computer. A Mill test and a Cozen test created pain near the lateral epicondylitis. The use of complementary functional neurologic assessment for radial nerve entrapment showed changes in manual muscle testing after tests were done in different positions to increase the compression on the nerve.

Intervention and Outcome

Chiropractic management was performed, including myofascial therapy, spinal and proximal radioulnar joint adjustments, neural mobilization, and the use of a splint. After 7 days (2 treatments), the patient showed no elbow pain even if he worked on his computer using a mouse. After a 2-year follow-up, no recurrence was reported.

Conclusion

In this case of radial nerve entrapment symptoms, the patient benefited from chiropractic management using standard chiropractic, applied kinesiology, and neural mobilization techniques. The complementary functional neurologic assessment of radial nerve entrapment proposed revealed muscles dysfunctions absent with the standard test position. These changes in manual muscle testing were useful to determine the possible sites of entrapment in order to direct the therapeutic efforts to these locations.

Shoulder Double Crush Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of Patients With Concomitant Suprascapular Neuropathy and Cervical Radiculopathy

Purpose

While the double crush phenomena (compression along two points on a nerve) has been established between median neuropathy and cervical radiculopathy, combined suprascapular neuropathy (SSN) and cervical C5/C6 radiculopathy-so-called shoulder double crush syndrome-has not been well examined. We aim to identify the incidence of shoulder double crush syndrome in patients undergoing arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release for SSN.

Methods

One hundred consecutive patients >18 years of age who were positive for SSN on electromyography and motor nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS) and underwent a suprascapular nerve release were included. Patients with evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome were identified based on x ray, cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and examination findings. Demographics, electrodiagnostics results, treatment courses, and clinical outcomes (visual analog scores and rotator cuff strength) following arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release were compared between patients with double crush syndrome versus isolated SSN.

Results

Thirty one percent of patients had evidence of shoulder crush syndrome. Two significant electrophysiologic differences were noted in shoulder double crush patients compared to isolated SSN patients. Patients with double crush had an increased incidence of median neuropathy (51% vs 30%, P = .04). Double crush patients had less supraspinatus motor amplitude difference between the affected side and non-affected side compared to isolated SSN patients (2.62 mV vs 3.44 mV, P = .03). In general, most double crush patients were treated conservatively with regard to their cervical spine pathology.

Conclusion

A significant percentage of patients with SSN have evidence of shoulder double crush syndrome. Patients with SSN and concomitant median neuropathy should have a detailed neck examination performed.

Electrodiagnostic Studies and Ultrasound Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve in Patients With Isolated Cervical Radiculopathy

Purpose

Although the literature has shown that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the carpal tunnel on ultrasound is enlarged in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, it does not provide information regarding whether proximal nerve pathology, such as that seen in cervical radiculopathy, increases the CSA of the median nerve.

Methods

In this study, 15 patients were enrolled who had a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy but not carpal tunnel syndrome. All patients underwent electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurement of the CSA of the median nerve.

Results

Increased median nerve CSA was seen in 1 of 15 patients (7%). Positive findings of cervical radiculopathy were found in 7 patients (47%) by electrodiagnostic studies.

Conclusions

In patients clinically diagnosed with isolated cervical radiculopathy, the vast majority have normal median nerve CSA measured on ultrasound.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic IV.

How I do it? Uniportal full endoscopic contralateral approach for lumbar foraminal stenosis with double crush syndrome

Background

Evolution of endoscopic surgery provides equivalent results to open surgery with advantages of minimal invasive surgery. The literature on technique Uniportal Full endoscopic contralateral approach is scarce.

Methods

The endoscopic contralateral approach technique applies for patients presenting with double crush syndrome with foraminal and extraforminal stenosis. The key steps focus on contralateral ventral overriding superior articular process decompression, foraminal and extraforaminal discectomy, and lateral vertebral syndesmophyte decompression leading to enlargement of the contralateral foramen and extraforamen size.

Conclusion

The Uniportal Full endoscopic contralateral approach is a good alternative to open surgery or minimally invasive microscopic surgery through direct endoscopic visualization of the entire route of exiting nerve with no neural retraction allowing both lateral recess and foraminal and extraforaminal decompression all in one approach.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04157-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.