1
|
Khokhar AS, Batko BD, Hanna G, Cleary C, Rousseau M, Crawford L, Edobor-Osula F. Surgical prophylaxis in pediatric orthopedic patients with penicillin allergy: a multicentered retrospective prognostic study. J Pediatr Orthop B 2024; 33:363-368. [PMID: 37712763 DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0000000000001126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Up to 20% of orthopedic surgeons still avoid the use of cephalosporins in patients with penicillin allergies despite its reported safety in the adult and general surgery pediatric population. The primary objective is to determine the incidence of adverse effects and allergic reactions when using cephalosporins in pediatric orthopedic patients labeled as penicillin-allergic as compared to those without previously reported penicillin allergy. A multicenter retrospective chart review was performed across three level 1 trauma centers from January 2013 to February 2020 to identify penicillin-allergic as well as non-penicillin-allergic pediatric patients treated for orthopedic injuries. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, antibiotic administered, timing of antibiotic administration, reported drug allergy, and described allergic reaction. Postoperative or intraoperative allergic reactions to antibiotics, surgical site infections, and complications were recorded. A total of 2289 surgeries performed by four fellowship-trained surgeons were evaluated. Eighty-five patients diagnosed with penicillin allergy were identified and underwent 95 surgeries and 95 patients without previously reported penicillin allergy underwent 95 surgeries. One patient, with a documented history of anaphylaxis to cefazolin, sustained an anaphylactic reaction intraoperatively to cefazolin. There were no other reported reactions, surgical site infections, or complications. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of allergic reaction in patients with previously reported penicillin allergy treated with cefazolin and those with no previous reported reaction ( P > 0.05). Prophylaxis with cephalosporins is not associated with increased risk for allergic reaction. Cephalosporins can be safely administered to pediatric patients with penicillin allergy undergoing orthopedic intervention. Level of evidence: Level II, Multicenter Retrospective Prognostic Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed S Khokhar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Brian D Batko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Gabriel Hanna
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Courtney Cleary
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Morgan Rousseau
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lindsay Crawford
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porto JR, Lavu MS, Hecht CJ, McNassor R, Burkhart RJ, Kamath AF. Is Penicillin Allergy a Clinical Problem? A Systematic Review of Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures With Implications for Patient Safety and Antibiotic Stewardship. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:1616-1623. [PMID: 38040064 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) who report penicillin allergy (PA) are frequently administered second-line antibiotics, although recent evidence suggests that this may be unnecessary and could increase infection risk. Many institutions have aimed to improve antibiotic deployment via allergy testing and screening; however, there is little standardization to this process. This review aimed to evaluate (1) antibiotic selection in patients who report PA and assess the impact of screening and testing interventions, (2) rates of allergic reactions in patients who report PA, and (3) the association between reported PA and screening or testing programs and odds of surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched on February 4, 2023 to identify all studies published since January 1, 2000 that evaluated the impact of PA on patients undergoing TJA (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023394031). Articles were included if full-text manuscripts in English were available, and the study analyzed the impact of PA and related interventions on TJA patients. There were 11 studies evaluating 1,276,663 patients included. Interventions were compared via presentation of key findings regarding rates of clinically relevant or high-risk PA reported upon screenings or testings, cephalosporin utilizations, allergic reactions, and postoperative infections (surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection). RESULTS All 6 studies found that PA screening and testing markedly increase the use of first-line antibiotics. Testing showed low rates of true allergy (0.7 to 3%) and allergic reaction frequency for patients who have reported PA receiving cephalosporins was between 0% and 2%. Although there were mixed findings across studies, there was a trend toward second-line antibiotic prophylaxis being associated with a slightly higher rate of infection in PA patients. CONCLUSIONS Using PA screening and testing can promote antibiotic stewardship by safely increasing the use of first-line antibiotics in patients who have a reported PA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, Therapeutic Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Porto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Monish S Lavu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christian J Hecht
