Discrepancy in pathology reports upon second review of radical orchiectomy specimens for testicular germ cell tumors

Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Tissue Biomarker Analysis: A Comparison of Human Protein Atlas and Individual Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Component Immunohistochemistry

The accurate management of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) depends on identifying the individual histological tumor components. Currently available data on protein expression in TGCTs are limited. The human protein atlas (HPA) is a comprehensive resource presenting the expression and localization of proteins across tissue types and diseases. In this study, we have compared the data from the HPA with our in-house immunohistochemistry on core TGCT diagnostic genes to test reliability and potential biomarker genes. We have compared the protein expression of 15 genes in TGCT patients and non-neoplastic testicles with the data from the HPA. Protein expression was converted into diagnostic positivity. Our study discovered discrepancies in three of the six core TGCT diagnostic genes, POU5F1, KIT and SOX17 in HPA. DPPA3, CALCA and TDGF1 were presented as potential novel TGCT biomarkers. MGMT was confirmed while RASSF1 and PRSS21 were identified as biomarkers of healthy testicular tissue. Finally, SALL4, SOX17, RASSF1 and PRSS21 dysregulation in the surrounding testicular tissue with complete preserved spermatogenesis of TGCT patients was detected, a potential early sign of neoplastic transformation. We highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary collaborative approach to fully understand the protein landscape of human testis and its pathologies.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of germ cell tumor in Jordan: A tertiary center experience

Objective

In the Middle East, there is a paucity of data regarding germ cell tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes. Herein, we aim to present the largest series in Jordan reporting our cancer center experience managing GCT.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2020, a total of 241 patients with a pathological diagnosis of GCT were treated at our cancer center. Demographic, epidemiologic, and pathological data were retrospectively collected. In addition, survival and relapse outcomes based on tumor stage and adjuvant treatment were collected.

Results

A total of 241 patients were diagnosed with GCT, of whom 108 (44.8%) had seminoma and 133 (55.2%) had non-seminoma tumors (NSGCT). Median age (interquartile range) at diagnosis was 31 years (25-36). Patients with seminoma (68.5%) had pT1 disease post orchiectomy, while only 37.5% of patients with NSGCT had pT1 on final pathology. Elevated tumor markers such as beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were present in 10% of seminomas. Following radical orchiectomy and staging, 88 (36.5%) went for active surveillance while 153 patients (63.5%) received adjuvant treatment. With regard to pathology slides read outside, rereading by our genitourinary pathologist yielded a discrepancy on GCT type in 41 (19.3%) out of 212 patients. The median follow-up was 36 (24-48) months. Twenty-two patients relapsed after an average follow-up time of 39 months. The 5-year overall survival for stage I, II, and III was 98%, 94%, and 87%, respectively, and 3-year recurrence-free survival for stage I, II, and III was 94.8%, 78%, and 67%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our data on testicular GCT including demographic, histological, and treatment outcomes were comparable to that of developed countries. In light of the pathology discrepancy rate revealed in our study, authors recommend a second review by expert genitourinary pathologists to ensure proper classification and management of GCT.

Management of stage I testicular cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy amongst young men, and a large proportion present with stage I disease. The options for management following radical orchiectomy are multifold. We review here approaches to treatment in this setting, providing an update on recent publications.

RECENT FINDINGS

At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, we maintain a nonrisk adapted active surveillance approach. With a dedicated surveillance program using low-dose computed tomography imaging, patients are appropriately identified early for treatment on relapse. There are ongoing investigations into minimizing toxicities of treatments for relapse, and in particular, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) presents an attractive alternative. This, though, remains investigational in the setting of seminoma.

SUMMARY

Testicular cancer is a highly curable malignancy. In stage I disease, an active surveillance approach following radical orchiectomy is preferred, irrespective of risk-profile. This approach serves to limit the toxicity of adjuvant treatment in a significant proportion of patients, while maintaining excellent survival outcomes.

Clinical dilemmas in local and regional testis cancer

At the Canadian Testis Cancer Workshop, the multidisciplinary management of testis cancer care was discussed. The two-day workshop involved urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, physician's assistants, residents, fellows, nurses, patients, and patient advocacy group members.This review summarizes the discussion regarding clinical dilemmas in local and regional testis cancer. We present cases that highlight the need for a coordinated approach to individualize care. Overarching themes include the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to testis cancer, willingness to involve a high-volume experienced center, and given that the oncological outcomes are excellent, a reminder that clinical decisions need to prioritize selecting a strategy with the least treatment-related morbidity when safe.