A comparison of the short-term effects of a botulinum toxin type a and triamcinolone acetate injection on adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder

Effect of ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin type A into shoulder joint cavity on shoulder pain in poststroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a common complication after stroke. It severely affects the recovery of upper limb motor function. Early shoulder pain in hemiplegic patients is mainly neuropathic caused by central nerve injury or neuroplasticity. Commonly used corticosteroid injections in the shoulder joint can reduce shoulder pain; however, the side effects also include soft tissue degeneration or increased tendon fragility, and the long-term effects remain controversial. Botulinum toxin injections are relatively new and are thought to block the transmission of pain receptors in the shoulder joint cavity and inhibit the production of neuropathogenic substances to reduce neurogenic inflammation. Some studies suggest that the shoulder pain of hemiplegia after stroke is caused by changes in the central system related to shoulder joint pain, and persistent pain may induce the reorganization of the cortical sensory center or motor center. However, there is no conclusive evidence as to whether or not the amelioration of pain by botulinum toxin affects brain function. In previous studies of botulinum toxin versus glucocorticoids (triamcinolone acetonide injection) in the treatment of shoulder pain, there is a lack of observation of differences in changes in brain function. As the content of previous assessments of pain improvement was predominantly subjective, objective quantitative assessment indicators were lacking. Functional near-infrared imaging (fNIRS) can remedy this problem.

METHODS

This study protocol is designed for a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with post-stroke HSP without biceps longus tenosynovitis or acromion bursitis. Seventy-eight patients will be randomly assigned to either the botulinum toxin type A or glucocorticoid group. At baseline, patients in each group will receive shoulder cavity injections of either botulinum toxin or glucocorticoids and will be followed for 1 and 4 weeks. The primary outcome is change in shoulder pain on the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcome is the assessment of changes in oxyhemoglobin levels in the corresponding brain regions by fNIRS imaging, shoulder flexion, external rotation range of motion, upper extremity Fugl-Meyer, and modified Ashworth score.

DISCUSSION

Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A shoulder joint cavity injections may provide evidence of pain improvement in patients with HSP. The results of this trial are also help to analyze the correlation between changes in shoulder pain and changes in cerebral hemodynamics and shoulder joint motor function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300070132. Registered 03 April 2023, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=193722 .

Association of Range of Motion Deficit and Recurrence of Pain After Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the factors influencing the duration of significant pain reduction after conservative management for adhesive capsulitis (AC).

METHODS

Follow-up for 6-8 months was performed with 141 patients with AC who experienced significant pain reduction after treatment. Clinical and demographic factors, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were collected and assessed pretreatment (T0), at 5 weeks post-treatment (T1), and at 6-8 months post-treatment (T2). Patients were divided into successful (n = 96) and unsuccessful (n = 45) NRS groups according to the degree of pain reduction at T2. We assessed post-treatment NRS and ROM improvement scores within each group and compared these parameters between the two groups.

RESULTS

Significant NRS and ROM improvements were achieved in all patients who participated in our study. The unsuccessful NRS group demonstrated a lack of significant improvement in abduction at T1 and T2. All T1 and shoulder ROM measurements among the unsuccessful NRS group were significantly smaller than those among the successful NRS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve a significant improvement in abduction angle after conservative management of AC was significantly associated with pain recurrence.

Cytokines' Role in the Pathogenesis and Their Targeting for the Prevention of Frozen Shoulder: A Narrative Review

Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common name for shoulder movement limitation with different degrees of shoulder rigidity and pain. It is characterized by varying developmental courses, different levels of shoulder movement limitation, and background ambiguity due to the multiplicity of its causative factors. Systemic inflammatory cytokines monitoring and restraining is easy to apply, fast to conduct, and needs lower costs compared to invasive methods for frozen shoulder stage evaluation and early controlling of its progress to the stage that necessitates surgical intervention. The aim of this review was to assess the recent findings concerning the role of cytokines in FS pathogenesis and the possibility of preventing or controlling their progress through targeting these cytokines by the new drugs candidates, such as hyaluronan (HA), botulinum toxin type A (BoNT A), Tetrandrine, tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6), and cannabidiol. Searching the PubMed site, we encountered out of 1608 records, from which 16 original studies were included for the quantitative construction of this systematic review screening of the recent studies to investigate the different FS pathogenic pathways. Most of the scenarios are centered around the inflammatory and fibrotic process triggered by synovial and capsular fibroblast stimulation. This mechanism depends mainly on alarmins cytokines, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin-33 (IL-33), and interleukin-25 (IL-25), with the stimulation of interleukin-1 α (IL-1α), interleukin-1 β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in a joint capsule. Different pathways of transforming growth factor- β (TGF-β) stimulation, resulting in overexpression of the fibrotic factors as tenascin C (TNC), fibronectin 1, collagen I (COL 1) and collagen III (COL III), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the capsular or synovial/capsular fibroblasts. The overall investigation of these studies led us to conclude that the new drug candidates proved their efficiency in controlling the common pathogenesis of the inflammatory and fibrotic pathways of frozen shoulder and therefore represent a prospect for easy and early controlling and efficiently treating this serious disease.