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ryan McNassor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Robert J Burkhart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nieboer M, Braig Z, Rosenow C, Marigi E, Tande A, Barlow J, Sanchez-Sotelo J, O'Driscoll S, Morrey M. Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with higher rates of elbow periprosthetic joint infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:940-947. [PMID: 38104721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common source of failure following elbow arthroplasty. Perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are considered standard of care. However, there are no data regarding the comparative efficacy of various antibiotics in the prevention of PJI for elbow arthroplasty. Previous studies in shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasty have demonstrated higher rates of PJI with administration of non-cefazolin antibiotics. The elbow has higher rates of PJI than other joints. Therefore, this study evaluated whether perioperative antibiotic choice affects rates of PJI in elbow arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-institution, prospectively collected total joint registry database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary elbow arthroplasty between 2003 and 2021. Elbows with known infection prior to arthroplasty (25) and procedures with incomplete perioperative antibiotic data (7) were excluded, for a final sample size of 603 total elbow arthroplasties and 19 distal humerus hemiarthroplasties. Cefazolin was administered in 561 elbows (90%) and non-cefazolin antibiotics including vancomycin (32 elbows, 5%), clindamycin (27 elbows, 4%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (2 elbows, 0.3%) were administered in the remaining 61 elbows (10%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the association between the antibiotic administered and the development of PJI. Infection-free survivorship was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Deep infection occurred in 47 elbows (7.5%), and 16 elbows (2.5%) were diagnosed with superficial infections. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients receiving non-cefazolin alternatives were at significantly higher risk for any infection (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-5.0; P < .01) and deep infection (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.5; P < .01) compared with cefazolin administration. Multivariable analysis, controlling for several independent predictors of PJI (tobacco use, male sex, surgical indication other than osteoarthritis, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score), showed that non-cefazolin administration had a higher risk for any infection (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.3; P < .01) and deep infection (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.3; P < .01). Survivorship free of infection was significantly higher at all time points for the cefazolin cohort. DISCUSSION In primary elbow arthroplasty, cefazolin administration was associated with significantly lower rates of PJI compared to non-cefazolin antibiotics, even in patients with a greater number of prior surgeries, which is known to increase the risk of PJI. For patients with penicillin or cephalosporin allergies, preoperative allergy testing or a cefazolin test dose should be considered before administering non-cefazolin alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah Nieboer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Zachary Braig
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Erick Marigi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aaron Tande
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan Barlow
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Shawn O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mark Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jones NK, Tom B, Simillis C, Bennet J, Gourgiotis S, Griffin J, Blaza H, Nasser S, Baker S, Gouliouris T. Impact of penicillin allergy labels on surgical site infections in a large UK cohort of gastrointestinal surgery patients. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2024; 6:dlae022. [PMID: 38372001 PMCID: PMC10873540 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Studies in the USA, Canada and France have reported higher surgical site infection (SSI) risk in patients with a penicillin allergy label (PAL). Here, we investigate the association between PALs and SSI in the UK, a country with distinct epidemiology of infecting pathogens and range of antimicrobial regimens in routine use. Methods Electronic health records and national SSI surveillance data were collated for a retrospective cohort of gastrointestinal surgery patients at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine the effects of PALs and the use of non-β-lactam-based prophylaxis on likelihood of SSI, 30 day post-operative mortality, 7 day post-operative acute kidney injury and 60 day post-operative infection/colonization with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria or Clostridioides difficile. Results Our data comprised 3644 patients and 4085 operations; 461 were undertaken in the presence of PALs (11.3%). SSI was detected after 435/4085 (10.7%) operations. Neither the presence of PALs, nor the use of non-β-lactam-based prophylaxis were found to be associated with SSI: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.90 (95% CI 0.65-1.25) and 1.20 (0.88-1.62), respectively. PALs were independently associated with increased odds of newly identified MRSA infection/colonization in the 60 days after surgery: aOR 2.71 (95% CI 1.13-6.49). Negative association was observed for newly identified infection/colonization with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: aOR 0.38 (95% CI 0.16-0.89). Conclusions No evidence was found for an association between PALs and the likelihood of SSI in this large UK cohort, suggesting significant international variation in the impact of PALs on surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick K Jones
