Surface adhesion and host response as pathogenicity factors of Neisseria meningitidis

Pathogenomic in silico approach identifies NSP-A and Fe-IIISBP as possible drug targets in Neisseria Meningitidis MC58 and development of pharmacophores as novel therapeutic candidates

Meningitis creates a life-threatening clinical crisis. Moreover, the administered antibiotics result into multi-drug resistance, thereby necessitating development of alternative therapeutic strategies. This study aimed at identifying novel-drug targets in Neisseria meningitidis and therapeutic molecules which can be exploited for the treatment of meningitis. Novel targets were identified by applying a pathogenomic approach involving protein data-set mining, subtractive channel analysis and subsequent qualitative analysis comprising of in silico pharmacokinetics, molecular docking and pharmacophore generation. Pathogenomic studies revealed Neisserial Surface Protein A (NSP-A) and Iron-III-Substrate Binding Protein (Fe-IIISBP) as potential targets. Two pharmacophore models comprising of 2-(biaryl) carbapenems, efavirenz, praziquantel and pyrimethamine for NSP-A and 2-(biaryl) carbapenems, trimipramine and pyrimethamine for Fe-IIISBP, showed successful docking, followed drug-likeness criteria and generated pharmacophore model with a score of 8.08 and 8.818, respectively, which had further been docked to the target stably. Thus, our study identifies NSP-A and Fe-IIISBP as novel targets in Neisseria meningitidis for which 2-(biaryl) carbapenems, efavirenz, praziquantel, trimipramine and pyrimethamine may be employed for effective treatment of meningitis.

A system to study the expression of phytopathogenic genes encoded by Burkholderia glumae

Rice is often infected by bacterial panicle blight disease caused by Burkholderia glumae. Since most studies have assessed the transcriptome of the plant when it is exposed to bacteria, the gene expression of the phytopathogenic bacteria have not been well elaborated during the infection process or in the host cell. Recently, a few researches were conducted to evaluate the in vivo transcriptome of bacteria during the infective process. Most bacterial cells do not express genes involved in pathogenicity in culture medium making it difficult to investigate gene expression of bacterial cells in plant cells. Here, we sought a simulated patho-system that would allow bacterial cells to express their pathogenic genes. Thus, rice root exudates (RE) and bacterial N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) were used and their effects on bacterial gene expression were assessed. Transcription patterns of B. glumae virulence determinants showed that enrichment medium (LB + RE + C8-HSL) could significantly induce virulence factor genes compared with Luria Bertani (LB; control) medium. The data indicate that the artificial environment is similar to the real patho-system, and that this induced maximum relevant gene expression. In this model system, bacterial gene expression changes are traceable in the infection process. Bacterial cells exposed to either an artificial environment or LB + RE + C8-HSL behaved similarly to the natural environment in situ.

Meningococcal pneumonia: a review

Background

Although Neisseria meningitidis is one of the major causes of meningitis, meningococcal pneumonia is the most common non-neurological organ disease caused by this pathogen.

Methods

We conducted a review of the literature to describe the risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of meningococcal pneumonia.

Results

Meningococcal pneumonia was first described in 1907 and during the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic large numbers of cases of meningococcal pneumonia occurred in patients following the initial viral infection. A number of publications, mainly case series or case reports, has subsequently appeared in the literature. Meningococcal pneumonia occurs mainly with serogroups Y, W-135 and B. Risk factors for meningococcal pneumonia have not been well characterised, but appear to include older age, smoking, people living in close contact (e.g. military recruits and students at university), preceding viral and bacterial infections, haematological malignancies, chronic respiratory conditions and various other non-communicable and primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases. Primary meningococcal pneumonia occurs in 5–10% of patients with meningococcal infection and is indistinguishable clinically from pneumonia caused by other common pathogens. Fever, chills and pleuritic chest pain are the most common symptoms, occurring in > 50% of cases. Productive sputum and dyspnoea are less common. Diagnosis of meningococcal pneumonia may be made by the isolation of the organism in sputum, blood, or normally sterile site cultures, but is likely to underestimate the frequency of meningococcal pneumonia. If validated, PCR-based techniques may be of value for diagnosis in the future. While penicillin was the treatment of choice for meningococcal infection, including pneumonia, prior to 1991, a third generation cephalosporin has been more commonly used thereafter, because of concerns of penicillin resistance. Chemoprophylaxis, using one of a number of antibiotics, has been recommended for close contacts of patients with meningococcal meningitis, and similar benefits may be seen in contacts of patients with meningococcal pneumonia. Effective vaccines are available for the prevention of infection with certain meningococcal serogroups, but this field is still evolving.

Conclusion

Meningococcal pneumonia occurs fairly frequently and should be considered as a possible cause of pneumonia, particularly in patients with specific risk factors.