1
|
Barac M, Scaletty S, Hassett LC, Stillwell A, Croarkin PE, Chauhan M, Chesak S, Bobo WV, Athreya AP, Dyrbye LN. Wearable Technologies for Detecting Burnout and Well-Being in Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e50253. [PMID: 38916948 PMCID: PMC11234055 DOI: 10.2196/50253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occupational burnout epidemic is a growing issue, and in the United States, up to 60% of medical students, residents, physicians, and registered nurses experience symptoms. Wearable technologies may provide an opportunity to predict the onset of burnout and other forms of distress using physiological markers. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify physiological biomarkers of burnout, and establish what gaps are currently present in the use of wearable technologies for burnout prediction among health care professionals (HCPs). METHODS A comprehensive search of several databases was performed on June 7, 2022. No date limits were set for the search. The databases were Ovid: MEDLINE(R), Embase, Healthstar, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection via Clarivate Analytics, Scopus via Elsevier, EBSCOhost: Academic Search Premier, CINAHL with Full Text, and Business Source Premier. Studies observing anxiety, burnout, stress, and depression using a wearable device worn by an HCP were included, with HCP defined as medical students, residents, physicians, and nurses. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies. RESULTS The initial search yielded 505 papers, from which 10 (1.95%) studies were included in this review. The majority (n=9) used wrist-worn biosensors and described observational cohort studies (n=8), with a low risk of bias. While no physiological measures were reliably associated with burnout or anxiety, step count and time in bed were associated with depressive symptoms, and heart rate and heart rate variability were associated with acute stress. Studies were limited with long-term observations (eg, ≥12 months) and large sample sizes, with limited integration of wearable data with system-level information (eg, acuity) to predict burnout. Reporting standards were also insufficient, particularly in device adherence and sampling frequency used for physiological measurements. CONCLUSIONS With wearables offering promise for digital health assessments of human functioning, it is possible to see wearables as a frontier for predicting burnout. Future digital health studies exploring the utility of wearable technologies for burnout prediction should address the limitations of data standardization and strategies to improve adherence and inclusivity in study participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milica Barac
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Samantha Scaletty
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Leslie C Hassett
- Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ashley Stillwell
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Paul E Croarkin
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mohit Chauhan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Sherry Chesak
- Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William V Bobo
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Arjun P Athreya
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Liselotte N Dyrbye
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Howie EE, Ambler O, Gunn EG, Dias RD, Wigmore SJ, Skipworth RJ, Yule SJ. Surgical Sabermetrics: A Scoping Review of Technology-enhanced Assessment of Nontechnical Skills in the Operating Room. Ann Surg 2024; 279:973-984. [PMID: 38258573 PMCID: PMC11086675 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the current evidence for surgical sabermetrics: digital methods of assessing surgical nontechnical skills and investigate the implications for enhancing surgical performance. BACKGROUND Surgeons need high-quality, objective, and timely feedback to optimize performance and patient safety. Digital tools to assess nontechnical skills have the potential to reduce human bias and aid scalability. However, we do not fully understand which of the myriad of digital metrics of performance assessment have efficacy for surgeons. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. MeSH terms and keywords included "Assessment," "Surgeons," and "Technology". Eligible studies included a digital assessment of nontechnical skills for surgeons, residents, and/or medical students within an operative context. RESULTS From 19,229 articles screened, 81 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in surgical specialties, settings, and outcome measurements. A total of 122 distinct objective, digital metrics were utilized. Studies digitally measured at least 1 category of surgical nontechnical skill using a single (n=54) or multiple objective measures (n=27). The majority of studies utilized simulation (n=48) over live operative settings (n=32). Surgical Sabermetrics has been demonstrated to be beneficial in measuring cognitive load (n=57), situation awareness (n=24), communication (n=3), teamwork (n=13), and leadership (n=2). No studies measured intraoperative decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The literature detailing the intersection between surgical data science and operative nontechnical skills is diverse and growing rapidly. Surgical Sabermetrics may provide a promising modifiable technique to achieve desirable outcomes for both the surgeon and the patient. This study identifies a diverse array of measurements possible with sensor devices and highlights research gaps, including the need for objective assessment of decision-making. Future studies may advance the integration of physiological sensors to provide a holistic assessment of surgical performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E. Howie
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Olivia Ambler
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Eilidh G.M. Gunn
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Roger D. Dias
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Human Factors and Cognitive Engineering Lab, STRATUS Centre for Medical Simulation, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stephen J. Wigmore
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Richard J.E. Skipworth
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Steven J. Yule
