Practical Assessment of Dysphagia in Stroke Patients

Reliability and Validity Analyses of the Practical Assessment of Dysphagia Test in Stroke

To investigate the validity and reliability of the Practical Assessment of Dysphagia (PAD) test as a quantitative and organ-specific test for stroke patients. In this study, PAD test data from 109 patients with stroke were used. The internal consistency of the PAD was analyzed using Cronbach's α value. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the PAD were analyzed using Kappa coefficient. Concurrent validity was evaluated based on the correlation between PAD and the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). The diagnostic accuracy of the PAD test in patients with stroke was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.98 and 0.99, respectively) were significant (p < 0.001) for the total PAD score. The functional dysphagia scale (FDS) score and penetration-aspiration score (PAS) correlated significantly with PAD (p < 0.001). The results of the ROC curve analysis with various cut-off points showed that the PAD test had high sensitivity and specificity. The PAD has high reliability and validity. Therefore, it is a useful screening test for dysphagia in patients with stroke.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Dysphagia Trained Nurse Assessment tool in acute stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Comprehensive swallow screening assessments to identify dysphagia and make early eating and drinking recommendations can be used by trained nurses. This study aimed to validate the Dysphagia Trained Nurse Assessment (DTNAx) tool in acute stroke patients.

METHODS

Participants with diagnosed stroke were prospectively and consecutively recruited from an acute stroke unit. Following a baseline DTNAx on admission, participants underwent a speech and language therapist (SLT) bedside assessment of swallowing (speech and language therapist assessment [SLTAx]), videofluoroscopy (VFS) and a further DTNAx by the same or a different nurse.

RESULTS

Forty-seven participants were recruited, of whom 22 had dysphagia. Compared to SLTAx in the identification of dysphagia, DTNAx had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.8-99.9) and specificity of 89.5% (95% CI 75.2-97.1). Compared to VFS in the identification of aspiration, DTNAx had a sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI 40.0-97.2) and a specificity of 81.6% (95% CI 65.7-92.3). Over 81% of the diet and fluid recommendations made by the dysphagia trained nurses were in absolute agreement compared to SLTAx. Both DTNAx and SLTAx had low diagnostic accuracy compared to the VFS-based definition of dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses trained in DTNAx showed good diagnostic accuracy in identifying dysphagia compared to SLTAx and in identifying aspiration compared to VFS. They made appropriate diet and fluid recommendations in line with SLTs in the early management of dysphagia.

A 2 DS 2 Score to Predict the Risk of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Stroke: An Indian Perspective

Background  Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is an important cause of poststroke morbidity and mortality. Several clinical risk scores predict the risk of SAP. In this study, we used the A ² DS ² score (age, atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, sex, and stroke severity) to assess the risk of SAP in patients admitted with acute stroke. Methods  A high (5-10) and a low (0-4) A ² DS ² score was assigned to patients with acute stroke admitted to the neurology ward. Univariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to find the strength of association of SAP and A ² DS ² score. Results  There were 250 patients with acute stroke of which 46 developed SAP. Forty-four patients developed SAP in high score as against 2 in low-score group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.15, p = 0.0001). A ² DS ² score >5 had sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 65.1% to predict SAP. The mean A ² DS ² score in patients with pneumonia was 7.02 ± 1.40 compared to 4.75 ± 1.92 in patients without pneumonia ( p = 0.0001). Conclusions  A ² DS ² score has a high sensitivity of 82% in predicting the risk of SAP and is a useful tool to monitor patients after acute stroke. A ² DS ² score can help in timely detection and prevention of SAP and reduction in caregiver's burden.

Dysphagia in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical management

Dysphagia may present in all critically ill patients and large-scale clinical data show that e.g. post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is commonly observed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Recent data demonstrate that dysphagia is mostly persisting and that its presence is independently associated with adverse patient-centered clinical outcomes. Although several risk factors possibly contributing to dysphagia development were proposed, the underlying exact mechanisms in ICU patients remain incompletely understood and no current consensus exists on how to best approach ICU patients at risk.From a clinical perspective, dysphagia is well-known to be associated with an increased risk of aspiration and aspiration-induced pneumonia, delayed resumption of oral intake/malnutrition, decreased quality of life, prolonged ICU and hospital length of stay, and increased morbidity and mortality. Moreover, the economic burden on public health care systems is high.In light of high mortality rates associated with the presence of dysphagia and the observation that dysphagia is not systematically screened for on most ICUs, this review describes epidemiology, terminology, and potential mechanisms of dysphagia on the ICU. Furthermore, the impact of dysphagia on affected individuals, health care systems, and society is discussed in addition to current and future potential therapeutic approaches.

Clinical Approaches to Assess Post-extubation Dysphagia (PED) in the Critically Ill

Swallowing disorders and respective consequences (including aspiration-induced pneumonia) are often observed in extubated ICU patients with data indicating that a large number of patients are affected. We recently demonstrated in a large-scale analysis that the incidence of post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is 12.4% in a general ICU population and about 18% in emergency admissions to the ICU. Importantly, PED was mostly sustained until hospital discharge and independently predicted 28- and 90-day mortality. Although oropharyngeal/laryngeal trauma, neuromuscular ICU-acquired weakness, reduced sensation/sensorium, dyssynchronous breathing, and gastrointestinal reflux, are all considered to contribute to PED, little is known about the underlying pathomechanisms and risk factors leading to PED in critically ill patients. Systematic screening of all potential ICU patients for oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) seems key for early recognition and follow-up, as well as the design and testing of novel therapeutic interventions. Today, screening methods and clinical investigations for dysphagia differ considerably. In the context of a recently proposed pragmatic screening algorithm introduced by us, we provide a concise review on currently available non-instrumental techniques that could potentially serve for non-instrumental OD assessment in critically ill patients. Following systematic literature review, we find that non-instrumental OD assessments were mostly tested in different patient populations with only a minority of studies performed in critically ill patients. Due to little available data on non-instrumental dysphagia assessment in the ICU, future investigations should aim to validate respective approaches in the critically ill against an instrumental (gold) standard, for example, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. An international expert panel is encouraged to addresses critical illness-related definitions, screening and confirmatory assessment approaches, treatment recommendations, and identifies optimal patient-centered outcome measures for future clinical investigations.