Radiographic Categorization of the Hip-spine Syndrome in the Setting of Hip Osteoarthritis and Sagittal Spinal Malalignment

Spinal fusion and total hip arthroplasty: why timing is important

BACKGROUND

There is increasing debate among orthopaedic surgeons over the temporal relationship between lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with hip-spine syndrome. Few large studies have directly compared the results of patients who undergo LSF prior to THA (LSF-THA) to those who undergo LSF after THA (THA-LSF). The current study matched THA patients with a prior LSF to patients who underwent LSF after THA to assess: 90-day and 1-year (1) medical/surgical complications; and (2) revisions.

METHODS

We queried a national, all-payer database to identify all patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2018 (n = 716,084). The LSF-THA patients and THA-LSF patients were then matched 1:1 on age, sex, Charleson Comorbidity Index, and obesity. Medical/surgical complications and revisions at 90 days and 1 year were recorded. Categorical and continuous variables were analysed utilising t-tests and chi-square, respectively.

RESULTS

LSF-THA patients experienced significantly more postoperative dislocations at 90 days and 1 year compared to THA-LSF patients (p = 0.048 and p < 0.001). There were a similar number of revisions performed for LSF-THA and THA-LSF patients at both 90 days and 1 year (p = 0.183 and p = 0.426). Furthermore, at 1 year, LSF-THA patients experienced more pneumonia (p = 0.005) and joint infection (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior LSF has been demonstrated to increase the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients undergoing THA. The results of the present study demonstrate increased dislocations with LSF-THA compared to THA-LSF. For "hip spine syndrome" patients requiring both LSF and THA, it may be more beneficial to undergo THA prior to LSF. Arthroplasty surgeons may wish to collaborate with spinal surgeons to ensure optimal outcomes for this group of patients.

Lumbar Level Significantly Influences Postoperative Global Sagittal Balance Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The current evidence regarding how level of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) influences correction of sagittal alignment is limited. This study sought to investigate the relationship of lumbar level and segmental angular change (SAC) of PSO with the magnitude of global sagittal alignment correction.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar PSO at a single institution. Radiographs were evaluated to quantify the effect of PSO on lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1-pelvic alignment (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between PSO SAC and the postoperative increase in LL (r = 0.316, P = .021) and PT (r = 0.352, P = .010), and a decrease in TPA (r = -0.324, P = .018). PSO level significantly correlated with change in T1SPI (r = -0.305, P = .026) and SVA (r = -0.406, P = .002), with more caudal PSO corresponding to a greater correction in sagittal balance. On multivariate analysis, more caudal PSO level independently predicted a greater reduction in T1SPI (β = -3.138, P = .009) and SVA (β = -29.030, P = .001), while larger PSO SAC (β = -0.375, P = .045) and a greater number of fusion levels (β = -1.427, P = .036) predicted a greater reduction in TPA.

CONCLUSION

This study identified a gain of approximately 3 degrees and 3 cm of correction for each level of PSO more caudal to L1. Additionally, a larger PSO SAC predicted greater improvement in TPA. While further investigation of these relationships is warranted, these findings may help guide preoperative PSO level selection.

The significant relationship among the factors of pelvic incidence, standing lumbar lordosis, and lumbar flexibility in Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: A descriptive radiographic study

INTRODUCTION

Spine stiffness is known to increase the risk of total hip replacement (THR) instability. The sagittal posture and lumbo-pelvic kinematics have therefore become parameters of interest when planning THR. We conducted this study to investigate (1) the distribution and characteristics of the spino-pelvic standing alignment, (2) the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lumbar flexibility, in Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients.

HYPOTHESIS

(1) Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients with different sagittal spino-pelvic alignments do not differ markedly in their demographics, PI, or lumbar flexibility; and (2) there is no significant relationship between PI, standing LL, and lumbar flexibility in a population of Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of radiographs from 945 Japanese patients who consecutively received THR for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. All patients pre-operatively underwent lateral standing and deep-seated lumbo-pelvic radiography on which the spino-pelvic parameters were measured. The difference between the standing and deep-seated LL angles defined the lumbar flexibility and was calculated as the delta (Δ) LL. Individual spino-pelvic standing alignment was stratified based on the difference between the PI and standing LL ('PI-LL mismatch'). 'PI-LL mismatch' of<-10°, between -10° and 10°, and>10° was defined as hyperlordosis, normolordosis, and flatback, respectively.

