Risk of sympathectomy after anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures

Incidence and Risk Factors for Lumbar Sympathetic Chain Injury After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), performed using a retroperitoneal approach, can lead to complications related to the approach, such as lumbar sympathetic chain injury (LSCI). Although LSCI is a common complication of OLIF, its reported incidence varies across studies due to an absence of specific diagnostic criteria. Moreover, research on the risk factors of postoperative sympathetic chain injuries after OLIF remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the incidence, and identify independent risk factors for LSCI, in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases who underwent OLIF.

METHODS

Between October 2020 and August 2023, a retrospective review was conducted at our institute on 200 patients who underwent OLIF at 1 to 4 consecutive spinal levels (L1-5) for degenerative spinal diseases including spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis. We excluded those with infections, trauma, tumors, and lower extremity edema/warmth due to other causes. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with and without LSCI symptoms. Demographic data, operative data, and pre- and postoperative parameters were evaluated for their association with LSCI using a univariate logistic regression model. Variables with a p-value <0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate model to identify the independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 200 patients (17.5%) developed LSCI symptoms after OLIF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that prolonged retraction time, particularly exceeding 31.5 miniutes, remained an independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 12.59; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that prolonged retraction time was an independent risk factor for LSCI following OLIF, particularly when it exceeded 31.5 minutes. Protecting the lumbar sympathetic chain during surgery and minimizing retraction time are crucial to avoiding LSCI following OLIF.

Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities

Lumbar back pain is one of the main causes of disability around the world. Most patients will complain of back pain at least once in their lifetime. The degenerative spine is considered the main cause and is extremely common in the elderly population. Consequently, treatment-related costs are a major burden to the healthcare system in developed and undeveloped countries. After the failure of conservative treatments or to avoid daily chronic drug intake, invasive treatments should be suggested. In a world where many patients reject surgery and prefer minimally invasive procedures, interventional radiology is pivotal in pain management and could represent a bridge between medical therapy and surgical treatment. We herein report the different image-guided procedures that can be used to manage degenerative spine-related low back pain. Particularly, we will focus on indications, different techniques, and treatment outcomes reported in the literature. This literature review focuses on the different minimally invasive percutaneous treatments currently available, underlining the central role of radiologists having the capability to use high-end imaging technology for diagnosis and subsequent treatment, allowing a global approach, reducing unnecessary surgeries and prolonged pain-reliever drug intake with their consequent related complications, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the economic burden.

Clinical results of lumbar sympathetic blocks in lower limb complex regional pain syndrome using infrared thermography as a support tool

AIM

To describe the clinical outcomes for a group of complex regional pain syndrome patients using infrared thermography as an intraprocedural support tool when undertaking fluoroscopy-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks.

SUBJECTS

27 patients with lower limb complex regional pain syndrome accompanied by severe pain and persistent functional impairment.

METHODS

A series of three fluoroscopic-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks with local anesthetic and corticoids using infrared thermography as an intraprocedural support tool were performed. Clinical variables were collected at baseline, prior to each block, and one, three, and six months after blocks in a standardized checklist assessing each of the clinical categories of complex regional pain syndrome stipulated in the Budapest criteria.

RESULTS

23.75% of the blocks required more than one chance to achieve the desired thermal pattern and therefore to be considered as successful. A decrease in pain measured on a visual analogic scale was observed at all time points compared to pre-blockade data, but only 37% of the cases were categorized as responders, representing a ≥ 30% decrease in VAS, with the disappearance of pain at rest. An improvement of most of the clinical variables recorded was observed, such as tingling, edema, perception of thermal asymmetry, difference in coloring and sweating. There was a significant decrease of neuropathic pain and improvement of functional limitation. Logistic regression analysis showed the main variable to explain the probability of being a responder was immobilization time (odds ratio of 0.89).

CONCLUSION

A series of fluoroscopy-guided lumbar sympathetic blocks controlled by infrared thermography in the treatment of lower limb CRPS showed a responder rate of 37%.

Risk factors for postoperative sympathetic chain dysfunction following oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a multivariate analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative sympathetic chain dysfunction (PSCD) was a relatively common complication after anterior lumbar interbody fusion due to the manipulation adjacent to the lumbar sympathetic chain (LSC). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of PSCD and identify its related independent risk factors after oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery.

