Association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the ESR2 and FSHR genes with poor ovarian response in infertile Jordanian women

Association of FSHR gene polymorphisms with poor ovarian response in patients undergoing IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The results of studies on the association between polymorphisms in the FSHR gene and the risk of POR undergoing IVF have been inconsistent with each other, so we conducted a meta-analysis of all the available studies to explore the association between polymorphisms in the FSHR gene and the risk of POR.

METHODS

Literature that met the inclusion criteria was collected by searching six electronic databases and basic data from included studies were extracted. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the strength of association between follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene polymorphism and poor ovarian response (POR) risk. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to determine whether there was publication bias, and sensitivity analysis and TSA analysis were used to verify the stability and reliability of the results.

RESULTS

We included 24 articles, 22 of which explored rs6166, including 2,206 cases and 3,897 controls. 6 articles explored rs6165, including 444 cases and 875 controls. Under additive, heterozygote, and dominant models, rs6166 was significantly associated with POR (S vs. N: OR = 1.29, 95 % CI = 1.05-1.59, P = 0.017; NS vs. NN: OR = 1.33, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.74, P = 0.038; NS + SS vs. NN: OR = 1.38, 95 % CI = 1.04-1.84, P = 0.025). In ethnicity-based subgroup analyses, the additive, homozygote, heterozygote, and dominant models increased Asian POR risk. Among the five genetic models, rs6165 was significantly associated with POR (T vs. C: OR = 1.64, 95 % CI = 1.25-2.16, P = 0.000; TT vs. CC: OR = 2.76, 95 % CI = 1.43-5.32, P = 0.003; CT vs. CC: OR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 1.19-2.10, P = 0.001; TT vs. CC + CT: OR = 2.32, 95 % CI = 1.67-3.23, P = 0.000; CT + TT vs. CC: OR = 1.80, 95 % CI = 1.22-2.65, P = 0.003). In ethnicity-based subgroup analyses, all five genetic models increased the risk of POR in Caucasians.

CONCLUSION

According to the current meta-analysis, the rs6166 S allele was significantly associated with an increased risk of POR, especially in Asian populations. The rs6165 T allele was significantly associated with an increased risk of POR, especially in Caucasian populations.

Molecular Role of Asn680Ser and Asp37Glu Missense Variants in Saudi Women with Female Infertility and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Female infertility (FI) is a global health issue. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common cause of FI. The renalase gene (RNLS) is associated with FI and other human diseases. Based on the documented missense variants, rs6166 and rs2296545 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were not identified in Saudi women with FI and PCOS. This study aimed to investigate the molecular role of the two SNPs in Saudi women with FI and PCOS. In this cross-sectional study, 96 healthy controls, 96 women with FI, and 96 women with PCOS were recruited. DNA was isolated, and polymerase chain reactions and Sanger sequencing analysis were performed using rs6166 and rs2296545 SNPs. The data obtained from the three groups were used to perform statistical analyses based on genotype, allele frequencies, regression models, and ANOVA analysis. Both rs6166 and rs2296545 had no role in FI or PCOS in Saudi women. A predicted reason for non-association in Saudi women could be the role of elderly women in the controls compared with women with FI and PCOS. Moreover, age, weight, and body mass index were higher in the control group than the FI and PCOS groups. In conclusion, rs6166 and rs2296545 SNPs were not associated with FI or PCOS in Saudi women.

Association of Polymorphisms in FSHR, INHA, ESR1, and BMP15 with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) refers to two or more unsuccessful in vitro fertilization embryo transfers in the same individual. Embryonic characteristics, immunological factors, and coagulation factors are known to be the causes of RIF. Genetic factors have also been reported to be involved in the occurrence of RIF, and some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may contribute to RIF. We examined SNPs in FSHR, INHA, ESR1, and BMP15, which have been associated with primary ovarian failure. A cohort of 133 RIF patients and 317 healthy controls consisting of all Korean women was included. Genotyping was performed by Taq-Man genotyping assays to determine the frequency of the following polymorphisms: FSHR rs6165, INHA rs11893842 and rs35118453, ESR1 rs9340799 and rs2234693, and BMP15 rs17003221 and rs3810682. The differences in these SNPs were compared between the patient and control groups. Our results demonstrate a decreased prevalence of RIF in subjects with the FSHR rs6165 A>G polymorphism [AA vs. AG adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.432; confidence interval (CI) = 0.206-0.908; p = 0.027, AA+AG vs. GG AOR = 0.434; CI = 0.213-0.885; p = 0.022]. Based on a genotype combination analysis, the GG/AA (FSHR rs6165/ESR1 rs9340799: OR = 0.250; CI = 0.072-0.874; p = 0.030) and GG-CC (FSHR rs6165/BMP15 rs3810682: OR = 0.466; CI = 0.220-0.987; p = 0.046) alleles were also associated with a decreased RIF risk. Additionally, the FSHR rs6165GG and BMP15 rs17003221TT+TC genotype combination was associated with a decreased RIF risk (OR = 0.430; CI = 0.210-0.877; p = 0.020) and increased FSH levels, as assessed by an analysis of variance. The FSHR rs6165 polymorphism and genotype combinations are significantly associated with RIF development in Korean women.

