1
|
Ha HI, Kim JH, Lim J, Song YJ, Won YJ, Lim MC. Incidence and treatment outcomes of ovarian carcinosarcoma from the national cancer registry of Korea. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e31. [PMID: 38072401 PMCID: PMC10792209 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence and survival outcomes of ovarian carcinosarcoma in Korea between 1999 and 2018. METHODS Patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinosarcoma between 1999 and 2018 were identified from the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) and their information was collected. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs), annual percent changes (APC), and relative survival rates of ovarian carcinosarcoma were calculated and compared to those of epithelial ovarian cancer. RESULTS According to the KCCR, 458 cases of ovarian carcinosarcoma were detected, and accounted for 1.5% (458/30,679) of all epithelial ovarian cancers in Korea between 1999 and 2018. The ASR of ovarian carcinosarcoma between 1999 and 2018 was 0.064 per 100,000 women. The incidence rate of ovarian carcinosarcoma increased during the study period, with an ASR of 0.029 per 100,000 in 1999 and 0.073 per 100,000 in 2018. The APC of ovarian carcinosarcoma during 1999-2018 was 5.86 (p<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma was 39 months, and the 5-year OS rate was 42.5%. Among ovarian carcinosarcomas, patients with localized stages showed better clinical outcomes than those with regional or distant stages (5-year OS, 60.8%, 57.9%, and 32.8%, respectively; p<0.001). In addition, younger (<50 years) patients showed better OS than older (≥50 years) patients (5-year OS, 52.6% vs. 40.2%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION Our nationwide registry-based study demonstrated that the incidence of ovarian carcinosarcoma increased from 1999 to 2018 in Korea. Patients with advanced-stage disease and older age (≥50 years) had poorer survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong In Ha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jiwon Lim
- Division of Cancer Registration and Surveillance, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Jung Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Young-Joo Won
- Division of Cancer Registration and Surveillance, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Division of Health Administration, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea
- Center for Clinical Trials, Hospital and Division of Tumor Immunology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ismail A, Choi S, Boussios S. Frontiers of Ovarian Carcinosarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1667-1682. [PMID: 37938504 PMCID: PMC10781844 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01138-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS), also known as a malignant mixed Müllerian tumour (MMMT), is a rare and aggressive form of cancer that accounts for less than 5% of ovarian cancers. It is characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates, with a median overall survival (OS) of less than 2 years. Several factors, including advancing age, nulliparity, reduced lactation rates, decreased use of oral contraceptive pills, genetic mutations in BRCA (breast cancer) genes, and the use of assisted reproductive technology, may increase the risk of OCS. Poor prognostic factors include an advanced stage at diagnosis, older age, lymph node metastasis, suboptimal surgical cytoreduction, the presence of heterologous features on histopathology, and increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour protein p53, and p53 alongside Wilms tumour 1 (WT1). The main treatment approach for OCS is cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, although immunotherapy is showing promise. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing may enhance outcomes by enabling personalized immunotherapy and targeted therapies for specific patient groups, thereby reducing unnecessary side effects and healthcare costs. However, there is currently a lack of standardised treatment regimens for OCS patients, with most studies consisting of case reports and a shortage of suitable comparator groups. This article aims to provide clinicians with information on the epidemiology, risk factors, prognostic factors, and latest therapeutic advancements in OCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayden Ismail
- GKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sunyoung Choi
- GKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Stergios Boussios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Kent, Gillingham, ME7 5NY, UK.
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
- Kent Medway Medical School, University of Kent, Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7LX, UK.
