The role of renal biopsy in small renal masses

Identifying the facilitators and barriers to implementation of renal tumour biopsy in the diagnostic pathway for small renal masses

OBJECTIVES

To understand the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of renal tumour biopsy (RTB) in the diagnostic pathway for renal tumours in England.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants consisted of patients who had a renal tumour diagnosed and/or treated at one of five tertiary centres in England, healthcare professionals involved in the direct care of patients diagnosed with renal tumours, and clinical service managers and commissioners. The study employed a mixed-methods research methodology consisting of individual interviews and an on-line survey that explored the types of facilitators and barriers individuals perceived and experienced and the frequency in which these were reported. A public dissemination event took place following the completion of data collection; to facilitate discussion of potential solutions to implementing RTB.

RESULTS

There were 50 participant interviews (23 patients, 22 clinicians, and five health service commissioners/operations managers). The patient on-line survey received 52 responses, and the clinician survey received 22 responses. Patients most frequently reported influences in choosing whether to undergo RTB pertained to wanting to know the diagnosis of their kidney mass (40%), the advice or information provided by healthcare professionals (40%), and not wishing to delay treatment (23%). Clinicians most frequently reported barriers to recommending RTB related to their uncertainty of diagnostic accuracy (56%), availability of appointments or hospital beds (52%), concerns of risk of bleeding (44%), risk of seeding (41%), and delays in meeting national cancer pathway targets (41%). The dissemination event was attended by 18 participants (seven patients and 11 clinicians). Suggestions to improve implementation included reducing variation and promotion of standardisation of practice by a consensus statement, increasing the evidence base (clinicians) and improved communication by developing better patient aids such as videos and diagrams (patients and clinicians).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of RTB may be dependent on the quality of information provided, its format and perceived reliability of the information. Increased utilisation of RTB may be improved by development of a consensus statement on the role of biopsy, with patients expressing a preference for alternative information aids such as patient videos.

Small Renal Masses: Developing a Robust Radiomic Signature

(1) Background and (2) Methods: In this retrospective, observational, monocentric study, we selected a cohort of eighty-five patients (age range 38-87 years old, 51 men), enrolled between January 2014 and December 2020, with a newly diagnosed renal mass smaller than 4 cm (SRM) that later underwent nephrectomy surgery (partial or total) or tumorectomy with an associated histopatological study of the lesion. The radiomic features (RFs) of eighty-five SRMs were extracted from abdominal CTs bought in the portal venous phase using three different CT scanners. Lesions were manually segmented by an abdominal radiologist. Image analysis was performed with the Pyradiomic library of 3D-Slicer. A total of 108 RFs were included for each volume. A machine learning model based on radiomic features was developed to distinguish between benign and malignant small renal masses. The pipeline included redundant RFs elimination, RFs standardization, dataset balancing, exclusion of non-reproducible RFs, feature selection (FS), model training, model tuning and validation of unseen data. (3) Results: The study population was composed of fifty-one RCCs and thirty-four benign lesions (twenty-five oncocytomas, seven lipid-poor angiomyolipomas and two renal leiomyomas). The final radiomic signature included 10 RFs. The average performance of the model on unseen data was 0.79 ± 0.12 for ROC-AUC, 0.73 ± 0.12 for accuracy, 0.78 ± 0.19 for sensitivity and 0.63 ± 0.15 for specificity. (4) Conclusions: Using a robust pipeline, we found that the developed RFs signature is capable of distinguishing RCCs from benign renal tumors.

The Role of CT Imaging in Characterization of Small Renal Masses

Small renal masses (SRM) are increasingly detected incidentally during imaging. They vary widely in histology and aggressiveness, and include benign renal tumors and renal cell carcinomas that can be either indolent or aggressive. Imaging plays a key role in the characterization of these small renal masses. While a confident diagnosis can be made in many cases, some renal masses are indeterminate at imaging and can present as diagnostic dilemmas for both the radiologists and the referring clinicians. This review focuses on CT characterization of small renal masses, perhaps helping us understand small renal masses. The following aspects were considered for the review: (a) assessing the presence of fat, (b) assessing the enhancement, (c) differentiating renal tumor subtype, and (d) identifying valuable CT signs.

Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer

Renal oncocytoma represents the most common type of benign neoplasm that is an increasing concern for urologists, oncologists, and nephrologists due to its difficult differential diagnosis and frequent overtreatment. It displays a variable neoplastic parenchymal and stromal architecture, and the defining cellular element is a large polygonal, granular, eosinophilic, mitochondria-rich cell known as an oncocyte. The real challenge in the oncocytoma treatment algorithm is related to the misdiagnosis due to its resemblance, at an initial radiological assessment, to malignant renal cancers with a completely different prognosis and medical treatment. Unfortunately, percutaneous renal biopsy is not frequently performed due to the possible side effects related to the procedure. Therefore, the majority of oncocytoma are diagnosed after the surgical operation via partial or radical nephrectomy. For this reason, new reliable strategies to solve this issue are needed. In our review, we will discuss the clinical implications of renal oncocytoma in daily clinical practice with a particular focus on the medical diagnosis and treatment and on the potential of novel promising molecular biomarkers such as circulating microRNAs to distinguish between a benign and a malignant lesion.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided trans-duodenal fine-needle biopsy of a small renal mass: case report and review of the literature

Background

The incidental detection of small renal masses (SRMs) is increasing and biopsy to obtain pathological diagnosis is increasingly proposed as a diagnostic tool to guide further management. Renal mass biopsies are traditionally performed via a percutaneous approach. However, this is not always feasible due to anatomical limitations. A rarely reported alternative biopsy approach for SRMs is endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB). Herein, we describe a case of EUS-guided trans-duodenal FNB for a SRM that was not amenable to standard percutaneous biopsy.

Case presentation

A 48-year-old man was incidentally found to have a right-sided SRM measuring 2.9 × 2.2 × 2.4 cm during evaluation for a hernia. It was anterior, interpolar, completely endophytic and near the renal hilum. The tumor was not amenable to traditional percutaneous biopsy due to its anterior location. However, the renal mass was in close proximity to the descending duodenum and so it was felt that an EUS-guided trans-duodenal FNB would be feasible. The procedure was successful without any complications. The specimen adequacy was satisfactory for evaluation and consistent with renal papillary carcinoma with WHO/ISUP grade 3 nuclear changes.

Conclusion

Our case report demonstrated that EUS-guided trans-duodenal FNB was a safe and feasible approach to obtaining biopsy tissue diagnosis of a SRM that was not amenable to percutaneous biopsy.

Juxtaglomerular cell tumor diagnosed preoperatively by renal tumor biopsy

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of small renal tumor from imaging analysis is limited. We report a case of juxtaglomerular cell tumor diagnosed preoperatively by renal tumor biopsy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 17-year-old male was urgently hospitalized for acute-onset congestive heart failure. Radiographic findings revealed a 2-cm mass lesion, and on renal biopsy, a juxtaglomerular cell tumor was suspected. The juxtaglomerular cell tumor was resected by laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, on suspicion of causing the heart failure. The patient's clinical symptoms improved drastically postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Biopsy may be a promising option for preoperative diagnosis of juxtaglomerular cell tumors.

Evaluation, diagnosis and surveillance of renal masses in the setting of VHL disease

This brief report focuses on the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically localized renal masses in children and adults with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. Counseling considerations pertinent to the urologists, medical oncologists, and multidisciplinary teams involved in the care of these patients are addressed. As practice patterns regarding the evaluation and management of VHL tumors can vary considerably, this report aims to provide guidance on some of the controversies associated with the diagnostic evaluation and initial management of localized renal masses in VHL patients.

