1
|
Li S, Zhang S, Zhang X, Yan J, Wang S, Tan L, Rao N, Chen K, Zhu L. The learning curve of the MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons. BMC Surg 2024; 24:53. [PMID: 38355459 PMCID: PMC10865591 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02344-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer surgeries involving MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction has traditionally been collaborative efforts between breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. However, in our institution, this procedure is performed by dual-trained breast surgeons who are proficient in both breast surgery and MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction. This study aims to provide insights into the learning curve associated with this surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included eligible breast cancer patients who underwent MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons between 2015 and 2020 at our institution. We present the learning curve of this surgical approach, with a focus on determining factors affecting flap harvesting time, surgery time, and ischemic time. Additionally, we assessed the surgical complication rates. RESULTS A total of 147 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. Notably, after 30 cases, a statistically significant reduction of 1.7 h in surgery time and 21 min in ischemic time was achieved, signifying the attainment of a plateau in the learning curve. And the major and minor complications were comparable between the early and after 30 cases. CONCLUSION This study explores the learning curve and feasibility experienced by dual-trained breast surgeons in performing MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05560633.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunrong Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
| | - Songliang Zhang
- Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510100, China
| | - Xiaolan Zhang
- Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510100, China
| | - Jingwen Yan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Luyuan Tan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
| | - Nanyan Rao
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
| | - Kai Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
- Artificial Intelligence Lab, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
| | - Liling Zhu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giesen T, Costa F, Fritsche E. Complex reconstruction of the clavicle with a prefabricated medial femur condyle chimeric flap including a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: A case report. Microsurgery 2024; 44:e31108. [PMID: 37668043 DOI: 10.1002/micr.31108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
The medial femur condyle (MFC) cortico-periosteal flap is a popular flap for bone reconstruction. The use of a chimeric version of this flap with a skin island has been described, but anatomical arterial variation can occur that prevent its harvest. Furthermore, the donor area of the skin paddle has been debated as poor because of the scarring in a visible area and because of the difficulty in obtaining pliable thin skin. We present a fabricated chimeric MFC cortico-periosteal flap joined with a superficial inferior epigastric perforator (SCIP) flap to reconstruct and augment a sclerotic and insufficient small clavicula with the skin paddle acting as a monitor and as a substitute for the overlying skin. A 52-year-old female patient had a history of multiple refractures of the right hypoplastic clavicle with a diameter of 7 mm, resulting in a sclerotic bone with a fibrotic scar. The reconstruction was done in one surgical session using a cortico-periosteal flap from the left medial condyle and a thin SCIP flap from the left groin. The area of the clavicle to be reconstructed was 3 cm, and the direct overlying skin (approximately 6 × 3 cm) was severely scarred and painful. The MFC flap was 5 × 4 cm, while the SCIP flap was 7 × 3.5 cm. The SCIP flap artery was anastomosed on the table end-to-side to the descending genicular (DG) artery of the MFC, and the vein was anastomosed end-to-end to a comitans vein of the DG artery. The flap fully survived after an initial congestion. At 12 months, we observed a satisfactory reconstruction of the clavicle with an enhanced diameter of 12 mm. The patient recovered full function of the shoulder with no pain. Using a fabricated chimeric flap composed of a medial femoral condyle and a superficial circumflex artery perforator flap may be an additional option for tailored reconstruction of complex osteo-cutaneous defect of clavicle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Giesen
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Elmar Fritsche
- Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|