Iatrogenic ureteral injury after gynecological surgery

Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison

PURPOSE

Open ureteral reimplantation is considered the standard surgical approach to treat distal ureteral strictures or injuries. These procedures are increasingly performed in a minimally invasive and robotic-assisted manner. Notably, no series comparing perioperative outcomes and safety of the open vs. robotic approach are available so far.

METHODS

In this retrospective multi-center study, we compared data from 51 robotic ureteral reimplantations (RUR) with 79 open ureteral reimplantations (OUR). Both cohorts were comparatively assessed using different baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression for independent predictors was performed.

RESULTS

Surgery time, length of hospital stay and dwell time of bladder catheter were shorter in the robotic cohort, whereas estimated blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion rate and postoperative complications were lower than in the open cohort. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, robotic approach was an independent predictor for a shorter operation time (coefficient - 0.254, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.342 to - 0.166; p < 0.001), a lower estimated blood loss (coefficient - 0.390, 95% CI - 0.549 to - 0.231, p < 0.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (coefficient - 0.455, 95% CI - 0.552 to - 0.358, p < 0.001). Moreover, robotic surgery was an independent predictor for a shorter dwell time of bladder catheter (coefficient - 0.210, 95% CI - 0.278 to - 0.142, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RUR represents a safe alternative to OUR, with a shorter operative time, decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay. Prospective research are needed to further define the extent of the advantages of the robotic approach over open surgery.

Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with bladder flap for benign ureteral stenosis: our initial experience

To present our experience with laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with bladder flap (LUCBF) for treating benign ureteral stenosis and evaluate its feasibility and efficacy. The clinical data of 27 patients with benign ureteral stenosis who underwent LUCBF were retrospectively analyzed. After identification and excision of the ureteral stenosis segment, the healthy ureteral stump was dissected and incised longitudinally. A U-shaped or spiral bladder flap was harvested from the anterolateral bladder wall for ureteroplasty. All patients underwent LUCBF successfully, including 14 patients were combined with psoas hitch technique, between 90 and 220 min (median, 155 min). The median length of ureteral defect was 6 cm (range, 5-17 cm). The median blood loss was 40 ml (20-150 ml). The median indwelling time of double-J stent was 8 weeks (range, 4-8 weeks). Five patients (10.6%) suffered postoperative complications during the follow-up period (range, 12-48 months), including fever, hematuria, urinary tract infection and recurrent stenosis. The success rate was 96.3% (26/27). Patients with long ureter defects had longer operative time and more blood loss than short ureter defects. LUCBF was a safe and feasible technique for benign ureteral stenosis. Long ureter defect was related to longer operative time and more blood loss.

2023 WSES guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of iatrogenic urinary tract injuries (IUTIs) during emergency digestive surgery

Iatrogenic urinary tract injury (IUTI) is a severe complication of emergency digestive surgery. It can lead to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and have a long-term impact on the quality of life. The reported incidence of IUTIs varies greatly among the studies, ranging from 0.3 to 1.5%. Given the high volume of emergency digestive surgery performed worldwide, there is a need for well-defined and effective strategies to prevent and manage IUTIs. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prevention, detection, and management of IUTIs in the emergency setting. The present guidelines, promoted by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), were developed following a systematic review of the literature and an international expert panel discussion. The primary aim of these WSES guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians and surgeons in the prevention, detection, and management of IUTIs during emergency digestive surgery. The following key aspects were considered: (1) effectiveness of preventive interventions for IUTIs during emergency digestive surgery; (2) intra-operative detection of IUTIs and appropriate management strategies; (3) postoperative detection of IUTIs and appropriate management strategies and timing; and (4) effectiveness of antibiotic therapy (including type and duration) in case of IUTIs.

Urological procedures performed by gynecologists: Activity profile in a gynecological surgery department, 10-year observation cohort

