Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo transfer cycles after freeze-all policy to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

[Clinical outcome after transfer of vitrified blastocysts in relation to freezing indication]

OBJECTIVES

In France, embryo thawing concern 45.8% of attempts at assisted reproductive technologies excluding artificial inseminations. This proportion is constantly increasing for various reasons. The main objective of this study is to compare the live birth rate following frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) according to the initial indication for freezing.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including patients who underwent FBT between 01/01/2020 and 06/30/2022 at the Regional University Hospital Center of Tours. The results were compared (univariate and multivariate analyses) between the three main indications for freezing: freezing of the complete cohort of blastocysts for risk of ovarian hyperstimulation (=OHS), freezing of supernumerary blastocysts after fresh blastocyst transfer (BT) with pregnancy (=second request) or without pregnancy (=BT failure). Results have also been described for other indications.

RESULTS

Among the 963 FBT cycles selected, 28% of live births by thawing were obtained, all indications of freezing combined. A significantly lower rate was identified in the FBT failure group compared to the OHS group. However, after adjustment, the results remained significant for the age of the patient on the freezing cycle but not for the indication for freezing.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of a FBT does not seem significantly impacted by the indication of freezing considering the confounding factors. The prospective analysis of more data from a multicenter study would be necessary to confirm these results.

Effect of exposed-to-air frequency of cryopreserved embryo on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective analysis of 9,200 vitrified-warmed transfer cycles

BACKGROUND

Cryopreservation of embryos plays a major role in the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. However, the storage condition of the cryopreserved embryo can change temporarily due to repeated retrieval of the embryo from the liquid nitrogen (LN2) tank during the practical application during cryopreservation. Whether the implantation potential of a cryopreserved embryo will be damaged when the cane containing it is temporarily exposed to air due to the transfer between the LN2 tank and LN2 container is yet to be elucidated. Also, whether the exposed-to-air frequency (EAF) of cryopreserved embryos influences the clinical outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the EAF of cryopreserved embryo affects the clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed embryo transfer.

METHODS

A total of 9200 vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles were included in this study. All cycles were divided into five groups according to different EAFs (2, 4, 6, 8, or ≥ 10). Post-warming survival rates and clinical outcomes, including implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were investigated. Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to compare the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes among the five groups. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between EAF and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the positive HCG rate, implantation rate and live birth rate (P > 0.05) among five EAF groups with respect to D3 embryo, D5 blastocyst and D6 blastocyst. Post-warmed survival rate of D3 embryos (P = 0.015) differed significantly among the five EAF groups, but it was not EAF-dependent. Although clinical pregnancy was different among the five groups with respect to D5 blastocyst (P = 0.042), multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounding variables suggested that EAF did not adversely affect clinical pregnancy or live birth.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that human vitrified embryos in the open system could be repeatedly retrieved from the LN2 tank without affecting the implantation potential of the embryo.

The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study

Background

The benefits of frozen embryo transfer (FET) vs. fresh embryo transfer for in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been discussed in previous studies.

Objective

To determine and compare the pregnancy outcomes following FET and frozen embryo transfer in women who underwent assisted reproductive techniques.

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 233 women candidates for IVF/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection who referred to the Kamali Training Medical Center, Karaj, Iran during 2019-2020 were evaluated in 2 groups of fresh (n = 127) and frozen (n = 106) embryo transfers. The rates of pregnancy outcomes including chemical and clinical pregnancy, live birth, preeclampsia, ectopic pregnancy, still birth, and pregnancy loss were compared between groups in 3 age subgroups (< 25, 25-35, and 35-40 yr old).

Results

No significant difference in terms of chemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were observed between groups in women aged < 25 yr. Chemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the FET group compared to fresh group in 25-35-yr-old women (p = 0.01, p = 0.03, and p = 0.01, respectively). In 35-40-yr-old women, no significant differences were observed in terms of chemical and clinical pregnancy rates, but live birth rate was found to be significantly higher in the FET group (p = 0.02). The pregnancy loss was lower in the FET group (p = 0.038).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the FET method in women aged 25-35 yr significantly increases the chance of successful IVF/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection.

