Comparison of postoperative quality of life of Limberg flap and Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus operations

Progress in the surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a review

BACKGROUND

A pilonidal sinus (PS) is an acquired disease resulting from recurrent infections and chronic inflammation. A PS involving the sacrococcyx is referred to as a sacrococcygeal PS (SPS). An SPS is a rare chronic infectious disease for which surgery is a good choice. The incidence of SPS has gradually increased worldwide in recent years. However, surgeons have not reached a consensus on the preferred surgical approach for SPS. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze differences in the efficacy of different surgical approaches for the treatment of SPS.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database covering the period from 1 January 2003, to 28 February 2023. The primary outcome parameters were recurrence and infection. Finally, statistical analysis (meta-analysis) was carried out using RevMan 5.4.1 software. In addition, we systematically reviewed the latest progress in the surgical treatment of SPS over the past 20 years, especially as reported in the past 3 years.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles, 54 studies, and 3612 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The recurrence rate following the midline closure (MC) technique was much higher than that of other techniques. Among the techniques analyzed, the differences between MC and Limberg flap (LF), and between MC and marsupialization were statistically significant [ P =0.0002, risk ratio (RR)=6.15, 95% CI 2.40, 15.80; P =0.01, RR=12.70, 95% CI 1.70, 95.06]. The recurrence rate of open healing was higher than that of the Karydakis flap (KF) technique, and the difference was statistically significant ( P =0.02, RR=6.04, 95% CI 1.37, 26.55). Most of the results comparing MC with other techniques suggested that the former had a higher infection rate, and the difference between MC and LF was statistically significant ( P =0.0005, RR=4.14, 95% CI 1.86, 9.23). Comparison between KF and LF, modified LF and KF showed that the differences were not statistically significant in terms of recurrence and infection ( P ≥0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There are various surgical treatment options for SPS, including incision and drainage, excision of diseased tissue with primary closure and secondary healing, and minimally invasive surgery. It is still not possible to determine which surgical technique should be considered the gold standard for treatment, as even the results of different researchers using the same operation method are conflicting. But what is certain is that the midline closure technique has a much higher incidence of postoperative recurrence and infection than other techniques. Therefore, the anorectal surgeon should formulate the most suitable individualized plan for the patient based on a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's wishes, appearance of the SPS, and the professional ability of the surgeon.

The application of the Limberg flap repair technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease

Pilonidal sinus disease (PNSD) challenged surgeons for decades. Limberg flap repair (LFR) is a common treatment for PNSD. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect and risk factors of LFR in PNSD. A retrospective study was conducted on the PNSD patients who visited two medical centers and four departments in the People's Liberation Army General Hospital and were taking LFR treatment between 2016 and 2022. The risk factors, the effect of the operation, and complications were observed. The effects of known risk factors on the surgical results were compared. There were 37 PNSD patients: male/female ratio of 35:2, average age: 25.1 ± 7.9 years. Average BMI: 25.2 ± 4.0 kg/m² , average wound healing time: 15.4 ± 3.4 days. 30 patients (81.0%) healed in stage one and 7 (16.3%) had postoperative complications. Only 1 patient (2.7%) had a recurrence while others were healed after dressing-changing. There was no significant difference in age, BMI, preoperative debridement history, preoperative sinus classification, Wound area, Negative pressure drainage tube, prone time (<3d) and treatment effect. Squat defecate and premature defecation were associated with treatment effect, and they were independent predictors of treatment effect in the multivariate analysis. LFR has a stable therapeutic outcome. Compared with other skin flaps, the therapeutic effect of this flap is not significantly different, but the design is simple and is not affected by the known risk factors before operation. However, it is necessary to avoid the influence of two independent risk factors, squatting defecation and premature defecation, on the therapeutic effect.

A minimally invasive pilonidal protocol improves quality of life in adolescents

BACKGROUND

Pilonidal disease adversely affects the quality of life (QoL) of adolescents with this condition. We report the impact of minimally invasive care on the QoL of a series of adolescent patients in a dedicated Pilonidal Care Clinic.

METHODS

Beginning in February 2019, all patients completed QoL surveys prior to each visit reporting current symptoms and their QoL impact. Data were collected prospectively with objective disease severity and treatment details. Patients with at least 2 clinic visits were included. Demographics, procedures performed, and median QoL scores by severity were analyzed.

RESULTS

74 patients were included. Mean age was 17.3 years (SD 2.4), mean BMI was 27.5 (SD 6.2), median follow-up duration was 4 months (2-12). At intake patients reported a median total QoL impact of 12 for those with mild disease, 11 for those with moderate disease, and 12 with severe disease. Median total QoL impact resolved by the second visit for patients with mild disease, the third for moderate disease, and decreased 88% by the fourth visit for patients with severe disease.

CONCLUSION

Pilonidal disease has a profound impact on most patients' quality of life. Minimally invasive care promptly resolves negative impacts on quality of life in adolescents.

Comparison of the Keystone flap and the Limberg flap technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease

Pilonidal sinus (PS) disease is a chronic inflammatory disease of the sacrococcygeal region. Although various methods have been described for surgical treatment, there is no consensus on the best surgical technique. The aim of this study was to present the results of a new advancement flap technique named the "Keystone flap (KSF)" and compared with the Limberg flap (LF) technique in pilonidal sinus surgery. A retrospective review was made of 124 consecutive patients surgically treated for PS disease with KSF and LF procedures. Baseline characteristics, operation time, volume of excised specimen, duration of hospitalization, duration of drainage, duration of healing, time to return to work, local complications and recurrence were evaluated and compared between the two procedures. Operation time, healing time, and time to return to work were significantly shorter in the KSF group. Partial wound dehiscense and prolonged wound healing were more common in the LF group. An additional intervention in the operating room was required by 21.1% of the LF group and was a significantly lower rate in the KSF group at 7.5%. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of recurrence. The KSF procedure seems promising for treating pilonidal sinus disease, with the advantages of shorter operation, healing, and return to work times. It also provides lower partial wound dehiscence and necrosis rates.

Karydakis procedure versus Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The Karydakis procedure (KP) and Limberg flap (LF) are two commonly performed operations for pilonidal sinus disease (PND). The present meta-analysis aimed to review the outcome of randomized trials that compared KP and LF.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched in a systematic manner for randomized trials comparing KP and LF through July 2020. This meta-analysis was reported in line with the PRISMA statement. The main outcome measures were failure of healing of PND, complications, time to healing, time to return to work, and cosmetic satisfaction.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials (1943 patients) were included. KP had a significantly shorter operation time than LF with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of -0.788 (95%CI: -11.55 to -4.21, p < 0.0001). Pain scores, hospital stay, and time to healing were similar. There was no significant difference in overall complications (OR= 1.61, 95%CI: 0.9-2.85, p = 0.11) and failure of healing (OR= 1.22, 95%CI: 0.76-1.95, p = 0.41). KP had higher odds of wound infection (OR= 1.87, 95%CI: 1.15-3.04, p = 0.011) and seroma formation (OR= 2.33, 95%CI: 1.39-3.9, p = 0.001). KP was followed by a shorter time to return to work (WMD= -0.182; 95%CI: -3.58 to -0.066, p = 0.04) and a higher satisfaction score than LF (WMD= 2.81, 95%CI: 0.65-3.77, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

KP and LF were followed by similar rates of complications and failure of healing of PND and comparable stay, pain scores, and time to wound healing. KP was associated with higher rates of seroma and wound infection, shorter time to return to work, and higher cosmetic satisfaction than LF.