Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The "Golden Age" of quadriceps tendon grafts for the anterior cruciate ligament: a bibliometric analysis

IMPORTANCE

Bibliometric research is a statistical analysis of publications to measure the scientific output in a specific field in order to highlight medical developments or knowledge gaps and to direct future scientific research. The quantity of orthopedic papers on the internet is astounding and is steadily growing as a result of recent advancements in technology and medicine. This is why choosing the right information is essential.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to analyze the current literature for trends in publications regarding quadriceps tendon (QT) grafting of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed was searched on August 28, 2023. References were collected from PubMed, and trends were analyzed using this information. This search retrieved 405 articles regarding human and animal studies. We analyzed the top 10 authors and journals in terms of publication numbers, citation numbers, and citations per year. The PubMed-by-year feature was used to compare the number of publications regarding ACL reconstruction by quadriceps grafting with all publications in PubMed.

FINDINGS

The number of yearly publications averaged 10 or less up to 2018, starting from 1982 when the first paper on the QT was published. However, the number of publications increased from 2018. While the total number of publications on this topic was 405, 260 were published from 2018 alone. The number of citations was 8262 in total overall years. It is expected that the last five years' publications, especially those for the last year, will be low in number, as it takes time for citations to accrue. The journal Arthroscopy published the most articles on this topic, with 57 papers and 1884 citations, followed by the American Journal of Sports Medicine, with 39 articles and 1576 citations. The top three journals on this topic were Arthroscopy, AmericanJournalofSportsMedicine, and KneeSurgery, SportsTraumatology, Arthroscopy. The most published author was Musahl V (with 24 articles), and the most cited author was Xerogeanes JW (with 570 citations).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Global trend analysis suggests that research on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps has significantly increased in the last 5 years and that the number of papers on this topic is increasing steadily. We found that the publications and citations are exhibiting a rising trend, Arthroscopy is the most impactful journal, and Musahl V is the most impactful author on the topic. Xerogeanes JW is the author with the most citations on the topic. The promising clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the QT have attracted the most research interest.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Editorial Commentary: Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Shows Advantages and Disadvantages

A quadriceps tendon autograft is becoming an increasingly popular graft option for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. The biomechanical properties of a QT autograft are favorable compared to a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or a doubled hamstring (HS) autograft. A QT autograft is associated with less donor site morbidity, such as anterior knee pain and difficulty with kneeling, than a BPTB autograft, and short-term studies have shown comparable clinical results when compared to a BPTB or a HS autograft. However, if harvested with a bone block, a QT autograft carries a higher risk of patellar fracture than a BPTB autograft. Other potential disadvantages include persistent quadriceps weakness, and registry data have shown a higher revision rate compared to a BPTB or HS ACL reconstruction, which is thought to be due to a high learning curve, leading to higher revision rates in low volume centers. Finally, a graft-fixation construct with good time 0 biomechanical characteristics may only be successful in the long term if the graft heals effectively. Time will tell.

Approximately half of pediatric or adolescent patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction return to the same level of sport or higher: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarise the surgical techniques and clinical outcomes in paediatric and adolescent patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (r-ACLR).

METHODS

Three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE) were searched from inception to 29 July 2023. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rates of instability, rupture and return to sport (RTS) were extracted.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 706 (711 knees) patients were included (48.7% female). The mean age at r-ACLR was 17.1 years (range: 16.5-18.0). Autografts (67.5%) were more common than allografts (32.2%) in revision, with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) being the most prevalent autograft source (59.6%). Bone grafts were used in seven patients (4.8% of 146 patients). The most common femoral and tibial fixation techniques were interference screws (37.6% and 38.1%, of 244 patients, respectively). The most common tunnelling strategy was anatomic (69.1% of 236 patients), and meniscus repairs were performed in 39.7% of 256 patients. The re-rupture rate was 13.0% in 293 patients. RTS at the same level or higher was 51.6% in 219 patients. The mean (SD) Lysholm score was 88.1 (12.9) in 78 patients, the mean (SD) Tegner score was 6.0 (1.6) in 78 patients, and the mean (SD) IKDC score was 82.6 (16.0) in 126 patients.

