Intravenous glutamine for severe acute pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

[Glutamine as a component of nutritional and metabolic therapy for surgical patients in ICU]

Glutamine is the most abundant amino acid in the human body that is involved in various metabolic processes. The development of hypermetabolic and hypercatabolic syndrome that accompanies critical conditions of ICU patients is associated with a decrease in the concentration of glutamine, especially in the blood plasma and muscles. This process may last for quite a long time and lead to a number of complications up to a fatal outcome. This review was aimed to analyze clinical studies conducted over the past 20 years that demonstrate the effect of intravenous infusion of glutamine dipeptide as part of balanced parenteral nutrition on the perioperative period: the severity of inflammatory response; the state of the intestinal mucosa; the incidence and severity of complications; mortality; the duration of stay in the ICU and hospital in general, etc. The analysis was performed using systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in different countries selected in the main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, etc.). Most of the reports state that the inclusion of glutamine dipeptide in nutritional and metabolic therapy (NMT) in surgical patients reduces the frequency and severity of infectious complications and mortality, reduces the length of stay in ICU and in hospital in general, improves the biochemical parameters that reflect the condition of patients, and reduces the treatment costs. Thus, the conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses confirm that the use of the parenteral form of glutamine dipeptide (Dipeptiven 20%) as part of balanced standard parenteral nutrition (PN) is a clinically and pharmacoeconomically justified strategy of NMT in surgical ICU patients.

Effects of glutamine supplementation on critically ill patients: Focus on efficacy and safety. An overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this overview of systematic reviews was to synthesize, appraise, and present all systematic review (SR) evidence on the clinical efficacy of glutamine administration to severely ill patients.

METHODS

Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Prospero were searched up to March 2020. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials published in English, comparing immunomodulating diets-containing exclusively glutamine-with standard diets for critically ill adult patients were selected. Data were collected from each selected systematic review and all available primary studies. The primary outcome was overall mortality; secondary outcomes were rate of infectious complications, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Seventeen SRs were eligible for inclusion. Of the SRs, 16 included meta-analyses with moderate degree of overlap (corrected covered area = 10%). These included 117 randomized controlled trials with 9933 patients. Glutamine supplementation was not associated with overall mortality and ICU LOS. However, it may reduce the rate of infectious complications overall (N = 3666, risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.92; I² = 33%: low quality of evidence). LOS was limited with the supplementation of glutamine (N = 4353 weighted mean difference, -2.90; 95% CI, -3.66 to -2.15; I² = 81%: very low quality of evidence), but this effect was diminished when only studies with low risk for bias were synthesized.

CONCLUSION

Glutamine could demonstrate a beneficial role in critical care patients of diminishing the rate of infectious complications and hospital and ICU LOS. However, future studies with better quality would confirm this finding.

Effects of parenteral glutamine in critically ill surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Introduction: glutamine (GLN), the most abundant non-essential amino acid in the plasma, tends to be rapidly depleted in cells in situations of metabolic stress. Some studies have demonstrated the benefits of GLN supplementation on mortality, infection, and length of hospital stay. The objective of this review was to analyze whether parenteral supplementation with GLN has any relevant effect in critically ill surgical patients. Methods: based on a systematic database search, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published since 1985 were included if they had evaluated the effect of parenteral GLN supplementation in critical surgical patients. The statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: seven RCTs were eligible for the meta-analysis. Parenteral glutamine supplementation was associated with a non-significant 24 % reduction in mortality (RR = 0.76; 95 % CI: 0.50-1.15). Infections were significantly reduced (RR = 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.45-0.80), and length of hospital stay was 4.09 days shorter (95 % CI: -6.71 to -1.46). Conclusion: parenteral GLN usage in critical surgical patients seems to decrease infection and length of hospital stay, but we could not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality.

The Pleiotropic Effects of Glutamine Metabolism in Cancer

Metabolic programs are known to be altered in cancers arising from various tissues. Malignant transformation can alter signaling pathways related to metabolism and increase the demand for both energy and biomass for the proliferating cancerous cells. This scenario is further complexed by the crosstalk between transformed cells and the microenvironment. One of the most common metabolic alterations, which occurs in many tissues and in the context of multiple oncogenic drivers, is the increased demand for the amino acid glutamine. Many studies have attributed this increased demand for glutamine to the carbon backbone and its role in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle anaplerosis. However, an increasing number of studies are now emphasizing the importance of glutamine functioning as a proteogenic building block, a nitrogen donor and carrier, an exchanger for import of other amino acids, and a signaling molecule. Herein, we highlight the recent literature on glutamine’s versatile role in cancer, with a focus on nitrogen metabolism, and therapeutic implications of glutamine metabolism in cancer.