METHODS

PSCD was defined as either of the following in the affected lower limb compared to the contralateral: (1) increase in skin temperature by 1 ºC or more, (2) reduced skin perspiration, (3) limb swelling or skin discoloration. Consecutive patients who underwent OLIF at L4/5 level from February 2018 and May 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups: patients with PSCD and patients without PSCD. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed on patients' demographic, comorbidities, radiological datum and perioperative factors to identify independent risk factors for PSCD.

RESULTS

Twelve (5.7%) of 210 patients experienced PSCD following OLIF surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the identification of lumbar dextroscoliosis (OR = 7.907, P = 0.012) and the presence of "tear-drop" psoas (OR = 7.216, P = 0.011) as independent risk factors for the PSCD following OLIF.

CONCLUSION

This study identified the lumbar dextroscoliosis and the "tear-drop" psoas as independent risk factors for the development of PSCD after OLIF. Spine alignment examination and the morphological identification of psoas major muscle should be highly noticed for the PSCD prevention following OLIF.

Lumbar Sympathetic Chain Tract and Mobility of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approach: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the lumbar sympathetic chain (LSC) relation to the surgical corridor for the oblique lumbar approach and the ability to mobilize the LSC.

METHODS

Forty-three cadavers were included. A left-sided anterior retroperitoneal approach was performed in supine position. The distances between the great vessels and psoas muscle (oblique corridor) and distance between great vessels and LSC at the L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 disk levels were measured. Mobilization of LSC at each disk level was done either close to or away from the psoas muscle, and each mobilization distance was measured.

RESULTS

The presence rates of LSC in oblique corridor were 19.5%, 43%, and 75.7% at L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 levels, respectively. At the L2/3 disk level, the mean distance between the psoas muscle and LSC and its mobility were 0.61 mm ± 1.31 mm and 2.72 mm ± 1.24 mm, respectively. At the L3/4 disk level, the mean distance between the psoas muscle and LSC and its mobility were 1.72 mm ± 2.53 mm and 3.11 mm ± 1.02 mm, respectively. At the L4/5 disk level, the mean distance between the psoas muscle and LSC and its mobility were 2.94 mm ± 3.52 mm and 2.53 mm ± 1.03 mm, respectively. The mean width of corridor of L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 were 10.73 mm ± 5.82 mm, 12.63 mm ± 5.02 mm, and 15.43 mm ± 6.31 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LSC tract usually lies in the oblique corridor in L4/5 but keeps decreasing in prevalence when approaching L3/4 and L2/3 levels. It can be mobilized a few millimeters close to or away from the psoas muscle. Care should be taken to prevent an LSC injury, particularly when the LSC needs to be retracted along with the psoas muscle.

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with grade-1 L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the comparative analysis included consecutive patients with grade-1 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent oblique LIF (OLIF, n = 36) or minimally invasive transforaminal LIF (MI-TLIF, n = 45) at the Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2016 to August 2017. Patient satisfaction Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), radiographic outcomes including anterior/posterior disc heights (ADH/PDH), foraminal height (FH), foraminal width (FW), cage subsidence, cage retropulsion, and fusion rate were assessed during a 2-year follow-up. Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were compared between groups using the independent sample t-test. Categorical data are presented as n (%) and were compared between groups using the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Repetitive measurement and analysis of variance was employed in the analysis of ODI, back pain VAS score, and leg pain VAS score. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The OLIF and MI-TLIF groups comprised 36 patients (age, 52.1 ± 7.2 years; 27 women) and 45 patients (age, 48.4 ± 14.4 years; 24 women), respectively. Satisfaction rates at 2 years post procedure exceeded 90% in both groups. The OLIF group had less intraoperative blood loss (140 ± 36 vs 233 ± 62 mL), lower back pain VAS score (2.42 ± 0.81 vs 3.38 ± 0.47), and ODI score (20.47 ± 2.53 vs 27.31 ± 3.71) at 3 months follow-up (with trends toward lower values at 2 years follow-up), but higher leg pain VAS scores at all postoperative time points than the MI-TLIF group (all p < 0.001). ADH, PDH, FD, and FW improved in both groups post-surgery. At the 2 year follow-up, the OLIF group had a higher rate of Bridwell grade-I fusion (100% vs 88.9%, p = 0.046) and lower incidences of cage subsidence (8.33% vs 46.67%, p < 0.001) and retropulsion (0% vs 6.67%, p = 0.046) than the MI-TLIF group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with grade-I spondylolisthesis, OLIF was associated with lower blood loss and greater improvements in VAS for back pain and ODI and radiologic outcomes than MI-TLIF. The OLIF is more suitable for these patients with low back pain as the main symptoms are accompanied by mild or no leg symptoms before operation.