Effectiveness of letrozole in pituitary downregulated normogonadotrophic young women with an initial poor response

It has been reported that 10 to 15% of young normogonadotrophic women show suboptimal response to standard long protocols. Letrozole (LE), an aromatase inhibitor, was shown to improve ovarian sensitivity to follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and follicular response to gonadotrophin treatment in poor ovarian response patients. We reasoned that it might be possible to utilize LE in young normogonadotrophic patients with unexpected hypo-response in standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol. A total of 652 patients defined as normogonadotrophic patients with unexpected hypo-response were divided into 2 groups, the +LE group and the +Gn group. +LE group: A fixed daily dose of 2.5 mg of LE was added on day 8 of stimulation. +Gn group: A fixed daily dose of 75 U of human menopausal gonadotrophin was added on day 8 of stimulation. The primary outcome measures were the number of oocytes obtained, fertilization rate, days of stimulation, and total FSH dosage. The secondary outcome measures were the implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. There were no significant differences in the clinical and hormonal characteristics between the 2 groups. A shorter duration of stimulation and a lower dosage of recombinant FSH consumption on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were all observed in the +LE group. Patients who received LE therapy showed a higher number of oocytes obtained and significantly higher fertilization rates. The implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were comparable in both groups. LE significantly improves the number of oocytes obtained in patients with suboptimal response to standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol.

The estrogen receptor polymorphisms and controlled ovulation hyperstimulation outcomes: a meta-analysis

Objective: Several studies evaluated the relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) polymorphisms and the outcomes of controlled ovulation hyperstimulation (COH). However, the results remained obscure. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to investigate the links between ER polymorphisms and COH outcomes.Methods: Eligible studies were identified from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase and the Chinese CNKI till Nov. 2021. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous variables were used to calculate correlations between ER polymorphisms and COH outcomes. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of thirteen papers were eventually enrolled in the current meta-analysis.Results: The following were the key findings of this meta-analysis: (1) PvuII polymorphism had a significant relationship with IVF pregnancy outcome in all models, except the recessive model(CC VS TT: OR, 5.51, 95% CI, 1.13,26.84; CC + CT VS TT: OR, 3.73, 95% CI, 1.21,11.57; CT VS TT: OR, 3.19, 95% CI, 1.11,9.16;C VS T: OR, 2.19, 95% CI, 1.15, 4.19), with large or extreme heterogeneity; (2) XbaI polymorphism had a significant association with IVF risk in heterozygous and dominant models(AG VS GG: OR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12,0.61; AAAG VS GG: OR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12,0.59), with no heterogeneity; (3) (TA)n polymorphism was linked with IVF risk in the homozygous and recessive models(LL VS SS:OR = 3.74, 95%CI = 1.53,9.12;LL VS LS + SS:OR = 2.75, 95%CI = 1.18, 6.38), with no heterogeneity; (4) for Alul polymorphism and its association with POR risk, significant relationship was observed in the recessive model(AA VS AG + GG:OR = 2.27, 95%CI = 1.46, 3.54), with no heterogeneity;(5) PvuII T/C mutation did not predict the follicle number, oocyte number, ratio of follicles to oocytes and the risk of IVF;(6) for XbaI polymorphism and pregnancy outcome of IVF, no significant association was observed under all models; and (7) RsaI polymorphism does not increase the risk of POR under all models.Conclusion: In summary, our meta-analysis found evidence supporting that PvuII polymorphism may serve as a marker in predicting pregnancy rate in IVF-ET, XbaI and (TA)n polymorphisms may be related with infertility, and Alul polymorphism may predict the poor ovarian response to COH. More well-designed investigations are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Association of AMH and AMHR2 gene polymorphisms with ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in Indian women

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and AMH type II receptor (AMHR2) genes with ovarian response and clinical pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we genotyped AMH polymorphisms (c. -649 T > C, c. 146 T > G, c. 252 G > A, and c. 303 G > A) in 365 women and AMHR2 polymorphisms (c. -482 A > G, c. 622-6 C > T, c. 4952 G > A, c. 10 A > G) in 80 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF.

RESULTS

Higher doses of exogenous FSH and lower numbers of preovulatory follicles were noted in women having AMH c. -649 T > C and AMH c. -146 T > G polymorphisms, respectively. Overall, we found that the presence of a polymorphic genotype (homozygous or heterozygous) at positions c. -649 T > C, c. 146 T > G, c. 252 G > A, and c. 303 G > A in the AMH gene was associated with higher doses of FSH for ovulation induction (p < 0.001). Interestingly, a higher live birth rate was noted in women with a homozygous polymorphic genotype for all four AMH SNPs investigated while none of the women showing a homozygous polymorphic genotype at all AMHR2 SNPs investigated in this study had a live birth.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that presence of AMHR2 SNPs (c. 482 A > G, c. 622-6 C > T, c. 4952 G > A, and c. 10 A > G) negatively correlate with live birth rate. However, these findings need to be validated by using larger sample size.

Association between GnRH Receptor Polymorphisms and Luteinizing Hormone Levels for Low Ovarian Reserve Infertile Women

The choice of ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles for low ovarian reserve patients is challenging. Our previous report indicated that the gonadotrophin-releasing (GnRH) agonist (GnRHa) protocol is better than the GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) protocol for young age poor responders. Here, we recruited 269 patients with anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) < 1.2 ng/mL undergoing their first ART cycles for this nested case-control study. We investigated the genetic variants of the relevant genes, including follicular stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR; rs6166), AMH (rs10407022), GnRH (rs6185), and GnRH receptor (GnRHR; rs3756159) in patients <35 years (n = 86) and patients ≥35 years of age (n = 183). Only the genotype of GnRHR (rs3756159) is distributed differently in young (CC 39.5%, CT/TT 60.5%) versus advanced (CC 24.0%, CT/TT 76.0%) age groups (recessive model, p = 0.0091). Furthermore, the baseline luteinizing hormone (LH) levels (3.60 (2.45 to 5.40) vs. 4.40 (2.91 to 6.48)) are different between CC and CT/TT genotype of GnRHR (rs3756159). In conclusion, the genetic variants of GnRHR (rs3756159) could modulate the release of LH in the pituitary gland and might then affect the outcome of ovarian stimulation by GnRHant or GnRHa protocols for patients with low AMH levels.