Major Depressive Disorder and Difference between Genders

Reading language of the eyes in female depression

Aberrations in non-verbal social cognition have been reported to coincide with major depressive disorder. Yet little is known about the role of the eyes. To fill this gap, the present study explores whether and, if so, how reading language of the eyes is altered in depression. For this purpose, patients and person-by-person matched typically developing individuals were administered the Emotions in Masked Faces task and Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, modified, both of which contained a comparable amount of visual information available. For achieving group homogeneity, we set a focus on females as major depressive disorder displays a gender-specific profile. The findings show that facial masks selectively affect inferring emotions: recognition of sadness and anger are more heavily compromised in major depressive disorder as compared with typically developing controls, whereas the recognition of fear, happiness, and neutral expressions remains unhindered. Disgust, the forgotten emotion of psychiatry, is the least recognizable emotion in both groups. On the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test patients exhibit lower accuracy on positive expressions than their typically developing peers, but do not differ on negative items. In both depressive and typically developing individuals, the ability to recognize emotions behind a mask and performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test are linked to each other in processing speed, but not recognition accuracy. The outcome provides a blueprint for understanding the complexities of reading language of the eyes within and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Discriminative Power of Handwriting and Drawing Features in Depression

This study contributes knowledge on the detection of depression through handwriting/drawing features, to identify quantitative and noninvasive indicators of the disorder for implementing algorithms for its automatic detection. For this purpose, an original online approach was adopted to provide a dynamic evaluation of handwriting/drawing performance of healthy participants with no history of any psychiatric disorders ([Formula: see text]), and patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression ([Formula: see text]). Both groups were asked to complete seven tasks requiring either the writing or drawing on a paper while five handwriting/drawing features' categories (i.e. pressure on the paper, time, ductus, space among characters, and pen inclination) were recorded by using a digitalized tablet. The collected records were statistically analyzed. Results showed that, except for pressure, all the considered features, successfully discriminate between depressed and nondepressed subjects. In addition, it was observed that depression affects different writing/drawing functionalities. These findings suggest the adoption of writing/drawing tasks in the clinical practice as tools to support the current depression detection methods. This would have important repercussions on reducing the diagnostic times and treatment formulation.

Effects of Venlafaxine on the Size of Brain and Expression of , and Genes in BALB/c Mice

Objectives

A growing body of evidence has recently suggested that taking venlafaxine during pregnancy may be linked to increased risk of certain congenital defects. The study aimed to address the effects of venlafaxine use during pregnancy on the development of the brain in mice.

Experimental design

Fourteen female BALB/c mice were randomly divided into two equally-sized groups: venlafaxine-treated and control. After mating, pregnant mice of venlafaxine-treated group were orally received the venlafaxine 35 mg/kg/day throughout pregnancy, while pregnant control mice did not receive any treatment. All pups were killed on postnatal day 21 and brain images were quantified using ImageJ software. The mRNA expression levels of SHANK3, TUBB5 and DDC of genes in pups' brain tissue samples were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR method.

Principal observations

The mean brain size of pups was significantly smaller in the venlafaxine-treated group than in the control group. Results showed that the mRNA expression levels of SHANK3 and TUBB5 was significantly downregulated in venlafaxine-treated mice compared to control group. Expression of DDC gene didn't showed significant differences between two groups.

Conclusions

These results provide evidence that use of venlafaxine during pregnancy may affect the brain development in mice and altered the expression of SHANK3 and TUBB5 genes in brain tissue.

