Perioperative Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

The declining incidence of cervical spine surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-surgeon series and literature review

OBJECTIVE

With an increasing number of disease-modifying drugs available to manage rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spine surgeons have anecdotally noted decreased rates of cervical spine surgical procedures in this population. Although these medications have been shown to mitigate RA progression and its systemic effects on joint destruction, there are currently no large-scale studies of RA patients that suggest the use of these disease-modifying drugs has truly coincided with a decline in cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

Patients with RA who underwent cervical spinal fusion from 1998 to 2021 performed by the senior author were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was stratified into 3 categories based on procedure level: 1) occipitocervical, 2) atlantoaxial, and 3) subaxial. The number of surgical procedures per year in each subgroup was evaluated to determine treatment trends over time. National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) data on both RA and non-RA patients who underwent cervical fusion were analyzed to assess for surgical trends over time and for differences in likelihood of surgical intervention between RA and non-RA patients over the epoch.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2021, the number of overall cervical fusions performed in RA patients significantly declined (-0.13 procedures/year, p = 0.01) in this cohort, despite an overall significant increase in cervical fusions in non-RA patients over the same period. NIS analysis of cervical fusions across all patients similarly demonstrated a significant increase in cervical fusions over the same epoch (19,278 cases/year, p < 0.0001). When normalized for changes in population size, the incidence of new surgical procedures was lower in patients with RA regardless of surgical technique. Anterior cervical fusion was the most common approach used over the epoch in both RA and non-RA patients; correspondingly, RA patients were significantly less likely to undergo anterior cervical fusion (OR 0.655, 95% CI -0.4504 to -0.3972, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

At the authors' institution, there was a clear decline in the number of cervical fusions performed to treat the 3 most common forms of cervical spine pathology in RA patients (basilar impression, atlantoaxial instability, and subaxial cervical deformity). Although national trends suggest an increase in total cervical fusions in both RA and non-RA patients, the incidence of new procedures in patients with RA was significantly lower than in patients without RA, which supports the anecdotal results of spine surgeons nationally.

The Influence of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Higher Reoperation Rates over Time Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion-A Nationwide Cohort Study

This study aimed to compare the rates of reoperation over time following first lumbar fusion in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and non-RA patients. This study was conducted using Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) data. We identified the RA group as 2239 patients who underwent their first lumbar fusion with RA and the control group as 11,195 patients without RA. This reflects a ratio of 1:5, and the participants were matched by sex, age, and index surgery date. The index dates were between 2012 and 2013. When comparing the rate of patients undergoing reoperation, the adjusted HR was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.10−1.6) in the RA group (p = 0.002). In terms of the three time intervals, the values in the time frames of <3 months and 3 months−1 year were not statistically significant. However, at 1 year post-surgery, there was a higher risk of reoperation in the RA group, as demonstrated by the Kaplan−Meier cumulative event analysis. This higher risk of reoperation continued to increase throughout 5 years of follow-up, after which it was stable until the last follow-up at 7 years. This population-based cohort study showed that the RA patients had a 1.31 times higher risk of reoperation following lumbar fusion than did the controls. This difference was more pronounced at 1 year post-surgery.

Surgical Management of the Lumbar Spine in Rheumatoid Arthritis

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview on the diagnosis and surgical management of rheumatoid involvement of the lumbar spine. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of synovial joints, most commonly appendicular followed by axial. Although cervical spine involvement of RA is well documented, data on lumbar spine involvement and surgical management remains limited.

METHODS

Using PubMed, studies published prior to November 2018 with the keywords "RA, etiology"; "RA, spine management"; "RA, surgical management"; "RA, treatment"; "RA, DMARDs"; "RA, lumbar spine"; "RA, spine surgical outcomes"; "RA, imaging" were evaluated.

RESULTS

The narrative review addresses the epidemiology, manifestations, imaging, surgical complications, and operative and nonoperative management of RA involvement of the lumbar spine.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheumatoid involvement of the lumbar spine can present with lower back pain, neurogenic claudication, radiculopathy, spinal deformity, and instability. Patients with RA have significantly higher rates of vertebral fractures and complications following surgical intervention. However, in the setting of instability and spinal deformity, thoughtful surgical planning in conjunction with optimal medical management is recommended.

The Management of Perioperative Immunosuppressant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis During Elective Hand Surgery

PURPOSE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a destructive inflammatory disease that commonly involves joints of the hand and wrist. Different recommendations exist for continuing or discontinuing immunosuppressant medications during the perioperative time period. The purpose of our study was to determine whether continuing or discontinuing medications (steroids, nonbiological, and/or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs]) were associated with an increased or decreased risk of postoperative complications.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of a cohort of RA patients who had elective hand surgery by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they had a documented diagnosis of seropositive RA by a rheumatologist and had elective hand surgery and/or a disease-related surgical procedure involving the upper extremity between January 2008 and August 2018. We stratified patients into different groups for comparison by classes of immunosuppressant medications for managing RA. These classes included corticosteroids, nonbiological DMARDs, biological DMARDs, and/or no medications. Immunosuppressant medications were then compared with no medications for the incidence of postoperative overall complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients had elective hand and/or upper extremity surgeries for RA. Mean patient age at the time of surgery (± SD) was 55 ± 13 years (range, 24-74 years). Of these 88 patients, 8 (9%) overall complications occurred. Complications were wound healing failures (n = 5), tendon rupture (n = 1), hematoma (n = 1), and surgical-site infection (n = 1). Perioperative medications included steroids (n = 31), nonbiological DMARDs (n = 68), biological DMARDs (n = 5), and no medication (n = 27). There were no significant differences in overall complications between patients on immunosuppressant medications and those on no medications. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 11.5 months (5-25.8) (range, 2-74 months).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients who continued or discontinued medications within 1 dosing interval of their usual dose perioperatively had similar rates of complications following elective hand surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Perioperative outcomes associated with thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomies for adult spinal deformity patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Spinal deformity causing spinal imbalance is directly correlated to pain and disability. Prior studies suggest adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have more complex deformities and are at higher risk for complications. In this study the authors compared outcomes of ASD patients with RA following thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomies to outcomes of a matched control cohort.

