Prospective evaluation of kidney displacement during supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Incidence, significance, and analysis of predictive factors

Could pain change position choice? Comparison of pain level, analgesic requirement and hospitalization time in supine and prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

Investigation of how position affects postoperative pain levels and hospitalization in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) surgery.

METHODS

Between August 2019 and December 2022, a total of 156 patients who underwent prone (pPNL) and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPNL) due to kidney stones were included in the study. Demographic data, preoperative CT scans, laboratory results, transfusion rates, operation durations, complication rates, stone-free rates, analgesic use, nephrostomy removal time, hospitalization duration, fluoroscopy time, hemoglobin decrease and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were evaluated for all patients. By comparing these data between the sPNL and pPNL groups, the effect of position selection in PNL on pain control, analgesic requirement, and hospitalization duration was examined.

RESULTS

In the comparison of the pPNL and sPNL groups, there was a significant difference between the two groups in body mass index, hounsfield unit, complication rate, analgesic rate, nephrostomy remove time, hospitalization time, operation time, fluoroscopy time and VAS score (p = 0.025, p < 0.001, p = 0.012, p = 0.012, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The shorter operation and hospitalization time in the sPNL group could be attributed to performing surgeries in a physiological position. Additionally, sPNL seems advantageous in terms of patients' pain levels, hospitalization time and VAS scores. One reason for this could be the different areas of access in sPNL and pPNL, which may correspond to different dermatome regions. Considering the low level of pain and reduced analgesic usage, sPNL appears to be advantageous.

Efficacy and safety of modified tract dilation technique using simultaneous pulling of proximal and distal ends of a guidewire for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in modified supine position

Purpose

Recently, the needs for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have become more increased because of an easy approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. However, making a nephrostomy tract during supine PCNL is more difficult than prone position due to movable kidney. To overcome this limitation, we used a modified nephrostomy tract dilation (MTD) technique using guidewire traction.

Materials and Methods

From January 2014 to June 2019, a total of 259 patients underwent PCNL in the modified supine position. Among them, the MTD technique was performed in 171 patients. For the MTD technique, two hydrophilic guidewires were passed from the nephrostomy tract and brought out through the urethra, then both proximal and distal ends were contralaterally pulled with tension for the easy placement of a fascia-cutting needle and a balloon catheter. We analyzed the efficacy of this technique in comparison with the conventional method.

Results

Intraoperative radiation exposure time (RET) (68.87 vs. 212.11 s) and hospital stay (5.90 vs. 6.74 days) were significantly shorter, while the success rate (77.2% vs. 63.6%) was significantly higher in the MTD group. Multivariate analysis showed that only the maximal stone diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.928; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.314–2.828; p=0.001) and MTD technique (OR, 0.017; 95% CI, 0.007–0.040; p<0.001) were independent factors for predicting short RET (<120 s).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that MTD technique can be effectively and safely performed in modified supine position PCNL, and it can be helpful in reducing RET and enhancing success rates.