Lumbar Sympathetic Trunk Injury: An Underestimated Complication of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar sympathetic trunk (LST) injury is one of the major complications after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). LST injury often manifests as unequal skin temperature in lower limbs after operation, and there may be a large number of missed diagnoses due to the lack of attention and different diagnostic methods. The study aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical characteristics of LST injury after OLIF.

METHODS

The data of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent OLIF in our hospital from April 2016 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, a total of 54 patients were included. There were 10 males and 44 females, aged 58.4 ± 10.9 years. The skin temperature of lower limbs was measured before and a day after surgery. The patients were followed up at 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after the surgery. Likert five-point scale was used to evaluate the discomfort caused by LST injury. Injury severity score was introduced to grade injury degree according to the recovery time of postoperative symptoms. The chi-square test was used to analyze the association of incidence of lumbar sympathetic trunk (LST) injury with contributing factors, such as gender and number of surgical segments.

RESULTS

The unequal temperature was not found before surgery in all the patients. Postoperatively, 16 cases (29.6%) had difference of skin temperature more than 0.5 °C and were diagnosed with LST injury. Eight patients (14.8%) had self-perception of skin temperature differences, and 12 patients (22.2%) had other symptoms, such as muscle pain, numbness, and weakness, which were not statistically different between patients with and without lumbar sympathetic trunk injury (p > 0.05). In the 16 patients with LST injury, the difference of skin temperature between the two legs was 0.6 ± 0.1 °C on the first day, and the temperature difference lasted for 1.5-~12 months. According to Likert five-point scale, two cases (12.5%) were poor, and 14 cases (87.5%) were moderate immediately after surgery. Fifteen cases improved to some extent 6 weeks to 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative LST injury is mainly manifested by different temperature of lower limbs. The incidence was higher in patients with multi-segment OLIF than in those with single-segment OLIF, and the subjective experience of most patients with LST injury was moderate discomfort.

Clinical presentation and surgical anatomy of sympathetic nerve injury during lumbar spine surgery: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To highlight the surgical anatomy, procedural variations, presentation, and management of sympathetic nerve injury after surgery of the lumbar spine.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for publications that were completed between 1951 and 2021. Relevant full-text articles published in the English language were selected and critically reviewed.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Sympathetic injury is a highly variable postsurgical complication with a greater incidence after an anterior or oblique approach to the lumbar spine compared to posterior and lateral approaches. The direct and extreme lateral approaches reduce the need to disturb sympathetic nerves thus reducing the risk of complications. It can present in multiple manners, including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and retrograde ejaculation. These complications can be transient and resolve spontaneously or be treated with medications, physical therapy, and spinal blocks. The severity of the conditions and extent of recovery can vary drastically, with some patients never fully recovering.

CONCLUSIONS

To access the lumbar spine, there are operational approaches and techniques that should be used to decrease the risk of intraoperative injury. It is crucial to understand the advantages and risks to different approaches and take the necessary steps to minimize complications. Early identification of dysfunction and adequate management of symptoms are imperative to effectively manage patients with lumbar sympathetic trunk and sympathetic nerve fiber injuries.

Surgical safe zones for oblique lumbar interbody fusion of L1-5: A cadaveric study

To evaluate the operating range and morphology of the surgical safe zone for oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Twenty embalmed full-torso cadaveric specimens were dissected. The oblique corridor and the distance between adjacent lumbar arteries were measured in a static state and with psoas major retraction. The morphology and size of the safe zone for OLIF and the location of the lumbar sympathetic trunk were also recorded. The oblique corridor of the L1-L5 segments was significantly greater in the retracted state than in the static state (p < 0.05). With psoas major retraction, the distances between adjacent lumbar arteries at L1-4 were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than those in the static state. The lumbar sympathetic trunk is just located in the safe zone and travels downward adjacent to the psoas major. The shape of the safe zone for OLIF was approximately an oblique upward parallelogram at L1/2 and L2/3, an isosceles trapezoid at L3/4, and an irregular quadrangle or triangle at L4/5. The safe zone for OLIF at L1/2, L2/3, and L3/4 was significantly larger during retraction than in the static state (p < 0.05). On the lateral side of the lumbar spine there is a natural surgical safe zone for OLIF, which can provide a sufficient operating space. The safe zone has a certain morphological pattern in L1-5 segments and psoas major retraction can significantly enlarge it.

