Course of the Femoral Artery in the Mid- and Distal Thigh and Implications for Medial Approaches to the Distal Femur: A CT Angiography Study

Navigation of femoral and popliteal artery around the knee with CT angiography: implications for surgical interventions

PURPOSE

Uncertainty about the exact position of the femoral and popliteal arteries in the medial thigh and posterior knee might increase vascular complications in surgical procedures. This study aimed to document femoral and popliteal arteries in the medial thigh and around the knee to assist surgeons in developing safer surgical approaches.

METHODS

The study included 120 patients-180 lower limbs-who underwent CT angiography (CTA) of the lower extremity. The distance from the femoral artery to the anterior border, midsagittal axis, and posterior border of the femur and the popliteal artery to the medial, lateral, and midpoint posterior cortex of the proximal tibia was measured in two- and three-dimensional CTA images.

RESULTS

The femoral artery was found to be on average 236.93 ± 29.61 mm, 195.34 ± 26.12 mm, and 146.28 ± 33.18 mm away from the adductor tubercle at the anterior, midsagittal axis, and posterior borders of the femur, correspondingly. The popliteal artery was to be located on average 5.40 ± 2.50 mm posterior to the midpoint of the plateau tibia at the joint line.

CONCLUSION

Considering the mentioned femoral/popliteal artery distances to the femur and proximal tibia would direct surgeons to the safe zones for more accurate surgical approaches in the medial thigh and around the knee when performing osteotomies, knee arthroplasty, arthroscopy, and trauma surgeries, to reduce possible vascular damages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medial augmentation plating of aseptic distal femoral nonunions

BACKGROUND

Distal femur nonunions are well-recognized contributors to persistent functional disability, with limited data regarding their treatment options. In the current study, we asked whether additional medial augmentation plating is a feasible treatment option for patients with aseptic distal femoral nonunion and intact lateral implants.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including 20 patients treated for aseptic distal femoral nonunion between 2002 and 2017. The treatment procedure included a medial approach to the distal femur, debridement of the nonunion site, bone grafting and medial augmentation plating utilizing a large-fragment titanium plate. Outcome measures were bone-related and functional results, measured by the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Rating Scale (HSS) and the German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D).

RESULTS

Eighteen of 20 nonunions showed osseous healing at 8.16 ± 5.23 (range: 3-21) months after augmentation plating. Regarding functional results, the mean HSS score was 74.17 ± 11.12 (range: 57-87). The mean SMFA-D functional index was 47.38 ± 16.78 (range 25.74-71.32) at the last follow-up. Index procedure-associated complications included two cases of persistent nonunion and one case of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the assessed outcome measures, augmentation plating is a feasible treatment option, with a high proportion of patients achieving bony union and good functional outcomes and a few patients experiencing complications.

Medial and lateral dual plating of native distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review

Introduction

Lateral locked plating (LLP) development has improved outcomes for distal femur fractures. However, there is still a modest rate of nonunion in fractures treated with LLP alone, with higher nonunion risk in high-energy fractures, intra-articular involvement, poor bone quality, severe comminution, or bone loss. Several recent studies have demonstrated both the safety and the biomechanical advantage of dual medial and lateral plating (DP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of DP for native distal femoral fractures by performing a systematic review of the literature.

Methods

Studies reporting clinical outcomes for DP of native distal femur fractures were identified and systematically reviewed. Publications without full-text manuscripts, those solely involving periprosthetic fractures, or fractures other than distal femur fractures were excluded. Fracture type, mean follow-up, open versus closed fracture, number of bone grafting procedures, nonunion, reoperation rates, and complication data were collected. Methodologic study quality was assessed using the Coleman methodology score.

Results

The initial electronic review and reverse inclusion protocol identified 1484 publications. After removal of duplicates and abstract review to exclude studies that did not discuss clinical treatment of femur fractures with dual plating, 101 potential manuscripts were identified and manually reviewed. After final review, 12 studies were included in this study. There were 199 fractures with average follow-up time of 13.72 months. Unplanned reoperations and nonunion occurred in 19 (8.5%) and 9 (4.5%) cases, respectively. The most frequently reported complications were superficial infection (n = 6, 3%) and deep infection (n = 5, 2.5%) postoperatively. Other complications included delayed union (n = 6, 3%) not requiring additional surgical treatment and knee stiffness in four patients (2%) necessitating manipulation under anesthesia or lysis of adhesions. The average Coleman score was 50.5 (range 13.5-72), suggesting that included studies were of moderate-to-poor quality.

