Medical versus surgical management for vesicoureteric reflux: the case for medical management

Access to treatment for chronic kidney disease by children and adolescents in Brazil

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify main factors associated with child and adolescent access to chronic kidney disease (CKD) treatment in Brazil.

METHODS

Multi-center cross-sectional study conducted in eight pediatric nephrology centers across all Brazilian geographic regions. Information was collected on characteristics associated with referral and treatment of patients with CKD. The following outcomes were analyzed as follows: (1) age at first consultation, and (2) time elapsed between referral and treatment at the specialized service.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-five children were assessed. Variables associated with age at first consultation were as follows: CAKUT (HR=1.7; 95%CI 1.3-2.2, p<0.01); private health plan (HR=1.54; 95%CI 1.06-2.23, p=0.02); modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey mMOS-SS score (HR=1.02; 95%CI 1.00-1.03, p=0.024); maternal age (HR=0.96; 95%CI 0.95-0.97, p<0.01); and number of siblings in the household (HR=0.86; 95%CI 0.79-0.83, p<0.01). Significant variables associated with time elapsed between referral and treatment at the specialized service were as follows: each additional occupant sharing the household (HR=0.94; 95%CI:0.89-0.99, p=0.02), residing in the Northeast (HR=0.81; 95%CI:0.67-0.98, p=0.03) and having someone to take them to the physician (HR=1.36; 95%CI 1.07-1.74, p=0.01). The median time interval between patient referral and treatment by the service was 11 days (IQR 10-31).

CONCLUSION

There are potentially modifiable factors hampering access of children with CKD to specialized treatment. The importance of the role of social support for the two outcomes should serve as an alert for health managers and professionals to consider this aspect throughout all steps of the care process of children with CKD.

Polyacrylamide Hydrogel as a Bulking Agent for the Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: Long-Term Results and Safety

PURPOSE

Polyacrylamide hydrogel has been shown to offer good short-term success for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Our objective was to provide long-term results of its efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study using polyacrylamide hydrogel to treat all grades of vesicoureteral reflux. Every patient underwent endoscopic injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel followed by 3-month postoperative renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram. Renal ultrasound was repeated at 12 and 36 months. Treatment success was defined as the absence of de novo or worsening hydronephrosis and the absence of reflux. Safety elements included new or worsening hydronephrosis, calcifications of the injected material and urinary tract infections.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients (123 refluxing renal units) were assessed. Median age at surgery was 45 months and median followup was 36 months. Median injected volume of hydrogel per refluxing renal unit was 1.0 ml. The overall success rate 3 months after a single injection was 71%. During long-term followup 68 of 70 eligible patients underwent 12-month ultrasound and 40 of 46 underwent 36-month ultrasound. No upper tract deterioration or bulking agent calcifications were reported. Nine (12%) and 2 patients (3%) presented with nonfebrile and febrile urinary tract infections, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The success rate of polyacrylamide hydrogel for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux is comparable to published results of dextranomer hyaluronic acid. The long-term safety data and potential lower cost of polyacrylamide hydrogel provide further support for the use of this nonparticulate bulking agent to treat reflux.

Patients with a history of infection and voiding dysfunction are at risk for recurrence after successful endoscopic treatment of vesico ureteral reflux and deserve long-term follow up

Aim of the Study:

Subureteral endoscopic injection of a bulking agent is an attractive alternative to open surgery or antibiotic prophylaxis for vesico ureteral reflux (VUR). Little information is available about long-term risk of recurrence after an initially successful treatment. Aim of this paper was to review short- and long-term success rate of endoscopic treatment in a single Center series after risk stratification of individual patients.

Materials and Methods:

The records of 126 patients who underwent Deflux injection for primary VUR were examined. Indications to treatment were an unvaried high grade VUR (IV-V) at 1 year from diagnosis and/or and recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) on antibiotic prophylaxis even in the presence of mild grade VUR (III grade). Gender, age and mode of diagnosis, infections (UTI), voiding dysfunctions, VUR grade and side, renal function, number of treatments were correlated to outcome. Long-term evaluation was planned at a minimum of 1 year from the last negative post-injection cystogram (MCUG). A new MCUG and DMSA scan were also offered to those complaining new UTI episodes. Late recurrences were correlated to history and grade of reflux. Data were analyzed with Graph Pad Instat software; the Chi-square test was used for univariate comparisons, the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.and multiple regression tests for factors influencing outcome.

Results:

M/F ratio was 62 to 64; median age at diagnosis was 28 months. VUR affected 198 renal units. Preinjection VUR grade was I in 1, II in 27, III in 107, IV in 59, and V in 4 units. Reduced DMSA uptake was evidenced in 51 units and scarring in 24. Median age at treatment was 34.5 months, for persistent high grade VUR (IV–V) in 55 patients and recurrent IVU in 92. Two hundred sixty seven injections were performed on 198 ureters. Complete resolution was documented by MCUG at 3-5 months in 68%, low grading < II in 20%, persistence or unsignificant reduction in 11%. Preoperative recurrent UTI, higher grade VUR, and bilaterality were correlated to a poorer surgical outcome. Among 80 successfully treated cases, 12 complained of persistent UTI. Recurrence of VUR was demonstrated in 31% of them. Deteriorated uptake or additional scarring in 25% was independent from VUR recurrence. Preoperative recurrent UTI and voiding dysfunction correlated significantly to late outcome.

Conclusions:

Preoperative recurrent IVU, together with high-grade reflux, seem to correlate to lower success rate of Deflux injection for primary VUR. Even after successful endoscopic treatment, long-term surveillance may be needed among these cases, mainly if voiding dysfunction is also recorded. Late recurring VUR must be actively excluded in case of new IVU episodes.

The impact of vesicoureteral reflux treatment on the incidence of urinary tract infection

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a heterogeneous disease and its management remains one of the most controversial topics in pediatrics. Management options include surveillance, antibiotics, and surgery. The approval of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) as a bulking agent by the Food and Drug Administration was followed by wide acceptance of endoscopic techniques as a major tool in the management of reflux. Pyelonephritis rather than VUR is the most common cause of kidney damage in children. It should be emphasized that the primary goal of diagnosing and treating VUR should be preventing this complication. There are no sufficient data in the literature to address the impact of the different treatment modalities on the incidence of febrile urinary tract infections (feb-UTIs) denoting pyelonephritis, with very few studies evaluating endoscopic treatment in light of this clear and well-defined outcome. The fact that we can correct the anatomy at the vesicoureteral junction with a simple and relatively safe outpatient procedure does not justify offering it to all patients. In this review, we attempt to critically evaluate the available literature pertaining to the impact of different treatment modalities on reducing the incidence of febrile UTIs and kidney damage, with a special emphasis on endoscopic treatment.