Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Reverse versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: A large matched cohort analysis

Introduction

The annual utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) has grown exponentially, in part due to the expanded indications of RTSA. This evolution in shoulder arthroplasty prompts the need to evaluate outcomes between ATSA and RTSA. However, many other studies comparing outcomes between ATSA and RTSA lacked a large nationally-represented sample, a matched cohort analysis, or both. In this study, we compare outcomes between patients undergoing ATSA or RTSA in a large matched-cohort analysis.

Methods

Patients undergoing RTSA or ATSA from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2016 and 2019 were identified. Groups were propensity-matched based on demographics and comorbidities. We compared medical and surgical complications, length of stay, and total hospital charges. T-tests and chi-square tests were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Odds ratios were calculated as a ratio between RTSA and ATSA groups.

Results

Following matching, there were 38,782 patients in the ATSA group and 35,461 patients in the RTSA group. The RTSA group had higher odds of acute renal failure (OR 1.35), blood loss anemia (OR 1.39), and pneumonia (OR 1.19). There were no differences for myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, mortality, periprosthetic fracture, or dislocation. The RTSA group had higher odds of periprosthetic mechanical complication (OR 1.92), but lower odds of periprosthetic joint infection (OR 0.65). The mean length of stay and total hospital charges were both higher in the RTSA group (p < 0.001).

Discussion

We found patients undergoing RTSA are at higher odds of inpatient medical complications, including acute renal failure and acute blood loss anemia. RTSA is associated with higher odds of short-term periprosthetic mechanical complications.

Shoulder replacement: an epidemiological nationwide study from 2009 to 2019

Background

Shoulder replacement (SR) constitutes the gold standard treatment for severe shoulder diseases, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, complex fractures, avascular necrosis and rotator cuff arthropathy. Although several countries have national registries, there is a lack of epidemiological data on SR. Sharing national statistics and correlating those to other countries could be helpful to compare outcomes and costs internationally. This paper aims to evaluate the trend of hospitalizations for SR (both first implants and revisions of anatomical and reverse prosthesis) in Italy from 2009 to 2019, based on the National Hospital Discharge Reports (S.D.O) provided by the Italian National Health Service (INHS). Moreover, the economic impact on the healthcare system of SR and SR revisions was assessed, providing a statistical prediction for the next ten years.

Methods

The data used in this paper were about patients who underwent Total Shoulder Replacement (TSR), Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty (SH) or Revision of shoulder joint replacement (RSR) from 2009 to 2019 in Italy. Information about patients was anonymous and included age, sex, days of hospitalization, procedures and diagnoses codes.

Results

From 2009 to 2019, 73,046 TSR and SH were performed in adult Italian residents, with a cumulative incidence of 13.6 cases per 100,000 adult Italian residents. While, 2,129 revisions of shoulder replacement were performed, with a cumulative incidence of 0.4 cases per 100,000 residents. Overall, females represented the majority of the cases (72.4% of patients who underwent TSR or SH and 59.1% of patients who underwent RSR). From 2009 to 2019, has been assessed an overall cost of 625,638,990€ for TSR or SH procedures in Italy. While, an overall cost of 9,855,141€ for RSR procedures in Italy was calculated.

Conclusions

The incidence of SR and RSR is expected to increase in the following years, constituting a burden for the healthcare systems. Overall, in Italy, the females represented the majority of patients. Further prospective studies on this topic in different countries can be con-ducted to make comparisons.

Different treatments for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture in the body, and their incidence is rising year by year as the population ages. However, the treatment of the proximal humerus in parts 3 and 4 is still debatable, necessitating a network meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for each treatment modality.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials on proximal humeral fractures up to June 21, 2022. We performed data extraction and literature quality assessment by two independent authors and extracted constant score and reoperation rate as indicators for evaluation. Stata software, Revman software, JAGS software and the R-based BlandAltmanLeh package, gemtc package and riags package were used to perform this Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Results

Following screening, 11 papers with a total of 648 participants were included in the analysis. The SUCRA values for the constant score were in the following order: RSA, IMN, Conservative, HA, and LP, and the SUCRA values for the reoperation rate were LP, HA, IMN, Conservative, and RSA.

Conclusion

The elderly with 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures should consider RSA because it received the best evaluation ranking in terms of constant score and reoperation rate.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022341209, identifier: CRD42022341209.