CONCLUSION

R-ACLR in paediatric and adolescent patients predominantly uses BPTB autografts and interference screw femoral and tibial fixation with concomitant meniscal procedures. Rates of re-rupture and RTS at the same level or higher were 13.0% and 51.6%, respectively. Information from this review can provide orthopaedic surgeons with a comprehensive understanding of the most commonly used operative techniques and their outcomes for revision ACLR in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Role of Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

» The quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is becoming increasingly popular in both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).» The biomechanical properties of the QT are similar to those of the native ACL, the hamstring tendon (HT), and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts.» QT autograft allows surgeons to be flexible with their graft size and reconstruction technique.» The QT autograft performs in a similar fashion to the BTB and HT autografts, with excellent patient-reported outcomes, consistent postoperative knee stability, and low rates of postoperative complications including graft failure and donor site morbidity.» There are emerging data that the QT autograft is a viable option in revision ACLR.

Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps, hamstring and patellar tendon autografts leads to similar functional outcomes but hamstring graft has a higher tendency of graft failure

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, and graft failure in revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT), Hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, 97 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction (40 patients received a QT, 26 an HT and 31 a BPTB graft) met the inclusion criteria. Pre-injury and at 2-year postoperatively patients were evaluated for patient-reported functional outcomes; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level and VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain; and graft failure. Patient-reported outcomes and graft failure were compared between the QT, HT and BPTB groups. The patients with graft failure were not included for outcome analysis at 2-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

All three revision groups with QT, HT and BPTB autograft did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, concomitant injuries and single-stage or double-stage procedures (n.s.). No significant difference was found in the pre-injury patient-reported outcome; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity and VAS for pain (n.s.) between the three groups. At the 2-year follow-up functional outcomes improved in all three groups and all the patients returned to pre-injury activity level; however, no significant difference was found in functional outcomes at the 2-year follow-up between the three groups (n.s.). Graft failure occurred in 4 (10%), 5 (19%) and 3 (10%) patients of QT, HT and BPTB groups, respectively. However, the rate of failure did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

All three autografts (QT, HT and BPTB) demonstrated satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in revision ACL reconstruction. Compared with QT and BPTB grafts, HT graft showed a higher tendency for failure rates. With the increasing incidence of revision ACL reconstruction, surgeons should be aware of all the available graft options. The findings of this study will assist the surgeons in the graft selection for revision ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Graft-Specific Surgical and Rehabilitation Considerations for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft has traditionally been the preferred surgical treatment for patients returning to Level 1 sports. More recently, international utilization of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for primary and revision ACLR has increased in popularity. Recent literature suggests that ACLR with the QT may yield less donor site morbidity than the BPTB and better patient-reported outcomes than the HT. Additionally, anatomic and biomechanical studies have highlighted the robust properties of the QT itself, with superior levels of collagen density, length, size, and load-to-failure strength compared to the BPTB. Although previous literature has described rehabilitation considerations for the BPTB and HT autografts, there is less published with respect to the QT. Given the known impact of the various ACLR surgical techniques on postoperative rehabilitation, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to present the procedure-specific surgical and rehabilitation considerations for ACLR with the QT, as well as further highlight the need for procedure-specific rehabilitation strategies after ACLR by comparing the QT to the BPTB and HT autografts.

Level of Evidence

Level 5.

Localized Anterior Arthrofibrosis After Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is More Common in Patients Who Are Female, Undergo Meniscal Repair, and Have Grafts of Larger Diameter

PURPOSE

To determine factors associated with localized anterior arthrofibrosis (cyclops lesion), such as graft size, warranting early reoperation for lysis of adhesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft.

