Discordance between patient and clinician reports of adverse reactions to MDR-TB treatment

Frequency and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions Among Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients: Analysis From a Prospective Study

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) management is often linked with a higher rate of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) needing effective and timely management of these ADRs, which, if left untreated, may result in a higher rate of loss to follow-up of drug-resistant patients.

Study objective: The study was aimed at prospectively identifying the nature, frequency, suspected drugs, and management approaches for ADRs along with risk factors of ADRs occurrence among DR-TB patients at Nishtar Medical University, Hospital, Multan, Pakistan.

Materials and Methods: The prospective study included all the DR-TB patients enrolled for treatment from January 2016 to May 2017 at the study site. Patients were evaluated for the treatment-induced ADRs as per standard criteria of the National Tuberculosis Program, Pakistan. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independent variables associated with the occurrence of ADRs.

Results: Out of 271 DR-TB patients included in the final analysis, it was observed that 55 patients (20.3%) experienced at least three ADRs. A total of 50 (18.5%) patients experienced zero adverse effects, while 15 (5.5%), 33 (12.2%), and 53 (19.6%) patients experienced one, two, and four ADRs, respectively. Gastrointestinal disturbances (66.7%), nervous system disorders (59.4%), and electrolyte disturbances (55.7%) remained the highest reported ADRs during therapy, followed by arthralgia (49.1%), ototoxicity (24%), pruritic reactions/rash (12.9%), dyspnoea (12.5%), and tinnitus (8.8%). Pulmonary cavitation at the baseline visit (p-value 0.001, OR 3.419; 95% CI (1.694–6.902) was significantly associated with the occurrence of ADRs among DR-TB patients.

Conclusion: The frequency of ADRs was high among the study cohort; however, these were managed effectively. Patients with recognized risk factors for ADRs occurrence need continuous clinical management efforts.

Risk factors for poor engagement in drug-resistant TB care in South Africa: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Metrics of poor patient engagement, including missed appointments, treatment interruption, sub-optimal medication adherence, and loss to follow-up, have been linked to poor clinical multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) outcomes. Understanding the risk factors for poor patient engagement is necessary to improve outcomes and control TB. This review synthesizes the risk factors for poor patient engagement in MDR-TB treatment across South Africa.

DESIGN

A systematic review of five databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science) was conducted, covering articles published between 2010 and 2020. Articles were included if they provided information about risk factors associated with poor engagement among adults (⩾15 years) in treatment for MDR-TB in South Africa. Reviews, editorials, abstracts, and case studies were excluded.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Male sex and younger age were the most consistently identified risk factors for poor engagement; however, there was a lack of consistency in the choice of covariates, measurement of the variables, analytic methods, and significant factors associated with poor engagement between studies. Alcohol use, substance use, living with HIV, pulmonary TB site, and ethnicity were all identified as risk factors in at least one included study, while formal housing and steady employment were found to be protective.

CONCLUSION

The available literature offers little cohesive data to address poor patient engagement in this population. Further research needs to focus on identifying and addressing risk factors for poor patient engagement. This is particularly salient within the context of newer all-oral and short-course MDR-TB treatment regimens.

"Side effects--part of the package": a mixed methods approach to study adverse events among patients being programmatically treated for DR-TB in Gujarat, India

Background

High rates of Adverse Events (AEs) during treatment is one of the leading causes of unsuccessful treatment outcomes among patients with drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). However, information related to AEs is not systematically collected and managed under programmatic setting. The present study assessed the a) incidence and pattern of adverse events in first three months of DR-TB treatment initiation; b) treatment seeking behaviour for AE management; and c) explore the challenges in seeking treatment and reporting AEs.

Methods

This mixed methods study included all patients diagnosed and initiated on treatment under RNTCP during July–September 2018 at Ahmedabad DR-TB centre. The patients were interviewed telephonically and assessed for all AEs experienced by them. In-depth interviews and key-informant interviews were conducted among patients, DOTS supervisors and programme staff (treatment supervisors, medical officer and district program managers).

