1
|
Terada S, Tanaka T, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Daimon A, Miyamoto S, Nishie R, Ueda S, Hashida S, Morita N, Maruoka H, Konishi H, Kogata Y, Taniguchi K, Komura K, Ohmichi M. Lymphatic Complications Following Sentinel Node Biopsy or Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4540. [PMID: 37445574 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is performed worldwide in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the occurrence rate of lymphatic complications between SNB and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LND) for EC. The medical records of women who underwent SNB or pelvic LND for EC between September 2012 and April 2022 were assessed. A total of 388 patients were enrolled in the current study. Among them, 201 patients underwent SNB and 187 patients underwent pelvic LND. The occurrence rates of lower-extremity lymphedema (LEL) and pelvic lymphocele (PL) were compared between the patients who underwent SNB and those who underwent pelvic LND. The SNB group had a significantly lower occurrence rate of lower-extremity LEL than the pelvic LND group (2.0% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.01). There were no patients who had PL in the SNB group; however, 4 (2.1%) patients in the pelvic LND group had PL. The occurrence rates of lower-extremity LEL and PL were significantly lower in patients who underwent SNB than those who underwent pelvic LND. SNB for EC has a lower risk of lymphatic complications compared to systemic LND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Terada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Tomohito Tanaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
- Translational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Hikaru Murakami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Tsuchihashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Akihiko Toji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Atsushi Daimon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Miyamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
- Translational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Ruri Nishie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Shoko Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Sousuke Hashida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Natsuko Morita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Maruoka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Hiromi Konishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Yuhei Kogata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Kohei Taniguchi
- Translational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Translational Research Program, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| | - Masahide Ohmichi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-0801, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos E, Moussa AM. Chylous Ascites and Lymphoceles: Evaluation and Interventions. Semin Intervent Radiol 2020; 37:274-284. [PMID: 32773953 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Kinmonth introduced lymphangiography in 1955 and it became an important tool in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The technique, based on bipedal approach, was difficult and time-consuming which limited its use in clinical practice. Cope is the father of percutaneous lymphatic interventions and he was the first person to access and intervene on the lymphatic system. After his initial work published on 1999, there has been an expansion of the lymphatic embolization techniques, particularly since the development of intranodal lymphangiography and advance lymphatic imaging. This article is focused on the evaluation and management of postoperative chylous ascites and lymphoceles. Their incidence is growing due to longer survival of cancer patients and more radical surgical approaches, leading to an increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Minimally invasive percutaneous lymphatic embolization is becoming a first-line therapy in patients with postoperative lymphatic leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Santos
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amgad M Moussa
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ochiai K, Kaneko M, Nozawa H, Kawai K, Hata K, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Shuno Y, Sasaki K, Hiyoshi M, Emoto S, Murono K, Sonoda H, Ishihara S. Incidence of and risk factors for lymphocele formation after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:161-169. [PMID: 31454448 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM Pelvic lymphocele is a common complication that develops after pelvic lymph node dissection. The incidence of pelvic lymphocele formation has been reported to be 10.5-51% after gynaecological or urological procedures. However, no evidence has been reported thus far with regard to the development of pelvic lymphocele following lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) for low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for lymphocele formation after LPND for low rectal cancer and to examine its clinical management. METHOD We retrospectively analysed the incidence of and risk factors for pelvic lymphocele formation after LPND for rectal cancer in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2017. We also compared the size of the lymphocele between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients by using CT volumetry and examined its clinical management. RESULTS A total of 30 out of 98 patients (30.8%) developed pelvic lymphocele after rectal LPND. The number of resected nodes was significantly higher in patients with a pelvic lymphocele (P < 0.01). The median volume was significantly higher in patients with symptomatic pelvic lymphocele (P = 0.011). Among the nine symptomatic patients, two underwent CT-guided drainage, one underwent transurethral ureteral stent placement and one underwent laparoscopic marsupialization. CONCLUSION It is essential to keep in mind the possibility of pelvic lymphocele formation during follow-up of patients who undergo LPND, and to consider an appropriate treatment when these patients are symptomatic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ochiai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Kaneko
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Hata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Tanaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Nishikawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Shuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Hiyoshi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Sonoda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Can we predict who will need lymphocele drainage following robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)? J Robot Surg 2019; 14:439-445. [PMID: 31422556 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01010-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) can cause lymphoceles. Lymphocele formation following PLND can reach up to 60% and are symptomatic in 0.4 to 16% of patients. The aim of the study was to identify factors that are significantly associated with lymphocele drainage. We retrospectively analysed all men that underwent RALP between April 2010 and November 2018 from our prospectively collected IRB approved database. All patients who developed lymphoceles were grouped into two groups, the ones who were drained and those not drained. Chi-square test was used to perform univariate analysis for categorical variables and student's t test for continuous variables. Odds ratio was calculated using logistic multiple regression analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The size of the lymphocele, the number of nodes retrieved, and BMI were significant factors that led to the drainage of lymphocele. The patients with lymphoceles larger than 10 cm had an odds ratio of 47.5 and those between 5 and 10 had an odds ratio of 10.7. The odds ratio of drainage in patients with BMI above 30 was 2.1. The odds of drainage were 8.8 when more than 10 nodes were taken. After PLND ultrasound could be effective in early identification of patients who could potentially need drainage. Early elective drainage should be offered to patients who have more than 10 lymph nodes removed with a lymphocele size more than 10 cm in size and BMI above 30.
Collapse
|