METHODS

All primary ASTQT autograft ACLRs within a single surgeon's prospectively collected registry with minimum 6-month follow-up were included. Patients who underwent multiligament knee reconstruction or cartilage restoration procedures were excluded. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis was defined as the requirement for a second procedure to achieve debridement and lysis of adhesions owing to the inability to regain terminal extension within 6 months of ACLR. The sex-specific incidence of arthrofibrosis was evaluated relative to age, weight, femoral and tibial tunnel sizes, meniscal repair, and meniscectomy by a binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

This study included 721 patients (46% female patients). There were 52 cases of localized anterior arthrofibrosis (7.2%). Female patients had a greater incidence of arthrofibrosis than male patients. Male patients with a femoral tunnel diameter of 9.25 mm or greater had an increased incidence of arthrofibrosis compared with those with a diameter of less than 9.25 mm, whereas a similar cutoff was not found to be statistically significant for female patients. Concomitant meniscal repair was associated with an increased risk of arthrofibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex and concomitant meniscal repair were associated with an increased localized anterior arthrofibrosis incidence. Furthermore, ASTQT with a femoral tunnel diameter of 9.25 mm or greater in male patients was associated with an increased incidence of arthrofibrosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, comparative prognostic trial.

GRAFTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Objective

This study proposes to systematically review the literature and compare data on (1) function, (2) pain, (3) return to sport, and (4) complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) and hamstring tendon autograft (HT).

Methods

In June 2021, a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS databases was performed, based on PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy included the keywords: "Previous Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," "ACL reconstruction," "quadriceps tendon autograft," "quadriceps graft," "Hamstring-Tendon Autografts." Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software (RevMan Web).

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding function according to Lysholm score (MD 3.01; CI-0.30, 6.33, p = 0.08), the presence of pain (RR 0.89; CI-0.57, 1.39, p = 0.60), and re-rupture (RR 0.60; IC-0.19, 1.88, p = 0.38).

Conclusion

QT and HT autografts show comparatively good results in ACL reconstruction without significant differences regarding function, pain, and rupture after surgical intervention. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review of Level II Studies.

A Minimally Invasive and Simple Technique of Superficial Quadriceps Tendon Graft Harvesting

Quadriceps tendon (QT) graft is a versatile graft for anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Advantages of quadriceps tendon autograft are the superior quality of graft, customization of graft size, reduced anterior knee pain, reduced risk of neurovascular injury, reduced incidence of arthrofibrosis compared to BPTB graft, preservation of ACL agonists, i.e., hamstrings, implantation of thicker graft and better patella mobility. Considering its advantages over other available autografts, its popularity is now increasing among surgeons. Conventionally, quadriceps tendon graft is harvested by an open technique, which produces an ugly scar and delays rehabilitation. In this article, we describe a minimally invasive technique of quadriceps tendon graft harvesting with a 2-2.5-cm vertical skin incision. Our technique does not require any specialized instrumentation, unlike other reported minimally invasive QT graft harvesting techniques, as we harvest the graft with a close tendon stripper.

Returning Athletes to Sports Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss treatment options, rehabilitation protocols, return-to-play criteria, and expected outcomes after non-operative and operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears among an athletic population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-operative treatment may be a viable option for some athletes with an ACL tears but can be difficult to predict "copers," and those that resume to sports return at lower performance level and/or less intense activities. Most studies assessing function after ACL reconstruction demonstrate favorable outcomes using patient-reported outcome studies. However, return-to-play and graft re-rupture rates vary substantially based on patient characteristics and level and type of athletic activity. Grafts used to reconstruct ACL produce similar objective outcomes and favorable patient-reported outcomes but have variable re-rupture rates depending on study and differ largely on morbidity associated with graft harvest. Various treatment methods including non-operative and operative techniques have been demonstrated to be efficacious in returning athletes to athletic activity depending on patient age and level of activity. Adherence to fundamental rehabilitation principles and accepted return-to-play guidelines can optimize outcomes and limit re-injury to the injured or contralateral limb.

No Difference in Complication Rates or Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Bone–Patella Tendon–Bone and Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

To compare subjective outcomes and complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) or quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data identified consecutive cohorts of patients undergoing ACLR with either BPTB or QT autograft. Patients with less than 12-month follow-up and those undergoing concomitant osteotomies, cartilage restoration, and/or other ligament reconstruction procedures were excluded. Pre- and postsurgical patient-reported outcomes including International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner, and Marx were compared between groups. Complications requiring reoperation were recorded.