- AELIA Organization, 9Th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Begum D, Aparajita, Baruah U, Barmon D. Ovarian Carcinosarcoma: Rare Histology Which Never Fails to be Aggressive. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2023; 73:541-543. [PMID: 38205105 PMCID: PMC10774454 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-023-01759-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dimpy Begum
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India
| | | | - Upasana Baruah
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India
| | - Debabrata Barmon
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim Y, Kang GH, Kim H. Prognostic significance of heterologous component in carcinosarcoma of the gynecologic organs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e73. [PMID: 37417301 PMCID: PMC10627759 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to determine the histologic presence of heterologous component as a prognostic factor in gynecologic carcinosarcoma through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for publications. Studies that evaluated survival effect of sarcomatous component based on histology in human ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma were included. Two authors independently reviewed the references based on eligibility criteria and extracted the data including primary tumor site, survival outcome, type of survival outcome, and proportion of each sarcomatous differentiation. The quality of each eligible study was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of survival outcome for carcinosarcoma with or without heterologous component. RESULTS Eight studies including 1,594 patients were identified. Overall proportion of carcinosarcoma with heterologous component was 43.3%. Presence of heterologous component was associated with worse overall survival (HR=1.81; 95% CI=1.15-2.85) but not with pooled recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival (HR=1.79; 95% CI=0.85-3.77). Removing multivariate analysis studies, early-stage studies, ovarian tumor study, or studies with large number of patient samples did not affect the significance between heterologous component and overall survival. CONCLUSION Gynecologic carcinosarcoma is histologically a biphasic tumor which comprise of epithelial and mesenchymal components. Our study emphasizes pathologic evaluation of heterologous component as a prognostic factor in gynecologic carcinosarcoma when all stages were considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022298871.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younghoon Kim
- Laboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyeong Hoon Kang
- Laboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang X, Wang S, Yao S, Shi W, Ma K. The clinical characteristics and treatment of ovarian malignant mesoderm mixed tumor: a systematic review. J Ovarian Res 2022; 15:104. [PMID: 36114551 PMCID: PMC9482291 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ovarian malignant mesoderm mixed tumor (OMMMT) is a rare clinical entity. To provide reference for the treatment and prognosis of OMMMT, we analyzed the clinical features, pathology and molecular biology characteristic of published cases. Methods The English and Chinese reported cases of OMMMT were selected from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov and CNKI database from 2000 to December 15th, 2021 following the PRISMA guidelines. Results A total of 63 literatures including 199 OMMMT cases were included. The average age of patients at diagnosis was 56.46 years, the highest incidence age was 60-65 years, and 82% of them were menopausal women. Most patients were diagnosed in FIGO III stage (59.64%). The most common symptom of OMMMT was abdominal pain (60.5%). 61.6% of patients were accompanied by ascites, while ascites was not associated with metastatic tumor and local recurrence. The CA125 of 88.68% patients increased. The most common reported carcinomatous component and sarcomatous component were serous adenocarcinoma (44.96%) and chondrosarcoma (24.81%), respectively. Initial treatment included surgery (94.97%) and taxanes-based (55.10%) or platinum-based (85.71%) chemotherapy regimens. The median survival time of patients was 20 months. Heterologous sarcoma component did not shorten life expectancy. The optimal ovarian tumor cell debulking surgery (OOTCDS), radiotherapy and chemotherapy could significantly prolong the median survival time of patients. Furthermore, platinum drugs could significantly prolong the survival time after comparing various chemotherapy schemes. Besides, the combination of platinum and taxanes was therapeutically superior to the combination of platinum and biological alkylating agents. Conclusion The OOTCDS and platinum-based chemotherapy regimen can improve the prognosis of OMMMT. Targeted therapy might become a new research direction in the future. Since the elderly patients are the majority, the toxicity of new drugs on the elderly patients is more noteworthy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-022-01037-6.
Collapse
|
6
|
Romeo C, Le Saux O, Jacobs M, Joly F, Ferron G, Favier L, Fumet JD, Isambert N, Colombo PE, Sabatier R, Bastide L, Charreton A, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Gertych W, Dubot C, Bello Roufai D, Bataillon G, Berton D, Kalbacher E, Pautier P, Pomel C, Cornou C, Treilleux I, Lardy-Cleaud A, Ray-Coquard I. Therapeutic Challenges in Patients with Gynecologic Carcinosarcomas: Analysis of a Multicenter National Cohort Study from the French Prospective TMRG Network. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:354. [PMID: 35053517 PMCID: PMC8773830 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gynecological carcinosarcomas are rare and aggressive diseases, with a poor prognosis. The rarity of these tumors explains the lack of robust and specific data available in the literature. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of initial adjuvant treatment and recurrent therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicentric cohort study within the French national prospective Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) network was conducted. Data from all included carcinosarcomas diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. RESULTS 425 cases of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (n = 313 and n = 112, respectively) were collected and analyzed from 12 participating centers. At diagnosis, 140 patients (48%) had a FIGO stage III-IV uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and 88 patients (83%) had an advanced ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) (FIGO stage ≥ III). Two hundred sixty-seven patients (63%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, most preferably carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen (n = 227, 86%). After a median follow-up of 47.4 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 15.1 months (95% CI 12.3-20.6) and 14.8 months (95% CI 13.1-17.1) for