Associated Joint Pain With Controlled Ankle Movement Walker Boot Wear

Acute biomechanical responses to wearing a controlled ankle motion (CAM) Walker boot during walking

BACKGROUND

Controlled ankle motion (CAM) boots are often prescribed during the rehabilitation of lower limb injuries and pathologies to reduce foot and ankle movement and loading whilst allowing the patient to maintain normal daily function.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this study was to quantify the compensatory biomechanical mechanisms undergone by the ipsilateral hip and knee joints during walking. In addition, the compensatory mechanisms displayed by the contralateral limb were also considered.

METHODS

Twelve healthy participants walked on an instrumented treadmill at their preferred walking speed. They underwent kinematic and kinetic analysis during four footwear conditions: normal shoes (NORM), a Malleo Immobil Air Walker on the right leg (OTTO), a Rebound® Air Walker on the right leg with (EVEN) and without (OSS) an Evenup Shoelift™ on the contralateral leg.

RESULTS

CAM boot wear increased the relative joint contribution to total mechanical work from the ipsilateral hip and knee joints (p < 0.05), which was characterised by increased hip and knee abduction during the swing phase of the gait cycle. EVEN increased the absolute work done and relative contribution of the contralateral limb. CAM boot wear reduced walking speed (p < 0.05), which was partially compensated for during EVEN.

SIGNIFICANCE

The increased hip abduction in the ipsilateral leg was likely caused by the increase in effective leg length and limb mass, which could lead to secondary site complications following prolonged CAM boot wear. Although prescribing an even-up walker partially mitigates these compensatory mechanisms, adverse effects to contralateral limb kinematics and kinetics (e.g., elevated knee joint work) should be considered.

Lower back kinetic demands during induced lower limb gait asymmetries

BACKGROUND

Gait asymmetries are common in many clinical populations (e.g., amputation, injury, or deformities) and are associated with a high incidence of lower back pain. Despite this high incidence, the impact of gait asymmetries on lower back kinetic demands are not well characterized due to experimental limitations in these clinical populations. Therefore, we artificially and safely induced gait asymmetry during walking in healthy able-bodied participants to examine lower back kinetic demands compared to their normal gait.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are lower back kinetic demands different during artificially induced asymmetries than those during normal gait?

METHODS

L5/S1 vertebral joint kinetics and trunk muscle forces were estimated during gait in twelve healthy men and women with a musculoskeletal lower back model that uniquely incorporated participant-specific responses using an EMG optimization approach. Five walking conditions were conducted on a force-measuring treadmill, including normal unperturbed "symmetrical" gait, and asymmetrical gait induced by unilaterally altering leg mass, leg length, and ankle joint motion in various combinations. Gait symmetry index and lower back kinetics were compared with repeated-measures ANOVAs and post hoc tests (α = .05).

RESULTS

The perturbations were successful in producing different degrees of step length and stance time gait asymmetries (p < .01). However, lower back kinetic demands associated with asymmetrical gait were similar to, or only moderately different from normal walking for most conditions despite the observed asymmetries.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings indicate that the high incidence of lower back pain often associated with gait asymmetries may not be a direct effect of increased lower back demands. If biomechanical demands are responsible for the high incidence of lower back pain in such populations, daily tasks besides walking may be responsible and warrant further investigation.

Commonly Used Types and Recent Development of Ankle-Foot Orthosis: A Narrative Review

(1) Background: ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is the most commonly prescribed orthosis to patients with foot drop, and ankle and foot problems. In this study, we aimed to review the commonly used types of AFO and introduce the recent development of AFO. (2) Methods: narrative review. (3) Results: AFO prevents the foot from being dragged, provides a clearance between the foot and the ground in the swinging phase of gait, and maintains a stable posture by allowing heel contact with the ground during the stance phase. In clinical practice, the most commonly used AFO include plastic AFO, walking boot, UD-Flex, and carbon fiber AFO. In addition, for compensating the demerits of these conventional AFOs, new types of AFOs, including AF Servo, TurboMed, three-dimensionally printed AFO, and AFO made from kenaf composites, were developed. (4) Conclusions: we think that our review can guide clinicians in selecting and prescribing the appropriate AFO for each patient in accordance with their specific physical conditions.