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brian Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Constantinos Simillis
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - John Bennet
- Department of General Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stavros Gourgiotis
- Department of General Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jo Griffin
- Department of Infection, Prevention and Control, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Blaza
- Department of Infection, Prevention and Control, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shuaib Nasser
- Department of Allergy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen Baker
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Theodore Gouliouris
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Markes AR, Bigham J, Ma CB, Iyengar JJ, Feeley BT. Preventing and Treating Infection in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2023:10.1007/s12178-023-09843-1. [PMID: 37227587 PMCID: PMC10382412 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09843-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty is relatively uncommon though associated with severe long-term morbidity when encountered. The purpose of the review is to summarize the recent literature regarding the definition, clinical evaluation, prevention, and management of prosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. RECENT FINDINGS The landmark report generated at the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection has provided a framework for diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder specific literature with validated interventions to reduce prosthetic joint infection is limited; however existing literature from retrospective studies and from total hip and knee arthroplasty allows us to make relative guidelines. One and two-stage revisions seem to demonstrate similar outcomes; however, no controlled comparative studies exist limiting the ability to make definitive recommendations between the two options. We report on recent literature regarding the current diagnostic, preventative, and treatment options for periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and further high-level shoulder specific studies are needed to answer questions generated from this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R Markes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - Joseph Bigham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | | | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
When intravenous vancomycin prophylaxis is needed in shoulder arthroplasty, incomplete administration is associated with increased infectious complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:803-812. [PMID: 36375749 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vancomycin is often used as antimicrobial prophylaxis for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) either when first generation cephalosporins are contraindicated or colonization with resistant bacteria is anticipated. In general, vancomycin necessitates longer infusion times to mitigate potential side effects. When infusion is started too close to the time of the incision, administration may not be complete during surgery. This study evaluated whether incomplete administration of intravenous vancomycin prior to SA affects the rate of infectious complications. METHODS Between 2000 and 2019, all primary SA types (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total SA, reverse SA) performed at a single institution for elective and trauma indications using intravenous vancomycin as the primary antibiotic prophylaxis and a minimum follow-up of 2 yr were identified. The time between the initiation of vancomycin and skin incision was calculated. Complete administration was defined as at least 30 min of infusion prior to incision. Demographic characteristics and infectious complications including survival free of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) were generated. Multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between vancomycin timing and the development of PJI. RESULTS A total of 461 primary SAs were included. Infusion was incomplete (< 30 minutes preoperatively) for 163 [35.4%] SA and complete (> 30 minutes preoperatively) for 298 [64.6%] SAs. The incomplete group demonstrated higher rates of any infectious complication (8% vs. 2.3%; P = .005), PJI (5.5% vs. 1%; P = .004), and reoperation inclusive of revision due to infectious complications (4.9% vs. 1%; P = .009). Survivorship free of PJI was worse in SA with incomplete compared to those with complete vancomycin administration. Survival rates for incomplete and complete administration were 97.6% and 99.3% at 1 mo, 95.7% and 99.0% at 2 yr, 95.1% and 99.0% at 5 yr, and 93.9% and 99.0% at 20 yr, respectively (P = .006). Multivariable analyses confirmed that incomplete vancomycin administration was an independent risk factor for PJI compared with complete administration (hazard ratio, 4.22 [95% confidence interval, 1.12-15.90]; P = .033), even when other independent predictors of PJI (age, male sex, prior surgery, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization, and follow-up) were considered. CONCLUSIONS When vancomycin is the primary prophylactic agent used at the time of primary SA, incomplete administration (infusion to incision time under 30 min) seems to adversely increase the rates of infectious complications and PJI. Prophylaxis protocols should ensure that complete vancomycin administration is achieved to minimize infection after SA.