RESULTS

In the present study, the spinal alignment of 115/945 (12.2%), 559/945 (59.2%), and 271/945 (28.6%) patients were classified as hyperlordosis, normolordosis, and flatback, respectively. Hyperlordotic patients had significantly lower PI (47.6°±7.8° vs. 52.7°±10.5°, p<0.001) and higher ΔLL (60.6°±12.6° vs. 51.6°±12.8°, p<0.001) than normolordotic patients. Patients with flatback were significantly older (age, 69.1±9.1 years vs. 62.7±9.8 years, p<0.001) with higher PI (56.9°±11.7° vs. 52.7°±10.5°, p<0.001) and lower ΔLL (35.2°±17.4° vs. 51.6°±12.8°, p<0.001) than normolordotic patients. A significant relationship between PI and the standing LL was found in the whole cohort (r=0.409, p=0.009), hyperlordotic (r=0.785, p<0.001), normolordotic (r=0.857, p<0.001), and flatback (r=0.664, p<0.001) patients. Significant relationships between the PI and ΔLL were also found in normolordotic (r=0.442, p=0.004) and flatback (r=0.449, p=0.003) patients but not hyperlordotic patients (r=0.154, p=0.367).

DISCUSSION

A large proportion of Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients have abnormal PI-LL mismatch (12% and 29% have hyperlordosis and flatback, respectively). The PI was a determinant of the standing LL and the lumbar flexibility, especially in the normolordotic and flatback individuals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective diagnostic radiographic study.

Spine-Pelvis-Hip Alignments in Degenerative Spinal Deformity Patients and Associated Procedure of One-Stage Long-Fusion with Multiple-Level PLIF or Apical-Vertebra Three Column Osteotomy-a Clinical and Radiographic Analysis Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the spine-pelvis-hip alignments in degenerative spinal deformity (DSD) patients, and compare the outcomes in the procedure of long-fusion with posterior lumbar inter-body fusion (PLIF) or single-level three-column osteotomy (STO) at lower lumbar level (LLL, L3 -S1 ) and thoracolumbar levels (TLL, T10 -L2 ) for those patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. Following institutional ethics approval, a total of 83 patients (Female, 67; Male, 16) with DSD underwent long-fusion with PLIF or STO surgery between March 2015 and December 2017 were reviewed. All of those patients were assigned into LLL and TLL groups. The average age at surgery was 65.2 years (SD, 8.1). Demographic (age, gender, BMI, and comorbidities), radiographs (both coronal and sagittal parameters) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessments were documented. The radiographic parameters and HRQOL-related measurements at pre- and post-operation were compared with paired-samples t test, and those variables in the two groups were analyzed using an independent-sample t test. The relationships between pelvic incidence (PI) and other sagittal parameters were investigated with Pearson correlation analysis. The Pearson χ2 or Fisher's exact was carried out for comparison of gender, incidence of comorbidities and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

There were 53 and 30 patients in the LLL and TLL groups respectively. Those spino-pelvic radiographic parameters had significant improvements after surgeries (P < 0.001). The patients in the two group with different pre-operative thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK, P = 0.003), PI (P = 0.02), and mismatch of PI minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL, P = 0.01) had comparable post-operative radiographic parameters except PI (P = 0.04) and pelvic-femur angle (PFA, P = 0.02). Comparing the changes of those spine-pelvic-hip data during surgeries, the corrections of TLK in TLL group were significant larger (P = 0.004). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there were negative relationship between PI and TLK (r = -0.302, P = 0.005), positive relationship between PI and LL (r = 0.261, P = 0.016) at pre-operation. Those patients underwent the surgical procedure that long-segment instrumentation and fusion with STO would have higher incidence of complications involving longer operative timing (P = 0.018), more blood loss (P < 0.001), revision surgery (P = 0.008), and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (P = 0.001). All the HRQOL scores significantly improved at final follow-up (P < 0.001), with no difference of intra-group.