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh & Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Surgical Sabermetrics Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vasireddi N, Vasireddi N, Shah AK, Moyal AJ, Gausden EB, Mclawhorn AS, Poelstra KA, Gould HP, Voos JE, Calcei JG. High Prevalence of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Limited Evidence-based Ergonomics in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482:659-671. [PMID: 37987688 PMCID: PMC10936985 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Disease Control defines work-related musculoskeletal disorders as disorders of the nerves, muscles, tendons, joints, spinal discs, and cartilage that are caused or exacerbated by the environment or nature of work. Previous meta-analyses have characterized work-related musculoskeletal disorders among interventionists, general surgeons, and other surgical subspecialties, but prevalence estimates, prognosis, and ergonomic considerations vary by study and surgical specialty. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What is the career prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in orthopaedic surgeons? (2) What is the treatment prevalence associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders in orthopaedic surgeons? (3) What is the disability burden of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in orthopaedic surgeons? (4) What is the scope of orthopaedic surgical ergonomic assessments and interventions? METHODS A systematic review of English-language studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed in December 2022 and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that presented prevalence estimates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders or assessed surgical ergonomics in orthopaedic surgery were included. Reviews, case reports, gray literature (conference abstracts and preprints), and studies with mixed-surgeon (nonorthopaedic) populations were excluded. The search yielded 5603 abstracts; 24 survey-based studies with 4876 orthopaedic surgeons (mean age 48 years; 79% of surgeons were men) were included for an analysis of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, and 18 articles were included for a descriptive synthesis of ergonomic assessment. Quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Tool revealed that studies had a low to moderate risk of bias, largely because of self-reporting survey-based methodology. Because of considerable heterogeneity and risk of bias, prevalence outcomes were not pooled and instead are presented as ranges (mean I 2 = 91.3%). RESULTS The career prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in orthopaedic surgeons ranged from 37% to 97%. By anatomic location, the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the head and neck ranged from 4% to 74%; back ranged from 9% to 77%; forearm, wrist, and hand ranged from 12% to 54%; elbow ranged from 3% to 28%; shoulder ranged from 3% to 34%; hip and thigh ranged from 1% to 10%; knee and lower leg ranged from 1% to 31%; and foot and ankle ranged from 4% to 25%. Of orthopaedic surgeons reporting work-related musculoskeletal disorders, 9% to 33% had a leave of absence, practice restriction or modification, or early retirement, and 27% to 83% received some form of treatment. Orthopaedic surgeons experienced biomechanical, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and metabolic stress during procedures. Interventions to improve orthopaedic surgical ergonomics have been limited, but have included robotic assistance, proper visualization aids, appropriate use of power tools, and safely minimizing lead apron use. In hip and knee arthroplasty, robotic assistance was the most effective in improving posture and reducing caloric expenditure. In spine surgery, proper use of surgical loupes was the most effective in improving posture. CONCLUSION Although the reported ranges of our main findings were wide, even on the low end of the reported ranges, work-related musculoskeletal disability among orthopaedic surgeons appears to be a substantial concern. We recommend that orthopaedic residency training programs incorporate surgical ergonomics or work injury lectures, workshops, and film review (alongside existing film review of surgical skills) into their curricula. We suggest hospitals engage in shared decision-making with surgeons through anonymous needs assessment surveys to implement wellness programs specific to surgeons' musculoskeletal needs. We urge institutions to assess surgeon ergonomics during routine quality assessment of novel surgical instruments and workflows. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Vasireddi
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, South Euclid, OH, USA
| | | | - Aakash K. Shah
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew J. Moyal
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, South Euclid, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Kornelis A. Poelstra
- The Robotic Spine Institute of New Jersey, Jersey City, NJ, USA
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - James E. Voos
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, South Euclid, OH, USA
| | - Jacob G. Calcei
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, South Euclid, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Howie EE, Dharanikota H, Gunn E, Ambler O, Dias R, Wigmore SJ, Skipworth RJE, Yule S. Cognitive Load Management: An Invaluable Tool for Safe and Effective Surgical Training. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2023; 80:311-322. [PMID: 36669990 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This article highlights the importance of considering Cognitive Load (CL) and Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) during surgical training, focusing on the acquisition of intra-operative skills. It describes the basis of CLT with the overarching aim of describing CLT-based techniques to enhance current training strategies and surgical performance, many of which are instinctively already employed in surgical practice. Currently, methods of feedback and assessment are imperfect - typically subjective, unsystematic, opportunistic, or retrospective, and at risk of human bias. Surgical Sabermetrics, the advanced analytics of surgical and audio-visual data, aims to enhance this feedback by providing objective, real-time, digital-based feedback. This article introduces the benefit of real-time measurement of CL to enhance feedback and its applications to surgical performance that follow the ethos of Surgical Sabermetrics.1 The 2022 theme for ICOSET was "Making it Better." Cognitive Load and Surgical Sabermetrics principles provide tools to make Surgical training better, with the goal of higher quality care for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E Howie
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Eilidh Gunn
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Ambler
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Dias
- STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen J Wigmore
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J E Skipworth
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Yule
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaysburg DM, Delman AM, Sisak S, Turner KM, Ammann AM, Cortez AR, Shah SA, Quillin III RC. Biophysiological stress and sleep deprivation among abdominal transplant surgery fellows: A prospective multi-institutional study using a wearable device. Am J Surg 2022; 225:962-966. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|