|
2
|
Chaurasia A, Singh S, Homayounieh F, Gopal N, Jones EC, Linehan WM, Shyn PB, Ball MW, Malayeri AA. Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220196. [PMID: 37384546 PMCID: PMC10323228 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
The two primary nephron-sparing interventions for treating renal masses such as renal cell carcinoma are surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) and image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation. Nephron-sparing surgery, such as PN, has been the standard of care for treating many localized renal masses. Although uncommon, complications resulting from PN can range from asymptomatic and mild to symptomatic and life-threatening. These complications include vascular injuries such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and/or renal ischemia; injury to the collecting system causing urinary leak; infection; and tumor recurrence. The incidence of complications after any nephron-sparing surgery depends on many factors, such as the proximity of the tumor to blood vessels or the collecting system, the skill or experience of the surgeon, and patient-specific factors. More recently, image-guided percutaneous renal ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for small renal tumors, with comparable oncologic outcomes to those of PN and a low incidence of major complications. Radiologists must be familiar with the imaging findings encountered after these surgical and image-guided procedures, especially those indicative of complications. The authors review cross-sectional imaging characteristics of complications after PN and image-guided thermal ablation of kidney tumors and highlight the respective management strategies, ranging from clinical observation to interventions such as angioembolization or repeat surgery. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Chung and Raman in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Chaurasia
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Shiva Singh
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Fatemeh Homayounieh
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Elizabeth C. Jones
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - W. Marston Linehan
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Paul B. Shyn
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Mark W. Ball
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Ashkan A. Malayeri
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Bao X, Dong W, Wang J, Sun F, Yao H, Wang D, Zhou Z, Wu J. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: Parenchymal preservation and functional recovery. Int J Urol 2022; 29:1188-1194. [PMID: 35764596 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) can benefit patients in terms of functional recovery in the treatment of renal hilar tumors compared to conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLPN). METHODS Between January 2019 and July 2021, patients with hilar tumors who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) were acquired at our center and were classified into RALPN and CLPN groups. Ipsilateral parenchymal volume (IPV) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined independently 3-5 days before and 3 months after PN using contrast-enhanced computed tomography and nuclear renal scans. Pearson correlation was used to determine the link between ipsilateral GFR preservation and IPV preserved. Concurrently, multivariable analysis was employed to determine characteristics associated with functional recovery. RESULTS A total of 96 patients with hilar tumors were studied, of which 41 received RALPN and 55 received CLPN. Excisional parenchymal volume was 27 and 37 cm3 (p = 0.005) in RALPN and CLPN groups, respectively, and IPV preserved was 77% and 68% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ipsilateral GFR preserved was 77.7% and 75.3%, respectively (p = 0.003). On Pearson correlation, ipsilateral GFR preservation was linked with IPV preserved (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). According to a multivariate study, baseline GFR, IPV preserved, and surgical procedures (RALPN vs. CLPN) were significant factors influencing functional recovery. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that RALPN, rather than CLPN, can achieve better functional recovery in the treatment of hilar tumors due to its ability to win more IPV preserved. RALPN should be recommended as the first-line treatment for hilar tumors, but randomized controlled trials are required to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingjun Bao
- Second Clinical Medical College, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.,Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Wen Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jipeng Wang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Fengze Sun
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Huibao Yao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Di Wang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Zhongbao Zhou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jitao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| |
Collapse
|