Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis: Optimizing Laboratory Procedures and Test Interpretation through a Clinical Audit and Global Survey of Practices

Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis: What's All the Fuss about?

Vasectomy is a reliable male contraceptive method with a success rate exceeding 98%. Despite its efficacy, vasectomy is not foolproof, with potential early and late failures requiring careful postoperative monitoring via post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA). Published guidelines emphasize the necessity of conducting PVSA to ensure clinical sterility. Despite these clear guidelines, discrepancies in adherence and interpretation persist, with significant mismatches between guidelines and actual practice. Recent shifts in societal attitudes toward reproductive autonomy, spurred by significant political events and socioeconomic factors, have increased vasectomy rates, particularly among younger, childless men. This demographic change calls for enhanced PVSA compliance and clear communication about the non-immediate contraceptive effect of vasectomy. Home test kits have emerged as a convenient, though not always reliable, method for conducting PVSAs, which may require reevaluation in clinical practice. Given the variations across clinical guidelines and the challenges in achieving consistent PVSA outcomes, further research is needed to harmonize PVSA protocols across different health systems. PVSA is typically conducted between 8 and 16 weeks post-vasectomy, depending on the surgeon's preference. Success is confirmed when a fresh, uncentrifuged sample exhibits either azoospermia, rare non-motile sperm (RNMS), or fewer than 100,000 non-motile sperm per milliliter. This effort will ensure that both patients and practitioners can rely on vasectomy as a safe and effective form of contraception. Effective patient counseling and strategic follow-up are crucial when it comes to managing expectations and ensuring compliance with post-vasectomy protocols, thereby minimizing the risk of unintended pregnancies post-procedure.

Effect of time since vasectomy on live birth rate of TESE‒ICSI egg donation cycles and male-related prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Vasectomy is a widely used method of contraception. However, some men may have the desire to become biological fathers again after a period.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of time since vasectomy and different male comorbidities on live birth rates from intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using donated oocytes by using testicular spermatozoa obtained by testicular sperm extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 123 couples who underwent a testicular sperm extraction‒intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle after vasectomy using donated oocytes. Subjects were divided into groups according to time since vasectomy and the male risk factor evaluated. The main outcomes measured were live birth rate per embryo transfer, per oocyte donation cycle, and per couple. We assessed the cumulative live birth rate according to the time since vasectomy and considered male comorbidities: body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and smoking.

RESULTS

The overall live birth rate per couple was 59.3% (50.6-68.0). Considering the number of embryo transfer and oocyte donation cycle, the live birth rates were 34.1% (27.8-40.4) and 44.5% (36.9-52.1), respectively. The live birth rate according to time since vasectomy was not statistically different between groups. Consequently, the cumulative live birth rate was similar between the different interval times when considering one to eight embryo transfers (p = 0.74). No statistical differences in live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate were found between groups clustered according to male body mass index, smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. However, diabetic male patients had a significantly lower rate of live birth rate per couple (22.2% [4.94-49.4]) than non-diabetic patients did (62.7% [53.7-71.8]) (p = 0.03), but not in their cumulative live birth rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The time since vasectomy seems to have no detrimental effects on the live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate in testicular sperm extraction‒intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with donated oocytes. Male diabetes negatively affects the overall live birth rate per couple, but not the cumulative live birth rate. These results could be useful for multidisciplinary patient-tailored counseling, regarding the chance of having a pregnancy and facilitating the decision-making process of the fertility specialists.

The Global Andrology Forum (GAF): Structure, Roles, Functioning and Outcomes: An Online Model for Collaborative Research

PURPOSE

There are no published examples of a global online research collaborative in andrology. We describe the development, profile and member characteristics of the first consortium of this type, the Global Andrology Forum (GAF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey sent to all GAF members collected demographic information (sex, age, experience, academic title, degrees, country, specialty, profession). It also tapped data on members' characteristics e.g., skills in research, software and statistics; preferred activities; time commitments; expected roles; and interest in participating in research, in GAF's scientific activities and collaborative online research. The findings were analyzed and tabulated. We outline members' demographic and professional characteristics and scientific achievements to date. A narrative approach outlined GAF's structure and functioning.

RESULTS

A total of 418 out of 540 members completed the survey and were included in the analysis (77.4% response rate). The sample comprised mainly urologists (34.2%) and a third of the respondents had practiced for >15 years (33.3%). Up to 86.1% of the members expressed interest in being actively engaged in writing scientific articles. A third of the sample (37.1%) could dedicate 4 to 6 hours/week. Few respondents reported skills in statistics and artwork (2.6% and 1.9% respectively). Members were assigned to specific roles based on their expertise and experiences. Collaborative working ensured the timely completion of projects while maintaining quality. For outcomes, GAF published 29 original articles within one year of its creation, with authors from 48 countries spanning topics that included varicocele, sperm DNA damage, oxidative stress, semen analysis and male infertility, oocyte/embryo, and laboratory issues of assisted reproductive technique (ART) and male infertility evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

GAF is a successful global online andrology research model. A healthy number of scientific articles have been published. Given such effectiveness, adopting the GAF model could be useful for other disciplines that wish to create and coordinate successful international online research groups.

A new approach to postvasectomy semen analyses eliminates the need to evaluate a fresh specimen

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines, confirmation that vasectomy results in sterility depends on microscopic examination of postvasectomy semen for the presence of spermatozoa. Guidelines established in 2012 require examination of a fresh specimen within 2 h of collection, which necessitates the patient making an appointment with either the surgeon's office or a licensed clinical laboratory. Twenty-five to 42% of patients fail to comply with postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA).

OBJECTIVES

To determine if an at-home semen collection kit can substitute for the evaluation of a fresh specimen and improve patient compliance with postvasectomy spermatozoa assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The kit contains a patented aldehyde-fixative that maintains spermatozoa and semen cells in suspension for quantitation. Patients order a PVSA kit to be delivered to their home and can collect a semen specimen and return it to the laboratory through regular US mail.

RESULTS

From January 2011 through December 2018, 6096 men undergoing vasectomy by 184 urologists in 33 states in the US ordered PVSA kits, of which 5408 (89%) returned at least one for analysis. Of those, 398 men (7.4%) returned the first kit with greater than 10,000 spermatozoa/ml within a year of vasectomy, of which only 4.4% contained greater than 100,000 spermatozoa/ml 12 weeks postsurgery. This suggests that fewer than 5% of postvasectomy patients might need follow-up fresh semen analyses, greatly easing the logistical burden of PVSA. Ninety percent of surgeons returning a patient satisfaction questionnaire said their patients "never" complained about using PVSA kits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

These data support the adoption of a new standard for PVSA that does not involve an initial evaluation of a fresh semen specimen.