Development of an algorithm using ultrasonography-assisted peripheral intravenous catheter placement for reducing catheter failure

Effects of ultrasound with an automatic vessel detection system using artificial intelligence on the selection of puncture points among ultrasound beginner clinical nurses

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound guidance increases the success rate of peripheral intravenous catheter placement. However, the longer time required to obtain ultrasound-guided access poses difficulties for ultrasound beginners. Notably, interpretation of ultrasonographic images is considered as one of the main reasons of difficulty in using ultrasound for catheter placement. Therefore, an automatic vessel detection system (AVDS) using artificial intelligence was developed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of AVDS for ultrasound beginners in selecting puncture points and determine suitable users for this system.

METHODS

In this crossover experiment involving the use of ultrasound with and without AVDS, we enrolled 10 clinical nurses, including 5 with some experience in peripheral intravenous catheterization using ultrasound-aided methods (categorized as ultrasound beginners) and 5 with no experience in ultrasound and less experience in peripheral intravenous catheterization using conventional methods (categorized as inexperienced). These participants chose two puncture points (those with the largest and second largest diameter) as ideal in each forearm of a healthy volunteer. The results of this study were the time required for the selection of puncture points and the vein diameter of the selected points.

RESULTS

Among ultrasound beginners, the time required for puncture point selection in the right forearm second candidate vein with a small diameter (<3 mm) was significantly shorter when using ultrasound with AVDS than when using it without AVDS (mean, 87 vs 247 s). Among inexperienced nurses, no significant difference in the time required for all puncture point selections was found between the use of ultrasound with and without AVDS. In the vein diameter, significant difference was shown only in the absolute difference at left second candidate among inexperienced participants.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography beginners needed less time to select the puncture points in a small diameter vein using ultrasound with AVDS than without AVDS.

Handheld Ultrasound Devices for Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation: A Scoping Review

Ultrasound-guided insertion of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is recommended for patients with difficult intravenous access, but access to ultrasound equipment is often limited to specialty departments. Compact, affordable handheld ultrasound devices are available, but the extent of their clinical adoption and impact on patient outcomes is unknown. This scoping review aimed to explore evidence regarding handheld and pocket ultrasound devices for PIVC insertion. Databases were searched for studies published in English between January 2000 and January 2023 evaluating handheld or pocket ultrasound devices weighing ≤3 kg for PIVC insertion. Data were extracted using standardized forms and summarized using descriptive statistics. Seventeen studies reporting the use of handheld or pocket ultrasound devices were identified. Most studies were conducted in adult inpatient facilities; 3 included pediatrics, and 2 reported out-of-hospital use. Participants with difficult intravenous access featured in 9 studies. Ultrasound training programs were described in 12 studies, with competency defined by number of successful PIVC insertions. Five studies reported clinician and/or patient perspectives. Ultrasound for PIVC insertion is not widely accessible in nonspecialist areas, but more compact and affordable handheld models could provide a solution, especially for patients with difficult access. More research evidence using handheld ultrasound is needed.

Predictive Factors for Infusion Site Induration After Outpatient Chemotherapy in Japan: A Secondary Analysis

PURPOSE

Even in the absence of extravasation, some patients develop induration at the peripheral intravenous catheterization site prior to the next day's treatment. Infusion site induration commonly affects patients who undergo repeated chemotherapy administrations. Vessel health is crucial for the continuation of chemotherapy. However, there is no effective method to prevent induration. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the factors that could cause induration for preventing its occurrence.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. All participants were undergoing outpatient chemotherapy. Participant characteristics and related catheterization data were collected on the treatment day as baseline, and induration incidence was recorded on the subsequent treatment day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of cutoff points of the vein and catheter diameter ratios for distinguishing between developed induration and not developed induration. Additionally, cox regression analysis with multiple imputation was used to investigate the factors that predicted induration.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients participated in the study. The cutoff point of the vein/catheter diameter ratio calculated using ROC analysis was ≥3.7. The ratio of larger-diameter veins to catheter diameter of ≥3.7 times was negatively associated with induration in both complete case analysis (HR: 0.11; p = 0.034) and multiple imputation analysis (HR: 0.12; p = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

Selecting the vein with 3.7 times higher diameter than the catheter diameter for the catheterization site may help prevent induration on the next treatment day.

Effectiveness of ultrasonography for peripheral catheter insertion and catheter failure prevention in visible and palpable veins

BACKGROUND

The increase in the success rate of peripheral intravenous catheterization against a difficult intravenous access (DIVA) using ultrasonography is reported; however, reports related to the effectiveness of using ultrasonography in increasing the success rate for visible and palpable veins is limited. Furthermore, according to a previous study, first attempt success in catheterization contributes to low catheter failure incidence. Thus, we developed a catheterization method using ultrasonography for peripheral veins including visible and palpable veins. This study investigates the effectiveness of ultrasonography use in improving the success rate of catheterization and preventing the catheter failure for peripheral veins including visible and palpable veins.

METHODS

Adult inpatients were recruited. Trained nurses inserted intravenous catheters using ultrasonography. Ultrasonography was used for all vein assessment, target vein selection, and puncturing (i.e. target point selection and/or needle guidance), regardless of the target vein's visibility or palpability. Catheters with over a 24-h dwelling time were followed for catheter failure incidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were recruited, and they required 34 catheterizations. Total number of catheterization attempts were 39. Of the peripheral veins, 51.3% (20/39) were visible and palpable, 48.7% (19/39) were DIVA. The rate of successful intravenous cannulation was 29 of 34 (85.3%) after one attempt and 4 of 34 (total 97.0%) after two attempts. The catheterization failure incidence was 3.2% (1/31) in the catheter that had an over 24-h dwelling time.

CONCLUSIONS

Using ultrasonography to all target veins might have contributed to higher success rates of catheterization and extremely low incidence of catheter failure based on objective findings. Selecting the vein with larger diameters and healthy tissue as puncture point and showing center of vessel lumen clearly using ultrasonography might have been contributed the results.

Catheter failure in the administration of hyperosmotic drugs through a peripheral vein and vascular selection: A retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to determine whether the placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) in the cephalic vein of the forearm could prevent PIVC failure in patients receiving hyperosmotic drugs through the peripheral vein. This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 20 years who had received infusion therapy via a PIVC in our institution between July and November 2017. Patients were divided into groups according to PIVC insertion into the cephalic, basilic, and medial veins. PIVCs used to administer drugs with osmotic pressure ratios > 2.0 were included. The primary outcome was survival time to catheter failure. Catheter failure was defined as accidental and unplanned catheter removal. We set the cephalic vein and other veins, including the medial and basilic veins, in the forearm as cohort groups. We used the Kaplan-Meier survival curves to compare the time until catheter failure in the cohort groups. The Cox proportional hazard models were fitted, and the hazard ratios were calculated. A total of 46 catheters with hyperosmotic agents were included in the analysis. Catheter failure was observed in 25 (54.3%) cases. Time to catheter failure in patients receiving high-dose drugs via the cephalic vein was significantly longer than that in the other two groups (p < 0.01). Thus, the cephalic vein, which has a high blood flow, is the ideal site of PIVC insertion in patients receiving high drug concentrations to prevent catheter failure.