Expanding living kidney donor criteria with ex-vivo surgery for renal anomalies

Current Perspectives on Endourological Ex Vivo Stone Interventions in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review (SR) of literature to assess the existing evidence concerning the success and complications of endourological ex vivo stone surgeries.

METHODS

Eligible studies for inclusion focused on investigating the success and/or complications related to endourological ex vivo surgeries in donors with nephrolithiasis. A SR was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search included databases of Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus and only article in English were included. Studies published between 2002 and 2023 included in this SR.

RESULTS

After screening 1726 abstracts, this SR included 16 studies with a total of 209 patients. The mean stone size was 5.6 mm and majority of kidneys contained single stones, located in the lower calyx. After ex vivo endourological stone surgeries, the average stone-free rate was found to be 95.4%. The mean duration of ex vivo surgery was 17.3 minutes. Regarding intraoperative complications, two patients (1%) experienced mucosal injuries during pneumatic lithotripsy. As for postoperative complications, two patients (1%) experienced vascular complications. In terms of urological complications, hematuria was observed in 24 patients (11.5%), while one patient (0.5%) experienced clot formation in renal pelvis. Seven patients (3.3%) had urinary tract infections, and three patients (1.4%) developed urolithiasis during the follow-up. Additionally, one patient (0.5%) experienced complete occlusion of ureteroneocystostomy and required revision.

CONCLUSION

Given the advancements in current technology and techniques, endourological ex vivo stone surgeries are increasingly recognized as an effective and safe option for donors with nephrolithiasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered under the protocol registration number CRD42024538384/PROSPERO.

Successful Kidney Transplantation Using Elderly Living Donor with Extremely Large Renal Cyst and Double Arteries

The authors describe a kidney transplant procedure using a living donor with a large cyst and double arteries. Due to the lack of regular transplant activity from a deceased donors, we decided to use the, so called, expanded criteria living donors, which means older age (more than 65 years), hypertension, some structural anomalies of the kidneys (cysts, multiple renal arteries), ABO incompatible kidney transplant, etc. The surgical procedure was the unroofing of a large cyst and wadding with perirenal fat. The 10 years survival rate is quite successful and we can recommend it.

Use and outcomes of kidneys from donors with renal angiomyolipoma: A systematic review

Background:

Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is the most frequent mesenchymal tumor of the kidney. Although there is a rare possibility of malignant transformation of AML, this risk has not been studied in immunosuppressed patients. The safety of donors with AML and their kidney transplant recipients has not been well established.

Methods:

A literature search was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception through May 15, 2018 (updated on October 2019). We included studies that reported the outcomes of kidney donors with AML or recipients of donor with AML. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42018095157).

Results:

Fourteen studies with a total of 16 donors with AML were identified. None of the donors had a diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), or epithelioid variant of AML. Donor age ranged from 35 to 77 years, and recipient age ranged from 27 to 62 years. Ninety-two percent of the donors were female. Only 8% were deceased donor renal transplant. The majority underwent ex vivo resection (65%) before transplantation, followed by no resection (18%), and the remaining had in vivo resection. Tumor size varied from 0.4 cm to 7 cm, and the majority (87%) were localized in the right kidney. Follow-up time ranged from 1 to 107 months. Donor creatinine prenephrectomy ranged 0.89–1.1 mg/dL and postnephrectomy creatinine 1.0–1.17 mg/dL. In those who did not have resection of the AML, tumor size remained stable. None of the donors with AML had end-stage renal disease or died at last follow-up. None of the recipients had malignant transformation of AML.

Conclusion:

These findings are reassuring for the safety of donors with AML (without TSC or LAM) as well as their recipients without evidence of malignant transformation of AML. As such, this can also positively impact the donor pool by increasing the number of available kidneys.

The history of renal transplantation in Canada: A urologic perspective

While the urologist's involvement in kidney transplantation varies from center to center and country to country, urologists remain integral to many programs across Canada. From the early days of kidney transplant to contemporary times, the leadership, vision, and skillset of Canadian urologists have helped progress the field. In this review of Canadian urologists' role in kidney transplantation, the achievements of this professional group are highlighted and celebrated. Original contributors to the field, as well as notable achievements are highlighted, with a focus on the impact of Canadian urologists.

Transplanting kidneys from donors with small renal masses - a strategy to expand the donor pool

INTRODUCTION

Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease, but organ demand continues to outstrip supply. The transplantation of kidneys from donors with small renal masses (SRMs) represents a potential avenue to expand the donor pool. We reviewed all published cases of transplants from donors with SRMs and we present followup data, best practices, and outline an actionable series of steps to guide the implementation of such transplants at individual centers.

METHODS

A detailed literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and SCOPUS databases was performed. Thirty unique data sets met inclusion criteria and described the transplantation of tumor-ectomized kidneys; nine data sets described the transplantation of contralateral kidneys from donors with SRMs.

RESULTS

A total of 147 tumorectomized kidneys have been transplanted. Pathology revealed 120 to be renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), of which 116 were stage T1a (0.3-4 cm). The mean followup time was 44.2 months (1-200). A single suspected tumor recurrence occurred in one patient nine years post-transplantation and it was managed with active surveillance. Twenty-seven kidneys have been transplanted from deceased donors with contralateral renal masses. Pathology revealed 25 to be RCCs, of which 19 were confirmed to be stage T1 (<7 cm). The mean followup time was 46.7 months (0.5-155). One recipient developed an RCC and underwent curative allograft nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful use of kidneys from donors with SRMs is feasible and safe, with an overall recurrence rate of less than 1.5%. The use of such kidneys could help alleviate the organ shortage crisis.

Challenges for the Travelling Donor: Variability Between Donor Workup and Donor Surgery in the Canadian Kidney Paired Exchange Program

BACKGROUND

A primary obstacle to providing renal transplantation is limited access to donated kidneys. The living-donor pool for renal allografts was greatly expanded through implementation of a kidney paired donation program. Whereas some programs ship donor kidneys to the site of renal transplantation, others send the donor to the site of transplantation. Performing the nephrectomy and transplantation at the same location may optimize functional renal outcomes, but preferred surgical approaches may differ between surgical teams performing the donor workup and donor surgery. Our objective was to identify incongruence between the surgery planned by the team that performed the donor's workup, and the surgery that took place at the site of donation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed between the site of preoperative surgical planning, and the site of surgery for kidney donors in the Canadian kidney paired donation program.

RESULTS

Fifty-one donors were preoperatively prepared in any of six Canadian provinces, and then underwent surgery in a different province. The surgical procedure performed for 31% of the patients' nephrectomies differed from the procedure suggested by the surgical team who conducted the preoperative workup. Half of these differences were between left laparoscopic and left laparoscopic hand-assisted, but the remainder included more substantial changes of sides and/or laparoscopic versus open procedures.

CONCLUSION

Optimal patient care is challenged in a kidney paired donation program that uses the "traveling donor" approach due to differing surgical techniques selected by the surgeon at the site of donor workup and the surgeon at the site of donation.