Language, cognitive, and speech in noise perception abilities of children with cochlear ımplants: a comparative analysis by implantation period and bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the language, cognitive, and speech in noise (SiN) perception abilities of children with cochlear implants (CIs) to those of their peers with NH by grouping them according to their implantation period (12-18 months/19-24 months) and unilateral/bilateral CI use.

METHODS

The sample comprised 50 children with cochlear implants (CIs) and 20 children with normal hearing (NH), ages 6-9 years. Children's language, cognitive, and speech in noise (SiN) perception skills were assessed.

RESULTS

Children with CIs between 12 and 18 months and 19 and 24 months performed more poorly than children with NH on language, verbal memory (VM), verbal-short-term memory (V-STM), verbal working memory (V-WM), rapid naming, and speech in noise (SiN) perception abilities measures (p < 0.001). In addition, children with CIs between 19 and 24 months performed worse on rapid naming and V-WM tasks than children with CIs between 12 and 18 months (p < 0.017). Children with unilateral and bilateral CI performed more poorly than children with NH on language, VM, V-STM, V-WM, rapid naming, and SiN perception abilities assessments (p < 0.001). Additionally children with unilateral CI users performed poorly than children with bilateral CI users on SiN perception (p < 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with congenital hearing loss (CHL), cochlear implantation between 12 and 18 months or sequential bilateral implantation is not sufficient for these children to perform like their NH peers in language, cognitive, and SiN perception abilities. In addition, intervention approaches should focus not only on increasing language skills, but also on cognitive abilities.

Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implants in children: Best timing of surgery and long-term auditory outcomes

PURPOSE

Evaluate the hearing outcomes of bilateral deaf children implanted simultaneously and define the most appropriate timing for surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Audiological CI results were retrieved in both the short-term and long-term period and compared by stratifying the patients into different subcohorts according to their age at surgery. Additional data collected were age at implant activation, etiology and timing of onset of deafness, presence of psychomotor delay.

RESULTS

fifty-six bilaterally implanted children were included. The short-term outcomes differed significantly when comparing groups of different ages at implantation: younger patients achieved better aided pure tone audiometry results. Considering long-term follow-up, a significant correlation was identified between an early age at implantation and the hearing outcome at ages 2 to 5 years. Perceptive levels were better at 4 years of age in the younger group. No significant differences were found between children implanted at before 12 months and between 12 and 16 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the analyzed follow-up data support the hypothesis that children implanted at before 24 months are expected to have better hearing performances. Nevertheless, these results are referred to a widely heterogeneous group of patients and the duration of auditory deprivation should be considered.

Benefit of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children between 5 to 18 years old: A prospective cohort study

Objective

To determine the benefit of sequential cochlear implantation after a long inter-implantation interval in children with bilateral deafness receiving their second implant between 5 and 18 years of age.

Study design

Prospective cohort-study.

Setting

Tertiary multicenter.

Patients

85 children with bilateral deafness and unilateral implantation receiving a contralateral cochlear implant at the age of 5 to 18 years.

Method

The primary outcomes were speech recognition in quiet and noise (CVC) scores. The secondary outcomes were language outcomes and subjective hearing abilities, all measured before and 12 months after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Medians of the paired data were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Univariable linear regression analyses was used to analyze associations between variables and performance outcomes.

Results

A significant benefit was found for speech recognition in quiet (96% [89–98] vs 91% [85–96]; p < 0.01) and noise (65% [57–75] vs 54% [47–71]; p = 0.01) in the bilateral CI condition compared to unilateral (n = 75, excluded 10 non-users). No benefit was seen for language outcomes. The subjective sound quality score was statistically significant higher in bilateral compared to the unilateral CI condition. Pre-operative residual hearing level in the ear of the second implant, the inter-implant interval and age at time of second implantation was not significantly associated with performance scores.

Conclusion

After 12 months of use, sequential bilateral cochlear implantation showed improved speech perception in quiet and noise and improved subjective sound quality outcomes in children despite a great inter-implantation interval (median of 8 years [range 1–16 years]).

Bilateral cochlear implantation

Binaural hearing has certain benefits while listening in noisy environments. It provides the listeners with access to time, level and spectral differences between sound signals, perceived by the two ears. However, single sided deaf (SSD) or unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users cannot experience these binaural benefits due to the acoustic input coming from a single ear. The translational research on bilateral CIs started in the year 1998, initiated by J. Müller and J. Helms from Würzburg, Germany in association with MED-EL. Since then, several clinical studies were conducted by different research groups from across the world either independently or in collaboration with MED-EL. As a result, the bilateral CI has become the standard of care in many countries along with reimbursement by the health care systems. Recent data shows that children particularly, are given high priority for the bilateral CI implantation, most often performed simultaneously in a single surgery, as the binaural hearing has a positive effect on their language development. This article covers the milestones of translational research from the first concept to the widespread clinical use of bilateral CI.

The influence of Slim Modiolar electrode on residual hearing in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

Hearing preservation cochlear implantation is an established procedure in patients with low-frequency residual hearing, especially in pediatric cochlear implantation. More delicate, thin electrode arrays can minimize damage in the inner ear and enhance the possibility for residual hearing preservation. The Cochlear^® CI532 electrode has been reported as an electrode with the potential for residual hearing preservation. No similar studies pertaining to hearing preservation in pediatric patients have appeared to date. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Cochlear^® CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode allows the preservation of low-frequency residual hearing in children undergoing cochlear implantation.

METHODS

In this multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective clinical cohort study, medical data of 14 pediatric patients implanted with the CI532 were collected. All patients had residual low-frequency hearing (preoperative audiogram or ABR with at least one threshold better than 90 dB HL at 125, 250, 500, or 1000 Hz). Postoperative thresholds were obtained 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

Based on the HEARRING classification, 78.6% of children (11/14) had complete hearing preservation at the last follow-up visit (12 months after CI, or if not available, 6 months). A total of 21.4% (3/14) had partial hearing preservation. At the last follow-up visit, neither minimal hearing preservation nor loss of hearing was observed. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 13 out of 14 patients (93%).

CONCLUSIONS

The residual hearing preservation results in children were superior to the results previously reported in adults.