Cadaveric Evidence of Complete Transection of the Lumbar Sympathetic Trunk After Extreme Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A Word of Caution

Lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine are believed to entail less risk of injury to the lumbar sympathetic trunk and plexus than anterior approaches. However, even the lateral approach can occasionally injure the sympathetic trunk. We report a literature review and cadaveric case of complete resection of the left sympathetic trunk at L3 following lateral transpsoas approach performed by a well-trained spine surgeon. A left lateral approach to the lumbar spine for a two-level total discectomy at L3-L4 and L4-L5 was undertaken on a fresh-frozen cadaver by an experienced spinal surgeon. The procedure followed standard spinal technique under fluoroscopy guidance. The cadaver was placed in a right lateral position and an operative corridor to the lateral aspect of the psoas major muscle was developed. Blunt dissection was carried through the muscle and standard total discectomy was completed at the target levels. Following the procedure, the lumbar spine and adjacent structures were anatomically dissected. It was found that the sympathetic trunk had been completely transected at the L3 level during the surgical procedure. Other major structures such as the femoral nerve, obturator nerve, and roots of the lumbar spinal nerves had not been injured. The above case highlights the proximity of the sympathetic trunk to lateral transpsoas approaches and the possibility of injury to it. We review the literature on postoperative cases of lumbar sympathetic dysfunction (SD) following such procedures and posit that some of these are due to direct iatrogenic injury.

The lumbar autonomic nerves in males: a few anatomical insights into anterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar autonomic nerve injury is an underappreciated complication of anterior lumbar spinal surgery. A detailed description of lumbar autonomic nerve anatomy would be helpful for surgeons to minimize the risk of this complication.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of lumbar autonomic nerves and provide a better understanding of these nerves for anterior lumbar spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A dissection-based study of 10 embalmed male cadavers.

METHODS

The lumbar autonomic nerves from 10 embalmed male cadavers were dissected in this study. The position of the lumbar sympathetic trunks was recorded. Distance between the initial sites of the lumbar splanchnic nerves (LSNs) and the corresponding lumbar vertebral inferior endplate, distance between the ipsilateral and adjacent LSNs, angles formed by the LSNs and the vertical axis were measured. This study has been supported by grants from Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (CN) (Grant No. 2017B020210010) without potential conflict of interest-associated biases in the text of the paper.

RESULTS

In this study, a total of 72 LSNs were identified in the 10 human cadavers. On average, the investigation found that the initial sites of the first, second, third, and fourth LSNs were 9 mm distal, 5 mm distal, 9 mm proximal, and 9 mm distal to the inferior endplates of the L1, L2, L3, and L4 vertebrae, respectively, with variations from 6 to 11 mm for each nerve among specimens. There was no significant difference in the angle between each lumbar splanchnic nerve and the vertical axis (H=2.461, p=.482), with an angle of approximately 50°±6°. The distance between the first and the second LSNs, the second and the third LSNs, or the third and the fourth LSNs were 24±6 mm, 22±8 mm, and 55±11 mm, respectively. The bilateral lumbar sympathetic trunks (N=57, 95%) were more likely to be located in the first third of the sagittal plane at the level of the L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 intervertebral discs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found the same number and parallel courses of LSNs on each side, and on both the left and right side, the distance between the third and the fourth LSNs was much larger than the distance between the other two adjacent LSNs. The initial sites of 80.6% (n=58) of LSNs were superior to the inferior endplate of the L3 vertebra. Improved knowledge of lumbar autonomic nerve anatomy may be of great significance in reducing complications and improving surgical safety.

Relation of lumbar sympathetic chain to the open corridor of retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine: an MRI study

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine used surgical corridor between psoas muscle and aorta for exposure to anterior part of lumbar spine. Lumbar sympathetic chain (LSC) runs in the corridor to make it a structure at risk of injury.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does LSC relationship with surgical corridor for minimally invasive retroperitoneal anterolateral oblique approach change in different intervertebral disc level?

