Comparison of parameters of spinal curves in the sagittal plane measured by photogrammetry and inclinometry

Assessment of anterior-posterior spinal curvatures in children suffering from hypopituitarism

BACKGROUND

Body posture may be disordered by vestibular dysfunction, neurological disorders, problems with the distribution of muscle tone, brain injuries, and other dysfunctions. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) can lead to many disorders, particularly of the musculoskeletal system. During treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH), an increase in muscle mass and an improvement in bone structure can be observed in children suffering from hypopituitarism from GHD.

METHODS

The study involved 33 children suffering from hypopituitarism with GHD (9 girls and 24 boys), aged 10-14 years old. Measurements of the magnitude of their anterior-posterior spinal curvatures were made using an inclinometer. The children were examined at the medianus of the sacrum bone, the Th12-L1 intervertebral area, and the C7-Th1 intervertebral area. In order to characterize the anterior-posterior curvature of the spine, the results were compared with the general norms reported by Saunders. Statistical calculations were carried out using the statistical package Statistica 10 PL.

RESULTS

Lumbar lordosis angles were higher in the patients currently receiving growth hormone (GH) treatment than in those who had yet to receive it. There is a statistically significant positive correlation between the length of growth hormone treatment and the alpha angle. There are also statistically significant correlations between age at the beginning of growth hormone therapy and the angle of lordosis. Statistically significant correlations were also seen between age at the beginning of growth hormone therapy and the alpha angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there may be changes in posture at the beginning of rhGH treatment, the sooner growth hormone therapy begins, the better the body posture. The longer the growth hormone treatment, the better the posture, as expressed by the alpha angle in the sagittal plane.

Concurrent validity of photogrammetric and inclinometric techniques based on assessment of anteroposterior spinal curvatures

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate correlations between parameters of anteroposterior spinal curvatures in the sagittal plane, measured with the use of photogrammetric technique and inclinometer in healthy elderly women.

METHODS

Randomized study involved 50 females, ranging from 50 to 70 years of age (mean 62.26 ± 6.94); mean body mass index (BMI) 27.69 ± 4.79. The examined parameters included angle of inclination in lumbosacral spine (ALFA), thoracolumbar transition (BETA), upper thoracic segment (GAMMA), angle of lumbar lordosis (LLA) and thoracic kyphosis (TKA). Results obtained with gravitational inclinometer were compared with those identified with photogrammetry method. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann-Whitney U test, regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In Mann-Whitney U test, with correction due to continuity, no statistically significant differences for any variable were found. Regression analysis was significant only for the variable of BETA angle. Bland-Altman coefficient for the respective angles was: ALFA 2.0%, BETA 4%, GAMMA 0%, LLA 2% and TKA 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results acquired with gravitational inclinometer and with photogrammetric technique are comparable, as the parameters of anteroposterior spinal curvatures acquired with these two methods are found to be compatible in the case of measurements of lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis.

Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture.

METHODS

Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculated by Harrison's posterior tangent method. The sacral inclination was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the sacral and vertical plane. In addition, MOCAP was used to calculate the spinal curvatures and sacral inclination.

RESULTS

The thoracic and lumbar spine and sacral inclination demonstrated excellent reliability, with mean ICCs levels greater than 0.980 and low CVs (mean: 2.15%). Systematic biases were not significant and were very near 0, and the mean standard errors were 0.257∘. ANOVA of the radiographic and MOCAP measures did not report any statistically significant differences in the comparisons. The systematic biases and mean random errors were lower than 1∘, with CVs lower than 5% and mean ICCs higher than 0.90 between sessions.

CONCLUSION

The MOCAP system delivered consistently reliable and valid results for standing curvatures compared with a radiographic technique. This system could be used with confidence in research and clinical environments for sagittal spinal curvature measurements.

Test-retest reliability and validity of a motion capture (MOCAP) system for measuring thoracic and lumbar spinal curvatures and sacral inclination in the sagittal plane

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the MOCAP system for measuring spinal sagittal thoracic and lumbar curvatures and sacral inclination in a standing posture.

METHODS

Twenty-five male adults were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs. The thoracic and lumbar curvatures were calculated by Harrison's posterior tangent method. The sacral inclination was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the sacral and vertical plane. In addition, MOCAP was used to calculate the spinal curvatures and sacral inclination.

RESULTS

The thoracic and lumbar spine and sacral inclination demonstrated excellent reliability, with mean ICCs levels greater than 0.980 and low CVs (mean: 2.15%). Systematic biases were not significant and were very near 0, and the mean standard errors were 0.257∘. ANOVA of the radiographic and MOCAP measures did not report any statistically significant differences in the comparisons. The systematic biases and mean random errors were lower than 1∘, with CVs lower than 5% and mean ICCs higher than 0.90 between sessions.

CONCLUSION

The MOCAP system delivered consistently reliable and valid results for standing curvatures compared with a radiographic technique. This system could be used with confidence in research and clinical environments for sagittal spinal curvature measurements.