Comparison of interradicular distances and cortical bone thickness in Thai patients with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography

3D Analysis of Tooth Movement Using 3D Technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

3D cone beam imaging (CBCT) has allowed clinicians to better understand the anatomical variations of cranial anatomy. One crucial aspect of this technology plays is the understanding of alveolar bone morphology and remodeling. Variations in cortical bone thickness between individuals have been reported. No published study has analyzed the relationship between cortical bone thickness and rate of tooth movement. The aim of this study is to begin answering the question: is there an association between rate of tooth movement and cortical bone thickness?

RECENT FINDINGS

Twenty-three patients underwent extraction of a single premolar in each of the four quadrants prior to orthodontic therapy. Routine clinical records including 3D CBCT images were acquired of all patients prior to first premolar extractions. Rate of tooth movement in each quadrant for each patient was determined via mesiodistal millimetric measurements obtained by a single calibrated operator. With CBCT images, cortical bone thickness was measured at various levels from the alveolar crest along the long axis of the to-be-extracted first premolars. The association between cortical bone thickness and rate of tooth movement was analyzed. Statistically significant associations were found between rate of tooth movement and cortical bone thickness at levels 2 mm, 5 mm, and 8 mm, apical to the alveolar crest in both the right and left maxillary quadrants (p < 0.05). Statistically significant associations were found between rate of tooth movement and cortical bone thickness at levels 5 mm and 8 mm apical to the alveolar crest in both mandibular quadrants (p < 0.05). Increased cortical bone thickness was associated with decreased rate of tooth movement. There was no statistically significant association between rate of tooth movement and cortical bone thickness 2 mm apical to the alveolar crest of the to-be-extracted first premolars in the mandibular left nor right quadrants (p > 0.05). Results suggest an inverse relationship may exist between cortical bone thickness and rate of tooth movement in both the maxilla and mandible. Cortical bone thickness may have the potential to serve as a predictive tool for rate of orthodontic tooth movement.

Evaluation of safe areas for miniscrew use according to various skeletal anomalies with CBCT

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine safe areas to apply miniscrews in the interradicular region of the maxilla and mandible in individuals with various sagittal skeletal malocclusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cone beam-computed tomography images of 159 individuals were used. Individuals were divided into three groups: Class I, Class II, and Class III. In the sagittal plane, 3-6-9-mm apical sections were determined from the alveolar crest apex. The buccal cortical bone thickness, interradicular distance, and buccolingual bone distances were measured.

RESULTS

In the buccal cortical bone thickness, we observed statistically significant differences between the classes except for the 1-1 region in the maxilla and all regions and sections in the mandible (p < 0.05). The differences in the buccolingual bone distance between classes were statistically significant, except for the 3-mm and 6-mm sections in the 3-4 and 4-5 regions of the maxilla, the 9-mm sections in the 1-2 and 2-3 regions, the 6-mm and 9-mm sections in the 3-4 region, and the 6-mm section in the 4-5 regions of the mandible (p < 0.05). The differences in the interradicular bone distance were statistically significant between the classes in all regions and sections of the mandible except the 6-mm sections in the 1-2 region and in all sections of the maxilla except the 6-mm sections in the 3-4 region (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed significant differences in the buccal cortical bone thickness, interradicular bone distance, and buccolingual bone distance among individuals.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the anatomy of interradicular regions and preventing complications.

Interradicular distance and alveolar bone thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of Persian adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns

Background

This study aimed to assess the interradicular distance and alveolar bone thickness of Persian adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns for miniscrew insertion using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on maxillary and mandibular CBCT scans of 60 patients (18–35 years) in three groups (n = 20) of class I, II and III sagittal skeletal pattern. Anatomical and skeletal parameters were measured at 2, 4 and 6 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) by one examiner. The intra- and inter-class correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the intra, and interobserver reliability. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05).

Results

The intra- and interobserver reliability were > 0.9 for all parameters. The largest inter-radicular distance in the maxilla was between the central incisors (1–1) in classes I and III, and between premolars (4–5) in class II patients. The largest inter-radicular distance in the mandible was between molar teeth (6–7) in all three classes. The buccal cortical plate thickness was maximum at the site of mandibular first and second molars (6–7). The posterior maxilla and mandible showed the maximum thickness of cancellous bone and alveolar process. Wide variations were noted in this respect between class I, II and III patients.

Conclusions

The area with maximum inter-radicular distance and optimal alveolar bone thickness for miniscrew insertion varies in different individuals, depending on their sagittal skeletal pattern.

Comparación de distancias interradiculares y grosor del hueso cortical en dos sectores del maxilar inferior para colocación de mini implantes

Introducción: la colocación de mini implantes interradiculares, como alternativa para el anclaje de aparatología ortodóntica, varía acorde a la clasificación esquelética del paciente Clase I o II. Es necesario realizar la correcta identificación de la ubicación radicular y grosor cortical como parte del análisis estratégico del área a intervenir. Objetivo: comparar tomográficamente las distancias interradiculares y grosor del hueso cortical en dos sectores del maxilar inferior para colocación de mini implantes. Materiales y métodos: estudio transversal que incluyó 120 tomografías computarizadas de haz cónico, pertenecientes a pacientes Clase I (60) y Clase II (60) esquelética. Se identificó tomográficamente la distancia interradicular, el ancho bucolingual y el grosor del hueso cortical bucal, a partir de la cresta alveolar entre el segundo premolar y primer molar inferior derecho y entre el canino y lateral del mismo lado. Un análisis estadístico con prueba t Student al 95% de confianza comparó la ubicación de las estructuras anatómicas para clase I y II esquelética. Resultados: en la distancia interradicular, comparativamente entre clase I y II, se encontró significancia entre canino y lateral derecho (p=< 0.054) a los 8 mm. En este mismo sector, en el ancho bucolingual, se encontró diferencia significativa  a  6mm de altura (p=<.04). En el grosor del hueso cortical no se encontraron diferencias estadísticas al comparar los  valores para la Clase I y II. Conclusiones: en Clase I y II, el mayor espesor para la colocación de mini implantes se registró en el espacio interradicular a 8 mm de altura y en  el ancho bucolingual a 6 mm.