INTRODUCTION

The proximity of the urinary tract to the female genital tract explains its possible involvement in pelvic gynaecological cancer or deep endometriosis. Surgical treatment is aimed at improving overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients, as well as restoring normal anatomy and functional integrity depending on the pathology. These operations are accompanied by significant post-operative complications. Thus, the urological procedures performed must be rigorously justified, and the different resection and reconstruction techniques adapted to the pathology and the level of infiltration.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the activity profile, over the last ten years, of a gynaecological surgery department in terms of urological procedures in the management of patients with deep endometriosis and pelvic carcinology.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a monocentric retrospective observational study, including all patients who underwent a urological procedure by a gynaecological surgeon only, as part of the management of pelvic gynaecological cancers or deep endometriosis, at the University Hospital Centre (CHU) of Strasbourg, between January 1st 2010 and April 31st 2021. The variables studied were early postoperative complications, the rate of surgical reintervention, operating time, length of hospital stay, the need for peri-operative drainage or transfusion, and post-operative functional disorders.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included, 27 in the pelvic gynaecological cancer group and 59 in the deep endometriosis group. 61.6% of patients received uretero-vesical catheterization, 60.5% partial cystectomy, 10.5% psoic bladder ureteral reimplantation, and 3.5% trans-ileal Bricker skin ureterostomy. The mean operating time was 316 min in the pelvic gynaecological cancer group and 198.9 min in the deep endometriosis group. The average hospital stay was 11.5 days, 22.3 days for patients treated for pelvic cancer and 6.3 days for those treated for endometriosis. The rate of minor post-operative complications was 8.2% of cases, and major post-operative complications 17.4% of cases, the majority of which were in the gynecological cancer group. There were no cases of intra- or early post-operative death. Early postoperative urinary complications affected 14.0% of the total patients, mostly in the gynaecological cancer group with 33.3% of patients, but only 5.1% of patients in the deep endometriosis group. The total reoperation rate within 60 days postoperatively was 15.1%, 40.7% for patients treated for gynaecological cancer and 3.4% for those treated for deep pelvic endometriosis. The rate of reoperations for urinary complications was 11.6% of total patients, or 76.9% of total reoperations. 15 patients received labile blood products intra- or postoperatively, 11 in the pelvic gynaecological cancer group and 4 in the endometriosis group.

CONCLUSION

Our overall results appear comparable to those reported in the literature and are particularly satisfactory in terms of post-operative complications after partial cystectomy in the management of deep endometriosis compared to other gynaecological departments. This work encourages us to continue and improve the training of gynaecological surgeons in terms of multidisciplinary surgical procedures, including urological ones, to obtain a global vision of the pathology and to allow an optimal quality of care for the patients.

Management strategies and root causes of missed iatrogenic intraoperative ureteral injuries with delayed diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study of 40 cases

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative iatrogenic ureteral injuries represent rare technical surgical complications with the potential for adverse patient outcomes, particularly when the diagnosis is delayed. Ideally, these technical complications are recognized and repaired intraoperatively. This study was designed to investigate the root causes and outcomes of missed intraoperative ureteral injuries at a tertiary urology referral centre in Tunisia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary urology referral centre in Tunis from January 1^st, 2015, to December 31^st, 2020, including all patients with iatrogenic ureteral injury, not diagnosed intraoperatively. The factors associated with the success of endoscopic treatment and those associated with the unfavourable evolution were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 40 iatrogenic ureteral injuries were included. Gynaecological surgery was responsible for 85% of ureteral injuries, mainly during hysterectomies (55%). The symptoms were dominated by low back pain (37.5%) and pyelonephritis (25%). Endoscopic treatment was attempted in 22 cases, it was sufficient in 12 cases. Ureteral injury required surgical treatment in 24 cases, and ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 16 cases. Nephrectomy was performed in eight cases, representing 20% of injuries, including three cases as the first treatment for late-diagnosed cases with a destroyed kidney. In the analytical study, endoscopic treatment was sufficient in 50% in case of ureteral fistula versus 27% in case of ureteral stenosis (p = 0.04). Nephrectomy was performed in 10% of cases when ureteral injury was diagnosed within the first month postoperatively compared to 60% of cases when this delay exceeded one month (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Iatrogenic ureteral injuries discovered postoperatively are mostly secondary to gynaecologic surgery. Although endoscopic treatment is usually performed as a first treatment, a more aggressive surgical is often necessary, with a nephrectomy rate of 20%.

Iatrogenic Ureteral and Colonic Injuries During Emergency Cesarean Section: A Lesson Learned from a Surgical Catastrophe - A Case Report

Introduction

Iatrogenic concomitant ureteral and colonic injury in emergency cesarean section (C-section) is an exceedingly rare, yet, catastrophic complication and has not been reported to our knowledge.

Case Report

A 30-year-old woman presented with decreased urination for 2 days after a C-section. Ultrasonography showed severe left hydronephrosis and moderate abdominal free fluid. A ureteroscopy revealed a total occlusion of the left ureter, and subsequently, a ureteroneocystostomy was performed. Two days later, the patient was complicated with abdominal distension that necessitated re-exploration. The exploration revealed colonic injury (rectosigmoid), peritonitis, endometritis, and ureteral anastomosis disruption. A colostomy, repair of colonic injury, hysterectomy, and ureterocutaneous diversion were performed. The patient's hospital stay was complicated, with stomal retraction requiring operative revision and wound dehiscence, which was treated conservatively. After 6 months, the colostomy was closed, and the ureter was anastomosed via the Boari-flap procedure.

Conclusion

Injuries to the urinary and gastrointestinal tracts are serious complications of a cesarean section; concurrent involvement is exceedingly rare; however, delayed recognition and intervention can worsen the prognosis.

Successful management of ureteral injury after gender-affirming laparoscopic hysterectomy: A case report

Introduction and importance

Case presentation

Clinical discussion

Conclusion

•

The majority of iatrogenic ureteral injuries occur during gynecological procedures.

