Novel interferon-gamma assays for diagnosing tuberculosis in young children in India

Utility of interferon-gamma releasing assay for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children is essential for its effective management and control. Reliable diagnostic tools that are currently available for identifying TB infection include the in vivo tuberculosis skin test (TST) and ex vivo interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IGRAs in children.

METHODS

Of the 768 screened studies, 47 met the eligibility criteria. Data from 9065 patients, including 1086 (12.0 %) with confirmed TB, were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the included studies, assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, was unclear.

RESULTS

The calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity of IGRAs in children were 0.85 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.89) and 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.88-0.97), respectively. Subpopulation analysis revealed that the sensitivities and specificities were as follows: QuantiFERON tests: 0.83 (95 % CI: 0.74-0.89) and 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.87-0.96), T-SPOT: 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.91) and 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.85-1.00), IGRAs in children under 15 years: 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.43-0.94) and 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.84-0.97), and IGRAs in children under 5 years: 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.52-0.97) and 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.90-0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of the IGRAs in children were moderate and high, respectively. Therefore, the IGRAs may be useful for detecting TB infection in children.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review protocol was prospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000046737).

Interferon-γ release assay and mantoux response in infants with tuberculous meningitis in low and intermediate burden countries

AIM

Until now, the performance of interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) and Mantoux tests remains unclear in infant tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Therefore, a systematic review is performed to evaluate the sensitivity of IGRA and Mantoux tests for the diagnosis of infant TBM in low and intermediate tuberculosis (TB) burden countries, while following PRISMA.

METHODS

Several databases, including PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched. Articles describing the results of IGRA or Mantoux tests among infant TBM were included for analysis. Data, such as age, sex, Mantoux test or IGRA, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) microbiological examinations (such as acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, TB PCR, and TB culture), were extracted from each study.

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles were enrolled for further analysis, including 48 cases. The mean age was 9.4 ± 5.8 months and boys accounted for 57.1% of infants (24/42). Mantoux test was positive in 57.4% (27/47) of tested infants and IGRA was positive in 77.8% (7/9) of infants. In addition, among the infants with confirmed TB, 18 (52.9%, 18/34) of them have positive Mantoux responses and 7 (20.0%, 7/35) have positive IGRA results.

CONCLUSIONS

In low or intermediate TB burden countries, the Mantoux test has a poor performance for diagnosing TBM among infants, and IGRAs appear to have a moderate sensitivity for the diagnosis of infant TBM.

The diagnostic value of T cell spot test and adenosine deaminase in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous infection of T cell spot test (T-SPOT.TB) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) have a high diagnostic value in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy. However, there were major differences in existing research in regard to the clinical application of the two trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of T-SPOT.TB and ADA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched to compare diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy by T-SPOT.TB and ADA. The search period was from inception to August 31, 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Meta-disc 1.4, Revman 5.4 and Stata 16.0. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize overall diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

10 qualified original research studies were included, with a total of 2075 patients, of which were 1391 tuberculous pleurisy and 684 non-tuberculous pleurisy. The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of T-SPOT.TB were as follows: sensitivity, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90; I² = 92.7%); specificity, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82; I² = 93.7%); PLR, 4.49 (95% CI: 2.29-8.80; I² = 94.9%); NLR, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.30; I² = 94.3%), DOR, 35.72 (95% CI: 11.15-114.47; I² = 91.5%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9283 (95% CI: 0.8912-0.9654). The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of ADA were as follows: sensitivity, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.62-0.67; I² = 98.2%); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.92; I² = 69.4%); PLR, 6.12 (95% CI: 4.71-7.96; I² = 11.9%); NLR, 0.33 (95% CI: 0.12-0.89; I² = 99.5%), DOR, 23.18 (95% CI: 12.75-42.14; I² = 66.7%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9208 (95% CI: 0.9029-0.9387).

CONCLUSION

Both T-SPOT.TB and ADA had high value in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. The sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB was higher than ADA, but the specificity of ADA was higher than T-SPOT.TB. On the whole, T-SPOT. TB had similar diagnostic accuracy to ADA.