The role of renal biopsy to improve small renal mass diagnosis and management: are there predictive factors for a higher detection rate? The first Italian study of 100 cases

BACKGROUND

Incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) has increased over the last decade: in order to reduce overtreatment of benign lesions, renal tumor biopsy (RTB) has been advocated. The primary aim of this study were to establish the rate of diagnostic biopsies and the concordance rate between RTB and surgical pathology with regard to tumor histology. The secondary aim was to identify what predictive factors are associated with an initial diagnostic biopsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed RTB performed in our center in patients with SRMs between 2015 and 2017. We assessed patient demographics and clinical status, lesion characteristics and procedural factors. The categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to identify what factors are indicative of non-diagnostic biopsies. We used the SPSS statistics v. 23.

RESULTS

We performed a total of 100 RTBs to management 94 patients. The initial biopsy was diagnostic in 88 patients (67 malignant and 21 benign lesion). The six remaining patients had repeat biopsies, of which four were diagnostic. Complications rate was 5% prevalently local hematoma treated with surveillance. Agreement between biopsy and surgical histology was found in 94% of cases. On contingency analysis and on univariate and multivariate analysis, these factors (age, tumor size, exophytic location, and type of imaging used) were not predictive with diagnostic biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

RTB for SRMs helps establish pre-treatment diagnosis, reduce overtreatment, with a low risk of complications and high diagnostic rate. In our experience, we did not find predictive factors more likely associated with a diagnostic biopsy.

An Integrated Score and Nomogram Combining Clinical and Immunohistochemistry Factors to Predict High ISUP Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Objective: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) has proposed a grading system to classify renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, classification using biopsy specimens remains problematic and, consequently, the accuracy of a biopsy-based diagnosis is relatively poor. This study aims to combine clinical and immunohistochemical (IHC) factors for the prediction of high ISUP grade clear cell RCC (ccRCC) in an attempt to complement and improve the accuracy of a biopsy-based diagnosis. Methods: A total of 362 ccRCC patients were enrolled in this study and used for the training set. We performed IHC analysis of 18 protein markers on standard tissue sections using an automated stainer. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to evaluate independent predictors for high ISUP grade. We evaluated different prediction models using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis. A nomogram for the derivation of an integrated score for predicting high ISUP grade ccRCC and a calibration curve were also plotted. Finally, an internal validation cohort was examined to evaluate the performance of our integrated scoring system and nomogram. Results: Multivariate logistic analyses revealed seven credible candidates for predicting high grade ISUP. These were age, tumor diameter, surgery, and CK7, Ki-67, PTEN, and MTOR protein expression. The ROC curves for the clinical, IHC and integrated models were compared in the training set, and the AUC for each was 0.731, 0.744, and 0.801, respectively. DeLong's test showed that the integrated model was significantly better at predicting high ISUP grade, when compared with the other models. Internal validation confirmed the good performance of the integrated score in predicting ISUP grade. Conclusion: We have developed a nomogram integrating clinical and immunohistochemical parameters to predict high ISUP grade for M0 ccRCC patients. This nomogram may offer potentially useful information during preoperative individualized patient risk assessment, and consequently may help urologists when planning personalized management regimens.

Outcomes of ultrasound guided renal mass biopsies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided renal mass biopsies (RMBs) at our institution and to determine what patient, procedural, and focal renal mass (FRM) factors were associated with nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided RMBs.

METHODS

Eighty-two ultrasound-guided renal mass biopsies performed between January 2014 and October 2016 were included in our study. Biopsy outcomes (diagnostic vs. nondiagnostic) and patient, procedural, and FRM characteristics were retrospectively reviewed and recorded. Univariate statistical analyses were performed to identify biopsy characteristics that were indicative of nondiagnostic biopsy.