Results

Total 207 AEs were reported by the 74 DR-TB patients. All patients experienced at least one AE during initial treatment period. Incidence rate of AEs (experienced) was 3.11 (1st month-4.6, 2nd month-2.7, 3rd month-2.02) per 100 person days. Of the 207 AEs, gastro-intestinal (59, 28.3%), ophthalmic (32, 15.4%) and otolaryngology (25, 11.9%) system related AEs were commonly experienced. Treatment was not sought in two-fifths of the AEs. Themes and sub-themes related to challenges in treatment seeking or reporting of AEs were 1) Patient related-Misconceptions, accessibility and affordability of management, lack of counselling support, stigma and discrimination, and past treatment experience; 2) Health system related- lack of guidelines and training for AE management, 3) Poor coordination between hospital and tuberculosis centre.

Conclusion

The incidence of AEs was high among patients with DR-TB in the first three months of treatment and treatment seeking/reporting was low. Adequate health education and counselling of the patient and orientation of the health systems is the need of the hour. An efficient real-time reporting and management of AE should be developed and tested for effective DR-TB control.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-020-05660-w.

Quality of sleep among patients diagnosed with tuberculosis-a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Tuberculosis (TB) can affect sleep and can predispose patients to chronic diseases like diabetes mellitus. On the other hand, sleep deprivation and diabetes mellitus can worsen tuberculosis. The aim of this study was to assess sleep quality, to estimate the prevalence of poor sleepers and those at risk for restless legs syndrome (RLS) and to evaluate the knowledge and practices regarding sleep hygiene among patients diagnosed with TB.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, a semi-structured questionnaire was administered to patients diagnosed with TB in Bengaluru, India. The questionnaire was comprised of sections including demography, knowledge and practice regarding sleep hygiene, the international restless leg study group consensus diagnostic criteria to diagnose RLS, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index, the Epworth sleepiness scale, and history of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

RESULTS

Of 206 participants enrolled, 125 men (61%), mean (SD) age was 41.0 (16.2) years, and 121 (59%) had pulmonary TB while the remaining 85 (41%) had extrapulmonary TB. The prevalence (95% confidence intervals) of poor quality sleepers was 17% (12, 23%), those with poor knowledge of sleep hygiene (< 6 marks) 33% (27, 40%), those at risk for RLS 32% (26, 39%), and those with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) 12% (8, 17%).

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of poor quality sleepers and those at risk for RLS are higher than normal population, thus making sleep quality assessment important in patients diagnosed with TB. Prevalence of those at risk for EDS was comparable to normal population.

Retrospective record review of pregnant women treated for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is amongst the top five causes of death in women of childbearing age (15-≤44 years). Little is known about treatment of pregnant women with drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). Treatment for pregnant women remains challenging and more complex in DR-TB/HIV co-infection, where an evidence-based guide to clinical practice is limited. The study reviewed treatment and pregnancy outcomes and birth outcomes of their new-born in a cohort of pregnant women with DR-TB from three MDR-TB hospitals during 2010 and 2018.

Design/Methods

Data were extracted from: TB register and patient clinic notes using a standardized case record form. Information on DR-TB treatment, pregnancy and Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) of twenty-six pregnant women treated with individualized second-line TB medications were captured. The frequency of favourable and adverse outcomes regarding disease and pregnancy were evaluated.

Results

The mean age was 29 years (SD ±5.1), with the minimum and maximum age of 21 and 40 years, respectively. Eleven (42.3%) were previously treated with first-line TB drugs, 11 (42.3%) never treated before and 4 (15.4%) were previously treated for DR-TB. Of the 26 women, 15 (57.7%) had at least one ADE, but most had more than one ADE. Seventeen women were successfully treated, and 22 live births recorded. Live birth outcome was significantly associated with trimester of initiation of DR-TB treatment (p = 0.036). The proportion of live births for the pregnancy trimester when DR-TB treatment was initiated, were 60.0%, 90.9% and 100.0%, for first, second and third trimester, respectively.

Conclusion

DR-TB treatment should be delayed until after the first trimester. Routine pharmacovigilance surveillance integrated antenatal and delivery services with an integrated record of DR-TB treatment during pregnancy is recommended. Prospective studies using standardised case record forms for DR-TB treatment for pregnant women could provide more insight on the effect of DR-TB treatment on the birth outcome.