Collapse
|
7
|
Documented Penicillin Allergies Should Not Preclude Use of Preoperative Cefazolin in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e107-e117. [PMID: 36580056 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perioperative cefazolin administration for total joint arthroplasty is a first-line antibiotic recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines for the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We aim to analyze the clinical viability of giving patients with a documented penicillin allergy (PA) a perioperative full-strength cefazolin "test dose" under anesthesia. METHODS This is a retrospective chart review of 2,451 total joint arthroplasties from a high-volume arthroplasty orthopaedic surgeon over a 5-year period from January 2013 through December 2017. This surgeon routinely gave patients with a documented PA a full-strength cefazolin test dose while under anesthesia instead of administrating a second-line antibiotic. The primary outcomes examined were allergic reaction and postoperative infection. RESULTS Cefazolin was given to 87.1% of all patients (1,990) and 46.0% of patients with a PA (143). The total rate of allergic reactions among all patients was 0.5% (11). Only one patient with a documented PA who received cefazolin had an allergic reaction. The reaction was not severe and did not require any additional treatment. In patients who had no reported allergies and received cefazolin, 0.3% (6) had an allergic reaction. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of allergic reaction when comparing patients with and without a PA (P = 0.95). Patients receiving cefazolin had an overall PJI rate of 2.9% (57) versus those patients receiving antibiotics other than cefazolin who sustained a 5.5% PJI rate (16), which was statistically significant (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION This study found that utilization of a full-strength test dose of cefazolin in patients with a documented PA is a feasible, safe, and effective way of increasing the rate of cefazolin administration and thus mitigating the risk of PJIs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Panther EJ, Hao KA, Wright JO, Schoch JJ, Ritter AS, King JJ, Wright TW, Schoch BS. Techniques for Decreasing Bacterial Load for Open Shoulder Surgery. JBJS Rev 2022; 10:01874474-202211000-00007. [PMID: 36821410 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.22.00141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
» Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% has been shown to reduce Cutibacterium acnes load on the skin. BPO 5% with miconazole nitrate (MN) 2% may be beneficial, whereas BPO 5% with clindamycin cream 1% to 1.2% does not seem to have additive effects when compared with BPO 5% alone. Chlorhexidine gluconate solutions reduce the total bacterial load on the skin, but do not seem to have a significant effect on C. acnes. » ChloraPrep seems to be the best surgical skin preparation to decrease overall positive skin cultures. Preincisional hydrogen peroxide 3% application has been shown to be a cost-effective practice to inhibit growth of C. acnes. Vancomycin powder before deltopectoral interval closure has antimicrobial effects against C. acnes and is a cost-effective practice. Finally, Bactisure surgical lavage is protective against the formation of biofilms. » IV cefazolin has been shown to be more effective for shoulder arthroplasty infection prophylaxis than antibiotic alternatives such as vancomycin. Thus, patients with a questionable history of penicillin allergy should undergo additional testing. » For shoulder surgery infection prophylaxis, we recommend the use of BPO 5% cream for 5 days preoperatively with chlorhexidine wipes the night before and the morning of surgery. IV cefazolin should be administered perioperatively, and patients with a questionable history of penicillin allergy should be tested. Surgeons should consider preincisional application of hydrogen peroxide 3% for 5 minutes, followed by standard ChloraPrep preparation. Normal saline should be used for preclosure lavage. Finally, application of vancomycin powder deep to the deltopectoral interval closure should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Panther
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kevin A Hao
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jonathan O Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jennifer J Schoch
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Alaina S Ritter
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perioperative Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Practice. Orthop Clin North Am 2022; 53:483-490. [PMID: 36208890 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Perioperative management for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty has evolved significantly over the years to reduce overt complications and improve patient outcomes. The groundwork for perioperative care encompasses initial patient selection and education strategies for achieving successful outcome. Multimodal pain management strategies have advanced patient care with the increased use of new regional/local anesthetics. In addition, complications resulting from blood loss and transfusions have been curtailed with the use of synthetic antifibrinolytic agents. It remains critical for shoulder arthroplasty surgeons to optimize patients during the perioperative period through various modalities to maximize functional progression, outcomes, and patient's satisfaction following shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
|
10
|
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Antibiotic Allergies Increase Risk of Postoperative Complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e1249-e1259. [PMID: 35587935 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic infections after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are associated with devastating complications and prolonged treatment. Patients with identified antibiotic allergy (ABX) may be at increased risk for complications because of suboptimal preincisional prophylaxis. This study aims to quantify the risk of postoperative outcomes and complications for patients undergoing TSA with a history of ABX. METHODS Retrospective cohort analysis of patient data was conducted using the PearlDiver Patient Records Database. Patients who underwent TSA for osteoarthritis were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes and were stratified based on self-reported (1) penicillin, (2) sulfonamide, or (3) other antibiotic allergies. We analyzed patient demographics, comorbidities, 90-day medical complications, and rate of revision