Frozen shoulder

Frozen shoulder is a common debilitating disorder characterized by shoulder pain and progressive loss of shoulder movement. Frozen shoulder is frequently associated with other systemic conditions or occurs following periods of immobilization, and has a protracted clinical course, which can be frustrating for patients as well as health-care professionals. Frozen shoulder is characterized by fibroproliferative tissue fibrosis, whereby fibroblasts, producing predominantly type I and type III collagen, transform into myofibroblasts (a smooth muscle phenotype), which is accompanied by inflammation, neoangiogenesis and neoinnervation, resulting in shoulder capsular fibrotic contractures and the associated clinical stiffness. Diagnosis is heavily based on physical examination and can be difficult depending on the stage of disease or if concomitant shoulder pathology is present. Management consists of physiotherapy, therapeutic modalities such as steroid injections, anti-inflammatory medications, hydrodilation and surgical interventions; however, their effectiveness remains unclear. Facilitating translational science should aid in development of novel therapies to improve outcomes among individuals with this debilitating condition.

Botulinum toxin injections for shoulder and upper limb pain: a narrative review

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been widely employed to treat poststroke spasticity, cervical dystonia and muscle hyperactivity. Recently, BoNT injections are increasingly used in treating musculoskeletal pain. The mechanism of BoNT in pain relief comprises relaxation of overused muscles and inhibition of inflammatory nociceptive cytokines/neurotransmitters. As BoNT injections seem promising in treating painful musculoskeletal disorders, we aimed to investigate its effectiveness in shoulder and upper limb pain. Although the present article is a narrative review, we employed a systematic approach to search for relevant articles in PubMed. A total of 19 clinical studies were included. Here, we observed that intramuscular BoNT injections were helpful in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. In shoulder joint pain, intra-articular and intrabursal BoNT injections achieved a longer period of pain relief than corticosteroid injections. Similarly, a more durable effect of intramuscular BoNT than saline injections was seen in shoulder myofascial pain. Its use in complex regional pain syndrome and persistent upper limb pain in breast cancer survivors was insufficient, necessitating more studies. Since not all of the included studies could provide Class I of evidence based on the efficacy criteria used by American Academy of Neurology, controlled clinical trials in a larger number of patients are necessary to verify validity of these findings in the future.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Chronic Joint Pain: Clinical and Experimental Evidence

Chronic osteoarthritis pain is an increasing worldwide problem. Treatment for osteoarthritis pain is generally inadequate or fraught with potential toxicities. Botulinum toxins (BoNTs) are potent inhibitors of neuropeptide release. Paralytic toxicity is due to inhibition at the neuromuscular junction, and this effect has been utilized for treatments of painful dystonias. Pain relief following BoNT muscle injection has been noted to be more significant than muscle weakness and hypothesized to occur because of the inhibition of peripheral neuropeptide release and reduction of peripheral sensitization. Because of this observation, BoNT has been studied as an intra-articular (IA) analgesic for chronic joint pain. In clinical trials, BoNT appears to be effective for nociceptive joint pain. No toxicity has been reported. In preclinical models of joint pain, BoNT is similarly effective. Examination of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and the central nervous system has shown that catalytically active BoNT is retrogradely transported by neurons and then transcytosed to afferent synapses in the brain. This suggests that pain relief may also be due to the central effects of the drug. In summary, BoNT appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of chronic joint pain. The long-term effects of IA BoNT are still being determined.

Comparative Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Injection for Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection is regarded as a promising treatment for musculoskeletal pain. However, its efficacy for treating chronic shoulder pain remains unclear. We investigated the effectiveness of BoNT injections for chronic shoulder pain by conducting a systematic search of electronic databases up to March 2020 for randomized control trials (RCTs) that used BoNT injections for chronic shoulder pain treatment. The primary outcome was the between-group comparison of pain reduction, quantified by the standardized mean difference (SMD). Nine RCTs comprising 666 patients were included and divided into two groups: one group with shoulder joint pain (n = 182) and the other group with shoulder myofascial pain (n = 484). Regarding shoulder joint pain, the efficacy of BoNT injections was similar to that of the reference treatment (SMD: −0.605, 95% confidence level [CI]: −1.242 to 0.032 versus saline; SMD: −0.180, 95% CI: −0.514 to 0.153 versus corticosteroids) at one month post-intervention, and was superior (SMD: −0.648, 95% CI: −0.1071 to −0.225 versus corticosteroids) between one and three months. Likewise, in terms of shoulder myofascial pain, the effectiveness of BoNT injections did not differ from the reference treatment (SMD: −0.212, 95% CI: −0.551 to 0.127 versus saline; SMD: 0.665, 95% CI: −0.260 to 1.590 versus dry needling and SMD: 1.093; 95% CI: 0.128 to 2.058 versus lidocaine) at one month post- intervention, and appeared superior (SMD: −0.314, 95% CI: −0.516 to −0.111 versus saline) between one and three months. Our meta-analysis revealed that BoNT injections could be a safe and effective alternative for patients with chronic shoulder pain.