Screening tests for active pulmonary tuberculosis in children

BACKGROUND

Globally, children under 15 years represent approximately 12% of new tuberculosis cases, but 16% of the estimated 1.4 million deaths. This higher share of mortality highlights the urgent need to develop strategies to improve case detection in this age group and identify children without tuberculosis disease who should be considered for tuberculosis preventive treatment. One such strategy is systematic screening for tuberculosis in high-risk groups.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the presence of one or more tuberculosis symptoms, or symptom combinations; chest radiography (CXR); Xpert MTB/RIF; Xpert Ultra; and combinations of these as screening tests for detecting active pulmonary childhood tuberculosis in the following groups. - Tuberculosis contacts, including household contacts, school contacts, and other close contacts of a person with infectious tuberculosis. - Children living with HIV. - Children with pneumonia. - Other risk groups (e.g. children with a history of previous tuberculosis, malnourished children). - Children in the general population in high tuberculosis burden settings.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched six databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase, on 14 February 2020 without language restrictions and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cross-sectional and cohort studies where at least 75% of children were aged under 15 years. Studies were eligible if conducted for screening rather than diagnosing tuberculosis. Reference standards were microbiological (MRS) and composite reference standard (CRS), which may incorporate symptoms and CXR.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. We consolidated symptom screens across included studies into groups that used similar combinations of symptoms as follows: one or more of cough, fever, or poor weight gain and one or more of cough, fever, or decreased playfulness. For combination of symptoms, a positive screen was the presence of one or more than one symptom. We used a bivariate model to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and performed analyses separately by reference standard. We assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen studies assessed the following screens: one symptom (15 studies, 10,097 participants); combinations of symptoms (12 studies, 29,889 participants); CXR (10 studies, 7146 participants); and Xpert MTB/RIF (2 studies, 787 participants). Several studies assessed more than one screening test. No studies assessed Xpert Ultra. For 16 studies (84%), risk of bias for the reference standard domain was unclear owing to concern about incorporation bias. Across other quality domains, risk of bias was generally low. Symptom screen (verified by CRS) One or more of cough, fever, or poor weight gain in tuberculosis contacts (4 studies, tuberculosis prevalence 2% to 13%): pooled sensitivity was 89% (95% CI 52% to 98%; 113 participants; low-certainty evidence) and pooled specificity was 69% (95% CI 51% to 83%; 2582 participants; low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 children where 50 have pulmonary tuberculosis, 339 would be screen-positive, of whom 294 (87%) would not have pulmonary tuberculosis (false positives); 661 would be screen-negative, of whom five (1%) would have pulmonary tuberculosis (false negatives). One or more of cough, fever, or decreased playfulness in children aged under five years, inpatient or outpatient (3 studies, tuberculosis prevalence 3% to 13%): sensitivity ranged from 64% to 76% (106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and specificity from 37% to 77% (2339 participants; low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 children where 50 have pulmonary tuberculosis, 251 to 636 would be screen-positive, of whom 219 to 598 (87% to 94%) would not have pulmonary tuberculosis; 364 to 749 would be screen-negative, of whom 12 to 18 (2% to 3%) would have pulmonary tuberculosis. One or more of cough, fever, poor weight gain, or tuberculosis close contact (World Health Organization four-symptom screen) in children living with HIV, outpatient (2 studies, tuberculosis prevalence 3% and 8%): pooled sensitivity was 61% (95% CI 58% to 64%; 1219 screens; moderate-certainty evidence) and pooled specificity was 94% (95% CI 86% to 98%; 201,916 screens; low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 symptom screens where 50 of the screens are on children with pulmonary tuberculosis, 88 would be screen-positive, of which 57 (65%) would be on children who do not have pulmonary tuberculosis; 912 would be screen-negative, of which 19 (2%) would be on children who have pulmonary tuberculosis. CXR (verified by CRS) CXR with any abnormality in tuberculosis contacts (8 studies, tuberculosis prevalence 2% to 25%): pooled sensitivity was 87% (95% CI 75% to 93%; 232 participants; low-certainty evidence) and pooled specificity was 99% (95% CI 68% to 100%; 3281 participants; low-certainty evidence). Of 1000 children, where 50 have pulmonary tuberculosis, 63 would be screen-positive, of whom 19 (30%) would not have pulmonary tuberculosis; 937 would be screen-negative, of whom 6 (1%) would have pulmonary tuberculosis. Xpert MTB/RIF (verified by MRS) Xpert MTB/RIF, inpatient or outpatient (2 studies, tuberculosis prevalence 1% and 4%): sensitivity was 43% and 100% (16 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and specificity was 99% and 100% (771 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Of 1000 children, where 50 have pulmonary tuberculosis, 31 to 69 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-positive, of whom 9 to 19 (28% to 29%) would not have pulmonary tuberculosis; 969 to 931 would be Xpert MTB/RIF-negative, of whom 0 to 28 (0% to 3%) would have tuberculosis. Studies often assessed more symptoms than those included in the index test and symptom definitions varied. These differences complicated data aggregation and may have influenced accuracy estimates. Both symptoms and CXR formed part of the CRS (incorporation bias), which may have led to overestimation of sensitivity and specificity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that in children who are tuberculosis contacts or living with HIV, screening tests using symptoms or CXR may be useful, but our review is limited by design issues with the index test and incorporation bias in the reference standard. For Xpert MTB/RIF, we found insufficient evidence regarding screening accuracy. Prospective evaluations of screening tests for tuberculosis in children will help clarify their use. In the meantime, screening strategies need to be pragmatic to address the persistent gaps in prevention and case detection that exist in resource-limited settings.