at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. RESULTS In total, 85,606 patients who underwent TSA for osteoarthritis from 2010 to 2018 were identified, of whom 7,836 (9.15%) had a reported ABX. Univariate analysis found the ABX cohort was younger (67.5 versus 67.7 year; P = 0.042), more often female (67.57% versus 54.79%; P < 0.001), and more likely to have Elixhauser comorbidities than nonallergic control subjects. Multivariate analysis found patients who reported ABX had increased likelihood of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 3.129), 1 year (OR: 2.016), and 2 years of surgery (OR: 2.221). Patients with reported ABX had increased likelihood of postoperative anemia (OR: 1.126), blood transfusion (OR: 1.238), and readmission (OR: 1.585) within 90 days of surgery. Patients with penicillin allergy had a greater incidence of revision due to PJI at 30 days (OR: 4.811), 90 days (OR: 2.91), 1 year (OR: 2.105), and 2 years (OR: 2.72). Rates of reported ABX increased from 2010 to 2018 (8.60% to 10.91%; P = 0.001) in patients undergoing TSA. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing TSA with a history of ABX had a higher risk of readmission, postoperative anemia, blood transfusions, and PJI. These findings support critical assessment and clarification of reported allergies before TSA and possibly the use of preoperative allergy testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3 therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
11
|
Marigi EM, Bartels DW, Yoon JH, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin Is Associated with Lower Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates Than Non-Cefazolin Alternatives. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:872-880. [PMID: 35188900 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although prophylactic antibiotics are considered the standard of care, data with regard to the comparative efficacy of specific antibiotics in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have remained limited. This study evaluated whether perioperative antibiotic choice affects rates of PJI development in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS From 2000 to 2019, all primary shoulder arthroplasty types (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty) performed for elective and trauma indications with perioperative antibiotic data and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were identified from a single institution. Demographic characteristics, PJI risk factors, and PJI-free survivorship data were retrieved. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association between the antibiotic administered and the development of PJI. RESULTS Of 7,713 shoulder arthroplasties, cefazolin was administered in 6,879 procedures (89.2%) and non-cefazolin antibiotics consisting of vancomycin (465 procedures [6.0%]), clindamycin (345 procedures [4.5%]), and alternative regimens (24 procedures [0.31%]) were administered in 834 procedures (10.8%). PJIs occurred in 101 shoulder arthroplasties (1.3%), with Cutibacterium acnes as the most common pathogen (44 procedures [43.6%]). PJI-free survivorship was greater in shoulder arthroplasties in which cefazolin was administered compared with those in which non-cefazolin antibiotics were administered, with 0.91% greater survival free of PJI at 1 month, 1.4% at 1 year, and 2.7% at 15 years (p < 0.001). Cefazolin administration, compared with non-cefazolin administration, was associated with a 69% reduction in all-cause PJI risk and a 78% reduction in C. acnes PJI risk (p < 0.001). A higher risk of PJI for both groups was observed with vancomycin; the hazard ratio [HR] was 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 4.40; p = 0.010) for all-cause PJI and 2.94 (95% CI, 1.12 to 7.49; p = 0.028) for C. acnes PJI. A higher risk of PJI was also observed for both groups for clindamycin; the HR was 5.07 (95% CI, 2.83 to 9.05; p < 0.001) for all-cause PJI and 8.01 (95% CI, 3.63 to 17.42; p < 0.001) for C. acnes PJI. CONCLUSIONS In primary shoulder arthroplasty, cefazolin administration was associated with a significantly lower rate of PJI compared with non-cefazolin alternatives, including both vancomycin and clindamycin. These risk discrepancies were observed across all infectious pathogens and may be considered even greater when C. acnes was the infecting bacterium. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erick M Marigi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Joo Hee Yoon
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John W Sperling
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghert M. Can We Improve Our Approach to Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Shoulder Arthroplasty?: Commentary on an article by Erick M. Marigi, MD, et al.: "Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin Is Associated with Lower Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates Than Non-Cefazolin Alternatives". J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:e45. [PMID: 35583546 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Ghert
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Almuhtarihan IF, S Suharjono, Airlangga PA, Padolo E. Use of prophylactic antibiotics on surgical site infections in arthroplasty patients (Scoping Review). JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/22104917221082313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increased demand for arthroplasty also increases the number of complications of arthroplasty, especially surgical site infection (SSI). One of the effective strategies in preventing surgical site infection is the use of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics. Objective To identify and analyse information from clinical studies regarding factors affecting the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in arthroplasty patients. Methods A scoping review was conducted through the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases within a publication range from January 2004 to August 2020. Study data are extracted and analysed by a minimum of two reviewers. Results The search results found 2.419 articles, with 39 articles were included for further analysis. Cefazolin monotherapy was the most frequently studied antibiotic (15 articles) followed by vancomycin monotherapy (8 articles). Most widely used antibiotics in arthroplasty were cefazolin mono-therapy (997.599 procedures with SSI incidence range: 0,20–16,05%) followed by vancomycin mono-therapy (125.170 procedures with SSI incidence range: 0.27–3,88%) The correct antibiotic dose has a lower percentage of the SSI than the wrong antibiotic dose. Meanwhile, administration of antibiotics within single dose or <24 h had a lower SSI percentage than administration of antibiotics >24 h. Administration antibiotics before incision also have a lower SSI percentage than after incision. There were no studies that discussed re-dosing of antibiotics in this scoping review. Conclusions There is still a need for further research related to the duration and specific timing of first dose of prophylactic antibiotics, especially regarding single dose or multiple dose antibiotics to obtain maximum effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irsan Fahmi Almuhtarihan