RESULTS

Ultrasound-guided RMBs were diagnostic in 70 out of 82 cases (85%) and non-diagnostic in 12 cases (15%). Among the diagnostic biopsies, 54 (77%) were malignant cases, 94% of which were renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Of the 12 nondiagnostic cases, the final diagnosis was RCC in 4 cases and angiomyolipoma in one case; seven of the nondiagnostic cases were lost to follow-up. A weak association (p = 0.04) was found between the number of needle passes and the biopsy outcome. None of the remaining collected RMB characteristics showed a significant correlation with a diagnostic or nondiagnostic RMB. Six patients (7%) experienced complications.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided renal mass biopsy is a safe and effective method for the diagnosis of renal masses with a low rate of nondiagnostic outcomes. A nondiagnostic biopsy should not be treated as a surrogate for a diagnosis since a significant number of patients with nondiagnostic biopsies have subsequently been shown to have renal malignancies. Repeat biopsy should be considered in such cases.

Evaluating the role for renal biopsy in T1 and T2 renal masses: A single-centre study

INTRODUCTION

Once used primarily in the identification of renal metastasis and lymphomas, various urological bodies are now adopting an expanded role for the renal biopsy. We sought to evaluate the role of the renal biopsy in a Canadian context, focusing on associated adverse events, radiographic burden, and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

This retrospective review incorporated all patients undergoing ultrasound (US)/computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies for T1 and T2 renal masses. There were no age or lesion size limitations. The primary outcome of interest was the correlation between initial biopsy and final surgical pathology. A binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine any confounding factors. Secondary outcomes included the accuracy of tumour cell typing, grading, the safety profile, and radiographic burden associated with these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients satisfied inclusion criteria for this study. Mean age and lesions size at detection were 60.9 years (±12.4) and 3.6 cm (±2.0), respectively. Most renal masses were identified with US (52.7%) or CT (44.6%). Three patients (2.0%) experienced adverse events of note. Eighty-six patients (58.1%) proceeded to radical/partial nephrectomy. Our biopsies held a diagnostic accuracy of 90.7% (sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 87.5%, positive predictive value 98.7%, negative predictive value 70.0%, kappa 0.752, p<0.0005). Binomial logistic regression revealed that age, lesion size, number of radiographic tests, time to biopsy, and modality of biopsy (US/CT) had no influence on the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal biopsies are safe, feasible, and diagnostic. Their role should be expanded in the routine evaluation of T1 and T2 renal masses.

Management of Small Renal Masses

With the ubiquitous use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging in recent years, the incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) has increased, and the evaluation and management of SRMs have become important clinical issues. Diagnosing a mass in the early stages theoretically allows for high rates of cure but simultaneously risks overtreatment. In the past 20 years, surgical treatment of SRMs has transitioned from radical nephrectomy for all renal tumors, regardless of size, to elective partial nephrectomy whenever technically feasible. Additionally, newer approaches, including renal mass biopsy, active surveillance for select patients, and renal mass ablation, have been increasingly used. In this chapter, we review the current evidence-based papers covering aspects of the diagnosis and management of SRMs.

Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Purpose To provide recommendations for the management options for patients with small renal masses (SRMs). Methods By using a literature search and prospectively defined study selection, we sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, prospective comparative observational studies, and retrospective studies published from 2000 through 2015. Outcomes included recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Results Eighty-three studies, including 20 systematic reviews and 63 primary studies, met the eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. Recommendations On the basis of tumor-specific findings and competing risks of mortality, all patients with an SRM should be considered for a biopsy when the results may alter management. Active surveillance should be an initial management option for patients who have significant comorbidities and limited life expectancy. Partial nephrectomy (PN) for SRMs is the standard treatment that should be offered to all patients for whom an intervention is indicated and who possess a tumor that is amenable to this approach. Percutaneous thermal ablation should be considered an option if complete ablation can reliably be achieved. Radical nephrectomy for SRMs should only be reserved for patients who possess a tumor of significant complexity that is not amenable to PN or for whom PN may result in unacceptable morbidity even when performed at centers with expertise. Referral to a nephrologist should be considered if chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²) or progressive chronic kidney disease occurs after treatment, especially if associated with proteinuria.