The impact of embryo vitrification on placental histopathology features and perinatal outcome in singleton live births

STUDY QUESTION

Does embryo vitrification affect placental histopathology pattern and perinatal outcome in singleton live births?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Embryo vitrification has a significant effect on the placental histopathology pattern and is associated with a higher prevalence of dysfunctional labor.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes differ between live births resulting from fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The effect of embryo vitrification on the placental histopathology features associated with the development of perinatal complications remains unclear.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective cohort study evaluating data of all live births from one academic tertiary hospital resulting from IVF treatment with autologous oocytes during the period from 2009 to 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All patients had placentas sent for pathological evaluation irrelevant of maternal or fetal complications status. Placental, obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from hormone replacement vitrified embryo transfers were compared with those after fresh embryo transfers. A multivariate analysis was conducted to adjust the results for determinants potentially associated with the development of placental histopathology abnormalities.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 1014 singleton live births were included in the final analysis and were allocated to the group of pregnancies resulting from fresh (n = 660) and hormone replacement frozen (n = 354) embryo transfers. After the adjustment for confounding factors the frozen embryo transfers were found to be significantly associated with chorioamnionitis with maternal (odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3) and fetal response (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.2-5.7), fetal vascular malperfusion (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.4-9.2), furcate cord insertion (OR 2.3 95% CI 1.2-5.3), villitis of unknown etiology (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.2), intervillous thrombi (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3-3.7), subchorionic thrombi (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.6-7.0), as well as with failure of labor progress (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4.2).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Since the live births resulted from frozen-thawed embryos included treatment cycles with previously failed embryo transfers, the factors over embryo vitrification may affect implantation and placental histopathology.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study results contribute to the understanding of the perinatal future of fresh and vitrified embryos. Our findings may have an implication for the clinical decision to perform fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Authors have not received any funding to support this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Use of a new set of key performance indicators for evaluating the performance of an in vitro fertilization laboratory in which blastocyst culture and the freeze-all strategy are the primary treatment in patients with in vitro fertilization

Objective

To evaluate the performance of an in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory using a new set of key performance indicators (KPIs) when the main treatment of IVF patients had been changed.

Methods

Patients who underwent fresh embryo transfer and the freeze-all strategy in August, September, and October 2017 were retrospectively studied to evaluate the performance of an IVF laboratory in September when implantation rate of fresh embryo transfer decreased. KPIs associated with blastocyst culture and the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle in patients with the freeze-all strategy were compared over 3 months.

Results

Day 5 usable blastocyst and good quality blastocyst rates, and day 3 usable/good quality embryo rates were not different among the three periods. The implantation rate and KPIs associated with morphological changes in warmed blastocysts in the first FET cycle in patients with the freeze-all strategy were also not different among the periods.

Conclusions

KPIs associated with embryo quality, blastocyst culture, and the pregnancy outcome of the first FET cycle in patients with the freeze-all strategy suggested that performance was unaffected in our IVF laboratory in September. These KPIs might be useful for internal quality control analysis of IVF laboratories.

Safety of Ovaleap® (Follitropin Alfa) in Infertile Women Undergoing Superovulation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Multinational Comparative, Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Ovaleap^® (follitropin alfa), a recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone, is a biosimilar medicinal product to Gonal-f^® and is used for ovarian stimulation. The main objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of Ovaleap^® compared to Gonal-f^® in one treatment cycle in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Safety of Ovaleap^® Follitropin alfa in Infertile women undergoing superovulation for Assisted reproductive technologies (SOFIA) was a prospective cohort study conducted in six European countries. Eligible patients were infertile women undergoing superovulation for assisted reproductive technology, who were administered Ovaleap^® or Gonal-f^® for ovarian stimulation and were naïve to follicle stimulating hormone treatment. The recruitment ratio was 1:1. The primary endpoint was incidence proportion of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the secondary endpoint was OHSS severity (Grades I, II, III). The effect of risk factors or potential confounders on the odds ratio for OHSS incidence as well as treatment effect on OHSS incidence was explored using univariate logistic regression. Pregnancy and live birth rates were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 408 women who were administered Ovaleap^® and 409 women who were administered Gonal-f^® were eligible for analysis. The incidence proportion of OHSS was 5.1% (95% CI: 3.4, 7.7) in the Ovaleap^® cohort and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9, 5.4) in the Gonal-f^® cohort. This difference in OHSS incidence proportion between the two cohorts was not statistically significant neither before (p = 0.159) nor after univariate adjustment for each potential confounder (p > 0.05). The incidence proportion of OHSS severity grades was similar in the two treatment groups (3.4% versus 2.0% for Grade I, 1.2% versus 1.0% for Grade II, and 0.5% versus 0.2% for Grade III, in the Ovaleap^® and Gonal-f^® cohorts, respectively), without a significant statistical difference (p = 0.865, for each grade). Among patients who had embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rates were 33% and 31% and live birth rates were 27% and 26%, in the two cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the SOFIA study indicate that the incidence proportions of OHSS and OHSS severity, as well as pregnancy and live birth rates, are similar between Ovaleap^® and Gonal-f^® treatments and corroborate the safety and effectiveness of Ovaleap^® as a biosimilar to Gonal-f^®.