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Pharmacy Department, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia
| | - S Suharjono
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Primadenny Ariesa Airlangga
- Dr Soetomo General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine University of Airlangga, Dr Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Elfri Padolo
- Pharmacy Department, Dr Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Penicillin Allergy in Spine Surgery: Increased rates of sepsis, emergency room visits and readmission. World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e91-e98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
15
|
Is Patient-reported Penicillin Allergy Independently Associated with Increased Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty of the Hip, Knee, and Shoulder? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:2699-2709. [PMID: 33027190 PMCID: PMC7899399 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with a patient-reported penicillin allergy may be at greater risk for postoperative prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty of the hip, knee, or shoulder. The increased risk of PJI in these patients has been attributed to these patients receiving a less-effective perioperative antibiotic. However, prior reports did not fully address the clinical characteristics of these unique patients, who may inherently be at greater risk of having a PJI, which may confound prior findings. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES After controlling for risk factors for PJI such as BMI, anxiety, depression, and other comorbidities, we asked: Are patients with a patient-reported penicillin allergy more likely to have a PJI after THA, TKA, or total shoulder arthroplasty than patients without such a reported allergy? METHODS We queried patient records from 2010 to 2017 from a nationwide administrative claims database of 122 million patients to adequately power an investigation comparing the 1-year incidence of PJI after TKA, total shoulder arthroplasty, and THA in patients with patient-reported penicillin allergy versus patients without a patient-reported penicillin allergy. Operative treatments for deep joint infection, identified by Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used as a surrogate for PJI. Clinical characteristics such as age, sex, BMI, length of stay, and Charlson comorbidity index and specific comorbidities including alcohol abuse, anemia, anxiety, cardiac disease, diabetes, immunocompromised status, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, tobacco use, and peripheral vascular disease were queried for each study group. The odds of PJI within 1 year of THA, TKA, or total shoulder arthroplasty were compared using multiple logistic regression after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as BMI, anxiety, depression and other comorbidities, we found that patient-reported penicillin allergy was independently associated with an increased odds of PJI after TKA (odds ratio 1.3 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.4]; p < 0.01) and total shoulder arthroplasty (OR 3.9 [95% CI 2.7 to 5.4]; p < 0.01). However, patient-reported penicillin allergy was not independently associated with an increased odds of PJI after THA (OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.3]; p = 0.36) after controlling for the same risk factors. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we found that patients with patient-reported penicillin allergy were at an increased risk for PJI after TKA and total shoulder arthroplasty, which we suspect-but cannot prove-is likely a function of those patients receiving a second-line antibiotic for presurgical prophylaxis. Since prior research has found that many patients listed in medical records as having a penicillin allergy are in fact not allergic to penicillin, we suggest that surgeons consider preoperative allergy testing, such as using an intraoperative test dose, to aid in choosing the most appropriate antibiotic choice before knee or shoulder arthroplasty and to amend patient medical records based on testing results. Future studies should determine whether this additional diagnostic maneuver is cost-effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
16
|
Contreras ES, Frantz TL, Bishop JY, Cvetanovich GL. Periprosthetic Infection After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2020; 13:757-768. [PMID: 32827305 PMCID: PMC7661562 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09670-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Periprosthetic infection is a relatively rare but potentially devastating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this article is to review the incidence, diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a focus on literature published within the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS The 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection provides us with a framework for the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher reported rate of infection compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our current diagnostic tests do not appear to be as sensitive when compared with the hip and knee literature. Similar success has been reported with single and two-stage revision protocols, although prospective comparative data are lacking. The significance of unexpected positive cultures during revision arthroplasty remains unclear. We report current diagnostic and therapeutic options for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the current literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Further high-level studies are warranted to refine these definitions and guide management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik S. Contreras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Travis L. Frantz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Julie Y. Bishop
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Gregory L. Cvetanovich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|