Integration of drug safety monitoring in tuberculosis treatment programmes: country experiences

New drugs and shorter treatments for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) have become available in recent years and active pharmacovigilance (PV) is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) at least during the early phases of implementation, with active drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) proposed for this. We conducted a literature review of papers reporting on aDSM. Up to 18 April, 2019, results have only been published from one national aDSM programme. Because aDSM is being introduced in many low- and middle-income countries, we also report experiences in introducing it into DR-TB treatment programmes, targeting the reporting of a restricted set of adverse events (AEs) as per WHO-recommended aDSM principles for the period 2014-2017. Early beneficial effects of active PV for TB patients include increased awareness about the occurrence, detection and management of AEs during TB treatment, and the increase of spontaneous reporting in some countries. However, because PV capacity is low in most countries and collaboration between national TB programmes and national PV centres remains weak, parallel and coordinated co-development of the capacities of both TB programmes and PV centres is needed.

Increased risk of aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss in MDR-TB patients with HIV coinfection

SETTING

A high proportion of individuals with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) develop permanent hearing loss due to ototoxicity caused by injectable aminoglycosides (AGs). The prevalence of AG-induced hearing loss is greatest in tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) endemic countries in sub-Saharan Africa. However, whether HIV coinfection is associated with a higher incidence of AG-induced hearing loss during MDR-TB treatment is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of HIV coinfection on AG-induced hearing loss among individuals with MDR-TB in sub-Saharan Africa.

DESIGN

This was a meta-analysis of articles published in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Cochrane Review, and reference lists using search terms 'hearing loss', 'aminoglycoside', and 'sub-Saharan Africa'.

RESULTS

Eight studies conducted in South Africa, Botswana and Namibia and published between 2012 and 2016 were included. As the included studies were homogeneous (χ2 = 8.84, df = 7), a fixed-effects model was used. Individuals with MDR-TB and HIV coinfection had a 22% higher risk of developing AG-induced hearing loss than non-HIV-infected individuals (pooled relative risk 1.22, 95%CI 1.10-1.36) during MDR-TB treatment.

CONCLUSION

This finding is critical for TB programs with regard to the expansion of injectable-sparing regimens. Our findings lend credibility to using injectable-sparing regimens and more frequent hearing monitoring, particularly in resource-limited settings for HIV-coinfected individuals.

The impact of adverse events on health-related quality of life among patients receiving treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis in Johannesburg, South Africa

BACKGROUND

Adverse events (AEs) are common during treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients receiving treatment for DR-TB or the effect of AEs on HRQoL.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study among adult patients with laboratory-confirmed rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (TB) on DR-TB treatment at a public-sector outpatient DR-TB clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa between 02/2015-01/2018. Data on HRQoL using the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire and self-reported AEs were collected by trained interviewers through face-to-face interviews. We report averages for the eight major domains and mental (MCS) and physical health (PCS) component summary scores, stratified by whether AEs were reported in the last four weeks. For comparative purposes, we enrolled two other patient groups and included data on a separate group of healthy adults.

RESULTS

We enrolled 149 DR-TB patients (median age 36 years IQR 29-43, 55% male, 77.9% HIV-positive, 81% on ART, 61.8% on a standard long-course regimen and 44.3% on DR-TB treatment for less than 6 months). 58/149 (38.9%) patients reported a total of 122 AEs in the preceding 4 weeks, of these the most common were joint pain (n = 22), peripheral neuropathy (n = 16), hearing loss (n = 15), nausea and vomiting (n = 12) and dizziness or vertigo (n = 11). SF-36 domains and summary scores (MCS and PCS) were lower in those who reported an AE compared to those who did not, and both were lower than healthy adults. Compared to those who did not report an AE, patients who reported AEs were more likely to have a low MCS (aRR 2.24 95% CI 1.53-3.27) and PCS (aRR 1.52 95% CI 1.07-2.18) summary score. HRQoL was lower among those on DR-TB treatment for 6 months or less.

CONCLUSION

Results show that DR-TB had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life, but that AEs during the early months on treatment may be responsible for reducing HRQoL even further. Our findings highlight the negative effects of injectable agents on HRQoL. Patients require an integrative patient-centered approach to deal with DR-TB and HIV and the potential overlapping toxicities which may be worsened by concurrent treatment.

