Higher baseline LDL-C levels amplify the short-term benefit of early intensive statin treatment in acute coronary syndrome

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in people with early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is similar to people with coronary artery disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014, which included 50 studies (45,285 participants).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of statins compared with placebo, no treatment, standard care or another statin in adults with CKD not requiring dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 4 October 2023. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. An updated search will be undertaken every three months.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or other statins, on death, cardiovascular events, kidney function, toxicity, and lipid levels in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 90 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more authors independently extracted data and assessed the study risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous benefits and harms with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 63 studies (50,725 randomised participants); of these, 53 studies (42,752 participants) compared statins with placebo or no treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range 2 to 64.8 months), the median dosage of statin was equivalent to 20 mg/day of simvastatin, and participants had a median eGFR of 55 mL/min/1.73 m2. Ten studies (7973 participants) compared two different statin regimens. We were able to meta-analyse 43 studies (41,273 participants). Most studies had limited reporting and hence exhibited unclear risk of bias in most domains. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statins prevent major cardiovascular events (14 studies, 36,156 participants: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79; I2 = 39%; high certainty evidence), death (13 studies, 34,978 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96; I² = 53%; high certainty evidence), cardiovascular death (8 studies, 19,112 participants: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87; I² = 0%; high certainty evidence) and myocardial infarction (10 studies, 9475 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). There were too few events to determine if statins made a difference in hospitalisation due to heart failure. Statins probably make little or no difference to stroke (7 studies, 9115 participants: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.08; I² = 39%; moderate certainty evidence) and kidney failure (3 studies, 6704 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. Potential harms from statins were limited by a lack of systematic reporting. Statins compared to placebo may have little or no effect on elevated liver enzymes (7 studies, 7991 participants: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), withdrawal due to adverse events (13 studies, 4219 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.60; I² = 37%; low certainty evidence), and cancer (2 studies, 5581 participants: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). However, few studies reported rhabdomyolysis or elevated creatinine kinase; hence, we are unable to determine the effect due to very low certainty evidence. Statins reduce the risk of death, major cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction in people with CKD who did not have cardiovascular disease at baseline (primary prevention). There was insufficient data to determine the benefits and harms of the type of statin therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins reduce death and major cardiovascular events by about 20% and probably make no difference to stroke or kidney failure in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. However, due to limited reporting, the effect of statins on elevated creatinine kinase or rhabdomyolysis is unclear. Statins have an important role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and death in people who have CKD and do not require dialysis. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. We will search for new evidence every three months and update the review when we identify relevant new evidence. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Higher baseline lipid levels amplify the benefit of secondary prevention therapy with statins in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Statins are recommended as the first-line treatments for reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The present study aimed to establish the baseline lipid levels associated with the greatest benefit from statin therapy in this population.

METHODS

The study used a retrospective cohort methodology. In total, 636 patients with ACS were enrolled at Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital from 2011 to 2013. Participants were divided into four groups (group 1, hyperlipidemia with inconsistent statin use; group 2, no hyperlipidemia with inconsistent statin use; group 3, no hyperlipidemia with consistent statin use; and group 4, hyperlipidemia with consistent statin use).

RESULTS

Patients in groups 3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29-0.82) and 4 (HR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10-0.45) had lower risks of MACE than those in group 1. In subgroup analysis, patients in group 4 had a lower risk of MACE than those in group 3 (adjusted HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.21-0.89).

CONCLUSION

Sustained statin therapy is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes in patients with ACS, especially in those with higher baseline lipid levels.

Current perspectives on the use of statins in the treatment of dyslipidaemic patients: focus on pitavastatin

A meeting entitled 'Current Perspective on the Use of Statins in the Treatment of Dyslipidemic Patients' was held in Stresa, Italy, on 27-28th June 2019. The presentations covered the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines on dyslipidaemia, with discussion about the importance of controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the pharmacological opportunities to reach the novel lipid goals. The roles of statins to manage dyslipidaemia in patients with different cardiovascular risks were also discussed. In particular, the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin for the treatment of dyslipidaemia were reviewed, highlighting its further advantages beyond LDL-C reduction. Therefore, the impact of statins on the glycaemic profile was discussed in view of the null/lower effect of pitavastatin as compared with other statins, as well as the interaction profile with other drugs commonly used. This meeting report summarizes the main messages of the discussion with a special focus on pitavastatin, whose main features in different settings are described.

Long-term benefits of high-intensity atorvastatin therapy in Chinese acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study

There is lack of long-term data on high-intensity statin therapy of Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this retrospective study, we compared the long-term efficacy and safety of high-intensity and conventional atorvastatin therapy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and plaque size, and improving cardiac function of ACS patients who underwent PCI.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 120 consecutive ACS patients who underwent PCI at our hospital. Group I received a loading dose of atorvastatin (80 mg/day) prior to PCI, followed by a maintenance dose of 40 mg/day for 3 months post-PCI. Group II received a regular dose of atorvastatin (20 mg/day) from the date of admission until 1 year post-PCI. The composite primary efficacy end point was the mean percent change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to week 48 in both groups and percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C target of ≤1.81 mmol/L.Group I had significantly higher mean baseline LDL-C than group II. Moreover, 8.3% of group I patients had an LDL-C ≤1.81 mmol/L versus 43.3% for group II. At week 24, 75.0% and 90.0% of group I and II patients, respectively, achieved the LDL-C target. At week 48, 85.0% and 96.7% of group I and II patients, respectively, achieved the LDL-C target. Additionally, the mean percent changes at week 4 from baseline in LDL-C were -33.6% ± 20.0% for group I versus -12.8% ± 19.6% for group II, and -47.0% ± 25.5% at week 48 for group I versus -36.4% ± 20.2% for group II. Meanwhile, significant reduction in plaque size and marked improvement in cardiac function were seen in patients receiving high-intensity atorvastatin therapy.Compared to conventional therapy, high-intensity statin therapy is more effective in reducing LDL-C and improving cardiac function of ACS patients, with a general benign safety profile over a period of 48 weeks. Our findings support the use of high-intensity statin therapy for Chinese ACS patients to improve the proportion of patients attaining the LDL-C target and reduction in plaque size and improvement cardiac function.

A review of statin use in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Western and Japanese populations

Early high-dose statin therapy to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes in Western patients with stable coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but many patients remain undertreated and do not attain LDL-C treatment goals. Early statin therapy has also been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese patients with ACS, and pretreatment with high-dose statin prior to percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in these patients. As is the case in Western populations, many Japanese patients may be undertreated and a residual cardiovascular risk remains. While differences in treatment practice, dosing and genetic factors exist between Japan and Western countries, similarities are also evident when Japanese statin studies are compared with those performed in Western populations. With the increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in Japan, aggressive statin treatment may be beneficial in achieving optimal cardiovascular outcomes.