Immune-related adverse events in patients with solid-organ tumours treated with immunotherapy: a 3-year study of 102 cases from a single centre

Sicca syndrome/Sjögren's disease associated with cancer immunotherapy: a narrative review on clinical presentation, biomarkers, and management

INTRODUCTION

Almost one-quarter of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) recipients experience sicca syndrome, while Sjögren's disease (SjD) is estimated at 0.3-2.5%, possibly underreported.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review (Medline/Embase until January/31/2024) addresses the pathophysiology, incidence, demographic/clinical features, biomarkers, labial salivary gland biopsy (LSGB), fulfillment of the idiopathic SjD (iSjD) classificatory criteria, differential diagnosis, and management of sicca syndrome/SjD associated with ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

SjD associated with ICIs is underdiagnosed, since studies that performed the mandatory SjD investigation identified that 40-60% of patients with sicca syndrome associated with ICIs meet the iSjD classificatory criteria. LSGB played a fundamental role in recognizing these cases, as most of them had negative anti-Ro/SS-A antibody. Despite the finding of focal lymphocytic sialoadenitis in LSGB samples mimicking iSjD, immunohistochemical analysis provided novel evidence of a distinct pattern for sicca syndrome/SjD associated with ICIs compared to iSjD. The former has scarcity of B lymphocytes, which are a hallmark of iSjD. Additionally, patients with sicca syndrome/SjD associated with ICIs have demographical/clinical/serological and treatment response dissimilarities compared to iSjD. Dryness symptoms are more acute in the former than in iSjD, with predominance of xerostomia over xerophthalmia, and partial/complete response to glucocorticoids. Dryness symptoms in ICI-treated patients warrant prompt SjD investigation.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.

METHODS

We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.

De novo Connective Tissue Disorders as Immune-related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment through blocking immunoregulatory pathways, resulting in augmented antitumor responses. However, ICIs can cause inflammatory autoimmune toxicities, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Common rheumatic irAEs include inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica-like symptoms, and myositis. Fewer cases of de novo connective tissue disease as irAEs have been described and have mainly presented with cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Treatments include glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing agents such as hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate with improvement of symptoms. In this review, the authors discuss immune-related SLE and SSc and their management.

Perspectives on Psoriasiform Adverse Events from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Lessons Learned from Our Practice

Background: New oncologic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have revolutionized the survival and prognosis of cancer patients. However, these therapies are often complicated by immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that may impact quality of life and potentially limit their use. Among these adverse events are psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis that may develop de novo or flare under treatment with ICIs. Given the exceptional immune status of patients receiving ICIs, managing these conditions without interfering with the effect of the oncologic treatment may prove very challenging. Aim: To review the literature data on ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation or development, to present our own experience, and to discuss the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this association and the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients. Case Reports: We report three cases of ICI-induced de novo psoriasis and two cases of ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation that required systemic treatment. Oral acitretin treatment successfully controlled psoriasis lesions in three cases and allowed for the continuation of immunotherapy. Literature Review: We performed a medical literature search across several databases (PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar) using the search terms "immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis/psoriasiform dermatitis/psoriasis arthritis". We identified and revised 80 relevant publications that reported 1102 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriasis arthritis induced or exacerbated by ICIs. We assessed the type of cancer, the therapeutic agent involved, the clinical form of psoriasis, the presence or absence of psoriatic arthritis, the personal and family history of psoriasis, the age, the gender, the time until onset or exacerbation of skin lesions, the specific treatment recommended, the need for ICI discontinuation, and the patient's outcome. Conclusions: As ICIs represent a fairly novel therapy, the association with several adverse effects is only now unraveling. Psoriasis exacerbation or onset following the initiation of immunotherapy is one such example, as more and more reports and case series are being published. Awareness of the relationship between psoriasis and treatment with ICIs, prompt recognition, and initiation of adequate skin-directed therapies are essential for the avoidance of skin lesions worsening, the need for systemic treatments that may interfere with ICIs' effects, or the discontinuation of the latter. In the absence of generally accepted guidelines, it is advisable to treat patients with severe, widespread psoriasis with drugs that do not impair the effects of immunotherapy and thus do not alter the patient's prognosis.

Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors—A 2023 Update

With the aging of the population, malignancies are becoming common complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in elderly patients. Such malignancies often interfere with RA treatment. Among several therapeutic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which antagonize immunological brakes on T lymphocytes have emerged as a promising treatment option for a variety of malignancies. In parallel, evidence has accumulated that ICIs are associated with numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as hypophysitis, myocarditis, pneumonitis, and colitis. Moreover, ICIs not only exacerbate pre-existing autoimmune diseases, but also cause de novo rheumatic disease–like symptoms, such as arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis, which are currently termed rheumatic irAEs. Rheumatic irAEs differ from classical rheumatic diseases in multiple aspects, and treatment should be individualized based on the severity. Close collaboration with oncologists is critical for preventing irreversible organ damage. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the mechanisms and management of rheumatic irAEs with focus on arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis. Based on these findings, potential therapeutic strategies against rheumatic irAEs are discussed.

Challenges in the diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica and related giant cell arteritis

INTRODUCTION

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has emerged as a relatively common condition in Western countries. Although the diagnosis is relatively straightforward in people over 50 years of age who complain of sudden onset of pain and stiffness in the shoulder and hip girdles along with elevation of biomarkers of inflammation, manifestations of polymyalgia can also occur in the context of different conditions. For this reason, a complete history and examination is required, including looking for symptoms and signs suggestive of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

AREAS COVERED

The review describes when and how to identify PMR, as well as when to suspect the presence of associated GCA or multiple conditions mimicking PMR.

EXPERT OPINION

PMR does not have a specific diagnostic test. For this reason, a thorough clinical history searching for clinical data of GCA is needed. Moreover, the possibility of other diseases mimicking PMR should be considered, particularly when atypical presentation or unusual clinical data are present.

Conundrum for Psoriasis and Thyroid Involvement

Strategies concerning thyroid anomalies in patients confirmed with psoriasis, either on clinical level or molecular levels, and their genetic findings remain an open issue. Identification of the exact subgroup of individuals that are candidates to endocrine assessments is also controversial. Our purpose in this work was to overview clinical and pathogenic data concerning psoriasis and thyroid comorbidities from a dual perspective (dermatologic and endocrine). This was a narrative review of English literature between January 2016 and January 2023. We included clinically relevant, original articles with different levels of statistical evidence published on PubMed. We followed four clusters of conditions: thyroid dysfunction, autoimmunity, thyroid cancer, and subacute thyroiditis. A new piece of information in this field was the fact that psoriasis and autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATD) have been shown to be related to the immune-based side effects of modern anticancer drugs-namely, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP). Overall, we identified 16 confirmatory studies, but with heterogeneous data. Psoriatic arthritis had a higher risk of positive antithyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAb) (25%) compared to cutaneous psoriasis or control. There was an increased risk of thyroid dysfunction versus control, and hypothyroidism was the most frequent type of dysfunction (subclinical rather than clinical), among thyroid anomalies correlated with >2-year disease duration, peripheral > axial and polyarticular involvement. With a few exceptions, there was a female predominance. Hormonal imbalance included, most frequently, low thyroxine (T4) and/or triiodothyronine (T3) with normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), followed by high TSH (only one study had higher total T3). The highest ratio of thyroid involvement concerning dermatologic subtypes was 59% for erythrodermic psoriasis. Most studies found no correlation between thyroid anomalies and psoriasis severity. Statistically significant odds ratios were as follows: hypothyroidism: 1.34-1.38; hyperthyroidism: 1.17-1.32 (fewer studies than hypo); ATD: 1.42-2.05; Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT): 1.47-2.09; Graves' disease: 1.26-1.38 (fewer studies than HT). A total of 8 studies had inconsistent or no correlations, while the lowest rate of thyroid involvement was 8% (uncontrolled studies). Other data included 3 studies on patients with ATD looking for psoriasis, as well as 1 study on psoriasis and thyroid cancer. ICP was shown to potentially exacerbate prior ATD and psoriasis or to induce them both de novo (5 studies). At the case report level, data showed subacute thyroiditis due to biological medication (ustekinumab, adalimumab, infliximab). Thyroid involvement in patients with psoriasis thus remained puzzling. We observed significant data that confirmed a higher risk of identifying positive antibodies and/or thyroid dysfunction, especially hypothyroidism, in these subjects. Awareness will be necessary to improve overall outcomes. The exact profile of individuals diagnosed with psoriasis who should be screened by the endocrinology team is still a matter of debate, in terms of dermatological subtype, disease duration, activity, and other synchronous (especially autoimmune) conditions.