Conclusions

Clinical research interest in DP of distal femoral fractures has markedly increased in the past few decades. The current data suggest that DP of native distal femoral fractures is associated with favorable nonunion and reoperation rates compared with previously published rates associated with LLP alone. In the current review, DP of distal femoral fractures was associated with acceptable rates of complications and generally good functional outcomes. More high-quality, directly comparable research is necessary to validate the conclusions of this review.

Biomechanical and anatomical considerations for dual plating of distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Distal femur fractures are challenging injuries historically associated with high rates of nonunion and varus collapse with operative management. As a result, clinical and research interest in dual plating (DP) of distal femur fractures has seen a dramatic increase in recent years. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding vascular anatomy and biomechanics of distal femur fractures treated with DP constructs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review of two medical databases (PubMed & Scopus) was performed to identify peer-reviewed studies on the anatomy and biomechanics regarding DP of distal femur fractures. A total of 1,001 papers were evaluated and 14 papers met inclusion criteria (6 anatomy and 8 biomechanics). Methodological quality scores were used to assess quality and potential bias in the included studies.

RESULTS

In the biomechanical studies, DP constructs demonstrated greater axial and rotational stiffness, as well as less displacement and fewer incidences of failure compared to all other constructs. Vascular studies showed that the femoral artery crosses the mid-shaft femur approximately 16.0-18.8 cm proximal to the adductor tubercle and it is located on average 16.6-31.1 mm from the femoral shaft at this location, suggesting that medial plate application can be achieved safely in the distal femur. The methodological quality of the included studies was good for biomechanical studies (Traa score 79.1; range 53-92.5) and excellent for anatomical studies (QUACs score 81.9; range 69.0-88.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Existing biomechanics literature suggests that DP constructs are mechanically stronger than other constructs commonly used in the treatment of distal femur fractures. Furthermore, medial distal femoral anatomy allows for safe application of DP constructs, even in a minimally invasive fashion. Dual plating should be considered for patients with distal femur fractures that have risk factors for instability, varus collapse, or nonunion.

Treatment of Recalcitrant Femoral Shaft Nonunion With Medial Femoral Condyle Pedicled Autograft: Technical Trick

SUMMARY

Nonunited fractures of the femoral shaft and distal femur are usually successfully addressed with stabilization with or without autogenous bone grafting. For the small subset of these problems that prove recalcitrant to front-line treatment, a pedicled medial femoral condyle (MFC) bone flap can provide a source of vascularized autograft with minimal donor site morbidity. The MFC has gained recent widespread adoption as a free vascularized bone transfer, and here, we present a surgical technique and retrospective analysis of patients treated with a pedicled MFC technique. This serves as a useful treatment option for these difficult problems and may be especially helpful in low resource environments or where microsurgical anastomosis is not feasible.

Anthropometric Factors on Safe Distances between Popliteal Vessels to the Femur for Cerclage Wiring of the Distal Femoral Fracture: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Background and Objectives: The proximity of the popliteal vessels in the distal femur may increase the risk of iatrogenic vascular injury during cerclage wiring. In this study, the closest location and distance of the popliteal vessels to the femur was examined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The associations between anthropometric factors and the distance that would guide the placement of wires safely during surgery were also identified. Materials and Methods: We reviewed adult knee magnetic resonance images and recorded: (1) the relation and the shortest horizontal distance (d-H) from the femoral cortex to the popliteal vessels in axial images and (2) the vertical distance (d-V) from the adductor tubercle to the axial level of the d-H values in coronal images. The effects of anthropometric factors (sex, age, body height, body weight, body mass index, thigh circumference, femoral length and femoral width) on these distances were analysed. Results: Analysis of 206 knee magnetic resonance images revealed that the closet locations of popliteal vessels were at the posteromedial aspect of the femur. The d-H and d-V were 7.38 ± 3.22 mm and 57.01 ± 11.14 mm, respectively, and were both shorter in women than in men (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified thigh circumference and femoral length as the most influential factors for the d-H and d-V, respectively (p < 0.001). Linear regression demonstrated a strong positive linear correlation between the thigh circumference and the d-H and between the femoral length and the d-V (Pearson’s r = 0.891 and 0.806, respectively (p < 0.001)). Conclusions: The closet location and distance of the popliteal vessels to the femur provide useful information for wire placement during distal femoral fracture surgery while minimising the risk of vascular injury. Given that patients with a smaller thigh circumference and a shorter femoral length are more likely to have a smaller d-H and a shorter d-V, respectively, cautious measures should be taken in such cases.