Platelet-rich plasma treatment in patients with refractory thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure: A comprehensive review

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of thin endometrium: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Thin endometrium (TE) is a common cause of female infertility in clinical practice. Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) therapy becomes a novel treatment for thin endometrium; however, its clinical application remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the therapeutic effects of intrauterine autologous PRP infusion in women with thin endometrium through relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We systematically searched studies published in English from inception until June 2024 in databases such as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. Search terms included "Platelet-Rich Plasma," "thin endometrium," "endometrial thickness," "infertility," "pregnancy," "reproduction," and "adverse reactions". RCTs identified through the search were subjected to systematic review and meta-analysis, and data were analyzed using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 678 patients with thin endometrium were included. Patients receiving PRP infusion demonstrated significantly superior outcomes compared to the control group in endometrial thickness (MD: 1.23, 95%CI: 0.87 to 1.59, P = 0.000), clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 2.04, 95%CI: 1.52 to 2.76, P = 0.000), live birth rate (RR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.57 to 3.85, P = 0.000), cycle cancellation rate (RR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23 to 0.93, P = 0.000), and embryo implantation rate (RR: 2.71; 95%CI: 1.91 to 3.84, P = 0.000). There were no statistically significance in spontaneous abortion rate (RR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.40 to 1.78, P = 0.659), chemical pregnancy rate (RR: 1.84, 95%CI: 0.72 to 4.72, P = 0.204) and endometrial vascular improvement rate (RR: 1.10; 95%CI: 0.89 to 1.38, P = 0.367) between the two groups. The limitations of this study includes that, we only included single lauguage for literature research, the sample size and heterogeneity which could cause criteria bias.

CONCLUSION

Intrauterine PRP infusion may be an effective and safe treatment for women with thin endometrium. Further high-quality, large-sample, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the reliability of our results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42023490421, and no modifications were made to the information provided at registration.

Not all platelet-rich plasma are created equal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to elucidate potential variations in clinical outcomes resulting from the use of different types of platelet-rich plasma (PRPs) in reproductive medicine. It seeks to explore the reasons behind the diverse results reported in various studies and assess the general features distinguishing different PRP formulations.

RECENT FINDINGS

PRPs have found applications across diverse medical fields, generating controversy due to the variability in outcomes. The field of reproductive medicine, despite its limited published studies, is encountering a similar challenge as it integrates these treatments.

SUMMARY

The multitude of PRP product brands in the market, coupled with 'home-made' PRPs, poses a significant barrier to establishing a common protocol for the preparation of standardized PRP products. This impediment hinders widespread adoption by clinicians, particularly in endometrial or ovarian treatments. Drawing from evidence in other medical disciplines, this review endeavors to compile essential characteristics that PRPs must possess, aiming to mitigate the impact of variables affecting results in forthcoming studies.

Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infertility-Infusion versus Injectable PRP

(1) Background: During IVF (in vitro fertilization) procedures, endometrial thickness has a significant role in the success of pregnancy outcomes for embryo transfers. Endometrial thickness, a crucial component of endometrial receptivity, is a contentious issue. The regenerative properties of PRP have been shown in recent research to have positive effects on the endometrium. PRP increases the pregnancy rate in IVF patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure. In order to demonstrate the efficacy of PRP therapies, this work compares the administration of injectable and infusible PRP during endometrial preparation. (2) Methods: This prospective single-arm control study was conducted at an IVF center in Oradea, Romania. This study included 50 patients; 27 were included in the group with Injectable PRP and 23 in the group with Infusible PRP. The outcome was compared between the two groups, with the primary outcome being the endometrial thickness after the PRP infusion or injection and the secondary outcome being the pregnancy rate in both groups. (3) Results: Patients who were treated with Injectable PRP had a higher pregnancy rate. An improvement in the quality of the endometrium, in terms of thickness, was also observed in the patients who were injected with PRP. (4) Conclusions: Compared to PRP infusions inside the uterus, sub-endometrial PRP injections in frozen embryo transfer methods have a greater pregnancy rate.

Factors Affecting the Potential Efficacy of Intrauterine Platelet-Rich Plasma Infusion on Thin Endometrium in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Optimizing endometrial thickness (EMT) is crucial for successful embryo implantation, but enhancing thin endometrium remains a significant challenge. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-derived therapies have emerged as a promising approach in reproductive medicine due to their capacity to facilitate tissue repair and regeneration. This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with the failure of intrauterine PRP infusion for thin endometrium in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). We retrospectively reviewed data from 77 women with RIF, all exhibiting an EMT of <7 mm. These women underwent programmed hormone therapy for frozen embryo transfer (FET) and received two autologous intrauterine PRP infusions. Following intrauterine PRP-lysate (PL) infusions, the mean increase in EMT was 1.9 ± 1.2 mm, with EMT reaching 7 mm in 86% of the cases (66/77; average EMT, 8.3 mm). We identified an exceedingly thin EMT as a risk factor impacting the therapeutic efficacy in increasing EMT (p = 0.04, OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.03-9.67). Additionally, the number of previous uterine surgeries emerged as a prognostic factor for pregnancy failure following PL infusion (p = 0.02, OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.12-3.64). Our findings suggest that an extremely thin EMT and a history of numerous uterine surgeries can impede successful pregnancy, even when an optimal EMT is achieved following PRP infusion.