The Impact of Osteoporosis on Adverse Outcomes After Short Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease

Systematic evaluation of vertebral bone quality score as an opportunistic screening method for BMD in spine surgery patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive value of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score for low BMD and osteoporosis. Furthermore, we sought to enhance diagnostic effectiveness by integrating VBQ with easily accessible patient-specific factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 180 patients. VBQ was obtained by preoperative MRI. Low BMD was classified as meeting the standards for either osteopenia or osteoporosis. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to detect the ability of variables to assess BMD. The z-test was used to compare the area under the curves of different variables.

RESULTS

VBQ was more effective in identifying low BMD than osteoporosis (AUC, 0.768 vs. 0.613, p = 0.02). Elevated VBQ (OR 6.912, 95% CI 2.72-17.6) and low BMI (0.858, 0.76-0.97) were risk factors for low BMD, while the risk factor for osteoporosis was age (1.067, 1.02-1.12), not VBQ. ROC analysis showed that AUCs were 0.613 for VBQ and 0.665 for age when screening for osteoporosis. The combined variable of VBQ, sex, age, and BMI obtained by logistic regression significantly improved the efficacy of BMD screening, with an AUC of 0.824 for low BMD and 0.733 for osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

VBQ is better at detecting low BMD than identifying osteoporosis. The ability of VBQ to predict osteoporosis is limited, and a similar diagnostic efficacy can be achieved with age. Incorporating VBQ alongside demographic data enhances the efficiency of BMD assessment. With the development of artificial intelligence in medicine, this simple method is promising.

Prior Fragility Fractures are Associated With a Higher Risk of Bone Health-Related Complications Within Eight Years Following Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the 8-year risk of revision lumbar fusion, pseudoarthrosis, mechanical failure, fragility fracture, and vertebral compression fracture in patients with a prior fragility fracture compared with those without.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Osteoporosis is a known modifiable risk factor for revision following lumbar fusion due to inadequate fixation. Patients with prior fragility fractures have been shown to have increased bone health-related complications following various orthopedic surgeries; however, there is a paucity of literature that identifies these complications in patients undergoing lumbar fusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged 50 years and older who underwent elective lumbar fusion were identified in a large national database and stratified based on whether they sustained a fragility fracture within three years prior to fusion. These patients were propensity-score matched to a control based on age, gender, and Charlson the comorbidity index using a 1:1 ratio. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to observe the cumulative incidences and risk of complications within eight years of index surgery.

RESULTS

After matching, 8805 patients were included in both cohorts. Patients who sustained a prior fragility fracture had a higher risk of revision [hazard ratio (HR): 1.46; 95% CI: 1.26-1.69; P <0.001), pseudoarthrosis (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.17-1.48; P <0.001), mechanical failure (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.78-2.45; P <0.001), secondary fragility fracture (HR: 6.36; 95% CI: 5.86-6.90; P <0.001), and vertebral compression fracture (HR: 7.47; 95% CI: 7.68-8.21; P <0.001) when compared with the control cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients who sustain a fragility fracture prior to lumbar fusion have an increased risk of revision, pseudoarthrosis, and mechanical failure within eight years. Surgeons should be aware of this high-risk patient population and consider bone health screening and treatment to reduce these preventable complications.

The Association of Preoperative Bone Mineral Density and Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) outcomes and complications as a function of preoperative bone mineral density (BMD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative BMD optimization is commonly initiated before lumbar spinal fusion, but the effects of BMD on ACDF are less known. Consequently, it remains unclear whether preoperative BMD optimization is recommended before ACDF.

METHODS

This systematic review included relevant clinical articles using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and MEDLINE from database inception until October 1, 2023. Eligible studies included those evaluating low BMD and outcomes after ACDF. All articles were graded using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) assessment tools.