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin in Osteoarticular Joint Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the efficacy of intra-articular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) into the painful joint diseases through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of controlled randomized trials. Intra-articular therapies (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid) have limited efficacy and run a risk of toxicity in patients with joint pain. New therapeutic options are needed to treat painful osteoarticular disease.

METHODS

We searched via Pubmed, American College of Rheumatology, and European League Against Rheumatism congresses, and gray literature for the studies reported until June 2016 and addressing the issue of BT intra-articular injections in patients with refractory joint pain. Randomized trials were included. For the meta-analysis, we compared a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 before treatment and at 1 or 2 months and 6 months after in the BT-A and the control groups for each study. We also compared separately low dose and high dose of BT at 1 or 2 months' evaluation.

RESULTS

In a total of 269 selected articles, 8 were analyzed and 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis involving a total of 382 patients. On comparing the NRS rating for 5 trials, at 1 or 2 months irrespective of the dose of BT, 4 trials showed a positive effect of BT compared with the control on the NRS and 1 found no effect; the overall weighted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] was -1.10 (-1.62, -0.58) (P<0.0001, I=63%). Among the 4 trials with a low dose of BT (100 U), comparing NRS at 1 or 2 months, 3 trials showed significant results with a positive effect of BT-A injection compared with the control on the NRS; the fourth study failed to find any effect. The overall weighted mean difference (95% CI) was -0.95 (-0.02, -1.88) (P=0.05, I=67%). In the 2 trials using a high dose of BT (200 U) comparing NRS at 1 or 2 months, there was an almost zero effect of BT, with an overall weighted mean difference (95% CI) of 0.13 (-0.55, 0.81) (P=0.71, I=0%). In the 3 trials comparing NRS at 6 months there was an overall weighted mean difference (95% CI) of -0.57 (-1.98, 0.83) (P=0.42, I=73%).

CONCLUSIONS

BT-A intra-articular injections have short-term benefits with a statistically significant decrease in the NRS pain score of around 1 point in patients with refractory joint pain. A decrease in the pain score was also observed at 6 months but with a nonsignificant result.

Intra-articular injection of botulinum toxin type A for shoulder pain in glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a case series summary and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases, and can be due to glenohumeral osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear, impingement, tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis, and subacromial bursitis. Several therapies have been proposed, including steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular injections, and physical therapies. Many published studies have reported on the employment of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) to reduce pain in subjects with neurological and musculoskeletal diseases by inhibiting substance P release and other inflammatory factors.

METHODS

In the present article, we briefly update current knowledge regarding intra-articular BoNT therapy, reviewing existing literature on intra-articular use of BoNT-A, including nonrandomized and randomized prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series published from December 1989 to November 2017. We also describe a case series of six subjects treated with intra-articular injection of incobotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of pain deriving from osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular BoNT-A is effective and minimally invasive. Pain reduction with an increase in shoulder articular range of motion in our experience confirms the effectiveness of BoNT-A injection for the management of this syndrome.

Assessing adverse effects of intra-articular botulinum toxin A in healthy Beagle dogs: A placebo-controlled, blinded, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical, cytological, and histopathological adverse effects of intra-articularly injected botulinum toxin A in dogs and to study whether the toxin spreads from the joint after the injection.

METHODS

A longitudinal, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with six healthy laboratory Beagle dogs. Stifle joints were randomized to receive either 30 IU of onabotulinum toxin A or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Adverse effects and spread of the toxin were examined by evaluating dynamic and static weight-bearing of the injected limbs, by assessing painless range of motion and pain on palpation of joints, and by performing synovial fluid analysis, neurological examination, and electrophysiological recordings at different examination time-points in a 12-week period after the injections. The dogs were then euthanized and autopsy and histopathological examination of joint structures and adjacent muscles and nerves were performed.

RESULTS

Intra-articular botulinum toxin A did not cause local weakness or injection site pain. Instead, static weight-bearing and painless range of motion of stifle joints decreased in the placebo limbs. No clinically significant abnormalities associated with intra-articular botulinum toxin A were detected in the neurological examinations. Electrophysiological recordings showed low compound muscle action potentials in two dogs in the botulinum toxin A-injected limb. No significant changes were detected in the synovial fluid. Autopsy and histopathological examination of the joint and adjacent muscles and nerves did not reveal histopathological adverse effects of the toxin.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular botulinum toxin A does not produce significant clinical, cytological, or histopathological adverse effects in healthy dogs. Based on the electrophysiological recordings, the toxin may spread from the joint, but its clinical impact seems to be low.