Embryo Selection Based on Morphological Parameters in a Single Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer Cycle

The process of selecting a good quality embryo to improve the pregnancy outcomes is very important. The aim of our study was to elaborate the embryo selection process in a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT) cycle by analyzing pre-vitrified and post-warmed blastocyst morphological factors to improve pregnancy outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, we performed 329 single VBT cycles. The pre-vitrified and post-warmed morphological factors of all blastocysts were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to select the independent morphological factor associated with ongoing pregnancy. The expansion of blastocoel (mid blastocoel; aOR 2.27, 95% CI.0.80-6.42, p = 0.12, expanded blastocoel; aOR 3.15, 95% CI.1.18-8.44, p = 0.02) in a pre-vitrified blastocyst and the grade of inner cell mass (ICM) (grade B; aOR 0.47, 95% CI.0.27-0.83, p = 0.01, grade C; aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.56 p < 0.01) in post-warmed blastocysts significantly predicted the ongoing pregnancy. After fertilization, the embryo developed as a blastocyst on day 5 (day 5) showed a higher ongoing pregnancy than that on day 6 (day 6) (aOR 0.50, 95% CI.0.26-0.94, p = 0.03). The results suggest that while selecting a vitrified-warmed blastocyst in a single VBT cycle, the day 5 vitrified blastocyst should be considered, and a higher expansion grade in the pre-vitrified blastocyst should be selected. Our study has shown that post-warmed ICM grade tends to be a predictive indicator for the selection of the best blastocyst and allows for successful pregnancy, with ongoing pregnancy in a single blastocyst transfer.

Frozen–thawed cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in high responder patients

Clinical outcomes following frozen–thawed cleavage embryo transfer versus frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer in high responder patients undergoingin vitrofertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles are still debated. In a retrospective study, 106 high responder patients who were candidate for ‘freeze-all embryos’ were recruited. Frozen–thawed embryos were transferred at the cleavage stage (n= 53) or the blastocyst stage (n= 53). Clinical pregnancy was considered as the primary outcome and chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, implantation rate, and fertilization rate, as well as miscarriage rate, were measured as the secondary outcome. Clinical (47.2% vs. 24.5%), chemical (56.6% vs. 32.1%), and ongoing pregnancy rates (37.7% vs. 17%) as well as implantation rates (33.6% vs. 13.5%) were significantly higher in the blastocyst group compared with the cleavage group respectively (P< 0.05). Miscarriage rate was comparable between groups (P> 0.05). Transfer of frozen–thawed embryos at the blastocyst stage was preferable in the high responder patients to increase implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates compared with cleavage stage embryo transfer.

Associations of post-warming embryo or blastocyst development with clinical pregnancy in vitrified embryo or blastocyst transfer cycles

Objective

To investigate whether the degree of post-warming embryo or blastocyst development is associated with clinical pregnancy in vitrified embryo or blastocyst transfer cycles.

Methods

Ninety-six vitrified cleavage-stage embryos and 58 vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles were selected. All transfer cycles were performed from February 2011 to March 2019, and all vitrified embryos or blastocysts were warmed from 4 PM to 6 PM and then transferred the next morning from 9 AM to 10 AM. The scores of the cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts were assessed at warming and at transfer using the modified Steer method and the Gardner method, respectively. The mean embryo or blastocyst score, score of the single top-quality embryo or blastocyst, and the difference in the score between warming and transfer were compared between nonpregnant and pregnant women.

Results

In the cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles, both the top-quality embryo score at transfer and the difference in the score between warming and transfer were significantly associated with clinical pregnancy. A top-quality embryo score at transfer of ≥60.0 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.673; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.531–0.815) and a difference in the score between warming and transfer of ≥23.0 (AUC, 0.675; 95% CI, 0.514–0.835) were significant predictors of clinical pregnancy. In blastocyst transfer cycles, the top-quality blastocyst score at transfer was the only significant factor associated with clinical pregnancy. A top-quality blastocyst score at transfer of ≥38.3 was a significant predictor of clinical pregnancy (AUC, 0.666; 95% CI, 0.525–0.807).

Conclusion

The top-quality embryo score at transfer and the degree of post-warming embryo development were associated with clinical pregnancy in vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles. In vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles, the top-quality blastocyst score at transfer was the only significant factor affecting clinical pregnancy.