METHODS

All patients with RA who underwent 3-column osteotomy for thoracolumbar deformity correction performed by the senior author from 2006 to 2016 were identified retrospectively. A cohort of patients without RA who underwent 3-column osteotomies for deformity correction was matched based on multiple clinical factors. Data regarding demographics and surgical approach, along with endpoints including perioperative outcomes, reoperations, and incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) were reviewed. Univariate analyses were used to compare patients with RA to matched controls.

RESULTS

Eighteen ASD patients with RA were identified, and a matched cohort of 217 patients was generated. With regard to patients with RA, 11.1% were male and the mean age was 68.1 years. Vertebral column resection (VCR) was performed in 22.2% and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in 77.8% of patients. Mean case length was 324.4 minutes and estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2053.6 ml. Complications were observed in 38.9% of patients with RA and 29.0% of patients without RA (p = 0.380), with a trend toward increased medical complications (38.9% vs 21.2%, p = 0.084). Patients with RA had a significantly higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE) (11.1% vs 1.8%, p = 0.017) and wound infections (16.7% vs 5.1%, p = 0.046). PJK occurred in 16.7% of patients with RA, and 33.3% of RA patients underwent reoperation. Incidence rates of PJK and reoperation in matched controls were 12.9% and 25.3%, respectively (p = 0.373, p = 0.458). At follow-up, mean sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was 6.1 cm in patients with RA and 4.5 cm in matched controls (p = 0.206).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that RA patients experience a higher incidence of medical complications, specifically DVT/PE. Preoperative lower-extremity ultrasounds, inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, and/or early initiation of DVT prophylaxis in RA patients may be indicated. Perioperative complications, morbidity, and long-term outcomes are otherwise similar to non-RA patients.

Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Matched-Pair Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

This study analyzed minimum 2-year hip arthroscopy outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and non-RA control patients. It also examined whether disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) affected RA patient outcomes. We hypothesized that patients with RA undergoing hip arthroscopy would have lower reported outcome scores.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected on all hip arthroscopies performed from 2009-2013. The indications for surgery were patients with hip pain and with physical examination and imaging studies confirming intra-articular pathology in whom conservative management had failed. The exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral hip conditions and Tönnis grade greater than 1. Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up and preoperative RA diagnoses were matched (1:2 ratio) to controls without RA (based on age ± 5 years, body mass index ± 5, and lateral center-edge angle [18°-25°, 26°-39°, or >39°]). RA cases were further analyzed based on DMARD use. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, as well as annually thereafter. The outcomes collected included the modified Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, satisfaction rating, future procedures, and complications.

RESULTS

We matched 26 hips in 20 RA patients to a control group of 52 hips in 52 patients. At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, RA patients reported no significant improvements except in the Non-Arthritic Hip Score, whereas the control group significantly improved in all PRO and VAS scores. Preoperative PRO and VAS scores between the RA and control groups were not significantly different, but postoperatively, all scores were lower in RA patients at a minimum of 2 years, whether they were taking DMARDs or not. Patients taking DMARDs showed slightly more improvement in PRO and VAS scores. There was a greater trend toward more secondary arthroscopy procedures for RA patients (19.2% vs 7.7%, P = .47), but total hip arthroplasty rates were similar. Complication rates were low in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy who have a diagnosis of RA had less improvement in PRO and VAS scores and were less satisfied than a matched control group of patients without RA at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients who were taking DMARDs had slightly better improvement in their PRO and VAS scores than nonmedicated patients. With this early follow-up, we could not show a difference in the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty, although RA patients required more revision arthroscopies than controls. Patients with a diagnosis of RA who undergo hip arthroscopy should be counseled about the potential for lesser degrees of postoperative improvement and should have their expectations managed accordingly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative trial.

Perioperative Management of Rheumatoid Medications in Orthopedic Surgery

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic autoimmune disorder known to cause progressive joint destruction. Over time, untreated RA can lead to pain and increasing disability, making orthopedic intervention necessary. The treatment of RA revolves around a variety of medications that blunt the overall immune response. However, this may increase the risk of infection and impair wound healing. Given the nature of this disease, orthopedists frequently encounter patients with RA in the operative setting. To optimize surgical outcomes, orthopedists must carefully manage and pay special attention to the adverse side effects of the complicated medication regimens of these patients perioperatively. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):282-286.].