Clinical and Radiologic Fate of the Lumbosacral Junction After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Bottom of a Long Construct in CMIS Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multilevel Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: Trends, Outcomes, and Cost

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) with multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in posterior long-segment fusion.

BACKGROUND

PSO and ALIF/LLIF are 2 techniques used to restore lumbar lordosis and correct sagittal alignment, with each holding its unique advantages and disadvantages. As there are situations where both techniques can be employed, it is important to compare the risks and benefits of both.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent PSO or multilevel ALIF/LLIF with posterior fusion of 7-12 levels and pelvic fixation were identified. 1:1 propensity score was used to match PSO and ALIF/LLIF cohorts for age, sex, and relevant comorbidities, including smoking status. Logistic regression was used to compare medical and surgical outcomes. Trends and costs were generated for both groups as well.

RESULTS

ALIF/LLIF utilization in posterior long fusion has been steadily increasing since 2010, whereas PSO utilization has significantly dropped since 2017. PSO was associated with an increased risk of durotomy ( P < 0.001) and neurological injury ( P = 0.018). ALIF/LLIF was associated with increased rates of postoperative radiculopathy ( P = 0.005). Patients who underwent PSO had higher rates of pseudarthrosis within 1 and 2 years ( P = 0.015; P = 0.010), 1-year hardware failure ( P = 0.028), and 2-year reinsertion of instrumentation ( P = 0.009). Reoperation rates for both approaches were not statistically different at any time point throughout the 5-year period. In addition, there were no significant differences in both procedural and 90-day postoperative costs.

CONCLUSIONS

PSO was associated with higher rates of surgical complications compared with anterior approaches. However, there was no significant difference in overall reoperation rates. Spine surgeons should select the optimal technique for a given patient and the type of lordotic correction required.

Management of severe adult spinal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgical strategies without posterior column osteotomies: a 13-year experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) without posterior column osteotomies for severe adult spine deformity (ASD) correction.

METHODS

All patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up undergoing staged CMIS correction of ASD from January 2007 to July 2018 were identified. All included patients had fusion of 3 or more interbody levels that spanned the L5-S1 junction. Only patients with severe deformity, Coronal Cobb > 50° or at least one SRS-Schwab ++ sagittal modifier (SVA > 95 mm, or PI-LL > 20, or PT > 30) were included. All complications were noted.

RESULT

136 patients met inclusion criteria; mean age of patients was 63.6 years (21-85, SD 13.7). The mean follow-up was 82.8 months (24-159, SD 36.6). The mean number of levels fused was 7 (3-16, SD 3). A total of 40 (29.4%) major complications were noted at final follow-ups: 2 (1.4%) intra-operative, 12 (8.9%) peri-operative (≤ 6 weeks from index), 26 (19.1%) post-operative (> 6 weeks from index). There was a total of 53 (40.0%) minor complications. Seven (5.1%) patients who developed radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis. Three patients (2.2%) developed proximal junctional failure. There were 8 (5.9%) cases of pseudarthrosis. Five of these occurred in patients undergoing AxiaLIF. All patients experienced improvements in patient-perceived outcomes (VAS, TIS, ODI, and SRS-22) and radiographic parameters at last follow-up when compared to pre-op (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rates of complications with CMIS correction of severe ASD are lower than published rates of complications seen with open ASD correction. Specifically, the incidence of catastrophic complications is lower. Furthermore, CMIS is associated with significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes, low rates of pseudarthrosis and proximal junctional kyphosis. Therefore, in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS may be an excellent alternative approach to addressing severe ASD.

Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion

Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations.

State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.