CONCLUSION

Patients suffered de-novo scoliosis or hyper-kyphosis with low PI would be vulnerable to significant thoracolumbar degeneration, and have more changes of spine-pelvis-hip data after long-fusion surgery, however, those with high PI would be closed to significant lumbar degeneration. Although spine-pelvis-hip alignments in DSD patients can be restored effectively after long-fusion with PLIF or STO, the incidence of complications in patients underwent STO was significant higher than that in patients performed multi-level PLIF.

Improvements in lower-extremity patient-reported outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

Recently, new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the spine were designed to overcome the limitations of previous spinal PROMs and to consider the whole spine as a single kinetic functional unit. Owing to the significance of spine-hip-knee and global body balance, the spine and lower extremities cannot be considered separately. However, no reports have evaluated lower-extremity functional outcome using PROMs after lumbar spine surgery. The authors aimed to elucidate changes in hip and knee PROMs after lumbar interbody fusion and to evaluate the sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters that were most strongly correlated with lower-extremity PROMs.

METHODS

In 2018, the authors consecutively evaluated patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery with at most three levels. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative clinical and radiographic data were assessed. Spinal functional outcomes were measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) questionnaire. Lower-extremity functional outcomes were evaluated with the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between spinal and lower-extremity PROMs and spinopelvic radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

The authors enrolled 67 patients, with a mean age of 66.4 years. The average number of surgical levels was 1.7. All assessed PROMs improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.001 for ODI, p < 0.001 for VAS, p = 0.017 for SRS-22r, p = 0.042 for HHS, and p = 0.033 for WOMAC). Spinopelvic parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), C7 sagittal vertical axis, and sagittal radiographic parameters of hip and knee, significantly improved after surgery. On linear regression analysis, HHS and WOMAC correlated with LL and PT, respectively (β = 0.554 and p = 0.043 for correlation of HHS with LL; β = 1.573 and p = 0.021 for correlation of WOMAC with PT).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrated that lumbar fusion surgery may induce postoperative improvements in lower-extremity functional and radiological outcomes. However, among radiographic parameters, changes in LL and PT were the most strongly associated with lower-extremity PROMs.

The Missing Link: Defining the Functional Parameters of Pelvic and Acetabular Alignment

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to define the three-dimensional functional alignment of the pelvis, proximal femur, and acetabulum during postural and physical activities.

METHODS

Thirty volunteers aged 40 years or greater were recruited. Reflective markers placed on bony prominences on the pelvis and lower extremities were tracked using a 12-camera motion analysis system. Measurements were obtained for various postures (ie, supine, standing, and sitting) and activities (ie, walking and ascending/descending stairs).

RESULTS

Significant pelvic motion occurred only in the sagittal plane. The mean posterior inclinations of the pelvis were 15°, 18°, and 51° in the supine, standing, and sitting positions, respectively. These corresponded to acetabular anteversion/inclination angles of 26°/44°, 28°/45°, and 55°/55°, respectively. For activities, the mean posterior inclinations of the pelvis were 19°, 19°, and 20° during walking and ascending and descending stairs, respectively. These corresponded to acetabular anteversion/inclination angles of 29°/45°, 29°/45°, and 30°/46°, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The functional parameters for pelvic and acetabular alignment were defined. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which these normal parameters are altered in the setting of hip and/or spinal degenerative disease to guide acetabular implant placement.

Preoperative imaging of spinopelvic pathologies : State of the art

The field of musculoskeletal diagnostics and personalized medicine has undergone a revolutionary transformation due to a deeper understanding of skeletal biomechanics and due to technological advancements. Analogous to this transformation, our understanding of spinopelvic conditions has experienced a paradigm shift in terms of both static and dynamic changes in spinopelvic pathologies and enabled a more accurate delineation of the drivers of disability. The purpose of this review is to describe the standard and state of the art of preoperative diagnostic and planning methods for common spinopelvic pathologies and to discuss both the added clinical value and limitations. The rationale is to accelerate the accurate and timely diagnosis and as well as the efficient and safe preoperative workflow.