RESULTS

The initial retrieval yielded 4271 articles for which 4 articles with 671 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean patient age was 56.4 ± 3.9 years, and 331 patients (49.3%) were female. A total of 265 (39.5%) patients had low BMD (T score<-1.0) before ACDF. Preoperative low BMD was associated with cage subsidence in single-level ACDF (odds ratio (OR) 2.57; P=0.063; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.95-6.95), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Osteoporosis (T score<-2.5) was associated with the development of adjacent segment disease following ACDF (OR 4.41; P<0.01; 95% CI: 1.98-9.83). Low pre-operative BMD was associated with reoperation within 2 years (P<.05) and strongly associated with pseudarthrosis (OR: 11.01; P=0.002; 95% CI 2.4-49.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low BMD who undergo ACDF have higher rates of subsidence, adjacent segment disease, and pseudarthrosis than those with normal BMD. Given the individual and system-wide burdens associated with these complications, some patients may benefit from preoperative BMD screening and optimization before undergoing ACDF.

Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess postoperative sclerotic modic changes (MCs) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease, investigating their prevalence, risk factors, and association with clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Sclerotic MCs may occur in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease after lumbar interbody fusion. The incidence and characteristics of postoperative sclerotic MCs, as well as their clinical impact, are unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 467 patients (510 levels) who underwent single or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery, divided into a postoperative sclerotic MC group (60 patients, 66 levels) and a non-MC group (407 patients, 444 levels). The time of development and location of postoperative sclerotic MCs, fusion rate, cage subsidence, bilateral process decompression, and cross-link usage were recorded. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index scores were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the development of postoperative sclerotic MCs.

RESULTS

The prevalence of postoperative sclerotic MCs was 12.8%. The postoperative sclerotic MC group had a higher body mass index (BMI). The postoperative sclerotic MC group demonstrated a fusion rate of 47%, significantly lower than that of the non-MC group (71%) at six months post-operation. At final follow-up, the fusion rate in the postoperative sclerotic MC group was 62%, significantly lower than that of the non-MC group (86%). Postoperative visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index scores were significantly higher in the group with postoperative sclerotic MCs. BMI and osteoporosis were significantly associated with the development of postoperative sclerotic MCs.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative sclerotic MCs generally appear within the first year after surgery, with a prevalence of 12.8%. The presence of postoperative sclerotic MCs can adversely impact postoperative outcomes. To prevent postoperative sclerotic MCs, the authors postulate extending the immobilization period with external bracing and improving the management of BMI and osteoporosis in the perioperative time window.

Survey on Actual Management of Osteoporosis with the Japanese Medical Data Vision Database in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion

Background: No actual data on spinal fusion and management of osteoporosis in Japan have been reported. The aim of the survey was to investigate pre- and post-operative management of osteoporosis, including testing and prescription, in elderly patients undergoing spinal fusion in Japan. Methods: Medical data on patients aged 65 years or older undergoing spinal fusion from April 2018 to March 2022 were extracted from the medical data vision (MDV) database containing health insurance claims data from Japanese acute care hospitals to investigate fusion area, pre- and post-operative osteoporosis tests (bone mineral density and osteoporosis markers), prescriptions of osteoporosis medications, and other information. Results: The analysis set consisted of 26,959 patients. Annual pre-operative BMD testing rates and osteoporosis markers testing rates were higher than the post-operative rates without significant annual changes. The post-operative prescription rate of osteoporosis medications throughout the target period was approximately two times higher than the preoperative rate. The drug with highest pre- and post-operative prescription rates was teriparatide (TPTD) followed by bisphosphonates, showing that the prescription rate of TPTD proportionally increased with the length of fusion area. Conclusions: It was suggested that patients aged 65 years or older undergoing spinal fusion might receive insufficient osteoporosis tests. Despite no trend in the testing rate with the length of fusion area, some tendency was observed in the selection of osteoporosis medications. In patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal fusion, early examination, diagnosis, and therapeutic intervention may improve the prognoses, and solid testing and prescriptions are therefore expected.