Botulinum toxin type A reduces TRPV1 expression in the dorsal root ganglion in rats with adjuvant-arthritis pain

Arthritis pain affects people's long-term health, and recent studies have demonstrated that transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) plays a crucial role in arthritis pain. In addition, Pre-clinical evidence indicated that botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) has antinociceptive effect. The present study investigated the causality between the antinociceptive effects of BoNT/A and the expression of TRPV1 in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in rats with adjuvant-arthritis pain. The results showed that BoNT/A significantly reduced adjuvant-arthritis nociceptive behaviors in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the BoNT/A cleaved synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (cl-SNAP-25) was detected in the DRG using immunofluorescence after intra-articular administration. Although BoNT/A significantly reduced the protein levels of TRPV1, there were no significant changes in the mRNA levels of TRPV1 between CFA and BoNT/A (1U, 3U, 10U) group after BoNT/A retrograde axonal transport into the DRG with quantitative RT-PCR. This research provides evidence that the antinociceptive mechanism of BoNT/A might be mediated by reduction of TRPV1 expression through inhibition of its plasma membrane trafficking after intra-articular administration.

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments

Adhesive shoulder capsulitis, or arthrofibrosis, describes a pathological process in which the body forms excessive scar tissue or adhesions across the glenohumeral joint, leading to pain, stiffness and dysfunction. It is a debilitating condition that can occur spontaneously (primary or idiopathic adhesive capsulitis) or following shoulder surgery or trauma (secondary adhesive capsulitis). Here, we review the pathophysiology of adhesive shoulder capsulitis, highlighting its clinical presentation, natural history, risk factors, pathoanatomy and pathogenesis. Both current non-operative and operative treatments for adhesive capsulitis are described, and evidence-based studies are presented in support for or against each corresponding treatment. Finally, the review also provides an update on the gene expression profile of adhesive capsulitis and how this new understanding can help facilitate development of novel pharmacological therapies.

Does chondrolysis occur after corticosteroid-analgesic injections? An analysis of patients treated for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies using continuous infusions of local anesthetics and basic science studies that model injections of local anesthetics have shown chondrotoxicity. However, clinical studies do not exist that have assessed for the risk of chondrolysis in nonarthritic joints exposed to single or intermittent corticosteroid or analgesic injections. Currently, there are no data available to guide the clinician on the safety of using these injections in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with at least 1 intra-articular injection of a corticosteroid and anesthetic was performed. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Prospective follow-up was performed to obtain patient-determined outcome scores, range of motion, and radiographs to determine the presence of chondrolysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with a mean age of 52.5 ± 7.2 years were enrolled at a mean follow-up of 54 months. The mean number of injections performed was 1.5 ± 0.7 (range, 1-4). At final follow-up, the mean Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score was 91.4% ± 14.2%; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 6.7 ± 9.6; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score, 7.4 ± 11.4; and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 92.7% ± 10.1%. The Shoulder Activity Score was 8.3 ± 4.7. Passive and active forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation, and cross-body adduction showed no significant differences compared with the unaffected contralateral shoulder. There was no radiographic evidence of chondrolysis in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show chondrolysis in patients treated with an intra-articular corticosteroid and local anesthetic for adhesive capsulitis. The findings of this study do not support the cessation of using intra-articular analgesic-corticosteroid injections for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.

Usefulness of intra-articular botulinum toxin injections. A systematic review

Botulinum toxin is a proven and widely used treatment for numerous conditions characterized by excessive muscular contractions. Recent studies have assessed the analgesic effect of botulinum toxin in joint pain and started to unravel its mechanisms.

LITERATURE-SEARCH-METHODOLOGY

We searched the international literature via the Medline database using the term "intraarticular botulinum toxin injection" combined with any of the following terms: "knee", "ankle", "shoulder", "osteoarthritis", "adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder".

RESULTS

Of 16 selected articles about intraarticular botulinum toxin injections, 7 were randomized controlled trials done in patients with osteoarthritis, adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, or chronic pain after joint replacement surgery. Proof of anti-nociceptive effects was obtained in some of these indications and the safety and tolerance profile was satisfactory. The studies are heterogeneous. The comparator was usually a glucocorticoid or a placebo; a single study used hyaluronic acid. Pain intensity was the primary outcome measure.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

The number of randomized trials and sample sizes are too small to provide a satisfactory level of scientific evidence or statistical power. Unanswered issues include the effective dosage and the optimal dilution and injection modalities of botulinum toxin.