OCS and UCS, respectively. The median overall survival for OCS and UCS was 37.1 months (95% CI 22.2-49.2) and 30.6 months (95% CI 24.1-40.9), respectively. With adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, mPFS was 41.0 months (95% CI 17.0-NR) and 18.9 months (95% CI 14.0-45.6) for UCS stages I-II and stages III-IV, respectively. In the early stage UCS subgroup (i.e., stage IA, n = 86, 30%), mPFS for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24) was not reached (95% CI 22.2-NR), while mPFS for untreated patients (n = 62) was 19.9 months (95% IC 13.9-72.9) (HR 0.44 (0.20-0.95) p = 0.03). At the first relapse, median PFS for all patients was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.5-5.3). In the first relapse, mPFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.5) and 2.2 months (95% CI 1.9-2.9) with a combination of chemotherapy or monotherapy, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Interestingly, this vast prospective cohort of gynecological carcinosarcoma patients from the French national Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors network (i) highlights the positive impact of adjuvant CT on survival in all localized stages (including FIGO IA uterine carcinosarcomas), (ii) confirms the importance of platinum-based combination as an option for relapse setting, and (iii) reports median PFS for various therapeutic strategies in the relapse setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Romeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
| | - Olivia Le Saux
- Cancer Research Center of Lyon CRCL, UMR Inserm 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Margaux Jacobs
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.J.); (F.J.)
| | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.J.); (F.J.)
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
| | - Gwenael Ferron
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Favier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Surgical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France;
| | - Ludovic Bastide
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France;
| | - Amandine Charreton
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
| | - Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France
| | - Witold Gertych
- Gynaecologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France;
| | - Coraline Dubot
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, 92210 Paris, France;
| | - Diana Bello Roufai
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, 92210 Paris, France;
| | - Guillaume Bataillon
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - Elsa Kalbacher
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, CHRU de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - Patricia Pautier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Pomel
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Caroline Cornou
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Isabelle Treilleux
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ren F, Wang S, Li F, Gao J, Xu H, Li X, Zhu L. Clinical Nomograms for Predicting the Overall Survival and Cancer-specific Survival of patients with Ovarian Carcinosarcoma patients after Primary Surgery. J Cancer 2021; 12:7223-7236. [PMID: 34729123 PMCID: PMC8558669 DOI: 10.7150/jca.63224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: At present, there is no clinical prediction model for ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) that is based on a large sample of real data. This study aimed to construct nomograms using data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database that can be used to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with OCS and further guide the choice of clinical treatment. Methods: We selected 2753 cases of OCS from the SEER database from 1998 to 2016. Patients were randomly divided in a 7:3 ratio into a training cohort (n = 1929) and a validation cohort (n = 824). Cox analysis was used to select prognostic factors for OS and CSS, and nomograms were then established. The performance of nomogram models was assessed using the concordance index, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, and by decision curve analysis. Data from 21 OCS patients at Shengjing Hospital from 2001 to 2021 were collected for external verification. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare survival outcomes between subgroups. Results: Nomograms based on independent prognostic factors showed good predictive power and clinical practicality. Internal and external validation indicated that the nomograms performed better than staging and grading systems. Significant differences were observed in the survival curves of different risk subgroups. Conclusions: The developed nomograms will enable individualized evaluation of the OS and CSS, thus guiding the treatment of patients with OCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Ren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, China
| | - Shengtan Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570011, Hainan, China
| | - Feifei Li
- Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Jian Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, China
| | - Haoya Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, China
| | - Xianli Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, China
| | - Liancheng Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu JWY, Dand S, Doig L, Papenfuss AT, Scott CL, Ho G, Ooi JD. T-Cell Receptor Therapy in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Mini Review. Front Immunol 2021; 12:672502. [PMID: 33927729 PMCID: PMC8076633 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.672502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer, in particularly high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS), are highly aggressive and deadly female cancers with limited treatment options. These tumors are generally unresponsive to immune check-point inhibitor (ICI) therapy and are referred to as immunologically “cold” tumors. Cell-based therapy, in particular, adoptive T-cell therapy, is an alternative immunotherapy option that has shown great potential, especially chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors has been modest. This review explores the potential of another cell-based therapy, T-cell receptor therapy (TCR-T) as an alternate treatment option for immunological “cold” OC and OCS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica W Y Wu
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Sudiksha Dand
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Lachlan Doig
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony T Papenfuss
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Clare L Scott
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Gwo Ho
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Department of Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Joshua D Ooi
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|