Changes in mRNA and miRNA expression in the prelimbic cortex related to depression-like syndrome induced by chronic social defeat stress in mice

Major depressive disorder is a complex psychiatric disorder with a high prevalence rate worldwide. Previous studies have demonstrated the involvement of the prelimbic cortex (PL) in mediating depressive-like behavior, however, the exact molecular mechanism taking place in the PL remains unclear. In the present study, we conducted high-throughput sequencing of mRNAs and miRNAs in PL tissue harvested from chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) susceptible male mice. We identified 59 differentially expressed mRNAs and 6 differentially expressed miRNAs, in which 40 mRNAs and 3 miRNAs were up-regulated, while 19 mRNAs and 3 miRNAs were down-regulated. Integrated analysis of miRNA-mRNA networks suggested that GPR35 signaling might be involved in CSDS-induced depressive-like behaviors. RT-PCR and western blot assays validated that Abra, Sell and GPR35 were up-regulated. Functionally, inhibition of GPR35 in the PL ameliorated CSDS-induced depressive-like behaviors. Thus, the present study provided a global view of mRNA and miRNA profiles in the PL of male stress susceptible mice, and suggested that GPR35 signaling was associated with CSDS-induced depressive-like behaviors. These results may be valuable for further investigations of the molecular regulatory mechanisms in stress-induced depression.

Systematic review of probiotics as an adjuvant treatment for psychiatric disorders

Introduction

Many psychiatric illnesses have been linked to the gut microbiome, with supplements such as probiotics showing some efficacy in alleviating the symptoms of some psychiatric illnesses. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current literature investigating the effects of adjuvant probiotic or synbiotic administration in combination with first-line treatments for psychiatric illnesses.

Method

A systematic search of four databases was conducted using key terms related to treatments for psychiatric illnesses, the gut microbiome, and probiotics. All results were then evaluated based on specific eligibility criteria.

Results

Eight studies met eligibility criteria and were analyzed for reported changes in outcome measures used to assess the symptoms of psychiatric illness and the tolerability of treatment. All Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (n = 5) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) (n = 1) studies found adjuvant probiotic or synbiotic treatment to be more efficacious in improving the symptoms of psychiatric illness than the first-line treatment alone or with placebo. The schizophrenia studies (n = 2) found adjuvant probiotic treatment to have no significant difference in clinical outcomes, but it was found to improve the tolerability of first-line antipsychotics.

Discussion and conclusion

The findings of the studies included in this review suggest the use of adjuvant probiotic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for MDD and GAD to be superior to SSRI treatment alone. Probiotic adjuvant treatment with antipsychotics could be beneficial for improving the tolerability of the antipsychotics, but these findings do not suggest that adjuvant probiotic treatment would result in improved clinical outcomes for symptoms of schizophrenia.

Evidence-Informed Approach to De-Prescribing of Atypical Antipsychotics (AAP) in the Management of Behavioral Expressions (BE) in Advanced Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD): Results of a Retrospective Study

The LuBAIR™ Paradigm is a novel approach to ascribe meaning to behavioral expressions in advanced neurocognitive disorders when the reliability of a clinical assessment is limited. The meaning ascribed to each behavioral category was used to identify those which are likely to respond to the use of atypical antipsychotics, in their management. De-prescribing was attempted on patients who qualified to enter this retrospective study. De-prescribing was defined as successful if individuals were completely withdrawn from AAP and remained off them for 60 days, without the re-emergence of behaviors. The LuBAIR™ Inventory was filled on two occasions. The data collected on the second occasion, in the successful and failed de-prescribed groups, were compared in this retrospective study. MANOVA, Chi-Square paired t-test statistical analyses were used to detect the differences in the behavioral categories between the two cohorts. Cohen d was used to measure effect size. Patients who did not have Mis-Identification and Goal-Directed Expressions were more likely to successfully de-prescribe: X2 (1, N = 40) = 29.119 p < 0.0001 and X2 (1, N = 40) = 32.374, p < 0.0001, respectively. Alternatively, the same behavioral categories were more likely to be present in patients who failed de-prescribing: MANOVA and paired t-test (p < 0.0001). Atypical antipsychotics, in their role as an antipsychotic and mood stabilizer, may be used to manage Mis-Identification and Goal-Directed Expressions, respectively.