•

A two-step process is recommended for delayed-diagnosed ureteral injuries.

•

Thin microguidewires are beneficial in difficult retrograde ureteral stenting.

•

The Boari flap technique is useful for patients with long lower ureter deficits.

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Management of Ureteral Iatrogenic Leakage after Gynecologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To report safety and efficacy of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of gynecologic iatrogenic urinary leaks.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of iatrogenic ureteral lesions treated between November 2009 to April 2019 was performed. Under ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy guidance, an attempt to place a ureteral stent and nephrostomy was carried out in the same session using an anterograde percutaneous approach. At the end of any procedure, a fluoroscopic control and a cone-beam CT scan (CBCT) were performed to check the correct placement and functioning of the nephrostomy and DJ stent. In cases of difficult ureteral stent placement via the single anterograde approach, the collaboration of urologists was requested to perform a rendezvous technique, combined with the retrograde approach.

RESULTS

DJ stent placement was achieved using the anterograde approach in 12/15 (80.0%) patients and using the retrograde approach in 3/15 cases (20.0%). Moreover, in 3/15 (20.0%) patients, surgical treatment was needed: in one case because of the persistence of ureteral stenosis at 6 months, and in the other two cases due to ureter-vaginal fistula. No major complications were recorded; overall, minor complications occurred in 4/8 patients.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of iatrogenic ureteral lesions after gynecological surgery is a safe and effective option.

Etiology and Ureteral Reconstruction Strategy for Iatrogenic Ureteral Injuries: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the etiology, characteristics, and ureteral reconstruction strategies of iatrogenic ureteric injuries in a high-volume center.

METHODS

Between September 2010 and August 2019, we retrospectively collected patients who underwent ureteral reconstruction due to iatrogenic ureteric injuries. Patient profiles, laboratory data, imaging studies, perioperative data, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The upper, middle, and lower thirds of the ureter were affected in 30, 2, and 36 cases, respectively. Of the 68 ureteric injuries, 69.1% occurred during urological procedures, followed by gynecological procedures, general surgery, radiotherapy, and orthopedic surgery. The majority of urological injuries (41, 87.2%) occurred due to stone removal. There was a significant difference in the age, sex, and location of ureteric injuries between the urological and nonurological groups. The median follow-up time was 17.9 months. The overall symptom remission rate was 91.2% and ranged from 87.5 to 100% for different reconstructive surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Urological procedures were the most common cause of iatrogenic ureteric injury; thus, extra care should be taken. Timely detection and appropriate treatment of the ureteric injuries are necessary. Treatment strategies should be depended on the location and length of injury.

Early detection and endoscopic management of post cesarean section ureterovaginal fistula: a case series study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the endourologic management of post-cesarean section ureterovaginal fistula.

METHODS

Between February 2016 and March 2019, eight patients presented because of vaginal leakage after cesarean section. All presented within 15 days from their original operations. Three of the patients had a vague lower abdominal pain, and five had ipsilateral flank pain; all had vaginal leakage. Physical examination, ultrasonography, and IVP were done to confirm the diagnosis. Ureteroscopy was the first treatment attempt, using two or three guide wires to find the proximal part of the ureter and insert a JJ stent.

RESULTS

In six patients, we could insert guide wires, find the proximal part of the ureter, and finally insert a JJ stent. In two patients, we could not even pass a guide wire, so we changed the position, and ureteral reimplantation was done. The stents were removed after 6 weeks, and after 3 months an IVP was planned again that showed all fistulae had resolved with no evidence of ureteral stricture.

CONCLUSION

In cases of ureterovaginal fistula after cesarean section, ultrasonography and IVP with lateral view x-ray films may confirm the diagnosis. The traditional treatment for ureterovaginal fistula is ureteral reimplantation, but endoscopic management may be a viable technique with less invasiveness and faster results and recovery. Thus, retrograde stenting can be accomplished in selected patients with ureterovaginal fistula after cesarean section and may eliminate the need for reimplantation of the ureter.

The GPS for surgery: A user-centered evaluation of a navigation system for laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Unsafe surgical care has emerged as a significant public health concern, motivated by a high percentage of major complications happening during surgery, attributed to surgeons' skills and experience, and determined to be preventable.

METHODS

This article presents APSurg, an Abdominal Positioning Surgical system designed to improve awareness and safety during laparoscopic surgery. The proposed system behaves like a GPS, offering an additional dynamic virtual reality view of the surgical field.

RESULTS

This work presents an evaluation study in terms of accuracy, effectiveness, and usability. Tests were conducted performing a localization task on an abdomen phantom in a simulated scenario. Results show a navigation accuracy below 5 mm. The task execution time was reduced by a 15% and the performed incision dimension was reduced by a 46%, with respect to a standard setup. A custom questionnaire showed a significant positive impact in exploiting APSurg during the surgical task execution.