Factors affecting modulation transfer function measurements in cone-beam computed tomographic images

Influence of voxel size on cone beam computed tomography artifacts arising from the exomass

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of voxel size on artifacts arising from the exomass in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

STUDY DESIGN

An imaging phantom was scanned using 2 CBCT units, each adjusted to 2 voxel sizes: 0.2 and 0.3 mm. From 1 to 3 metal inserts of titanium, cobalt-chromium, or amalgam were placed in the exomass and additional CBCT scans were acquired. Mean voxel gray values were obtained from 16 homogeneous areas of the phantom and averaged, and the standard deviation was calculated to obtain voxel gray value variability. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance, Tukey, and Dunnett tests (α =.05).

RESULTS

Overall, mean voxel gray values and voxel gray value variability did not differ significantly between CBCT scans obtained with voxel sizes of 0.2 and 0.3 mm for either CBCT model tested (P > .05). Despite some exceptions in which significant differences were observed between the 2 voxel sizes (P < .05), the mean voxel gray values and voxel gray value variability resulting from different metal compositions and, in most situations, for different numbers of metal inserts in the exomass were not affected.

CONCLUSION

Voxel size has little influence on exomass-related CBCT artifacts.

Influence of voxel size on micro-CT analysis of debris after root canal preparation

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) voxel size on the evaluation of debris accumulation after passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in curved root canals prepared with rotary nickel-titanium files. Mesial root canals (n = 24) of mandibular molars with curvature between 25° and 35° were prepared using ProDesign Logic 30/.05 (PDL) or HyFlex EDM 25/.08 (HEDM). PUI was performed after root canal preparation of all root canals. The specimens were scanned using high-resolution (5 μm voxel size) micro-CT imaging before and after experimental procedures. The percentage of debris was analyzed in the middle and apical thirds using images with 5, 10 and 20 μm voxel sizes. Data were compared using unpaired and paired Student's t-test, ANOVA and Tukey's statistical tests (α = 0.05). There were no differences among the debris analyses performed at different voxel sizes (5, 10 and 20 μm) (p > 0.05). The percentage of debris was similar between the root canals prepared by PDL and HEDM before and after PUI (p > 0.05). In both groups, the percentage of debris decreased in the middle third after PUI (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this ex vivo study, it can be concluded that the voxel sizes evaluated did not have a significant impact on the analysis of accumulated debris. However, the results showed a tendency for detection of more debris in the analysis performed using a lower voxel size. PUI decreased the debris accumulation in the middle third of curved root canals.

How image-processing parameters can influence the assessment of dental materials using micro-CT

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of voxel size and different post-processing algorithms on the analysis of dental materials using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Materials and Methods

Root-end cavities were prepared in extracted maxillary premolars, filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), and scanned using micro-CT. The volume and porosity of materials were evaluated and compared using voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 µm, as well as different software tools (post-processing algorithms). The CTAn or MeVisLab/Materialise 3-matic software package was used to perform volume and morphological analyses, and the CTAn or MeVisLab/Amira software was used to evaluate porosity. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (P<0.05).

Results

Using MeVisLab/Materialise 3-matic, a consistent tendency was observed for volume to increase at larger voxel sizes. CTAn showed higher volumes for MTA and IRM at 20 µm. Using CTAn, porosity values decreased as voxel size increased, with statistically significant differences for all materials. MeVisLab/Amira showed a difference for MTA and IRM at 5 µm, and for Biodentine at 20 µm. Significant differences in volume and porosity were observed in all software packages for Biodentine across all voxel sizes.

Conclusion

Some differences in volume and porosity were found according to voxel size, image-processing software, and the radiopacity of the material. Consistent protocols are needed for research evaluating dental materials.