1
|
Klein EM, Sauer S, Klein S, Tichy D, Benner A, Bertsch U, Brandt J, Kimmich C, Goldschmidt H, Müller-Tidow C, Jordan K, Giesen N. Antibiotic Prophylaxis or Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Support in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3439. [PMID: 34298654 PMCID: PMC8303829 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We compare, in this manuscript, antibiotic prophylaxis versus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support as anti-infective strategies, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), undergoing high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT). At our institution, antibiotic prophylaxis after HDT/ASCT in MM was stopped in January 2017 and replaced by G-CSF support in March 2017. Consecutive MM patients who received HDT/ASCT between March 2016 and July 2018 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. In total, 298 patients and 353 individual cases of HDT/ASCT were evaluated. In multivariate analyses, G-CSF support was associated with a significantly shortened duration of severe leukopenia < 1/nL (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 16.22), and hospitalization (estimate = -0.19, p < 0.001) compared to antibiotic prophylaxis. Rates of febrile neutropenia, need of antimicrobial therapy, transfer to intensive care unit, and death, were similar between the two groups. Furthermore, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a significantly increased risk for the development of multidrug resistant bacteria especially vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium compared to G-CSF support (odds ratio (OR) = 17.38, p = 0.01). Stop of antibiotic prophylaxis as an anti-infective strategy was associated with a reduction in overall resistance rates of bacterial isolates. These results indicate that G-CSF support should be the preferred option in MM patients undergoing HDT/ASCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Klein
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Klinikum Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Klein
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Diana Tichy
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Bertsch
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Brandt
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Kimmich
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karin Jordan
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Giesen
- Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slimings C, Riley TV. Antibiotics and healthcare facility-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 update. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:1676-1688. [PMID: 33787887 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic use is the most important modifiable risk factor for healthcare facility-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HCFA-CDI). Previous systematic reviews cover studies published until 31 December 2012. OBJECTIVES To update the evidence for associations between antibiotic classes and HCFA-CDI to 31 December 2020. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, WorldCat and Proquest Dissertations & Theses were searched for studies published since 1 January 2013. Eligible studies were those conducted among adult hospital inpatients, measured exposure to individual antibiotics or antibiotic classes, included a comparison group and measured the occurrence of HCFA-CDI as an outcome. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise study quality. To assess the association between each antibiotic class and HCFA-CDI, a pooled random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis was used to investigate study characteristics identified a priori as potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS Carbapenems and third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin antibiotics remain the most strongly associated with HCFA-CDI, with cases more than twice as likely to have recent exposure to these antibiotics prior to developing HCFA-CDI. Modest associations were observed for fluoroquinolones, clindamycin and β-lactamase inhibitor combination penicillin antibiotics. Individual study effect sizes were variable and heterogeneity was observed for most antibiotic classes. CONCLUSIONS This review provides the most up-to-date synthesis of evidence in relation to the risk of HCFA-CDI associated with exposure to specific antibiotic classes. Studies were predominantly conducted in North America or Europe and more studies outside of these settings are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Slimings
- Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Western Australia
| | - Thomas V Riley
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia.,Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|