Results

One hundred nineteen patients met inclusion criteria, including 39 QT autografts and 80 BPTB autografts. Demographic information was comparable between groups. Mean follow-up was comparable between groups (QT 22.4 ± 10.6 months vs BPTB 28.5 ± 18.5 months, P = .06). At minimum 12-month follow-up (range 12.0-100.8 months), patients in both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee (QT 60.0%, P < .0001; BPTB 57.7%, P < .0001), all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domains, PROMIS Mobility T-Score (QT 27.2%, P = .0001; BPTB 23.2%, P < .0001), PROMIS Global Physical Health (QT 14.4%, P = .002; BPTB 13.4%, P = .001), PROMIS Physical Function (QT 29.6%, P < .0001; BPTB 37.1%, P < .0001), PROMIS Pain Interference (QT –16.5%, P < .0001; BPTB –20.8%, P < .0001), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, (QT 76.9%, P < .0001; BPTB 73.3%, P < .0001), Tegner (QT 92.9%, P = .0002; BPTB 101.4%, P < .0001), and Marx (QT –26.6%, P = .02; BPTB –32.0%, P = .0002) with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Overall postoperative reoperation rate did not differ between groups (QT 12.8% vs BPTB 23.8%, P = .2). Revision ACL reconstruction rate did not differ between groups (QT 5.1% vs BPTB 7.5%, P = .6).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing autograft ACLR with either BPTB or QT demonstrated significant subjective improvements in patient-reported outcomes from preoperative values and no statistically significant differences in outcomes between the groups. Complication and revision ACLR rates were similar between the 2 groups.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective cohort study.

Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This review aimed to assess whether peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft would have comparable functional outcomes and graft survival rates when compared to hamstring tendon (HT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid (MEDICINE), and EMBASE databases were queried for original articles from clinical studies including the keywords: ACL reconstruction and PLT autograft. Studies comparing PLT autograft versus HT autograft were included in this analysis and the following data were extracted from studies meeting the inclusion criteria: graft diameter, functional outcomes (Tegner activity scale, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score), knee laxity (Lachman test), and complications (donor site pain or paresthesia, graft failure). Besides, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) pre-operation and at last follow-up were also compared among patients using PLT autograft. Meta-analysis was applied using Review Manager 5.3 and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies including 925 patients with ACL reconstruction met inclusion criteria. Of these, 5 studies included a direct comparison of PLT autograft (164 patients) versus HT autograft (174 patients). No significant difference was observed between PLT and HT autografts for Tegner activity scale, Lachman test, donor site pain, or graft failure. However, PLT groups demonstrated better Lysholm score (mean difference between PLT and HT groups, 1.55; 95% CI 0.20-2.89; p = 0.02) and IKDC subjective score (mean difference between PLT and HT groups, 3.24; 95% CI 0.29-6.19; p = 0.03). No difference of FADI was found (n.s.) but AOFAS was slightly decreased at last post-operative follow-up for patients with PLT autograft compared with pre-operative scores (mean difference of 0.31, 95% CI 0.07-0.54, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PLT autograft demonstrated comparable functional outcomes and graft survival rates compared with HT autograft for ACL reconstruction. However, a slight decrease in AOFAS score should be considered during surgical planning. Hence, the PLT is a suitable autograft harvested outside the knee for ACL reconstruction to avoid the complication of quadriceps-hamstring imbalance which can occur when harvesting autografts from the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Evolution in ACL Autograft Harvesting Techniques: Transition to Minimally Invasive Autograft Harvesting

Surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction continue to evolve. Harvesting techniques for commonly used ACL autografts such as bone patellar tendon bone, hamstring, and quadriceps tendon have similarly continued to progress. Traditional larger incisions for graft harvesting that were described in the 1980s have given way to smaller or more minimally invasive techniques. Advantages of these techniques are primarily anatomy based and include the following: decreased nerve complaints such as hypoesthesia or dysesthesia, improved cosmesis, decreased surgical site pain or morbidity, and, in the case of hamstring harvesting, easier tendon identification. The current literature supports reproducible minimally invasive or modified graft harvesting techniques for bone patellar tendon bone, hamstring, and quadriceps tendon autografts. Specialized instrumentation is available to simplify the harvesting process. Each of these techniques is described in detail outlining surgical steps, technical considerations, and precautions. Knowledge and review of these techniques provides the surgeon with greater flexibility and options when choosing and harvesting autograft tissue for ACL reconstruction.

