Compartment syndrome and regional anaesthesia: Critical review

Risk Factors and Timing of Fasciotomy for Isolated Pediatric Lower Extremity Trauma

BackgroundPrevious single-center reports have demonstrated a longer time from traumatic leg injury to fasciotomy in pediatric trauma patients (PTPs) with compartment syndrome. We hypothesized most fasciotomies in isolated pediatric lower extremity trauma (LET) are delayed (>6 hours from admission) and sought to investigate risk factors for pediatric fasciotomy.MethodsThe 2017-2020 TQIP database was queried for PTPs <17 years old with isolated injury to the leg. The primary outcome was fasciotomy. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated risk factors for fasciotomy.ResultsFrom 97,217 PTPs, 358 (0.4%) underwent a fasciotomy, with a majority being delayed (60.3%); the median time to fasciotomy was 9.6 hours. Patients undergoing fasciotomy were older (median age 14 vs 12 years, P < 0.001), had a higher rate of severe LET (4.9% vs 1.2%, P < 0.001), and had tibial fracture (70.7% vs 27.6%, P < 0.001). They also had increased rates of in-hospital complications (14.2% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001), limb loss (1.1% vs <0.1%, P < 0.001), and longer median length of stay (LOS) (5 vs 2 days, P < 0.001). The most injured vessel in those undergoing fasciotomy was the popliteal artery (9.9%). Independent risk factors associated with fasciotomy included injuries to the popliteal vein (OR 30.72, CI 11.06-85.29, P < 0.001), femoral vein (OR 18.19, CI 6.40-51.69, P < 0.001), and popliteal artery (OR 13.74, CI 8.45-22.34, P < 0.001) and tibial fracture (OR 7.46, CI 5.57-10.00, P < 0.001).DiscussionMost fasciotomies were delayed for PTPs with isolated lower extremity injury. Popliteal vein injury increases the risk for fasciotomy 30-fold. Patients undergoing fasciotomy tend to have more complications and longer LOS.

Trauma Patients and Acute Compartment Syndrome: Is There an Ariadne's Thread That Can Safely Guide the Anesthesiologist/Emergency Physician Out of the Labyrinth?

Trauma patients in the emergency department experience severe pain that is not always easy to manage. The risk of acute compartment syndrome further complicates the analgesic approach. The purpose of this review is to discuss relevant bibliography and highlight current guidelines and recommendations for the safe practice of peripheral nerve blocks in this special group of patients. According to the recent bibliography, peripheral nerve blocks are not contraindicated in patients at risk of acute compartment syndrome, as long as there is surveillance and certain recommendations are followed.

Isolated Extensor Hallucis Longus Compartment Syndrome: A Case Report

We present the case of an isolated extensor hallucis longus compartment syndrome following a diaphyseal fibular fracture. Our subject underwent syndesmotic fixation and experienced ongoing pain post-procedure. This was associated with an isolated loss of power in extension of the hallux. A diagnosis of an isolated extensor hallucis longus compartment syndrome followed. Our case highlights the vulnerability of this muscle belly to ischemia and reiterates the value of complete clinical examination in the postoperative patient.

Lower Extremity Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Patients at Risk for Acute Compartment Syndrome

A delayed acute compartment syndrome (ACS) diagnosis often results in devastating complications; however, the sensitivity of the classic signs and symptoms is very low. All analgesic modalities have been implicated in delaying the diagnosis, but there is very little evidence linking peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) with delays in diagnosis. In fact, there is evidence that PNBs may facilitate an early diagnosis; this may be in part due to differences in how ischemic and inflammatory pain is transmitted through unique nociceptive pathways. Collaboration is required to optimize care for patients at risk for ACS.

Pain Control with Regional Anesthesia in Patients at Risk of Acute Compartment Syndrome: Review of the Literature and Editorial View

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a devastating complication that can happen in almost every part of the human body, most noticeably after long bone fractures. The cardinal symptom of ACS is pain in excess of what would otherwise be expected from the underlying injury and unresponsive to routine analgesia treatment. There is paucity of literature on major analgesic management strategies including opioid analgesia, epidural anesthesia, and peripheral nerve blocks with regard to their differential efficacy and safety of pain management in patients at risk of developing ACS. The lack of quality data has led to recommendations that are perhaps more conservative than they should be, particularly when it comes to peripheral nerve blocks. In this review article, we attempt to make recommendations in favor of regional anesthesia in this vulnerable group of patients and strategies that will optimize adequate pain control and improve surgical outcome without jeopardizing patient safety.

Unique Issues Related to Regional Anesthesia in Pediatric Orthopedics

This article will narrow its focus largely to notable issues related to regional anesthesia in pediatrics. First, the controversy surrounding awake versus anesthetized block placement will be addressed. There will also be a discussion on the use of regional anesthetics in orthopedics cases and the risk of compartment syndrome. Subsequently, the concern for regional anesthetics in the setting of an instrumented spine (eg, following spine fusion, baclofen pump placement) will be reviewed as such can have significant ramifications for patients. Finally, this article will consider ambulatory regional catheters and their increasing use in pediatric orthopedic anesthesia. Their utilization during the COVD epidemic played a key role in facilitating procedures that would have been canceled due to the protracted hospital bed shortage.

