1
|
Fuentes-Braesch M, Tuijthof GJM, Emans PJ, Emanuel KS. The preferred technique for knee synovium biopsy and synovial fluid arthrocentesis. Rheumatol Int 2023; 43:1767-1779. [PMID: 36513849 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05256-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
For knee osteoarthritis and related conditions, analysis of biomarkers hold promise to improve early diagnosis and/or offer patient-specific treatment. To compare biomarker analyses, reliable, high-quality biopsies are needed. The aim of this work is to summarize the literature on the current best practices of biopsy of the synovium and synovial fluid arthrocentesis. Therefore, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles that applied, demonstrated, or evaluated synovial biopsies or arthrocentesis. Expert recommendations and applications were summarized, and evidence for superiority of techniques was evaluated. Thirty-one studies were identified for inclusion. For arthrocentesis, the superolateral approach in a supine position, with a 0°-30° knee flexion was generally recommended. 18-gage needles, mechanical compression and ultrasound-guidance were found to give superior results. For blind and image-guided synovial biopsy techniques, superolateral and infrapatellar approaches were recommended. Single-handed tools were preconized, including Parker-Pearson needles and forceps. Sample quantity ranged approximately from 2 to 20. Suggestions were compiled for arthrocentesis regarding approach portal and patient position. Further evidence regarding needle size, ultrasound-guidance and mechanical compression were found. More comparative studies are needed before evidence-based protocols can be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Fuentes-Braesch
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Emans
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kaj S Emanuel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Treu EA, Cushman DM, Wheelwright J, Blackburn B, Teramoto M, Archibeck M. Is ultrasound-guided hip aspiration more successful than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection? J Bone Jt Infect 2023; 8:151-163. [PMID: 38774034 PMCID: PMC11106766 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-8-151-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: aspiration of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly performed to assist in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to determine whether fluoroscopic- or ultrasound- guided hip aspiration differs in the ability to acquire synovial fluid and in the accuracy of diagnosing infection. Methods: all THA aspirations performed between 2014 and 2021 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Aspirations were classified as successful or dry. If successful, the volume of fluid obtained was recorded. The sensitivity and specificity of hip aspiration in identifying PJI were calculated with four methods: (1) culture results excluding saline lavage, (2) culture results including saline lavage, (3) 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria, and (4) 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Analyses were performed using Student's t test or Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables and chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: 290 aspirations were included (155 fluoroscopic-guided and 135 ultrasound-guided). Success of aspiration (> 0.5 mL) was more common in the ultrasound cohort (69 %) than fluoroscopy (53 %) (p < 0.0055 ). When successful, more volume was obtained in the ultrasound cohort (mean 13.1 mL vs. 10.0 mL; p = 0.0002 ). Ultrasound-guided aspiration was more sensitive than fluoroscopy in diagnosing PJI using culture results excluding saline lavage (85 % vs. 73 %; p = 0.03 ), culture results including saline lavage (85 % vs. 69 %; p = 0.001 ), 2018 MSIS-ICM criteria (77 % vs. 52 %; p = 0.02 ), and 2021 EBJIS criteria (87 % vs. 65 %; p = 0.02 ). Ultrasound-guided aspiration was more specific than fluoroscopy in diagnosing PJI using 2021 EBJIS criteria (100 % vs. 96 %; p = 0.001 ). Conclusions: ultrasound-guided aspiration is more frequently successful and yields more fluid than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration of THA. Ultrasound-guided aspiration is more sensitive in diagnosing PJI than fluoroscopy using culture data, 2018 MSIS-ICM criteria, and 2021 EBJIS criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A. Treu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Daniel M. Cushman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - John C. Wheelwright
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Brenna E. Blackburn
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Masaru Teramoto
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Michael J. Archibeck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Alcala-Galiano A, Allen G, Aparisi Gómez MP, Aringhieri G, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gitto S, Grainger AJ, Greenwood S, Gupta H, Isaac A, Ivanoski S, Khanna M, Klauser A, Mansour R, Martin S, Mascarenhas V, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McKean D, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Mirón Mombiela R, Moutinho R, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Prada González R, Prakash M, Posadzy M, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Ž, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Tomas X, Vasilevska Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Obradov M. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part VI, foot and ankle. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:1384-1394. [PMID: 34432122 PMCID: PMC8794903 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08125-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Clarity regarding accuracy and effectiveness for interventional procedures around the foot and ankle is lacking. Consequently, a board of 53 members of the Ultrasound and Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) reviewed the published literature to evaluate the evidence on image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around this anatomical region. Methods We report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered around foot and ankle in order to derive their clinical indications. Experts drafted a list of statements and graded them according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus was considered strong when > 95% of experts agreed with the statement or broad when > 80% but < 95% agreed. The results of the Delphi-based consensus were used to write the paper that was shared with all panel members for final approval. Results A list of 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications for image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle were drafted after a literature review. The highest level of evidence was reported for four statements, all receiving 100% agreement. Conclusion According to this consensus, image-guided interventions should not be considered a first-level approach for treating Achilles tendinopathy, while ultrasonography guidance is strongly recommended to improve the efficacy of interventional procedures for plantar fasciitis and Morton’s neuroma, particularly using platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroids, respectively. Key Points • The expert panel of the ESSR listed 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle. • Strong consensus was obtained for all statements. • The highest level of evidence was reached by four statements concerning the effectiveness of US-guided injections of corticosteroid for Morton’s neuroma and PRP for plantar fasciitis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08125-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. .,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, Brunssum, Kerkrade, the Netherlands