The Effect of Diabetes on Complications after Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Spinal fusion procedures are used to treat a wide variety of spinal pathologies. Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been shown to be a significant risk factor for several complications following these procedures in previous studies. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis elucidating the relationship between DM and complications occurring after spinal fusion procedures.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches of PubMed and EMBASE were performed from their inception to October 1, 2022, to identify studies that directly compared postfusion complications in patients with and without DM. Studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria if they reported the following data for patients with and without DM: (1) demographics; (2) postspinal fusion complication rates; and (3) postoperative clinical outcomes. The included studies were then pooled and analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies, with a cumulative total of 18,853 patients (2695 diabetic patients), were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Analysis showed that diabetic patients had significantly higher rates of total number of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-1.58; P = 0.001), postoperative pulmonary complications (OR=2.01; 95%CI=1.31-3.08; P = 0.001), postoperative renal complications (OR=2.20; 95%CI=1.27-3.80; P = 0.005), surgical site infection (OR=2.65; 95%CI=2.19-3.20; P < 0.001), and prolonged hospital stay (OR=1.67; 95%CI=1.47-1.90; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DM had a significantly higher risk of developing complications after spinal fusion, particularly pulmonary and renal complications, in addition to surgical site infections and had a longer length of stay. These findings are important for informed discussions of surgical risks with patients and families before surgery.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Osteoporosis on Reoperation Rates and Complications after Surgical Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

There is considerable heterogeneity in findings and a lack of consensus regarding the interplay between osteoporosis and outcomes in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather and analyze existing data on the effect of osteoporosis on radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes following surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to determine the effect of osteoporosis on the incidence of adverse outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar degenerative spinal diseases. The approach focused on the radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates, and other medical and surgical complications. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed on the eligible studies.

RESULTS

The results of the meta-analysis suggested that osteoporotic patients experienced increased rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD; p=0.015) and cage subsidence (p=0.001) while demonstrating lower reoperation rates than non-osteoporotic patients (7.4% vs. 13.1%; p=0.038). The systematic review also indicated that the length of stay, overall costs, rates of screw loosening, and rates of wound and other medical complications may increase in patients with a lower bone mineral density. Fusion rates, as well as patient-reported and clinical outcomes, did not differ significantly between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis was associated with an increased risk of ASD, cage migration, and possibly postoperative screw loosening, as well as longer hospital stays, incurring higher costs and an increased likelihood of postoperative complications. However, a link was not established between osteoporosis and poor clinical outcomes.

Sarcopenia and Postoperative Complications, Cost of Care, and All-Cause Hospital Readmission Following Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis: A Propensity Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Sarcopenia, characterized by decreased muscle mass and function, is projected to affect more than 200 million people worldwide by 2060. This study aimed to evaluate the rates of short-term complications following lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients with and without a recent diagnosis of sarcopenia.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was queried to evaluate all patients who underwent index lumbar spine arthrodesis from 2012 to 2019. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare rates of 90-day surgical and medical complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare cumulative rates of reoperation and all-cause hospital readmission. Two sample t testing was used to compare costs of care. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 a priori.

RESULTS

Of 239,953 patients undergoing lumbar spine arthrodesis, 1087 had a recent diagnosis of sarcopenia (0.45%) before surgery. Patients with sarcopenia were significantly more likely to experience a urinary tract infection (odds ratio = 1.41, P = 0.035) and undergo incision and drainage (odds ratio = 2.66, P = 0.010) within 90 days after lumbar arthrodesis. Patients with sarcopeniawere at a 24% greater risk of 1-year all-cause hospital readmission. The 90-day cost of care was significantly greater in patients with sarcopenia ($37,689.86 vs. $26,635.72; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing lumbar spine arthrodesis, sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including increased costs of care. Spine surgeons should consider screening patients for sarcopenia preoperatively and counsel them regarding their increased risk of complications. Additionally, surgeons may consider preoperative optimization, like the management of low bone density.