Role of Pronator Quadratus Repair in Volar Locking Plate Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

The Outcome of under 10 mm Single-Incision Surgery Using a Non-Specialized Volar Plate in Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The distal radius fracture is a common orthopedic injury. We aimed to share the surgical steps and investigate the outcomes of treating distal radius fractures with wounds ≤10 mm using a globally accessible locking plate.

METHODS

We collected 46 patients who underwent surgery via a <10 mm wound, with a control group consisting of 40 patients who underwent conventional procedures. Both groups were treated using the same volar plate. We compared the radiographic reduction quality, including volar tilt angle, radial inclination angle, and ulna variance. Additionally, clinical outcomes, such as pain assessed using VAS, Q-Dash score, and PRWE, were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the wound was also analyzed. The follow-up time for the clinical outcomes was 24.2 ± 13.47 months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the quality of reduction in parameters such as the volar tilt angle (p = 0.762), radial inclination angle (p = 0.986), and ulna variance (p = 0.166). Both groups exhibited comparable results in pain VAS (p = 0.684), Q-Dash score (p = 0.08), and PRWE (p = 0.134). The ≤10 mm incision group displayed an increase in satisfaction with the wound (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating distal radius fractures with a <10 mm wound using a non-specialized locking plate is a feasible approach. It does not compromise the quality of fracture reduction or functional scores and improves wound satisfaction.

[Standardized reduction and palmar plating of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures for safe and atraumatic reconstruction of the anatomy of the radius]

OBJECTIVE

Standardization of palmar plate osteosynthesis in order to consequently achieve physiologic anatomy of the distal radius end.

INDICATIONS

Unstable dorsally displaced distal radius fractures or fractures that should be treated functionally.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Severe intraarticular joint depression that cannot be reduced with either a palmar or arthroscopic assisted approach.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Patient in supine position with the forearm supinated on arm table. Radiopalmar incision along the radial border of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. Detachment of the pronator quadratus muscle from radial to ulnar. Gross reduction with eventual correction of a dorsal or radial shift. Placement of the angular stable plate and preliminary fixation with a nonangular stable cortical screw in the long hole at the radius shaft. Fluoroscopic control of axial alignment in the anteroposterior view and of correct distal position of the plate in the lateral view under reduction condition. Placement of one or two angular stable screws at the shaft. Under subtle reduction with flexion, ulnar deviation and axial traction placement of two K‑wires via the holes at the distal edge of the plate. These wires mostly keep reduction maintained while reduction maneuver can be paused. Fluoroscopic control in two planes. Replacement of the wires by distal angular stable screws with the help of the wires as an orientation. In case of insufficient reduction, reduction maneuver can be repeated while the first angular stable screw is locked. Final fluoroscopic control in two planes and ulnar deviation, eventually also in tangential view and clinical testing for stability of the distal radioulnar joint. Wound closure only by skin suture. Application of a sterile dressing and a palmar cast.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Arm consequently in upright position and active and complete movement of fingers. Palmar below-elbow cast for 2 weeks, then movement of wrist without exertion. After regular radiographic control 4-5 weeks postoperatively, increase of axial load to normal and, if needed, physiotherapy. Clinical control for irritation of tendons by plate or screws after 1 year and eventual plate removal.

Does pronator quadratus repair affect functional outcome following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair versus no repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, CNKI, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases. All randomized controlled trials comparing PQ repair with no repair in distal radius fractures before January 2023 were included. Two investigators independently screened eligible articles, assessed the study quality, and extracted data from included studies. Continuous variables used standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval as efficacy statistics. The meta-analysis was performed using the Revman 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 430 patients in 7 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 218 underwent PQ repair, while 212 patients underwent no repair. The results of the meta-analysis displayed statistically significant differences in grip strength (short-term), pronation angle (short-term), and pronation strength (short- and long-term) between the two groups. No significant difference in other outcomes was found between the two treatment arms.

Discussion

The repair of PQ may further increase grip strength and pronation function in the short-term and enhance long-term pronator muscle strength compared to no repair. However, due to the small number of articles included in the study, the above conclusions need to be verified by a larger sample and multi-center clinical study.