1
|
Alsulimani O, Alhaddad A, Altassan M, Bukhari A, Munshi L, Sabir G. The Precision of All-on-Four Implant Position Recorded from Three Different CBCT Machines. Eur J Dent 2024. [PMID: 39043211 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the dimensional discrepancy and degree of deviation of All-on-Four implant position between different cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four implants (4.5 × 10 mm Superline II, Dentium, South Korea) were placed in an All-on-Four style in an artificial mandible. The jaw was radiated 30 times using three different CBCT machines (Rainbow CT, Dentium; Veraview X800, Morita, Japan; Planmeca Viso G3, Planmeca OY, Finland). A total of 30 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files were exported, n = 10. All-on-Four implants from each DICOM file were segmented and exported as an STL file (three-dimensional image) using Blue Sky Plan software (version 4.12.13/Blue Sky Bio, United States). All-on-Four implant zone dimensions (X, Y, and Z axes) and the total degree of deviation between All-on-Four implants per CBCT machine were measured using Autodesk Meshmixer software (version 3.5.474/California, United States). The data distribution's normality and variances' equality were tested with Shapiro-Wilk's and Levene's tests, respectively (p-value < 0.05). Data were analyzed using Brown-Forsythe one-way analysis of variance and Tamhane's post hoc tests to compare the differences between the groups (p-value <0.05). RESULTS The respective X, Y, and Z mean dimensions of the All-on-Four implant zone were: Dentium (34.95, 14.71, and 9.97); Morita (34.88, 14.74, and 10.56); and Planmeca (34.73, 15.15, and 12.33). Significant differences between CBCT machines were found in all axes (p-value < 0.05); however, the Z-axis had the most differences. Notably, Planmeca exhibited the highest standard deviation (SD) in all axes (0.16-0.35), exhibiting the lowest consistency in the CBCT machines' readings. The Dentium exhibited the lowest deviation in the implant position, with the lowest SD (0.61). A significant difference in the total degree of deviation was spotted when only Morita was included in the comparison (p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study's findings are of significant importance as they reveal that the implant position recorded from the CBCT machines was most discrepant in the buccolingual dimension (Z-axis). Planmeca exhibited the least implant-dimensional accuracy of the CBCT machines, while Dentium exhibited the highest implant position accuracy. These results could significantly impact the choice of CBCT machine for implant placement, especially since an accurate CBCT image is crucial for digital implant planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamah Alsulimani
- Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Alhaddad
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mosa Altassan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Asmaa Bukhari
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lulu Munshi
- Internship program, Faculty of Dentistry King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghalia Sabir
- Internship program, Faculty of Dentistry King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demehri S, Baffour FI, Klein JG, Ghotbi E, Ibad HA, Moradi K, Taguchi K, Fritz J, Carrino JA, Guermazi A, Fishman EK, Zbijewski WB. Musculoskeletal CT Imaging: State-of-the-Art Advancements and Future Directions. Radiology 2023; 308:e230344. [PMID: 37606571 PMCID: PMC10477515 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
CT is one of the most widely used modalities for musculoskeletal imaging. Recent advancements in the field include the introduction of four-dimensional CT, which captures a CT image during motion; cone-beam CT, which uses flat-panel detectors to capture the lower extremities in weight-bearing mode; and dual-energy CT, which operates at two different x-ray potentials to improve the contrast resolution to facilitate the assessment of tissue material compositions such as tophaceous gout deposits and bone marrow edema. Most recently, photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been introduced. PCCT is a technique that uses photon-counting detectors to produce an image with higher spatial and contrast resolution than conventional multidetector CT systems. In addition, postprocessing techniques such as three-dimensional printing and cinematic rendering have used CT data to improve the generation of both physical and digital anatomic models. Last, advancements in the application of artificial intelligence to CT imaging have enabled the automatic evaluation of musculoskeletal pathologies. In this review, the authors discuss the current state of the above CT technologies, their respective advantages and disadvantages, and their projected future directions for various musculoskeletal applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadpour Demehri
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Francis I. Baffour
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Joshua G. Klein
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Elena Ghotbi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Hamza Ahmed Ibad
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Kamyar Moradi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Katsuyuki Taguchi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - John A. Carrino
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Ali Guermazi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Wojciech B. Zbijewski
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
da Fonte JB, Andrade TMD, Albuquerque RL, de Melo MDFB, Takeshita WM. Evidence of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of X-rays in the oral mucosa epithelium of adults subjected to cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 47:20170160. [PMID: 29091472 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess cytological evidence of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of X-rays in oral exfoliated cells of adults subjected to partial and total cone beam CT (CBCT) (stitching module) by means of micronuclei frequency, associated with counting of degenerative nuclear alterations (pyknosis, karyolysis, karyorrhexis, buds and broken eggs), besides comparing the partial and total CBCT (stitching module) in search of possible differences in the nature and/or intensity of the effects. METHODS 29 adults who were referred to total or partial CBCT were selected. All CBCT were performed with a Carestream CS 9000 3D scanner (Carestream Health Inc., Rochester, NY). Material collection was done immediately before CBCT and 10 days later, by scraping the left and right cheek mucosa with a plastic spatula. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test (paired data), at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS The statistically significant difference was noted in the frequency of micronucleated cells for both partial and total acquisition (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). Regarding to cytotoxicity, there was a statistically significant difference for both partial and total acquisition (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The partial and total CBCT seems to offer risks of inducing genetic damage. In addition both forms of CBCT acquisition have promoted the induction of cytotoxic nuclear alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Bm da Fonte
- 1 Department of Dentistry, Master's Degree Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, UFS, Aracaju, Brazil.,2 Department of Dentistry, Discipline of Radiology and Dental Imaging, Federal University of Sergipe, UFS Aracaju, Brazil
| | - Taís M de Andrade
- 3 Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, UFS, Aracaju, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Lc Albuquerque
- 4 Department of Dentistry, Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Tiradentes University, UNIT, Aracaju, Brazil
| | - Maria de Fátima B de Melo
- 2 Department of Dentistry, Discipline of Radiology and Dental Imaging, Federal University of Sergipe, UFS Aracaju, Brazil.,5 Departament of Oral Pathology, Radiology & Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA
| | - Wilton M Takeshita
- 2 Department of Dentistry, Discipline of Radiology and Dental Imaging, Federal University of Sergipe, UFS Aracaju, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|