Adverse drug reactions during drug-resistant TB treatment in high HIV prevalence settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of adverse drug reactions or events (ADR) during drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) treatment in the context of settings with high HIV prevalence (at least 20% of patients).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles in PubMed and Scopus. Pooled proportions of patients experiencing adverse events and relative risk with 95% CI were calculated.

Results

The search yielded 24 studies, all observational cohorts. Ten reported on the number of patients experiencing ADR and were included in the meta-analysis representing 2776 study participants of whom 1943 were known to be HIV infected (70.0%). An average of 83% (95% CI: 82%-84%) of patients experienced one or more ADR. Among the seven articles ( n  =   664 study participants) with information on occurrence of severe ADR, 24% (95% CI: 21%-27%) of patients experienced at least one severe ADR during drug-resistant TB treatment. Sixteen of the 24 studies analysed the relative risk of ADR by HIV infection, nine of which found no statistically significant association between HIV infection and occurrence of drug-related ADR. There was insufficient information to disaggregate risk by concomitant treatment with HIV antiretrovirals or by immunosuppression (CD4 count).

Conclusions

No randomized clinical trials were found for WHO-recommended treatment of drug-resistant TB treatment where at least 20% of the cohort was coinfected with HIV. Nearly all patients (83%) experience ADR during DR-TB treatment. While no significant association between ADR and HIV coinfection was found, further research is needed to determine whether concomitant antiretrovirals or immunosuppression increases the risks for HIV-infected patients.

Risk factors for adverse drug reactions in pediatric inpatients: A cohort study

Purpose

The present study aims to identify the risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADR) in pediatric inpatients.

Methods

A prospective cohort study in one general pediatric ward in a hospital in Northeast Brazil was conducted in two stages: the first stage was conducted between August 17^th and November 6^th, 2015, and the second one between March 1^st and August 25^th, 2016. We included children aged 0–14 years 11 months hospitalized with a minimum stay of 48 hours. Observed outcomes were the ADR occurrence and the time until the first ADR observed. In the univariate analysis, the time to the first ADR was compared among groups using a log-rank test. For the multivariate analysis, the Cox regression model was used.

Results

A total of 173 children (208 admissions) and 66 ADR classified as “definite” and “probable” were identified. The incidence rate was 3/100 patient days. The gastro-intestinal system disorders were the main ADR observed (28.8%). In addition, 22.7% of the ADR were related to antibacterials for systemic use and 15.2% to general anesthesia. Prior history of ADR of the child [hazard ratio (HR) 2.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19–5.00], the use of meglumine antimonate (HR 4.98; 95% CI 1.21–20.54), antibacterial for systemic use (HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.08–6.98) and antiepileptic drugs (HR 3.84; 95% CI 1.40–10.56) were identified risk factors for ADR.

Conclusions

We identified as risk factors the prior history of ADR of the child and the use of meglumine antimonate, antibacterial for systemic use and antiepileptic drugs.

Adverse Events Associated with Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in China: An Ambispective Cohort Study

Background

Adverse events are under-appreciated negative consequences that are significant clinical problems for patients undergoing anti-MDR-TB treatment due to longer duration of treatment and more need for concurrent use of multiple second-line drugs.

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of adverse events and their impact on MDR-TB therapy and treatment outcome, and to identify possible drug-event pairs in China.

Material/Methods

An ambispective cohort study was conducted based on hospital medical records, which included a retrospective study that enrolled 751 MDR-TB patients receiving standardized regimen between May 2009 and July 2013, and a follow-up investigation of treatment outcome conducted in December 2016 in China. Adverse events were determined according to laboratory results or clinical criteria. Cox’s proportional hazards regression models were used for evaluating associations.

Results

There were 681(90.7%) patients experienced at least 1 type of adverse event and 55.2% of them required a changed MDR-TB treatment; 51(6.8%) patients required permanent discontinuation of the offending drug due to adverse events. The occurrence of adverse events was associated with poor treatment outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI 1.21, 1.87). A total of 10 different drug-event pairs were identified.

Conclusions

Adverse events occurred commonly during MDR-TB treatment in China, and often resulted in MDR-TB treatment change. The occurrence of adverse events affected MDR-TB poor outcome after treatment.