| | - Domenico Albano
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.,Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Georgina Allen
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK.,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Hospital Vithas Nueve de Octubre, Valencia, Spain
| | - Giacomo Aringhieri
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Vito Chianca
- Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Napoli, Italy.,Clinica di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Angelo Corazza
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | - Danoob Dalili
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Francesco Di Pietto
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Haidari, Athens, Greece
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Isaac
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Slavcho Ivanoski
- Department of Radiology, Special Hospital for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, St. Erazmo -, Ohrid, North Macedonia.,Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | | | - Andrea Klauser
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ramy Mansour
- Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vasco Mascarenhas
- Hospital da Luz, Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Lisbon, Portugal.,AIRC, Advanced Imaging Research Consortium, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - David McKean
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | | | - Kalliopi Melaki
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmelo Messina
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ricardo Moutinho
- Hospital da Luz, Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Lisbon, Portugal.,Hospital de Loulé, Loulé, Portugal
| | - Cyprian Olchowy
- Department of Oral Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Davide Orlandi
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Mahesh Prakash
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Saulius Rutkauskas
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Žiga Snoj
- Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Tomas
- Radiology Dpt. MSK Unit. Hospital Clinic (CDIC), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jelena Vucetic
- Radiology Department, Hospital ICOT Ciudad de Telde, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | | | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Varelli Institute, Naples, Italy
| | - Marina Obradov
- Department of Radiology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdellatif W, Ding J, Khorshed D, Shojania K, Nicolaou S. Unravelling the mysteries of gout by multimodality imaging. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 50:S17-S23. [PMID: 32620197 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Gout is a common inflammatory arthritis that manifests as an aggregate of variably symptomatic monosodium urate crystals (MSU) in the joints and surrounding tissues in addition to multisystem involvement such as genitourinary and cardiovascular systems. In recent decades, there has been a documented increase in the prevalence and incidence of gout. Risk factors for gout include obesity, dietary influences, hypertension, renal impairment, and diuretic use. A prompt diagnosis followed by uric acid lowering treatment prior to the onset of bone destruction is the goal in any suspected case of gout. Advanced imaging modalities, such as dual energy computed tomography (DECT) and ultrasonography (US), employed for the diagnosis of gout are each accompanied by advantages and disadvantages. Conventional radiography (CR), although useful in visualizing joint erosions and mineralization, is limited in its ability to diagnose gout flare. Although synovial fluid aspiration remains the gold standard for MSU crystal visualization, less-invasive imaging modalities are preferred to avoid potential complications. DECT and US in particular are useful in the diagnosis of gout. In this review, we will discuss the current state and role of imaging in the detection of gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Abdellatif
- Department of Radiology, Department of Emergency and Trauma Radiology, University of British Columbia/ Vancouver General Hospital, 899W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Ding
- Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Kam Shojania
- Department of Rheumatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Savvas Nicolaou
- Department of Radiology, Department of Emergency and Trauma Radiology, University of British Columbia/ Vancouver General Hospital, 899W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gervasi M, Barbieri E, Capparucci I, Annibalini G, Sisti D, Amatori S, Carrabs V, Valli G, Donati Zeppa S, Rocchi MBL, Stocchi V, Sestili P. Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy in Recreational Runners with Peritendinous Hyaluronic Acid Injections: A Viscoelastometric, Functional, and Biochemical Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10071397. [PMID: 33807327 PMCID: PMC8037202 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achilles tendinopathy (AT) affects ca. 10 million recreational runners in Europe; the practice of hyaluronic acid (HA) infiltration is being increasingly adopted. The aim of this pilot study was to monitor the effects of a three-local time-spaced injections regimen of HA in the treatment of AT in middle-aged runners combining for the first time viscoelastometric, biochemical, and functional methodologies with routine clinical examinations. METHODS Eight male runners (Age 49.3 ± 3.9), diagnosed for unilateral AT, were given three ultrasound (US) guided peritendinous HA injections at the baseline (T0) and every fifteenth day with a follow-up on the forty-fifth day (T1, T2, and T3). At all-time points patients were assessed for viscoelastic tone and stiffness, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and pain level (Likert scale 0-5). The peritendinous effusions of the injured tendon were collected at T0 and T2 to quantify the volume variations and the IL-1β and MMP-3 levels. RESULTS At T0 MVIC and pain score were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in injured tendons. The volume, IL-1β and MMP-3 levels decreased in the course of treatment and the clinical endpoints ameliorated over time. Tone, stiffness, and functional performance also varied significantly at T2 and T3, as compared to T0. CONCLUSIONS The sequential peritendinous injections of HA were effective in the amelioration of the clinical symptoms, as well as of the functional and viscoelastic state associated with AT. The determination of the viscoelastometric state may help to precisely evaluate the healing process in AT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gervasi
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-072-230-3013
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
- Interuniversity Institute of Myology (IIM), 06121 Perugia, Italy
| | - Italo Capparucci
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Giosuè Annibalini
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Davide Sisti
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Stefano Amatori
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Vittoria Carrabs
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Giacomo Valli
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Sabrina Donati Zeppa
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Marco Bruno Luigi Rocchi
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Vilberto Stocchi
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Piero Sestili
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University Urbino Carlo Bo, via A. Saffi 2, 61029 Urbino, Italy; (E.B.); (I.C.); (G.A.); (D.S.); (S.A.); (V.C.); (G.V.); (S.D.Z.); (M.B.L.R.); (V.S.); (P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|