Contribution to the coincidence of malignant tumours and some allergic manifestations

A systematic review of the safety of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

The safety of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis (AD), a common and morbid disease, has recently been the focus of increased scrutiny, adding confusion as how best to manage these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of these systematic reviews was to determine the safety of topical therapies for AD.

METHODS

Databases searched included: OVID Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. In addition to the articles identified by this search, investigators were also referred to a list of links (most recently updated 25 September 2005) to recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) studies, reports and meetings regarding the topical calcineurin inhibitors for further potential references. Only fully published papers available in English and data obtained from FDA sites were included. Furthermore, the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for each systematic review were further evaluated at a meeting of all of the content and evidence-based medicine experts participating in this process and alteration of the inclusion criteria was done at that time when it was felt necessary to avoid inclusion of lower-quality data in the review. Qualitative review of the abstracted data was performed and reviewed at a meeting of all of the content and evidence-based medicine experts.

RESULTS

While systemic exposure to these topical agents does occur, physiological changes appear to be uncommon and systemic complications rare and have only been found with use of topical corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data that are available the overall safety of AD therapies appears to be good with the only documented systemic side-effects of therapy those occasionally seen with use of topical corticosteroids.

Monoclonal gammopathies and malignancies in patients with chronic urticaria

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been described in association with chronic urticaria (CU) in patients with Schnitzler syndrome. Chronic urticaria may be a manifestation of hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

This study was conducted to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of MGUS or malignancy in patients with CU. The Mayo Clinic electronic database was reviewed to identify patients with the diagnosis of CU.

RESULTS

Of the 1639 patients presenting with CU between 1994 and 2001, 797 (49%) underwent laboratory evaluation for the presence of a coexisting monoclonal protein. Forty-seven CU patients had MGUS, 142 had a malignancy, and 24 had both. Fifteen percent of CU patients with MGUS had a hematologic malignancy compared with 0.9% of CU patients without MGUS (P < 0.001). Patients presenting with a new diagnosis of CU at an older age (> 56 years) were more likely to have associated underlying MGUS. The occurrence of MGUS in this group was higher than the reported incidence of MGUS in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CU younger than 43 years were unlikely to have associated MGUS or malignancy. A higher percentage of patients with CU and MGUS had an associated diagnosis of hematologic malignancy.