Therapeutic benefits of glutamine: An umbrella review of meta-analyses

Glutamine may be an essential amino acid in patients with catabolic disease, as it has been demonstrated that circulating glutamine levels drop during critical illness and following major surgery; this may result in an increase in secondary infection risk, recovery time and mortality rates. However, there is much discrepancy in the literature with regards to randomized controlled studies, and therefore, the present study is an umbrella review of published meta-analyses, conducted to examine the effectiveness of glutamine's role as a therapeutic agent. A search using PubMed, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from January 1st, 1980 to December 31st, 2016 was conducted using the following strategy: 'Glutamine AND (meta-analysis OR systematic review)' and publications were retrieved, which provided quantitative statistical analysis of pooled treatment effects on the relative risks of infectious complications, mortality and length of stay in hospital. A total of 22 meta-analyses were entered into the current umbrella review. As displayed in Tables I, II and III, these analyses are split into three groups, based on different parameters. Of the 19 meta-analyses investigating the effects of infectious complications, 15 identified statistically significant reductions in complications, with relative risks ranging between 0.42 and 0.93. In addition, 12 of the 18 meta-analyses analyzing the length of hospital stays presented statistically significant reductions in the length of stay, with reductions ranging between 0.19 to 4.73 days. Only 4 of the 15 meta-analyses studying mortality effects identified statistically significant reductions in mortality with relative risks ranging between 0.64 and 1.28. Statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in 16 of 22 meta-analyses, and publication bias was observed in five of 11 meta-analyses. Glutamine supplementation for critically ill or surgical patients through parenteral or enteral routes appears to reduce the rate of hospital acquired infectious complications and shortening of the length of stay in hospital. Furthermore, glutamine supplementation appeared to reduce the rate of in-patient mortality, but the majority of meta-analyses did not reach statistical significance. However, researchers must appreciate the positive results with caution in light of the fact that there exists statistically significant heterogeneity for the majority of meta-analyses, and statistically significant publication bias in almost half.

Is there a role for glutamine supplementation in the management of acute pancreatitis?

There is no consensus about the effects of glutamine supplementation for acute pancreatitis. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening 30 databases, we identified 15 systematic reviews including 31 randomized controlled trials addressing the question of this article. We combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings following the GRADE approach. We concluded glutamine supplementation might decrease infectious complications in acute pancreatitis, but it is not clear if it affects mortality or length of hospital stay because the certainty of the evidence is very low.

Current concepts in the management of acute pancreatitis

Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) are based on the Western experience, which may be difficult to extrapolate in India due to socioeconomic constraints. Hence, modifications based on the available resources and referral patterns should be introduced so as to ensure appropriate care. We reviewed the current literature on the management of AP available in English on Medline and proposed guidelines locally applicable. Patients of AP presenting with systemic inflammatory response syndrome are at risk of moderate-severe pancreatitis and hence, should be referred to a tertiary center early. The vast majority of patients with AP have mild disease and can be managed at smaller centers. Early aggressive fluid resuscitation with controlled fluid expansion, early enteral nutrition, and culture-directed antibiotics improve outcomes in AP. Infected pancreatic necrosis should be managed in a tertiary care hospital within a multidisciplinary setup. The "step up" approach involving antibiotics, percutaneous drainage, and minimally invasive necrosectomy instituted sequentially based on clinical response has improved the outcomes in this subgroup of patients.

Parenteral glutamine supplementation in critical illness: a systematic review

Introduction

The potential benefit of parenteral glutamine (GLN) supplementation has been one of the most commonly studied nutritional interventions in the critical care setting. The aim of this systematic review was to incorporate recent trials of traditional parenteral GLN supplementation in critical illness with previously existing data.

Methods

All randomized controlled trials of parenterally administered GLN in critically ill patients conducted from 1997 to 2013 were identified. Studies of enteral GLN only or combined enteral/parenteral GLN were excluded. Methodological quality of studies was scored and data was abstracted by independent reviewers.

Results

A total of 26 studies involving 2,484 patients examining only parenteral GLN supplementation of nutrition support were identified in ICU patients. Parenteral GLN supplementation was associated with a trend towards a reduction of overall mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75, 1.03, P = 0.10) and a significant reduction in hospital mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51, 0.90, P = 0.008). In addition, parenteral GLN was associated with a strong trend towards a reduction in infectious complications (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73, 1.02, P = 0.09) and ICU length of stay (LOS) (WMD –1.91, (95% CI -4.10, 0.28, P = 0.09) and significant reduction in hospital LOS (WMD -2.56, 95% CI -4.71, -0.42, P = 0.02). In the subset of studies examining patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN), parenteral GLN supplementation was associated with a trend towards reduced overall mortality (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71, 1.01, P = 0.07).

Conclusions

Parenteral GLN supplementation given in conjunction with nutrition support continues to be associated with a significant reduction in hospital mortality and hospital LOS. Parenteral GLN supplementation as a component of nutrition support should continue to be considered to improve outcomes in critically ill patients.