Myositis in Germany: epidemiological insights over 15 years from 2005 to 2019

BACKGROUND

The medical care of patients with myositis is a great challenge in clinical practice. This is due to the rarity of these disease, the complexity of diagnosis and management as well as the lack of systematic analyses.

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, the aim of this project was to obtain an overview of the current care of myositis patients in Germany and to evaluate epidemiological trends in recent years.

METHODS

In collaboration with BARMER Insurance, retrospective analysis of outpatient and inpatient data from an average of approximately 8.7 million insured patients between January 2005 and December 2019 was performed using ICD-10 codes for myositis for identification of relevant data. In addition, a comparative analysis was performed between myositis patients and an age-matched comparison group from other populations insured by BARMER.

RESULTS

45,800 BARMER-insured individuals received a diagnosis of myositis during the observation period, with a relatively stable prevalence throughout. With regard to comorbidities, a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular disease as well as neoplasm was observed compared to the control group within the BARMER-insured population. In addition, myositis patients suffer more frequently from psychiatric disorders, such as depression and somatoform disorders. However, the ICD-10 catalogue only includes the specific coding of "dermatomyositis" and "polymyositis" and thus does not allow for a sufficient analysis of all idiopathic inflammatory myopathies subtypes.

CONCLUSION

The current data provide a comprehensive epidemiological analysis of myositis in Germany, highlighting the multimorbidity of myositis patients. This underlines the need for multidisciplinary management. However, the ICD-10 codes currently still in use do not allow for specific analysis of the subtypes of myositis. The upcoming ICD-11 coding may improve future analyses in this regard.

Intestinal Microbiota: The Driving Force behind Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

Despite the great achievements of cancer immunotherapy in a variety of tumors, tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance still plague patients and clinical researchers. In particular, the occurrence of immune-related adverse events forces patients to discontinue cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, it is urgent to optimize cancer immunotherapy and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. With the iteration of sequencing technology, the microbiome, as the second set of genomes in the body, has been proven to be involved in immunity and metabolism. More and more studies are gradually shifting the perspective to the intestinal microbiota and cancer immunotherapy. The intestinal microbiota reactivates and modulates immune cells in immunotherapy and is expected to become a biomarker for predicting immune efficacy. Targeting to improve the intestinal microbiota can enhance anti-tumor immunity. This advantage is beneficial to control related adverse symptoms and expand the beneficiary population of cancer immunotherapy. This finding can help clinicians comprehensively evaluate the effect of tumor screening and tumor treatment. Therefore, the innovative combination of gut microbiota and cancer immunotherapy is expected to be an active strategy to enhance individualized immune responses.

Abstract

In recent years, cancer immunotherapy has become a breakthrough method to solve solid tumors. It uses immune checkpoint inhibitors to interfere with tumor immune escape to coordinate anti-tumor therapy. However, immunotherapy has an individualized response rate. Moreover, immune-related adverse events and drug resistance are still urgent issues that need to be resolved, which may be attributed to the immune imbalance caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Microbiome research has fully revealed the metabolic-immune interaction relationship between the microbiome and the host. Surprisingly, sequencing technology further proved that intestinal microbiota could effectively intervene in tumor immunotherapy and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Therefore, cancer immunotherapy under the intervention of intestinal microbiota has innovatively broadened the anti-tumor landscape and is expected to become an active strategy to enhance individualized responses.

An Unusual Presentation of Inflammatory Shoulder Arthritis Associated with Nivolumab: A Case Report

CASE

A 68-year-old woman with a history of stage IIIC (T3bN1bM0) melanoma with metastases to her right axilla status after 10 cycles of nivolumab presented with right shoulder pain. Radiographs showed a progressive erosive glenohumeral joint lesion. The workup was negative for metastasis and infection. Her clinical and radiographic findings were consistent with erosive arthritis. The patient underwent shoulder hemiarthroplasty and experienced substantial improvements.

CONCLUSION

This is an unusual case of inflammatory arthritis associated with nivolumab, an antiprogrammed cell death protein 1, and is an important reminder of the musculoskeletal toxicities associated with immunotherapies.