Acute Extremity Compartment Syndrome and (Regional): Anesthesia: The Monster Under the Bed

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is a potential orthopedic emergency that leads, without prompt diagnosis and immediate treatment with surgical fasciotomy, to permanent disability. The role of regional anesthesia (RA) for analgesia in patients at risk for ACS remains unjustifiably controversial. This critical review aims to improve the perception of the published literature to answer the question, whether RA techniques actually delay or may even help to hasten the diagnosis of ACS. According to literature, peripheral RA alone does not delay ACS diagnosis and surgical treatment. Only in 4 clinical cases, epidural analgesia was associated with delayed ACS diagnosis.

Regional analgesia for lower leg trauma and the risk of acute compartment syndrome: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists

Pain resulting from lower leg injuries and consequent surgery can be severe. There is a range of opinion on the use of regional analgesia and its capacity to obscure the symptoms and signs of acute compartment syndrome. We offer a multi-professional, consensus opinion based on an objective review of case reports and case series. The available literature suggested that the use of neuraxial or peripheral regional techniques that result in dense blocks of long duration that significantly exceed the duration of surgery should be avoided. The literature review also suggested that single-shot or continuous peripheral nerve blocks using lower concentrations of local anaesthetic drugs without adjuncts are not associated with delays in diagnosis provided post-injury and postoperative surveillance is appropriate and effective. Post-injury and postoperative ward observations and surveillance should be able to identify the signs and symptoms of acute compartment syndrome. These observations should be made at set frequencies by healthcare staff trained in the pathology and recognition of acute compartment syndrome. The use of objective scoring charts is recommended by the Working Party. Where possible, patients at risk of acute compartment syndrome should be given a full explanation of the choice of analgesic techniques and should provide verbal consent to their chosen technique, which should be documented. Although the patient has the right to refuse any form of treatment, such as the analgesic technique offered or the surgical procedure proposed, neither the surgeon nor the anaesthetist has the right to veto a treatment recommended by the other.

Pediatric acute compartment syndrome due to surgical positioning: A case report

Pediatric acute compartment syndrome from surgical positioning may be difficult to recognize. Increasing anxiety and analgesic requirements can suggest developing compartment syndrome. We present a case of compartment syndrome after a non-orthopedic surgery.

Compartment syndrome: Neuromuscular complications and electrodiagnosis

Compartment syndrome (CS) is a treatable condition characterized by elevated intracompartmental pressure and may be acute or chronic in nature. Sustained elevated compartment pressure can lead to ischemia and necrosis of muscle as well as injury to peripheral nerves, creating a deficit that may be neuropathic, myopathic, or mixed. While electrodiagnostic assessments are of limited utility in the diagnosis of acute/traumatic CS, they can assist with prognosticating return of function after surgical fasciotomy or in clarifying the injury pattern in cases in which a traumatic injury results in subsequent neuromuscular deficits. They can also be used to rule out conditions that mimic chronic exertional CS. During electrodiagnostic assessment, clinicians should be aware of patterns associated with muscle fibrosis vs denervation and use this information to assist with prognostication and appropriate counseling for patients regarding any interventional or adaptive treatments that may help restore function.

[Regional anesthesia in daily clinical practice: an economic analysis based on case vignettes]

BACKGROUND

The economic effect is a crucial aspect of every medical procedure. This article analyzes the economic implications of various methods in anesthesia based on three case vignettes.

METHODS

The management of anesthesia of a forearm fracture with sufficient brachial plexus blockade, general anesthesia and insufficient brachial plexus blockade with subsequent general anesthesia was analyzed with respect to the relevant cost factors (personnel costs, durables, consumables, fixed assets costs, anesthesia-related overhead costs).

RESULTS

Sufficient regional anesthesia was the least expensive method for a forearm fracture with 324.26 €, followed by general anesthesia with 399.18 € (+23% compared with regional anesthesia). Insufficient regional anesthesia was most the expensive method, which necessitated an additional general anesthesia (482.55 €, +49% compared with sufficient regional anesthesia).

CONCLUSION

Even considering that this cost analysis was calculated based on data from only one medical institution (General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna), regional anesthesia appeared to be cost efficient compared with other anesthesia procedures. Main cost drivers in this example were personnel costs.

Pediatric Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Despite the widespread use of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks in adults, its use in children has been sporadic. Indications for the use of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve block in children involve orthopedic procedure, where significant pain is anticipated beyond 24 hours. Techniques to place the perineural catheters in children are similar to that used in adults. The incidence of serious side effects in pediatric ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve block is extremely rare. When this is combined with the potential to increase patient and family satisfaction and decrease opioid-related side effects, ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve block become a compelling choice.