Quadriceps Tendon-Bone Full-Thickness Autograft: Reproducible and Easy Harvesting Technique Using Simple Surgical Tools

Autogenous quadriceps tendon-bone graft is a great choice for knee reconstruction procedures, including primary and revision reconstructions of both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament. In primary ACL reconstruction, one of the most frequently performed procedures in orthopaedic surgery, it is gaining more and more popularity owing to improved or similar biomechanical, anatomic, and histological properties than bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. The clinical outcomes of quadriceps tendon-bone graft in ACL reconstruction are similar to bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, however, lowering the inconvenience associated with donor-site morbidity and making it possible to adjust graft length and diameter. This Technical Note describes a surgical technique for harvesting a full-thickness quadriceps tendon graft with a bone block using simple surgical tools.

Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Grafts Commonly Used for Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament are common, and often are treated with reconstruction. Limited quantitative data are available describing material properties of grafts used for reconstructions such as the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HS), and quadriceps tendon (QT). The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare microstructural and mechanical properties of BPTB, HS, and QT grafts.

METHODS

Forty specimens (13 BPTB, 13 HS, and 14 QT grafts) from 24 donors were used. Specimens were subjected to preconditioning, stress relaxation, and ramp to failure. Mechanical parameters were calculated for each sample, and polarization imaging was used to evaluate the direction and strength of collagen fiber alignment during testing.

RESULTS

QT had the largest modulus values, and HS had the smallest. BPTB exhibited the least disperse collagen organization, while HS were the least strongly aligned. Microstructural properties showed more strongly aligned collagen with increasing load for all grafts. All tissues showed stress relaxation and subtle microstructural changes during the hold period.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanical and microstructural properties differed significantly among BPTB, HS, and QT grafts. QT exhibited the largest moduli and greatest strength of collagen alignment, while HS had the smallest moduli and least strongly aligned collagen.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study identified mechanical and microstructural differences among common grafts and between these grafts and the cruciate ligaments they replace. Further research is needed to properly interpret the clinical relevance of these differences.

Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hybrid Transtibial Femoral Drilling and a Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Significant controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in adolescents with 1 to 3 years of skeletal growth remaining. Graft choice and physeal injury remain primary concerns given significantly elevated rates of failure of hamstring autograft reconstructions in this population, as well as risks of leg-length discrepancy and growth axis deviation. Traditional (more vertical) transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel can reduce risks of physeal injury but has been shown to have less accuracy restoring the native femoral ACL footprint and associated incomplete knee stabilization. On the other hand, anteromedial and outside-in drilling yields improvements in the tunnel location and biomechanics but at the cost of a more oblique trajectory and greater risk of physeal injury. A hybrid transtibial pin technique using a Pathfinder guide facilitates femoral drilling with the "best of both worlds," allowing for reproduction of the native ACL footprint and a more physeal-respecting femoral tunnel. When combined with an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft and suspensory fixation, the hybrid transtibial method yields a reliable, safe, and robust construct with promising results for the young athlete. We describe our preferred graft harvest, tunnel drilling, and fixation techniques to minimize physeal risks and optimize outcomes.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Partial-Thickness Quadriceps Tendon Graft Secured With a Continuous-Loop Fixation Device

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has recently gained popularity because newer techniques allow harvest of a robust graft with little soft-tissue dissection or donor-site morbidity. The QT graft can provide a safe, reproducible, and versatile option for primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with equivalent outcomes and failure rates to those of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts. Therefore, continued improvement in surgical technique may help to further improve patient outcomes. This study introduces a modification of current QT techniques using a partial-thickness graft with continuous-loop EndoButton fixation (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA).