Antibody induction therapy in adult kidney transplantation: A controversy continues

Immune modulation in transplant medicine: a comprehensive review of cell therapy applications and future directions

Balancing the immune response after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) remains an ongoing clinical challenge. While immunosuppressants can effectively reduce acute rejection rates following transplant surgery, some patients still experience recurrent acute rejection episodes, which in turn may progress to chronic rejection. Furthermore, these immunosuppressive regimens are associated with an increased risk of malignancies and metabolic disorders. Despite significant advancements in the field, these IS related side effects persist as clinical hurdles, emphasizing the need for innovative therapeutic strategies to improve transplant survival and longevity. Cellular therapy, a novel therapeutic approach, has emerged as a potential pathway to promote immune tolerance while minimizing systemic side-effects of standard IS regiments. Various cell types, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), regulatory myeloid cells (RMCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), offer unique immunomodulatory properties that may help achieve improved outcomes in transplant patients. This review aims to elucidate the role of cellular therapies, particularly MSCs, T cells, Tregs, RMCs, macrophages, and dendritic cells in SOT and VCA. We explore the immunological features of each cell type, their capacity for immune regulation, and the prospective advantages and obstacles linked to their application in transplant patients. An in-depth outline of the current state of the technology may help SOT and VCA providers refine their perioperative treatment strategies while laying the foundation for further trials that investigate cellular therapeutics in transplantation surgery.

Effects of Antithymocyte Globulin, Basiliximab, and Induction-Free Treatment in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression

OBJECTIVES

Induction treatment in renal transplant is associated with better graft survival. However, intensified immunosuppression is known to cause unwanted side effects such as infection and malignancy. Furthermore, the effects of the routine use of immunosuppressants in low-risk kidney transplant recipients are still not clear. In this study, we assessed the first-year safety and efficacy of induction treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined first living donor kidney transplant patients who were on tacrolimus based immunosuppression therapy. We formed 3 groups according to the induction status: antithymocyte globulin induction, basiliximab induction, and no induction. We collected outcome data on delayed graft function, graft loss, creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rates, acute rejection episodes, hospitalization episodes, and infection episodes, including cytomegalovirus infection and bacterial infections.

RESULTS

We examined a total of 126 patients (age 35 ± 12 years; 65% male). Of them, 25 received antithymocyte globulin, 52 received basiliximab, and 49 did notreceive any induction treatment. We did not observe any statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in terms of acute rejection episodes, delayed graft function, and first-year graft loss. The estimated glomerular filtration rates were similar among the groups. Overall bacterial infectious complications and cytomegalovirus infection showed similar prevalence among all groups. Hospitalization was less common in the induction-free group.

CONCLUSIONS

In low-risk patients, induction-free regimens could be associated with a better safety profile without compromising graft survival. Therefore, induction treatment may be disregarded in first living donor transplant patients who receive tacrolimusbased triple immunosuppression treatment.

The Impact of Human Microbiotas in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Organ Transplantation

The human microbiota heavily influences most vital aspects of human physiology including organ transplantation outcomes and transplant rejection risk. A variety of organ transplantation scenarios such as lung and heart transplantation as well as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is heavily influenced by the human microbiotas. The human microbiota refers to a rich, diverse, and complex ecosystem of bacteria, fungi, archaea, helminths, protozoans, parasites, and viruses. Research accumulating over the past decade has established the existence of complex cross-species, cross-kingdom interactions between the residents of the various human microbiotas and the human body. Since the gut microbiota is the densest, most popular, and most studied human microbiota, the impact of other human microbiotas such as the oral, lung, urinary, and genital microbiotas is often overshadowed. However, these microbiotas also provide critical and unique insights pertaining to transplantation success, rejection risk, and overall host health, across multiple different transplantation scenarios. Organ transplantation as well as the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant pharmacological regimens patients undergo is known to adversely impact the microbiotas, thereby increasing the risk of adverse patient outcomes. Over the past decade, holistic approaches to post-transplant patient care such as the administration of clinical and dietary interventions aiming at restoring deranged microbiota community structures have been gaining momentum. Examples of these include prebiotic and probiotic administration, fecal microbial transplantation, and bacteriophage-mediated multidrug-resistant bacterial decolonization. This review will discuss these perspectives and explore the role of different human microbiotas in the context of various transplantation scenarios.

Impact of low-level pretransplant donor-specific antibodies on outcomes after kidney transplantation

Background

The effect of low‐level pretransplant donor‐specific antibody (DSA) on kidney transplant outcomes is not well described. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes among patients of varying immunologic risk, based on the level of pretransplant DSA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult kidney transplant recipients who had undergone a transplant at our center between January 2013 and May 2017. Patients were grouped as negative DSA (mean fluorescence intensity, [MFI_SUM < 100]), low‐level DSA (MFI_SUM 100–1000), and positive DSA (MFI_SUM > 1000). Rejection, infection, graft, and patient survival were outcomes measured.

Results

Of 952 patients, 82.1% had negative DSA, 10.7% had low‐level DSA, and 7.1% had positive DSA. The positive DSA group had the highest rate of antibody‐mediated rejection (10.3%), followed by low‐level DSA (7.8%) and the negative DSA group (4.5%) (p = .034). The rate of BK viremia was highest in the positive DSA group (39.7%), followed by the low‐level group (30.4%) and the negative DSA group (25.6%), (p = .025). None of the other outcomes, including graft or patient survival, were different between the groups.

Conclusion

While low‐level DSA should not prevent proceeding with kidney transplantation, it should not be ignored. Future studies are needed to investigate the long‐term effects of varying levels of pre‐transplant DSA on outcomes.

Direct T-cell Inhibition and Agents Targeting T-cell Migration and Chemotaxis

Lymphocyte depletion and blockade of T-cell activation and trafficking serve as therapeutic strategies for an enlarging number of immune-mediated diseases and malignancies. This review summarizes the infection risks associated to monoclonal antibodies that bind to the α chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, the cell surface glycoprotein CD52, and members of α4- and β2-integrin families acting as cell-adhesion molecules. An outline of the mechanisms of action, approved indications and off-label uses, expected impact on the host immune response, and available clinical evidence is provided for each of these agents.

In Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Positive Virtual Crossmatch, High PRA was Associated With Lower Incidence of Viral Infections

BACKGROUND

There is little information on the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with CMV and BK infections in sensitized patients.

METHODS

We examined 254 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with positive virtual crossmatch and negative flow crossmatch.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients (43%) developed CMV disease or BK infection or nephropathy (BKVN). Specifically, 78 patients (30.7%) developed BK infection, 19 (7.5%) had BKVN, and 33 (12.9%) presented with CMV disease. Four patients (1.5%) developed both infections. Mean time from transplant to diagnosis for BK and CMV was 4.07 ± 3.10 and 8.35 ± 5.20 months, respectively. African American (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.37-5.07; P = 0.003), thymoglobulin induction (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.38-3.43; P = 0.0008), DSA greater than 500 MFI at transplant (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.05-2.57; P = 0.03), history of diabetes (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.60; P = 0.04), CMV D+/R- (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.06-5.01; P = 0.03), and acute rejection (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.99-2.24; P = 0.05) were associated with increase incident of BK/CMV, whereas rituximab (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91; P = 0.02), peak PRA greater than 80% (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84; P = 0.01), and living donor transplant (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87; P = 0.01) were associated with a lower likelihood of infection. Thymoglobulin induction (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.02-6.13; P = 0.04), and peak PRA greater than 80% (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.86; P = 0.02) remained significant predictors of infection after multivariate adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more than 40% of patients with a positive virtual crossmatch presented with BK infection/CMV disease, high PRA greater than 80% seemed to be protective.

A comparison of three induction therapies on patients with delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

We compare the outcomes of induction therapies with either methylprednisolone (group 1, n = 58), basiliximab (group 2, n = 56) or alemtuzumab (group 3, n = 98) in primary deceased donor kidney transplants with delayed graft function (DGF). Protocol biopsies were performed. Maintenance was tacrolimus and mycophenolate with steroid (group 1 and 2) or without steroid (group 3). One-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR) rates were 27.6, 19.6 and 10.2 % in group 1, 2 and 3 (p = 0.007). AR was significantly lower in group 3 (p = 0.002) and group 2 (p = 0.03) than in group 1. One-year graft survival rates were 90, 96 and 100 % in group 1, 2 and 3 (log rank p = 0.006). Group 1 had inferior graft survival than group 2 (p = 0.03) and group 3 (p = 0.002). The patient survival rates were not different (96.6, 98.2 and 100 %, log rank p = 0.81). Multivariable analysis using methylprednisolone induction as control indicated that alemtuzumab (OR 0.31, 95 % CI 0.11-0.82; p = 0.03) and basiliximab (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.23-0.98; p = 0.018) were associated with lower risk of AR. Therefore, alemtuzumab or basiliximab induction decreases AR and improves graft survival than methylprednisolone alone in patients with DGF. Alemtuzumab induction might also allow patients with DGF to be maintained with contemporary steroid-withdrawal protocol.

Comparison of the Effect of Alemtuzumab versus Standard Immune Induction on Early Kidney Allograft Function in Shiraz Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy regimens classified as conventional immunosuppressive agents and lower doses of conventional agents combined with antibodies against T-cell antigens have been purposed to prevent acute rejection after renal transplantation. Various induction agents with different doses and durations have been suggested based on the risk profile of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the acute rejection rate (total rate and based on the type of induction therapy regimen) during the first year after kidney transplantation, the type of acute rejection based on Banff classification and to determine the associations between rate of acute rejection, type of the rejection and induction therapy regimen.

METHODS

249 kidney transplant candidates were divided into two groups-low-risk patients (n=208) who received conventional immunosuppressive agents, and high-risk patients (n=41) who received alemtuzumab-and followed for one year to detect acute rejection first diagnosed clinically, and confirmed by percutaneous kidney biopsy based on Banff criteria.

RESULTS

The total incidence of acute rejection was 19.6% (20.7% of the low-risk and 14.4% of the high-risk patients). The most prevalent types of the acute rejection in patients treated with conventional immunosuppressive agents and patients received alemtuzumab as induction therapy were grade IB and grade IA, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection among recipients received a kidney from a deceased donor was 20.6% and grade IA was the most prevalent type (6.9%) whereas the most prevalent grade of acute rejection in patients who received living donor grafts was IB (8.3%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the expected greater risk for acute rejection among high-risk patients, no significant difference was observed between low- and high-risk patients, which may be justified by the greater efficacy of alemtuzumab compared with standard triple induction therapy in reducing the rate of acute rejection.

Long-term outcome of ketoconazole and tacrolimus co-administration in kidney transplant patients

AIM: To study the long-term outcome of ketoconazole and tacrolimus combination in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS: From 2006 to 2010, ketoconazole was given in 199 patients and was continued for at least 1 year or until graft failure (Group 1), while 149 patients did not receive any ketoconazole (Group 2). A combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate and steroid was used as maintenance therapy. High risk patients received basiliximab induction.

RESULTS: Basic demographic data was similar between the 2 groups. The 5-year cumulative incidence of biopsy-confirmed and clinically-treated acute rejection was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (34% vs 18%, P = 0.01). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated graft survival (74.3% vs 76.4%, P = 0.58) and patient survival (87.8% vs 87.5%, P = 0.93) were not different between the 2 groups. Multivariable analyses identified ketoconazole usage as an independent risk of acute rejection (HR = 2.33, 95%CI: 1.33-4.07; P = 0.003) while tacrolimus dose in the 2^nd month was protective (HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-0.96; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION: Co-administration of ketoconazole and tacrolimus is associated with significantly higher incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.