METHODS

Left LSC was identified in axial magnetic resonance imaging images at L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 intervertebral disc levels of 144 patients. Distances between LSC and left psoas muscle and aorta were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 62.3 years. LSC was identifiable in 90.9% of levels. Distance between LSC and psoas muscle at L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 was 4.0 mm, 4.7 mm and 5.2 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2-3 and L4-5 level (p = 0.006). Distance between LSC and aorta at each level was 12.4 mm, 12.3 mm and 10.6 mm without statistical difference. In non-scoliosis group distance between LSC and psoas muscle at each level was 3.1 mm, 3.3 mm and 4.0 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2-3 and L4-5 level (p = 0.012) and between L3-4 and L4-5 level (p = 0.041). Distance between LSC and aorta at each level was 11.9 mm, 11.4 mm and 10.2 mm. Statistical difference was found between L2-3 and L4-5 disc level (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

LSC moves away from psoas muscle and becomes closer to aorta in L4-5 disc level. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Radiographic Study of Lumbar Sympathetic Trunk in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery

BACKGROUND

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery provides a convenient and minimal access to the lesion disc with few complications; however, the left lumbar sympathetic trunk (LST) lies in the surgical field with a certain incidence of injury. The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic structures of the left LST at risk for injury during OLIF at different lumbar segment levels based on radiologic evaluations.

METHODS

Forty-four healthy young people (22 men and 22 women) were recruited, and routine lumbar magnetic resonance radiograph was performed. The LST, abdominal aorta (AA), and psoas muscle (PM) were observed, and all parameters were acquired using axial T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence images. Independent-samples t test, 1-way analysis of variance test, and Least significant difference test were used to explore the LST's tract and the anatomic relationship with the adjacent anatomic landmarks at different levels.

RESULTS

The distance from the left lateral border of the AA to the anterior medial border of the left PM was significantly narrowing from the L2-3 to L4-5 segment levels (13.72 ± 3.00, 11.78 ± 2.69, and 9.18 ± 3.43 mm). The distance from the left lateral border of the AA to the left LST was also significantly decreased from the L2-3 to L4-5 segment levels (11.14 ± 2.89, 9.36 ± 2.79, and 6.63 ± 2.94 mm). However, the distance from the leading edge of the left PM to the left LST had no statistical differences among all adjacent segment levels (2.96 ± 0.62, 2.83 ± 0.62, and 3.07 ± 0.86 mm). The location of the left LST is more backward and lateral at level L2-3, whereas it is inside front at levels L3-4 and L4-5.

CONCLUSIONS

The practical risk of LST injury in different segment levels varied with specific anatomic conditions. The segment level L2-3 could provide a safer surgical space for OLIF, and the risk of the left LST injury might be greater during OLIF at level L4-5.

Non-neurological major complications of extreme lateral and related lumbar interbody fusion techniques

BACKGROUND

Complications exclusive of new neurological deficits/injuries that follow extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) and related lateral lumbar interbody techniques should be better recognized to determine the safety of these procedures. Unfortunately, a review of the XLIF literature did not accurately reflect the frequency of these "other complications" as few US surgeons publish such adverse events that may lead to medicolegal suits.

METHODS

Major complications occurring with XLIF included sympathectomy, major vascular injuries, bowel perforations, sterile seromas, and instrumentation failures.

RESULTS

The frequency of sympathectomy was 4% for XLIF vs. 15% for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). There were three major vascular injuries for XLIF; one fatal intraoperative event, one life-threatening retroperitoneal hematoma, and one iatrogenic lumbar artery pseudoaneurysm that was successfully embolized. Two bowel perforations were reported, whereas a third was a "direct communication." One patient developed a sterile recurrent seroma due to vancomycin powder utilized for an XLIF. One study cited malpositioning of an XLIF cage resulting in a lateral L3-L4 extrusion, whereas the second series looked at the 45% risk of cage-overhang when XLIF devices were placed in the anterior one-third of the vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

Excluding new neurological deficits, XLIF techniques resulted in multiple other major complications. However, these small numbers likely reflect just the tip of the iceberg (e.g., 10%) and the remaining 90% may never be known as many US-based spine surgeons fail to publish such adverse events as they are discoverable in a court of law and may lead to medicolegal suits.