Transradial Approach for Thoracolumbar Spinal Angiography and Tumor Embolization: Feasibility and Technical Considerations

Comparative study of the clinical value of digital subtraction angiography via femoral and radial arterial paths

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) performed via femoral artery and radial artery approaches.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 480 patients requiring cerebral vascular angiography at the First People's Hospital of Changde City from March 2020 to February 2022. Patients were divided into the femoral artery group (transfemoral approach, n=400) and the radial artery group (transradial approach, n=80) according to the surgical route. We compared perioperative metrics, success rates of selective angiography and puncture, and complication rates (including pseudoaneurysm, urinary retention, hematoma, vasospasm) between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze factors influencing the failure of angiography by each approach.

RESULTS

The radial artery group exhibited shorter durations for puncture, hemostasis, exposure, operation, and postoperative recovery (all P<0.001). The success rate of selective angiography was higher in the radial artery group (93.75%) compared to the femoral artery group (85.25%) (χ2=4.168, P=0.041). No significant difference was found in puncture success rates between the groups (χ2=0.235, P=0.628). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the radial artery group (2.50%) compared to the femoral artery group (9.25%) (χ2=4.069, P=0.044). Gender and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significant predictors of angiography failure in both approaches (both P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The transradial approach for DSA is safe and feasible, offering advantages in terms of operational time and complication rates, making it the preferred method in clinical settings.

Distal transradial access for targeted spinal angiography and embolization

BACKGROUND

Spinal catheter angiography is commonly performed in the evaluation and treatment of spinal vascular lesions. The typical approach to spinal angiography consists of access through the femoral artery with the use of suitably shaped catheters for selective catheterization of the spinal segmental vasculature. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of distal transradial access through the "anatomical snuffbox" for targeted spinal angiography, for the investigation and treatment of selected spinal lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent transradial spinal angiography and embolization was performed from August 2019 to January 2022. A total of eight patients were identified, who underwent targeted spinal angiography through distal transradial access. Outcome measures were documented in a tabular manner.

RESULTS

Radial access was successful in all patients. Seven patients had vascular tumors of the spinal column and underwent tumor embolization followed by segmental artery occlusion prior to surgery. One patient had a spinal dural AV fistula that could not be embolized due to feeding vessel tortuosity and eventually went on to have a laminectomy. Mean fluoroscopy time was 31.4 min. There were no access site hemorrhagic complications. One patient experienced transient mild hand numbness during the period of hemostasis with the vascular compression device that resolved completely within 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal transradial access is a feasible and safe option for targeted spinal angiography and treatment in selected patients.

Assessment of Intraoperative Spinal Angiography via the Popliteal Artery for Spinal Vascular Diseases

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative spinal angiography via the popliteal artery for patients in the prone position has been reported only twice in 4 patients. This study aimed to clarify the safety precautions to be taken with this technique in a larger patient cohort.

METHODS

Seven patients with spinal vascular disorders underwent intraoperative spinal angiography in the prone position via the popliteal artery. Ultrasound was used to evaluate the neurovascular anatomy in the popliteal fossa and guide the arterial puncture. Patient characteristics, features of angiography devices, puncture attempts, and angiography-related complications, such as hematoma formation and injury to the neurovascular bundle, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average number of arterial puncture attempts was 1.3 times (range: 1-2). Sheaths (4 and 4.5 Fr) with different ineffective lengths were used. In 1 case, a 4.5-Fr sheath was replaced with a 4-Fr sheath with a shorter noneffective length as the length of the catheter limited access to the target. Catheters with Type-JB2 tip shapes were used for craniocervical junction lesions, and those with Type-KAGAWA tip shapes were used for thoracic and lumbar spinal lesions. No puncture site complications were observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative spinal angiography via the popliteal artery was an effective tool in surgeries for spinal vascular diseases. The introduction of the ultrasound enabled atraumatic puncture of the popliteal artery. Spinal targets above T5 to T6 may be inaccessible from the popliteal fossa when using a 100-cm-long catheter.