Factors associated with differential T cell responses to antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 in pulmonary tuberculosis patients

The T-SPOT.TB assay detects cellular immune responses to 2 core Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens, early secreted antigenic target of 6-kDa protein (ESAT-6) and culture filtrate protein-10 (CFP-10). T-SPOT.TB has been recently used for auxiliary diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). However, testing can produce inconsistent results due to differential PTB patient immune responses to these antigens, prompting us to identify factors underlying inconsistent results.Data were retrospectively analyzed from 1225 confirmed PTB patients who underwent T-SPOT.TB testing at 5 specialized tuberculosis hospitals in China between December 2012 and November 2015. Numbers of spot-forming cells (SFCs) reflecting T cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens were recorded then analyzed via multivariable logistic regression to reveal factors underlying discordant T cell responses to these antigens.The agreement rate of 84.98% (82.85%-86.94%) between PTB patient ESAT-6 and CFP-10 responses demonstrated high concordance. Additionally, positivity rates were higher for ESAT-6 than for CFP-10 (84.8% vs 80.7%, P < .001), with ESAT-6 and CFP-10 microwell SFC numbers for each single positive group not differing significantly (P > .99), while spot numbers of the single positive group were lower than numbers for the double positive group (P < .001). Elderly patients (aged ≥66 years) and patients receiving retreatment were most likely to have discordance results.ESAT-6 promoted significantly more positive T-SPOT.TB results than did CFP-10 in PTB patients. Advanced age and retreatment status were correlated with discordant ESAT-6 and CFP-10 results. Assessment of factors underlying discordance may lead to improved PTB diagnosis using T-SPOT.TB.

Higher T-SPOT.TB threshold may aid in diagnosing active tuberculosis?: A real-world clinical practice in a general hospital

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether increased cut-off of the T-SPOT.TB could aid in diagnosing active tuberculosis (ATB).

METHODS

Patients suspected of having TB were enrolled to derive a T-SPOT.TB threshold value to help diagnose ATB, which was subsequently validated in real-world clinical practice.

RESULTS

In total, 701 adult patients suspected of having tuberculosis who had undergone the T-SPOT.TB assay were included in the derivation cohort. The numbers of ESAT-6 (U = 43583, P = 0.0002) and CFP-10 (U = 41753, P < 0.0001) spot-forming cells (SFCs) significantly increased in the ATB group compared with the Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) group. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, when a cut-off of 37.5 SFCs/2.5 × 10⁵ cells was used to discriminate between ATB and LTBI, the sensitivity was 57.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.7%-64.2%) and the specificity was 59.8% (95% CI 55.2%-64.2%). A threshold value of 173.5 SFCs/2.5 × 10⁵ could be used to obtain a specificity of <90% to discriminate between ATB and LTBI. The diagnostic accuracy of higher T-SPOT.TB threshold values in the validation cohort was similar to that in the derivation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-burden countries, a higher threshold value of 173.5 SFCs/2.5 × 10⁵ may aid in ATB diagnosis in suspected tuberculosis patients.

Risk Factors for False-Negative Interferon-γ Release Assay Results in Culture-Confirmed Childhood TB

A negative interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) result might inappropriately lower the clinical suspicion for childhood tuberculosis (TB) and result in delayed treatment initiation. However, the risk factors associated with false-negative IGRA results in children remain unclear. Between May 2012 and January 2018, 156 culture-confirmed childhood TB patients who had received T-SPOT.TB test were included. Data, including demographic information and clinicopathological variables, were collected via questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% CI of risk factors associated with false-negative T-SPOT.TB results. The positive rate of T-SPOT.TB test was 85.9% in childhood TB patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that younger age (≤ 9 years; OR = 4.782; 95% CI: 1.689, 13.539), weight for age (z-score > 0.37; OR = 4.256; 95% CI: 1.458, 12.428), and hypoproteinemia (total protein ≤ 68.4 g/L; OR = 7.131; 95% CI: 1.864, 27.271) were risk factors for false-negative T-SPOT.TB results in childhood TB. Younger age, overweight, and hypoproteinemia were found to be associated with false-negative T-SPOT.TB results in childhood TB. Health care professionals should consider these risk factors when evaluating suspected childhood TB with negative T-SPOT.TB results.